Executive bonuses banned at six UK water companies over pollution
LONDON - Six UK water companies were banned from paying bonuses to senior executives, which the government said would be inappropriate given their failure to clean up their massive sewage discharges.
The new measures, whose targets include the country's biggest supplier, financially troubled Thames Water, prohibit the companies from paying bonuses "to water bosses that oversee poor environmental and customer outcomes", the government announced in a statement.
Suffering from underinvestment in a sewer system that dates largely back to the Victorian era, UK water companies, privatised since 1989, have been under fire for several years due to the discharge of significant quantities of sewage into rivers and the sea.
Despite this, "water companies have awarded over £112-million ($152-million) in bonuses and incentives over the last decade," the government noted.
These executives "should only get bonuses if they've performed well, certainly not if they've failed to tackle water pollution", said environment minister Steve Reed.
The Labour government, which came to power in July, has promised to reform a sector "in crisis" and has already legislated to toughen penalties for water company bosses who fail to comply with the law.
Water regulator Ofwat last week imposed a record fine of £123-million on London supplier Thames Water, which serves 16 million customers, for repeated sewage spills.
Some £18.2-million of the fines related to "unjustified" payouts of dividends.
The firm is seeking a private buyer to avoid a state bailout.
US investment fund KKR pulled out of a potential deal on Tuesday.
Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water were also hit with the bonus ban.
Britain's public spending watchdog warned in April that the water sector as a whole will need to invest £290-billion over the next 25 years to meet environmental and supply challenges.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
a day ago
- eNCA
Executive bonuses banned at six UK water companies over pollution
LONDON - Six UK water companies were banned from paying bonuses to senior executives, which the government said would be inappropriate given their failure to clean up their massive sewage discharges. The new measures, whose targets include the country's biggest supplier, financially troubled Thames Water, prohibit the companies from paying bonuses "to water bosses that oversee poor environmental and customer outcomes", the government announced in a statement. Suffering from underinvestment in a sewer system that dates largely back to the Victorian era, UK water companies, privatised since 1989, have been under fire for several years due to the discharge of significant quantities of sewage into rivers and the sea. Despite this, "water companies have awarded over £112-million ($152-million) in bonuses and incentives over the last decade," the government noted. These executives "should only get bonuses if they've performed well, certainly not if they've failed to tackle water pollution", said environment minister Steve Reed. The Labour government, which came to power in July, has promised to reform a sector "in crisis" and has already legislated to toughen penalties for water company bosses who fail to comply with the law. Water regulator Ofwat last week imposed a record fine of £123-million on London supplier Thames Water, which serves 16 million customers, for repeated sewage spills. Some £18.2-million of the fines related to "unjustified" payouts of dividends. The firm is seeking a private buyer to avoid a state bailout. US investment fund KKR pulled out of a potential deal on Tuesday. Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water were also hit with the bonus ban. Britain's public spending watchdog warned in April that the water sector as a whole will need to invest £290-billion over the next 25 years to meet environmental and supply challenges.
TimesLIVE
2 days ago
- TimesLIVE
Thames Water creditors see a 'short and closing window' to rescue company
Thames Water's senior creditors said there was a 'short and closing window' for a market-led rescue of the water company after US private equity firm KKR pulled out of a multibillion-pound funding plan on Tuesday. The creditors said on Wednesday they had submitted a long-term plan to fix the root causes of Thames Waters' problems. The heavily indebted water company, Britain's biggest, moved a step closer to nationalisation on Tuesday when KKR walked away from investing about £4bn (R96.7bn) of equity. The group of senior debt holders said they had a proven track record of stewardship and could deliver 'substantial fresh investment' to turn around the company under new leadership. 'The creditors believe that Thames Water requires an urgent and fundamental reset and there is a very short and closing window in which a market-led solution can succeed,' they said in a statement, adding that discussions with the regulator Ofwat and the government would be advanced in the coming weeks. They are being advised by corporate troubleshooter Mike McTighe, who is a potential candidate for chair if the proposal succeeds, according to a source close to the creditors. Thames Water in March agreed to postpone a challenge to the regulator's decision on how much it could increase customers' bills while it explored the potential equity raise. That deferral is set to expire next month. A spokesperson for Thames Water declined to comment on the creditors' statement. It said on Tuesday, when announcing that KKR had walked away, that it would 'progress discussions on the senior creditors' plan with Ofwat and other stakeholders'.
eNCA
22-05-2025
- eNCA
UK court gives govt green light to reach Chagos Islands deal
A British court on Thursday paved the way for a government deal on returning the remote Chagos Islands to Mauritius, lifting a temporary ban which had forced an 11th-hour halt to an accord being signed. The agreement would see Britain hand back the Indian Ocean archipelago to its former colony and pay to lease a key US-UK military base on Diego Garcia, the largest island. Labour Prime Minister Keir Starmer had been been due to conclude the agreement in a virtual signing ceremony with Mauritian representatives earlier on Thursday. But in a last minute pre-dawn court hearing, two Chagossian women won a temporary injunction from London's High Court on the deal's progress, in an embarrassing turn of events for Starmer whose government has faced huge criticism over the plan. After a hearing at 10:30 am, Judge Martin Chamberlain lifted the injunction, saying there was a "very strong case" that the UK national interest and public interest would be "prejudiced" by extending the ban. He said any further challenges would have to be heard by the Court of Appeal. A government spokesman said "we welcome the judge's ruling today". But the opposition Conservatives have slammed the government's Chagos Island deal as "British sovereign territory being given away" in a "bad deal" for the UK. Earlier, the two Chagossian women, Bernadette Dugasse and Bertrice Pompe applied for the injunction after a leaked newspaper report late on Wednesday indicated the government planned to unveil the deal. As around 50 protesters gathered outside the court, the two women's lawyer, Philip Rule, alleged the government was acting "unlawfully" and argued there was "significant risk" that Thursday could be last opportunity for the court had to hear the case. But Starmer has said that international legal rulings have put Britain's ownership of the Chagos in doubt and only a deal with Mauritius can guarantee that the base remains functional. The base on Diego Garcia is leased to the United States and has become one of its key military facilities in the Asia-Pacific region, including being used as a hub for long-range bombers and ships during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. - 'Sellout' claims - "The deal is the right thing to protect the British people and our national security," a government spokesperson told AFP ahead of the ruling. DoD/AFP | - The opposition Conservatives, however, described the deal as a "sellout for British interests". "You're seeing British sovereign territory being given away to an ally of China, and billions of pounds of British taxpayers' money being spent for the privilege," said senior Tory politician Robert Jenrick. "This was always a bad deal," he added. Britain kept control of the Chagos Islands after Mauritius gained independence in the 1960s. But it evicted thousands of Chagos islanders who have since mounted a series of legal claims for compensation in British courts. In 2019, the International Court of Justice recommended that Britain hand the archipelago to Mauritius after decades of legal battles. The deal would give Britain a 99-year lease of the base, with the option to extend. AFP | Yelim LEE Mauritian Prime Minister Navin Ramgoolam has said his country would pursue its fight for full sovereignty over the islands if Washington refused to support the return. By Helen Rowe And Peter Hutchison
