Executive bonuses banned at six UK water companies over pollution
The new measures, whose targets include the country's biggest supplier, financially troubled Thames Water, prohibit the companies from paying bonuses "to water bosses that oversee poor environmental and customer outcomes", the government announced in a statement.
Suffering from underinvestment in a sewer system that dates largely back to the Victorian era, UK water companies, privatised since 1989, have been under fire for several years due to the discharge of significant quantities of sewage into rivers and the sea.
Despite this, "water companies have awarded over £112-million ($152-million) in bonuses and incentives over the last decade," the government noted.
These executives "should only get bonuses if they've performed well, certainly not if they've failed to tackle water pollution", said environment minister Steve Reed.
The Labour government, which came to power in July, has promised to reform a sector "in crisis" and has already legislated to toughen penalties for water company bosses who fail to comply with the law.
Water regulator Ofwat last week imposed a record fine of £123-million on London supplier Thames Water, which serves 16 million customers, for repeated sewage spills.
Some £18.2-million of the fines related to "unjustified" payouts of dividends.
The firm is seeking a private buyer to avoid a state bailout.
US investment fund KKR pulled out of a potential deal on Tuesday.
Yorkshire Water, Anglian Water, Wessex Water, United Utilities and Southern Water were also hit with the bonus ban.
Britain's public spending watchdog warned in April that the water sector as a whole will need to invest £290-billion over the next 25 years to meet environmental and supply challenges.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
Private island off the coast of Wales hits the market for £3 million
Thorne Island. Image: Piers Cunliffe/Bloomberg Sarah Rappaport Thorne, a 2.5-acre private island off the coast of Pembrokeshire in South West Wales, has hit the market for £3 million with Strutt & Parker. The Victorian-era fort was built as defensive outpost for the naval base of Milford Haven and is accessibly only by boat or helipad. It's been fully renovated, and the 8,119 square feet of space includes five bedrooms and a rooftop bar. Thorne Island is completely self-sufficient with generators, solar panels and heat pumps. The coastal landmark is currently owned by tech entrepreneur Mike Conner, formerly the chief executive officer of Appsbroker. He bought the island in 2017 after seeing a video about it on YouTube. It was derelict then, but he saw its potential as a project, and he was up for a challenge. 'I feel like if you're sat in the office, sometimes you need something that's stimulating outside your family and friends,' says Conner of his purchase of the fort. 'Thorne's been a great stress reliever.' Connor gushes about the boyhood sense of wonder he gleans from a trip to his Island compound. 'I see it as a really expensive train set,' he says. 'It's just somewhere to go on boats and play with a crane and generators and fix stuff.' Conner adds that he's also had great parties on the island, including one memorable event where 80 guests spent the night. 'It's such a different environment. No one is looking at their phones, and everyone's very excited by the boats and being here,' Conner says. 'So even though it's only around 300 meters from the land, it feels like you're in a different country.' The main entrance is through the historic gates, into a hall with an open-plan reception, dining and sitting room with exposed brickwork. The bedrooms are spaced around the outer walls of the fort and feature panoramic views of the Pembrokeshire coastline. Conner recalls days spent working from the office he created for himself on the island and watching peregrine falcons fly by and lobster fishermen sailing past his window. 'It's just such a nice contrast to working from home and looking out the window to a street for your view.' He says he's put the island on the market now because his family just doesn't get out to Thorne enough. 'We've got quite a nice yacht in Croatia, and my kids are 22, 19 and 14, and they prefer to boat around the Med on the yacht rather than go to Wales.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Transforming Thorne Island The fort that dominates the island was built in the 1850s, during a period of British concern about the strength of the French navy; it could house around 100 soldiers. Its necessity as a military outpost faded with time, and the government sold it off in 1932 and it was converted to a hotel before it was left to decline. Conner says when he bought it, the fort was in rough shape and needed major investment. He spent about £2 million pounds on the purchase and renovation work. The fort was waterlogged and had no electricity when Conner purchased it. 'It was the most viewed property on Rightmove that year, and it was derelict,' he says. 'The thought of restoring a building and figuring out how all this new technology-like reverse osmosis for the water supply-would work with what the Victorians had done already, just really appealed to me,' he says. For four years during the renovation, a construction crew lived on the original barracks on the island and went back to the mainland in rotating shifts. Boats weren't enough to get the necessary supplies in, Connor says, so there was 'an awesome two days of heli-lifting,' during which essential materials for the renovation work were airlifted to the island. 'We had eight people on the island and eight on the mainland just hooking up different loads to the helicopters and going back and forth,' he says. 'It was truly an epic endeavor.' The construction crew also installed a 10-meter (33-foot) crane with its own engine to help with the process. Conner says the nature of the island made some aspects of the build particularly complicated. 'Because you've got an 8-meter tidal range outside the island, you can't leave boats. You have to lift them out of the water. If the tide's going out, they'll be left hanging by a rope,' he says. 'So there's just a whole lot of things we had to do to make the build viable.' Ensuring the fort could function off the power grid-sustainably-was also a challenge, he says, including the process of installing a biodigester to process waste.
The Herald
3 days ago
- The Herald
‘Politically driven' US government report slams South Africa, Brazil
This year's report was prepared after a major department revamp that included the firing of hundreds of people, many from the agency's bureau of democracy, human rights and labour, which takes the lead in writing the report. In April secretary of state Marco Rubio wrote an opinion piece saying the bureau had become a platform for 'left-wing activists', and vowing the Trump administration would reorient it to focus on 'Western values'. In Brazil, where the Trump administration has clashed with the government, the state department found the human rights situation declined after the 2023 report found no significant changes. This year's report took aim at the courts, stating they took action undermining freedom of speech and disproportionately suppressing the speech of supporters of former president Jair Bolsonaro, among others. Bolsonaro is on trial before the supreme court on charges that he conspired with allies to violently overturn his 2022 electoral loss to leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Trump has referred to the case as a 'witch hunt' and called it grounds for a 50% tariff on Brazilian goods. 'South Africa took a substantially worrying step' In South Africa, whose government the Trump administration has accused of racial discrimination towards Afrikaners, this year's report said the human rights situation significantly worsened. It said: 'South Africa took a substantially worrying step towards land expropriation of Afrikaners and further abuses against racial minorities in the country.' In last year's report, the state department found no significant changes in the human rights situation in South Africa. Trump issued an executive order this year calling for the US to resettle Afrikaners. He described them as victims of 'violence against racially disfavoured landowners', accusations that echoed far-right claims but which have been contested by the government. South Africa dismissed the report's findings, and said it was flawed, inaccurate and disappointing. The government said: 'It is ironic that a report from a nation that has exited the UN Human Rights Council and therefore no longer sees itself accountable in a multilateral peer review system would seek to produce one-sided fact free reports without any due process or engagement.' Reuters
Daily Maverick
05-08-2025
- Daily Maverick
No easy solutions as Britain faces summer of social and economic discontent
Britain is in the grip of a deepening malaise. Over the past few months and years, a growing and unsettling consensus has emerged: the country is broken. What is less clear is what could be the route towards repair. Two interconnected crises lie at the heart of the discontent. First is a fraying of what could broadly be termed the social fabric, which leads citizens towards having some trust in each other, and more generally in the state itself. In the Daily Mail, Andrew Neil warns that 'Britain is on the edge of disaster… I'm scared for what's to come.' A recent Economist poll found that seven in 10 Brits believe race riots in the near future are likely. This apprehension is easy to understand. Over the past few weeks protests erupted in Epping, Essex and near Canary Wharf in London, where locals rallied against the government's decision to house young male asylum seekers in local hotels. Demands to 'send them home' and 'save our kids' soon proliferated online, drawing in agitators from both left and right. These social tensions, particularly over illegal immigration, have become national flashpoints. Meanwhile, Britain's politics is rapidly fracturing along both ethnic and ideological lines. Jeremy Corbyn recently launched a (yet unnamed) new left-wing party with former Labour MP Zarah Sultana that is likely to draw votes not just from the left but also from those who are furious about Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer's accommodating stance on Israel. This will further fragment the centre. And Nigel Farage, whose extreme right wing Reform UK party has been leading in the polls for months, has warned that 'civil disobedience on a vast scale' will break out unless migrants stop arriving in the UK from across the Channel in small boats. Why are the British in such a state of angst? And, more importantly, are they right to be so worried? Much of the anger can be traced to a second, more fundamental issue: the failure of the British economy. Business confidence has cratered. A July survey by business lobby The Institute of Directors (IoD) found that more than 80% of British executives were pessimistic about the economy; a gloom deeper than that felt even after Brexit, the Covid-19 pandemic, or Liz Truss' catastrophic mini-budget that almost bankrupted the country. The institute's economic confidence index has plunged to a record low of -72. What went wrong? But what has gone wrong? Essentially, Britain's economy is no longer able to deliver rising living standards, reasonable costs of living or acceptable levels of public services. The state has little fiscal room to ease budgetary trade-offs, while politicians have been either unable or unwilling to confront the difficult choices they entail, be they on welfare, taxation, spending or structural reform. Starmer's caution on welfare reform during the 2024 general election campaign is symptomatic of this broader political paralysis. Economic data underscores the scale of the problem. According to the 2025 Living Standards Review from the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, real disposable income per capita rose by a paltry 14% between 2007 and 2024, compared with 48% in the halcyon days between 1990 and 2007. Given the collapse in economic fortunes of Britons, it is no surprise disillusionment is rife. The International Monetary Fund similarly reports that annual trend growth in GDP per capita has declined from 2.5% between 1990 and 2007 to just 0.7% from 2008 to 2025, which is the steepest drop among the G7 plus Spain. Had pre-2008 trends continued, the UK's GDP per capita in 2025 would be a full 33% higher than it is now, representing the largest shortfall in this group. This drop is fundamentally a result of stagnant productivity. Between 2007 and 2023, output per hour in the UK rose by just 6%, among peers outperforming only Italy. In contrast, the US posted a 22% increase, while the Eurozone averaged 10% (an important consideration given the reality of Brexit). The UK's torpid productivity is of grave socioeconomic concern. When economies cease to grow, everything becomes zero-sum; more for one group of people means less for others. The problem is exacerbated if demographic change increases the number of older beneficiaries of fiscal transfers relative to that of younger, productive taxpayers. The overwhelming questions in politics become less about growing the pie, but rather a race to contain collective frustration. Arresting this decline first requires being honest about past failures. There needs to be an acknowledgement that the economic model born of the Thatcher neoliberal revolution has not delivered long-term gains. Much of the post-1980s performance was a mirage created by a global credit boom to which the UK was more exposed than any other developed economy. The act of economic suicide that was Brexit has not helped either. The Centre for European Reform estimates that by mid-2022, the UK's GDP was 5.5% lower than it would have been had it remained in the EU. Structural weaknesses These structural weaknesses have become apparent by the increasingly precarious state of public finances. The Office for Budget Responsibility has flagged the UK's perilous position; the country now has the sixth-highest debt, fifth-highest deficit and third-highest borrowing costs among developed economies. June 2025 saw the second-highest government borrowing on record, surpassed only by June 2020 at the height of the Covid-19 pandemic. Bond markets have traditionally given more leeway to Britain because of its reputation for seriousness, political stability and fiscal prudence. But Liz Truss' disastrous spell as PM seems to have blown that premium for good, while Starmer's Labour looks more like a teetering administration on its last legs than a barely one year old government with a huge majority in the House of Commons. Nigel Farage looks on eagerly from the wings. Last month, the government failed to pass modest welfare reforms that would have raised a measly £6.5-billion (R156-billion), a fraction of the £1.3-trillion (R31-trillion) annual public spend. Embattled Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves has instead raised taxes on labour and targeted non-domiciled residents, risking the flight of high earners who contribute disproportionately to both tax revenues and general economic activity, particularly in the all-important regional powerhouse of London. While an outright crisis — whether a debt blow out or social unrest — is still on balance unlikely, the long-term trajectory looks bleak. The UK faces challenges not unlike those confronting other post-industrial democracies. But without access to the EU single market, burdened with a dysfunctional political class and bound by stagnant economic productivity, Britain appears locked in a slow and grinding descent. The post-1980s era of growth is over. What lies ahead for Britain may not necessarily be an immediate crisis, but it is likely to be a drawn-out period of socioeconomic pain and inexorable decline. DM
