
Donald Trump announces 25% tariffs on imports from Japan and South Korea, warns against retaliation
In identically worded letters to South Korean President Lee Jae-myung and Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru, Trump said the United States had shown 'great commitment' by continuing trade relations with both countries despite 'significant' deficits.
'We have decided to move forward with you, but only with more balanced, and fair, TRADE,' Trump wrote in the letters released by the White House.
Trump made it clear that if either country responds by raising its own tariffs on US goods, the US would increase its new 25% levy proportionally.
'If for any reason you decide to raise your Tariffs, then, whatever the number you choose to raise them by, will be added onto the 25% that we charge,' he warned.
Trump emphasised that the persistent trade deficit with both nations was 'a major threat to our Economy and, indeed, our National Security.'
He criticized 'Tariff and Non Tariff Policies and Trade Barriers' in both countries, arguing they have resulted in 'unsustainable trade deficits' for the US.
The president offered a path for Japanese and South Korean companies to avoid the tariffs: move manufacturing to the United States.
'There will be no Tariff if [you] decide to build or manufacture product within the United States,' Trump wrote. He promised expedited approvals, 'in a matter of weeks.'
While laying out the new penalties, Trump left the door open for renegotiation if Japan and South Korea open their markets further.
'If you wish to open your heretofore closed Trading Markets to the United States... we will, perhaps, consider an adjustment to this letter,' he said.
With the 90-day pause on sweeping tariffs set to expire July 9, the United States is preparing to reimpose trade duties on a wide range of global imports, following US President Donald Trump's controversial tariff announcement on April 2 — dubbed 'Liberation Day.' At the time, Trump claimed the US was being 'ripped off' by foreign economies and pledged to correct 'unfair trade practices.'
While the initial shock prompted global market turmoil, the administration suspended the tariffs temporarily. Now, as the deadline approaches, concerns are rising among trading partners.
Despite repeated claims of '90 deals in 90 days,' progress has been sluggish. So far, the US has only finalised trade pacts with Britain and Vietnam, and reached a temporary tariff de-escalation with China, where duties had reached triple-digit levels on some goods.
'Unless partners want to come back and try to negotiate, this is the rate their products will face,' Trump economic adviser Bessent said of the letters sent to US allies.
Trump has also threatened an additional 10% tariff on countries aligning with the BRICS bloc (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa), accusing them of following 'anti-American policies.' The threat followed public condemnation of Trump's tariff strategy by several BRICS leaders during a recent summit.
There was no official confirmation from the White House as of Monday on whether Trump would formally extend the tariff deadline past July 9. However, the administration has indicated that higher rates will begin taking effect August 1, giving some countries more time to negotiate and potentially avoid duties.
The European Commission said EU chief Ursula von der Leyen held a 'good exchange' with Trump over the weekend in an attempt to de-escalate the standoff. Other allies are also said to be lobbying to avert the sweeping tariffs.
Under the new policy, Trump has outlined a 10% base tariff on most countries, with reciprocal rates up to 50% for nations he claims have imposed unfair trade practices on the US.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump calls reporter ‘evil' when asked about lack of warnings before Texas floods
US President Donald Trump, in a recent roundtable event with Texas officials, turned down questions on the lack of warnings prior to the deadly floods that hit Texas last week. 'Only a very evil person would ask a question like that,' Trump said.(AP) Donald Trump, along with his wife Melania, visited Central Texas on Friday, a week after deadly flash floods battered the region, killing over 100 people and leaving thousands of others scrambling for safety. "The first lady and I are here in Texas to express the love and support and the anguish of our entire nation in the aftermath of this really horrific and deadly flood," Trump said as he spoke at the roundtable event. 'A very evil person would ask that' Trump was asked for his response to the concerns flagged by the citizens of the hill country about the lack of alert prior to the alarming rise in water levels in the Guadalupe river, that might have led to lesser fatalities in the region. The President called the reporter 'evil'. 'Only a very evil person would ask a question like that,' he said. Republican Representative Chip Roy took to a prompt defence for the President, calling the question 'ridiculous'. "Don't go around pointing fingers," Roy said. Amid growing questions about how local officials responded to the crisis as well as about the federal response, including the fate of the Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA), Trump said, 'Everyone did a great job.' "We mourn for every single life that was swept away in the flood, and we pray for the families that are left behind," Trump added. "It's amazing, the incredible spirit from those families." 'Nobody has any idea' "Nobody has any idea how and why a thing like this could happen," he told reporters. The President praised everyone for doing an incredible job under the devastating circumstances. 'I just have admiration for the job that everybody did. There's just admiration.' Never happened before? 'It's easy to sit back and say, 'Oh, what could have happened here or there, maybe we could have done something differently.' This was a thing ... that's never happened before,' the President affirmed. The 2025 Texas floods were at least the fifth time in the last century that the region saw horrifying floods, that quickly turned deadly. Flash floods have swept Texas earlier in 1978, 1987, and 1990. Marked with abnormally rising water levels in the Guadalupe river, the floods had seen several fatalities and multiple missing cases. The area, which is known locally as 'Flash Flood Alley,' has hills that quickly gather water and funnel it into narrow river banks. Water rises fast, catching people by surprise. California fires win over Texas floods Donald Trump had a delayed reaction to the California wildfires, that hit the state earlier this year. He had thrown brickbats at California's Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and other local Democratic officials. This time, he flaunted his alliance with Republican Gregg Abbott, governor of Texas. 'He's an amazing guy. We've become very, very close politically and personally,' the President said. The areas that suffered the most during the flash floods included Kerr County, where at least 27 campers and counselors died. Kerr County remains a significant flood hit area among others which were strong vote banks for the President in the last election. 'I will tell you that politically, I don't want to say politics, but politically, it's been a very special place to me,' the President added. 'Fully funded within minutes' Talking more about the deadly calamity, Trump flaunted the undeniable damage control his administration pushed out to the ones affected. "I would say they were fully funded within minutes of hearing about this," Trump said at the roundtable. 'And you know, the state of Texas, No. 1, they do it right, and they've done it right for a long time.' In the same event, Trump also avoided answering questions on whether he is still aiming to phase out FEMA.


Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tesla's India entry puts spotlight on trade pact with US
As Tesla gets ready for its big showroom opening in Mumbai on July 15, India and the US will have perhaps wrapped up most parts of their bilateral trade agreement. President Donald Trump has already fired fresh salvos on a host of countries in the form of tariffs with Brazil hogging the headlines with a hefty 50 per cent. Peace has been made with China after the US realised that the latter was no easy pushover. Likewise, in the case of India, a separate deal will be finalised shortly where sectors like automotive will also feature in it. The US has made known that the reciprocal tariffs will kick in from August 1 and a host of countries have already been identified for levies. India and a handful of others have been exempt since they will be entering into exclusive pacts with the US. It is here that Tesla could benefit if import duties on completely built units from the US to India are slashed to levels of under 50 per centwhich will be lower than prevailing levels. Given that India's GST levels on electric vehicles are just 5 per cent, Tesla's CEO, Elon Musk , will have every reason to smile. The final cost of his Model Y will then be in the range of $60,000 (around ₹55 lakh or thereabouts). There is no question that Tesla and Musk still have tremendous appeal across the affluent class in India. However, that does not mean that sales will take off with a bang from Day observer The Tesla aura Even if the India-US trade pact does not provide for a dramatic slash in CBU levies, Tesla may still choose to partially subsidise its range in order to draw more customers. As an industry observer says, the company is aware that there is a certain aura it has that could work out to its advantage in the short-term. However, it will eventually have to walk the talk in terms of ensuring fast-charging infrastructure as well as timely after-sales service. 'There is no question that Tesla and Musk still have tremendous appeal across the affluent class in India. However, that does not mean that sales will take off with a bang from Day 1. Sure, there will be some initial euphoria in Mumbai and Delhi but this will not last forever,' said the observer quoted earlier. There is also no question that the massive halo that enveloped Tesla a few years ago has dimmed to an extent now thanks to the fact that it is no longer seen as the invincible EV brand. Today, the Chinese have taken over that slot with brands like BYD surging ahead in the electric vehicle race. Automakers from China are now pulling out all the stops in offering top-class design and features at competitive prices, a heady mix which Tesla and other brands from the West are unable to replicate. As an automotive CEO wryly added, 'If Chinese automakers had been allowed to invest here in India, they would have literally had a field day. Indians love the latest features in their cars and this is where brands from China would have left others way behind.' Right now, there is no love lost between India and China thanks to the border clashes which broke out in 2020 and relations have taken a nosedive since then. Rough run Tesla has also had a rough run in recent times thanks to the initial bromance between Trump and Musk which soured later and led to a falling out subsequently. The Tesla CEO's new avatar as a politician antagonised buyers in Europe who gave the cold shoulder to his cars and their sales have been falling dramatically across Germany, France, Italy and a host of other countries. It is unlikely if similar sentiments will extend to India where Musk continues to be a poster boy for EVs even while his company struggles against stronger Chinese rivals. On the contrary, industry sources believe that policymakers in India are still smitten by the Tesla CEO which explains why they literally rolled out the red carpet for him in the form of a new EV policy. Even this was no enough to attract Musk who is now determined not to produce cars in India and has opted to have them imported instead. With the new trade policy between India and the US also expected to be more liberal towards CBU imports, he will be happy sticking to this route with a handful of stores spread across India for the rich and famous who still swear by the Tesla brand. The big question still remains…will Tesla end up being a huge success story in India or will the magic fade fast? After all, Indians are fastidious when it comes to price and features along with levels of customer support for the cars. There will also be concerns about resale value which possibly explains why many prefer the lease option for EVs instead of outright ownership. Pioneering status According to an automobile executive, Tesla derives its halo 'equally from its pioneering status' of creating a new category in the market coupled with the 'genius' of Elon Musk. He said BYD was getting increasing recognition for its superior technology even while the 'opaqueness' of Chinese pricing 'casts a shadow' on the authenticity of its competitiveness. Will Tesla then stay the course in India? The executive was of the view that the brand's status symbol in India of being the first few customers to own a car would actually subside very quickly. This was because of superior electric offerings from the stables of companies like BMW for instance. 'So, these are emotional more than rational purchases of the wannabes,' he added. The purchasing pattern in India, like the rest of the world, would also follow a layered route with different categories like innovators and early adopters leading the way while the more circumspect would follow after gauging market reaction. This is typical for all products and perhaps a little longer for those with hefty price tags. By the end of the day, added the executive, customers are comfortable with products that are represented by 'great brands, look great, perform reliably and durably, are backed by good service, feel comfortable and offer great value for money, including resale value'. When it comes to a new beast like electric, the buying process could quite naturally take a more cautious and introspective route since big bucks are involved. I just don't understand why India is so obsessed with Elon Musk. His coming to India is not going to make a difference except for a few hundred people who will buy a Auto Industry Leader On a roll Before his entry into politics and during the period when he was literally on a roll, Musk had everyone eating out of his hand. Every single statement hinting at an India entry was met with politicians across the landscape literally imploring him to set up shop in their individual States. At a national level too, the EV policy was tailored to meet the Tesla CEO's whims and fancies except that he refused to bite the bait and play ball. These levels of hero worship irked some industry leaders who wondered what the big fuss was about when there were other automakers who were also doing a great job in the electric space. One of them told this writer in no uncertain terms, 'I just don't understand why India is so obsessed with Elon Musk. His coming to India is not going to make a difference except for a few hundred people who will buy a Tesla. If he wants to come to India, he has to come on our terms and not on his (terms).' Affordable imports The only difference this time around is that despite his recent falling out with the US President, Musk will still enjoy the backing of a trade deal with India which will clearly help him at least from the viewpoint of more affordable CBU imports. Assuming this does happen, other carmakers in India will also seek similar concessions given that they have invested in EVs. This is where free trade agreements with Europe and ASEAN may just pave the way for CBU import even though there will be a cap on their numbers. It will also be interesting to see if an India-US trade pact will change the business models of companies like Ford which have already announced their comeback plans. Will this also encourage Harley-Davidson (a favourite reference point for Trump) to have a rethink on India beyond the current alliance with Hero MotorCorp? Tesla has thrown its hat into the India ring finally. What this will mean for India's auto sector and the tariff scenario remains to be seen. Doubtless, the White House will be watching the turn of events carefully and given Trump's unpredictable nature, India will play its cars very safely.


Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
ICC's ambitious mobile cricket game plan sparks interest from global gaming giants
The ICC's search for a developer to create a flagship mobile cricket game has garnered significant interest from major gaming companies. Krafton, EA Sports, Dream11, and Nazara Technologies are among the firms vying for the opportunity. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The International Cricket Council 's (ICC) global call for expressions of interest (EOI) to develop a flagship mobile cricket game has attracted significant attention from prominent gaming companies , according to people familiar with the firms are understood to have shown interest, including Krafton—the South Korean publisher of Battlegrounds Mobile India (BGMI) and a major investor in India's gaming sector; LightFury Games, a domestic studio backed by Blume Ventures and Krafton; EA Sports , known for franchises such as FIFA, F1, and Madden NFL; Dream11 , India's leading fantasy sports platform with a strong cricket-focused user base; and Nazara Technologies , which has a broad portfolio in mobile gaming and esports with a focus on sports potential participants include JetSynthesys, also backed by Krafton , Mobile Premier League (MPL), and several consulting EOI process is understood to be ongoing, with a shortlist potentially in the works. These selected parties will be invited to participate in the next stage: a detailed Invitation to Tender (ITT). Shortlisted entities will be expected to submit commercial terms during the ITT EOI was published on 16 ICC and the gaming companies did not respond to ET's queries. Nazara Technologies , which owns the World Cricket Championship (WCC) game, said it continues to explore potential opportunities for its flagship observers see this initiative as a key step in the digital transformation of cricket . Although cricket video games have been available for years, licencing rights have typically been split among multiple ICC's direct involvement seeks to consolidate these rights and introduce an officially sanctioned global title for cricket traditional areas like media rights and sponsorship, gaming rights are becoming an important focus for sports bodies. They offer new avenues for engagement, revenue, and brand presence among younger, digital-first project is being managed by ICC Business Corporation FZ LLC (IBC), the ICC's commercial subsidiary based in Dubai. IBC, in collaboration with its 12 Full Member Nations, is exploring the possibility of licencing certain intellectual property (IP) rights on a collective basis to a qualified entity for the development and publishing of a new, world-class mobile cricket initiative forms part of a broader push to connect with the sport's large base of digitally native followers. With cricket's global fan base estimated at more than a billion, the ICC is looking to channel that interest into a high-quality mobile gaming experience.A key element of the project involves licensing a comprehensive set of ICC intellectual property, including tournament branding, trophies, team uniforms, and player final consolidation of these rights is still in progress, IBC has indicated the potential for granting exclusive global rights for mobile may also propose additional versions for PC, console, or browser platforms if such expansions support the project's commercial ICC is not offering upfront funding. Instead, the commercial framework is expected to rely on minimum guarantees combined with revenue sharing, aligning incentives between the ICC and the selected companies with demonstrated technical expertise, financial stability, and a successful track record in mobile and sports gaming will be EOI outlines specific eligibility requirements, including experience in genres such as casual, arcade, simulation, or fantasy/strategy games, along with capabilities in live operations, user acquisition, and community were required to submit an eight-page response covering their company overview, financial performance over the last three years, leadership team, and relevant project also needed to include a vision for the game, addressing gameplay design, target audiences, monetisation plans, and creative direction.