logo
Implications And Scenarios If U.S. Oil Production Plateaus In 2027

Implications And Scenarios If U.S. Oil Production Plateaus In 2027

Forbes17-04-2025

An oil drilling rig along the Pecos River in the Permian Basin, Loving, New Mexico, U.S. (Photo: Jim ... More West)
Conjecture about when U.S. oil production may plateau is not new. Many in the industry, including several energy bosses, reckon the country's output - currently north of 13.5 million and the highest in the world - will continue to rise at least until 2027.
In March, at CERAWeek 2025, a major energy event organized by S&P Global, ConocoPhillips CEO Ryan Lance and Occidental Petroleum CEO Vicki Hollub joined many of their industry peers in predicting a U.S. crude production plateau sometime between 2027 and 2030.
Now the Energy Information Administration, statistical arm of the Department of Energy, has also predicted that a 2027 production plateau sounds fairly plausible.
In its Annual Energy Outlook 2025 published on Wednesday, the EIA said U.S. production will rise to 14 million bpd in 2027, and may likely stabilize at or near that level for a few years up until the early 2030s, before a gradual decline comes into view.
After that, a further decline may happen at a much faster rate through to the 2050s as the uptick from the U.S. shale bonanza starts to ebb away. Shale production itself is also expected to peak in 2027.
It draws the contribution of U.S. shale industry into sharp focus. In 2024, U.S. output grew on an annualized basis by 2%, or by 270,000 bpd, to average around 13.2 million bpd. Nearly all the production growth came from the Permian region, which accounted for nearly half of total U.S. crude oil production, according to the EIA.
Shale production is expected hit a record of 10 million bpd by 2027, up from 9.7 million bpd expected in 2025. Thereafter, it may well be on a sliding track down to 9.33 million bpd by 2050.
Commenting on the EIA's projections, the DoE criticized the previous Biden Administration and flagged President Donald Trump's pro oil credentials since he took office in January.
"The report reflects the disastrous path for American energy production under the Biden administration - a path that was soundly rejected by the American people last November.
"By unleashing energy that is affordable, reliable, and secure, this administration is ensuring America's future is marked by energy growth and abundance - not scarcity."
As things stand, the U.S. remains the world's leading oil producer, a crown it bagged toward the end of 2023 and continues to hold. It may continue to bag that title till at least the turn of the decade, if not longer.
However, Saudi Arabia is sitting on spare capacity of 3 million bpd and could be in a position to challenge the U.S. if the latter's decline rate is deeper than forecast. Becuase despite the U.S. shale bonanza, the Saudis remain the world's buffer producers, i.e., they hold a large amount of spare capacity that can be used to absorb supply shocks and stabilize oil prices.
Overall, a market adjustment may be required by importers of light sweet crude out in Asia, from the Indian subcontinent to the East. Many are currently enjoying being in the position of being able to import readily available and competitively priced U.S. light sweet crudes.
But there is belief in the wider industry that U.S. output decline is likely to be gradual and may be mitigated through technology.
For instance, Lance of ConocoPhillips predicted at CERAWeek that will be a slow decline beyond 2030 and technology can help with resource maximization.
"Of course, market share for OPEC+ will start rising again as U.S. oil production starts to plateau and demand continues to rise as we think it will over time. But there's a ton of resources in the U.S. I've never been against this industry in terms of technology because you can always figure out a way to get more resource out of the rock."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats more likely than Republicans to boycott brands, new survey
Democrats more likely than Republicans to boycott brands, new survey

Axios

time14 minutes ago

  • Axios

Democrats more likely than Republicans to boycott brands, new survey

Why it matters: These murky expectations highlight the complicated environment businesses are currently operating in. What they're saying: "Businesses need to understand how their brand aligns to current issues and the values that matter to their customer base," says Mallory Newall, vice president at Ipsos. "Brands cannot please everyone, and wading into the political fray does not come without risk. It needs to be done in a strategic way. However, there are potential upsides if companies have a clear understanding of who they're talking to and who their customers are. Those who act inauthentically will lose ground in this environment," she added. State of play: There's a disconnect in what consumers say and what they do. 53% of Americans say they are less likely to buy from a company that takes a stance they don't agree with, but only 30% actually do. Between the lines: A company's political or social stances influence Democrats more than Republicans, per the survey. Democrats are more likely to boycott (40%) than Republicans (24%), but they are also 2x more likely to go out of their way to support a brand that aligns with their values. Target is the latest American corporation to grapple with these boycotts, following its retreat from diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. Of note: Boycotting is a luxury afforded to those with disposable income, per the survey. Households with incomes of $100k and above are 50% more likely to stop buying from a company they disagree with than those households making $50k and below. What to watch: 67% of Democrats say they are closely tracking how companies respond to pending Supreme Court decisions, compared to 52% of Republicans. There is more appetite across party lines for business commentary on economic issues — like inflation and trade policies — than other policy issues. The bottom line: "The data suggest that Democratic consumers are much more likely to actually follow through on the threat to withhold or reduce spending when they disagree with brands during this era of complete GOP control," says Matt House, managing partner at CLYDE.

Trump and Xi Hold First Call in Months
Trump and Xi Hold First Call in Months

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump and Xi Hold First Call in Months

Chinese President Xi Jinping is seen at the Ho Chi Minh Mausoleum in Hanoi on April 15, 2025. Credit - Athit Perawongmetha—POOL/AFP via Getty Images) Trump and Xi Hold First Call in Months, Setting Stage For More Trade Talks President Donald Trump spoke with Chinese leader Xi Jinping on Thursday as tariff negotiations between the world's two largest economies have stalled in recent weeks. The call lasted about 90 minutes and focused 'almost entirely on trade,' Trump said in a social media post Thursday morning. Talks had been expected to take place this week after representatives from both countries met in Geneva last month and agreed to temporarily pause the trade war. China's official Xinhua News Agency said the call took place at Trump's request. Trump said a follow-up trade meeting would be held soon, and that both he and Xi had invited each other for official state visits. Trump said one day earlier that it was difficult to reach a deal with Xi: 'I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Wednesday. The call was likely the first time they spoke since Trump took office in January. However, in an April interview with TIME, Trump claimed that Xi had already called him—which Chinese officials disputed. Trade negotiations between the two leaders had stalled after both countries agreed on May 12 to temporarily lower tariffs, with Trump dropping his 145% tariffs on Chinese goods to 30% for 90 days, and Xi easing its levies from 125% to 10%. But the Trump Administration has accused China of reneging on the terms by curbing exports of rare earth minerals used by American manufacturers. China has rejected that charge, saying its export controls apply globally and are not targeted at the United States. In response, the Trump Administration has proposed revoking visas for some Chinese students and issuing new export controls on advanced technologies such as jet engine components and A.I. chips. 'China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US,' Trump wrote on Truth Social last week. 'So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!' Trump has made reducing America's dependency on Chinese manufacturing a cornerstone of his second-term agenda. Xi, facing a sluggish post-COVID economy and persistent pressures from a real estate slowdown, is pushing to secure China's dominance in future technologies like electric vehicles and artificial intelligence. The United States ran a $295 billion trade deficit with China in 2024, according to U.S. Census Bureau data, a figure Trump frequently cites as evidence of unfair trade practices. His Administration maintains that only top-level talks can break the current deadlock. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently said that a leader-to-leader exchange was essential to restart negotiations in earnest. Write to Nik Popli at

Trump and Elon Musk's Bromance Is Circling the Drain Over Budget Bill
Trump and Elon Musk's Bromance Is Circling the Drain Over Budget Bill

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump and Elon Musk's Bromance Is Circling the Drain Over Budget Bill

Tensions are rising between Donald Trump and his biggest 2024 campaign financier, Elon Musk. The dynamic duo—who were practically inseparable after November—are driving apart over their differing opinions on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' an extension to his 2017 tax cuts for multimillionaires and corporations that is projected to add trillions to the national deficit. The president reportedly 'wasn't happy' and was left 'confused' as to why his richest MAGA ally had become more outspoken in his criticism of the bill since exiting his role as a special government employee, according to senior White House officials who spoke with The Wall Street Journal. The whole situation caught senior Trump advisers off guard, the Journal reported. Last month, Musk confessed in an interview with CBS that he believed Trump's spending package was actually a bad idea. But the tech billionaire has become more brazen in his read of the bill in the weeks since he's left the White House. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote Tuesday afternoon on X, the social media platform he owns. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' In a separate post, the world's richest man—who had promised to bankroll Republican primaries mere months ago—made clear what he now planned to do with his cash. 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people,' wrote Musk. The bill passed the House by a vote of 215–214, with two Republicans joining all Democrats in voting against it. By Wednesday, Musk's directive for more than 200 million of his social media followers was clear: 'KILL the BILL.' That same day, Trump posted an image of Musk's exit message from the previous week without further comment. Media commentators picked up on the signal, with CNN host Erin Burnett laughing off Trump's response to Musk's online tirade against his 'entire domestic agenda' as 'thinly veiled.' Republicans plan to offset the expensive tax cut by slashing some $880 billion from Medicaid. But Musk's issue with Trump's plan has little to do with slashing programs aimed at supporting and uplifting the most vulnerable Americans—instead, he's condemned the bill on the basis that it would effectively undo his work atop the Department of Government Efficiency, which was tasked with paring down government spending. Musk was Trump's top financial backer in the 2024 election, spending at least $250 million in the final months of the president's campaign after Trump was shot in July. Musk had also promised to funnel funds toward other Republicans, declaring in the wake of the November election that his super PACs would 'play a significant role in primaries.' In the following months, Musk threatened to use his money to fund primary challengers to Trump's agenda and go after Democrats, and that he would be preparing 'for the midterms and any intermediate elections, as well as looking at elections at the district attorney level.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store