logo
Switzerland is in a uniquely difficult position when it comes to tariffs. Here's why

Switzerland is in a uniquely difficult position when it comes to tariffs. Here's why

CNBC12 hours ago
Switzerland is scrambling to make a trade deal with Washington as it looks to avoid a "triple blow" of economic problems after being hit with 39% tariffs on goods imported to the U.S.
Swiss leaders this week travelled to Washington D.C. in an attempt to strike a deal with the U.S. administration in a bid to avoid the hefty duties which will come into effect Aug. 7.
The 39% tariff rate, which is one of the highest in U.S. President Donald Trump's latest flurry of new duties, came as a surprise to the European country as a trade agreement had seemingly been imminent.
Trump told CNBC on Tuesday that Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter "didn't want to listen" to his concerns about the U.S. trade deficit with Switzerland. Following the announcement of the 39% tariff rate, the Swiss government said Switzerland had maintained a "very constructive stance from the outset" during "intensive" talks.
The U.S. recorded a $38.3 billion trade deficit with Switzerland when accounting for goods, and a $29.7 billion surplus in the services realm last year, according to the Office of the United States Trade Representative.
The looming tariffs are expected to not only hit Swiss companies, but concerns have also emerged about the wider impact on the country's economy.
Quarterly economic growth has remained somewhat muted for some time, with gross domestic product expanding by 0.5% in the first quarter of 2025.
Swiss inflation has also long been at low levels, even turning negative earlier this year. In July, the consumer price index came in at 0.2% compared with the same month a year earlier.
As long as pharmaceutical products — which are key Swiss exports — are not affected by tariffs, their impact on economic growth may be limited, Adrian Prettejohn, Europe economist at Capital Economics, told CNBC.
"We estimate that the current tariff rate of 39%, but with exemptions for pharmaceutical products, would reduce GDP by around 0.6% in the medium term. While this is significant, it is not catastrophic, indeed it is equivalent to around only three months of economic growth," he explained.
However, Trump also told CNBC in Tuesday's interview that a sector-specific tariff on pharmaceuticals could go as high as 250% within the next 18 months.
U.S. duties on pharma imports would be a major blow to Switzerland, a major hub for the global pharmaceutical industry. In 2023, the life sciences sector contributed 38.5% of Swiss exports.
The sector-specific duties would "likely "take the aggregate impact of US tariffs on Switzerland's GDP to over 1% and potentially as much as 2%," Prettejohn said.
"Pharma is by far the most important export for Switzerland," Torsten Sauter, head of Swiss equity research at Kepler Cheuvreux, said in a note on Monday. "Here, Switzerland has leverage via US pharma reliance, but it must tread carefully — one misstep could trigger a devastating 39% tariff on its most valuable sector."
Beyond Trump's tariffs, demand for the Swiss franc is also adding to Switzerland's economic and diplomatic woes.
Since the beginning of the year, the currency — typically seen as a safe haven asset in times of uncertainty or market turbulence — has gained around 11% against the U.S. dollar. Its surging value has been weighing on inflation, prompting the Swiss National Bank to reduce its key interest rate to 0% in June.
Swiss exporters are now facing a "triple blow" of problems, said Kepler Cheuvreux's Sauter in his note on Monday.
"Steep tariffs … [would] come on top of a weak USD/CHF currency pair, and a competitive disadvantage compared to neighbouring countries," he explained.
The European Union recently secured a deal with the Trump administration that will see a blanket 15% tariff imposed on goods the bloc exports to the U.S. — a significantly lower rate than Switzerland faces.
Kamal Sharma, G10 FX strategist at Bank of America, told CNBC on Wednesday that Trump's trade policies were putting the Swiss National Bank in "a very, very difficult situation."
"I think the big issue is that from a rates perspective, the market is now starting to get a little bit more concerned, because negative [rates] is something that's always on the horizon," he said. "There is some concern that if the U.S.-Swiss trade deal stays as it is, it means it's going to press the SNB into further accommodative action."
In the past negative rates have done little to increase inflation and weaken currencies, and are also unlikely to cushion a tariffs blow, Sharma said.
"The more direct response that the SNB could take is to say, look, we need to offset this by engineering some currency depreciation, and what that does is that it brings intervention back into play. So intervention now is more likely than it was before," the strategist added.
But that isn't an easy move for Swiss policymakers to make. SNB intervention in the foreign exchange market led to Switzerland being labeled a currency manipulator during Trump's first term, and earlier this year the country was added to a "Monitoring List" of trading partners "whose currency practices and macroeconomic policies merit close attention."
Trump's tariff policy also takes into account any "currency manipulation and trade barriers." Swiss officials have denied accusations of deliberately devaluing the Swiss franc against the greenback.
However, BoA's Sharma said that the SNB is likely to plow ahead with currency intervention, even if it "may further incur the wrath of the U.S. administration."
"In some ways, [they've] got nothing more to lose … they have to start thinking about Swiss industry."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil prices rise on US demand strength, though sanctions uncertainty remains
Oil prices rise on US demand strength, though sanctions uncertainty remains

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Oil prices rise on US demand strength, though sanctions uncertainty remains

By Yuka Obayashi TOKYO (Reuters) -Oil prices rose on Thursday, pausing a five-day losing streak, on signs of steady demand in the U.S., the world's biggest oil user, though the prospect of U.S.-Russian talks on the Ukraine war eased concerns of supply disruptions from further sanctions. Brent crude futures rose 20 cents, or 0.3%, to $67.09 a barrel by 0039 GMT while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $64.57 a barrel, up 22 cents, or 0.3%. Both benchmarks slid about 1% to their lowest in eight weeks on Wednesday after U.S. President Donald Trump's remarks about progress in talks with Moscow. Trump could meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin as soon as next week, a White House official said on Wednesday, though the U.S. continued preparations to impose secondary sanctions, including potentially on China, to pressure Moscow to end the war in Ukraine. Russia is the world's second-biggest producer of crude after the U.S. Still, oil markets were supported from a bigger-than-expected draw in U.S. crude inventories last week. The Energy Information Administration said on Wednesday that U.S. crude oil stockpiles fell by 3 million barrels to 423.7 million barrels in the week ended August 1, exceeding analysts' expectations in a Reuters poll for a 591,000-barrel draw.[EIA/S] Inventories fell as U.S. crude exports climbed and refinery runs climbed, with utilization on the Gulf Coast, the country's biggest refining region, and the West Coast climbing to their highest since 2023. But the unsettled nature of the talks and the overall supply and demand situation with major producers increasing their output has made investors cautious, said Hiroyuki Kikukawa, chief strategist of Nissan Securities Investment, a unit of Nissan Securities. "Uncertainty over the outcome of the US-Russia summit, possible additional tariffs on India and China - key buyers of Russian crude - and the broader impact of U.S. tariffs on the global economy are prompting investors to stay on the sidelines," said Kikukawa. "With planned OPEC+'s output increases weighing on prices, WTI will likely remain in the $60-$70 range for the rest of the month," he said, referring to the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies including Russia. Adding to the pressure on Russian oil buyers, Trump on Wednesday imposed an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods, citing their continued imports of Russian oil. The new import tax will go into effect 21 days after August 7. Trump also said he could announce further tariffs on China similar to the 25% duties announced earlier on India over its purchases of Russian oil.

Miranda Devine: Biden abused his authority by turning FEMA into a far-left political machine
Miranda Devine: Biden abused his authority by turning FEMA into a far-left political machine

New York Post

time4 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Miranda Devine: Biden abused his authority by turning FEMA into a far-left political machine

The Biden administration abused its power by turning the entire mechanism of the federal government into a Democrat voter mobilization campaign, according to newly unearthed White House documents viewed exclusively by The Post. The worst offender was FEMA, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, under the Department of Homeland Security, which was controlled for four years by Biden's Machiavellian border buster Alejandro Mayorkas. When responding to an emergency or a natural disaster, FEMA employees were directed to make voter registration a 'key priority.' They politically targeted vulnerable people in their hour of need instead of focusing on providing federal assistance. Left-wing NGOs were brought in to 'educate' FEMA staff about 'equity and voter access for individuals affected by disaster,' says a Trump administration official. 'FEMA's job is to make sure Americans who have suffered catastrophic loss due to some disaster in their community [can access] food, water and shelter . . . Under President Biden, FEMA, like every agency, produced a plan on how they would leverage these crisis situations for political [purposes]. I can't think of anything more disgusting.' FEMA snubbed GOP FEMA employees were so fixated on voter outreach that, when they visited hurricane-ravaged Florida last October, they didn't even bother knocking on the doors of houses that had Trump signs in the yard. Instead of assisting Hurricane Milton survivors, they were instructed to 'avoid homes advertising Trump,' according to an Office of Special Counsel complaint. FEMA supervisor Marn'i Washington was fired as a scapegoat after Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis called foul on the scam and The Daily Wire reported that at least 20 homes with Trump signs or flags had been skipped by FEMA and denied the opportunity of qualifying for federal assistance. It stands to reason that if FEMA's priority was getting out Democrats to vote, the last people they would want to visit were Trump supporters. The Florida scandal came on the heels of the Biden administration's sluggish response to Hurricane Helene in Trump-supporting rural areas of North Carolina and Tennessee. Whether it was Hurricane Helene, the Maui wildfires, Hurricane Ian, or the East Palestine train derailment, FEMA always came up short during the Biden years. The agency's inadequate performance is more understandable when you realize that providing actual disaster relief to victims had become simply a side dish to the partisan political priorities of the Democratic Party. Every week, Post columnist Miranda Devine sits down for exclusive and candid conversations with the most influential disruptors in Washington. Subscribe here! It began the minute Joe Biden came into office, when he concocted a fake voter registration crisis by leveraging the same racial discord that he had exploited during the George Floyd riots the previous summer, claiming that 'many Americans, especially people of color, confront significant obstacles to exercising the fundamental right' to vote, including 'difficulties with voter registration, lack of election information, and barriers to access at polling places.' This was not true. In fact, voter turnout in the 2020 election of 67% was the highest recorded in the 21st century, according to the Census Bureau. Voter registration, likewise, was at a record high in 2020. 'Equity' and 'access' were euphemisms for policies designed simply to increase Democrat voter turnout by targeting demographics that traditionally vote Democrat. Biden launched his federal government-wide voter recruitment program with an Executive Order on March 7, 2021, to 'promote equity in voter access.' The date was chosen deliberately to fall on the 56th anniversary of Bloody Sunday to invoke the civil rights legacy of fighting voter suppression against black Americans. Biden announced the scheme at a breakfast in Selma, Ala., absurdly tying the Jan. 6 Capitol riot to what he claimed was a renewed struggle for voting rights. Fed turnout machine A federal lawsuit filed by nine states last August claimed that his order was drafted by progressive racial activist group Demos, which 'monitors implementation and advocates that federal agencies do more.' The EO was executed by Susan Rice, Biden's assistant to the president for domestic policy, whose primary focus was making 'equity' central to every arm of government. In 2021, she commanded all federal agencies to dream up ways to re-engineer their activities to prioritize voter turnout, especially in 'marginalized communities.' The Department of Energy, for example, targeted low-income households that qualify for federal weatherization assistance with voter registration paraphernalia before the 2022 midterm elections. The Department of Labor enlisted state workforce agencies to designate American Job Centers as voter registration agencies and coordinating exclusively with leftist 'voting rights' groups. The Department of Health and Human Services instructed federal health centers to engage in voter turnout, including 'encouraging patients to register to vote, assisting patients with completing registration forms, sending completed forms to the election authorities.' HHS also encouraged voter registration by ineligible illegal aliens who had access to health coverage through the Affordable Care Act, according to an expose by Heritage Foundation Senior Legal Fellow Hans von Spakovsky. DHS went above and beyond. A FEMA 'Strategic Plan for the Implementation of Executive Order 14019, Promoting Access to Voting' dated Sept. 10, 2021, and sent to Rice by Katherine Culliton-González, DHS officer for civil rights and civil liberties, summarized what DHS was doing to comply with Biden's EO by using disasters and emergencies to harvest voters: 'DHS has planned and begun implementing a variety of internal and external activities to promote access to voting.' The plan included 'key messaging and . . . resources to promote equity in voter access through their training preparedness initiatives for individuals impacted by a disaster or emergency event.' Also included were novel ways of harnessing 'internal resources, and points of public interface to promote equity in voter access before, during, and after a disaster or emergency event.' Registration drive Another arm of Mayorkas' empire, the Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), was enlisted for the turnout effort, with a plan to 'build up its existing efforts to facilitate voter registration for new citizens at the end of naturalization ceremonies, in coordination with governmental and nongovernmental organizations.' At 2,100 naturalization ceremonies for new Americans, DHS embedded 'voter-registration outreach,' inserting 2 million voter registration forms in 'welcome packets' and inviting only partisan left-leaning groups. Another White House document covering 'Partnerships and Outreach' showed that DHS signed 'Memorandums of Understanding' with the League of Women Voters in October 2022 and NALEO Educational Fund in February 2023, for naturalization 'ceremony support.' Another DHS outfit, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, co-hosted 'Your Vote Your Voice 'cyber-hygiene webinars' with another NGO, the Chicago-based Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL). Taxpayer resources allocated by DHS for voter turnout in 2022-2024 included 12 full-time USCIS employees, $1.9 million in print contracts, and 'costs absorbed' for a dedicated five-person team from FEMA's Individual and Community Preparedness Division. President Trump issued a new executive order in March this year to reverse Biden's subterfuge, calling on every federal agency to ensure the voter outreach schemes are dismantled. The cost of this Sovietization of the federal government is incalculable. But let's hope FEMA and the other agencies can get back to their day jobs.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store