
What Chinese propaganda says about Albo
The Global Times is a leading English-language propaganda mouthpiece for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Doing its best to imitate a Western-style publication, it is often used to circulate the CCP's various pet peeves and routinely takes scathing shots at Australia.
But the Chinese government tabloid had only good things to say after the Prime Minister's meet with Xi Jinping and other party top brass. Anthony Albanese and Xi Jinping met in Beijing on Tuesday. Sky News Credit: NewsWire
An 'opinion' piece published on Wednesday said the meetings 'set the tone for steady progress in bilateral ties while keeping external disruptions at bay' — a swipe at the US.
'The turnaround in China-Australia relations reflects the genuine expectations of both peoples,' the unattributed piece said.
'It also demonstrates that China and Australia are opportunities for each other's development – and highlights the strong appeal of China's vast market, the resilience of its economic growth, and the certainty of its continued commitment to opening up.'
It acknowledged but glossed over sore spots in the relationship, such as the Port of Darwin.
Mr Albanese vowed during the election to break the 99-year lease to Chinese logistics giant
Landbridge Holdings. Mr Albanese's China visit has gone down well with the nation's state media. Sky News Credit: NewsWire
The Global Times previously described the pledge as a 'drastic step' and 'ethically questionable'.
Mr Albanese also said after meeting Mr Xi that the Chinese leader did not raise the port, suggesting it may have dropped off Beijing's top-tier grievances.
'Of course, compared with the 'minefields' status described by the Global Times editorial three years ago, today's China-Australia relationship is like a plane flying in the 'stratosphere' after passing through the storm zone, and the most turbulent and bumpy period has passed,' the opinion piece said.
The Chinese have waged a charm offensive on Mr Albanese's six-day trip, with officials and business leaders wooing him in the glitz of central Shanghai before his high-level talks in Beijing.
He has in turn spruiked Australia's trade and tourism offerings.
Though, despite best efforts on both sides to keep things positive, chasmic differences remain.
Against a backdrop of China's rapid military build-up, Mr Albanese has kept firmly to his mantra of co-operating where 'we can' and disagreeing where 'we must'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

AU Financial Review
28 minutes ago
- AU Financial Review
‘We are not Luddites': AFR readers react to AI productivity boost
Almost 75 per cent of readers polled by The Australian Financial Review support a push by the Productivity Commission and business to embrace artificial intelligence as a way to lift productivity and boost the economy, but almost half do not support union involvement in AI regulation. Productivity Commission chairwoman Danielle Wood is recommending the Albanese government overhaul company tax, speed up planning approvals for infrastructure projects and embrace artificial intelligence to lift the economy out of stagnation. She said Australian full-time workers would be at least $14,000 better off by 2035 if productivity growth was boosted.

Sky News AU
28 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Albanese pressed on whether Australia will recognise Palestine as a state
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese was questioned on the "atrocities" in Gaza and the call to recognise Palestine as a state. "I share the distress that people around the world would feel around young Mohammad, one year old, he is not a threat to the state of Israel, nor is he someone who can be seen to be a fighter for Hamas," Mr Albanese said during Question Time on Monday. "The position of the Australian government is very clear that innocent life matters, every Israeli and every Palestinian. "My government is committed to a two-state solution, Israel and Palestine."

ABC News
28 minutes ago
- ABC News
Liberal Party's climate policy a huge headache for state and federal leaders
Political parties are funny beasts, as the Liberals were reminded on the weekend. To win elections they need to appeal to broad sections of the community, many of whom only have a passing interest in politics once every few years. Former Liberal Prime Minister John Howard famously referred to the party as a "broad church" for voters. And yet the heart of the parties — the kind of people who, for example, show up to Saturday morning meetings years out from an election — are not always representative of broader society. Both Labor and the Liberals can struggle at times because it is those very people who help shape policies — and more importantly, party brands in the eyes of ordinary voters. It can create headaches when, for example, that core group votes to abandon a commitment to net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, continuing a debate which has dogged the party for years, as the WA Liberals' State Council did on Saturday. The group also voted to remove the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Island flags behind the prime minister at press conferences and cut back on Welcome to Country ceremonies. The net zero issue has dogged the Liberals for years, with federal leader Sussan Ley setting up a working group to review the party's policy after its federal election drubbing. But the WA Liberals' State Council was not waiting for that review, nor was one of its most prominent voices who supported the motion. "We're part of a process," frontbencher Andrew Hastie, acknowledged on Saturday. "But I think it's pretty clear the South Australian division, the WA division, the Northern Territory division have adopted this position. "We'll see how the LNP goes in future weeks." The debate is shaping up as a thorny issue for Ley, who faces not only division between the party's membership and its elected members, but among its own MPs. In a sign of just how thorny the issue is, WA Leader Basil Zempilas had to spend part of his Monday morning defending his different position after attending the council meeting, but leaving before votes were taken. "The WA Parliamentary Liberal Party supports the status quo," he told reporters. "We are very comfortable with standing in front of the Aboriginal flag, we are very comfortable with the Welcome to Country and we support the status quo on the net zero targets." Party members who spoke to the ABC on the condition of anonymity to speak freely pointed out there was not necessarily anything unusual with that position. The views of the lay party — ordinary members who voted on Saturday — are not binding on elected MPs, who have the final say on the party's policies. Lay party motions are just one viewpoint to consider, they said. Also, they added, the motions were focused on the federal party, not the state. Which is all well and good, and gives Zempilas the ability to freely offer his own position without creating an even bigger storm. But it does little to solve the Liberals' key problem: the effect this splintering can have on public perception at both state and federal levels. Because the potential cost of this position is making it harder to win back the very voters who have deserted the party in recent years. At a state level, the party had bled voters to a more centrist Labor Party for a range of reasons, including it would seem the Liberals' drift further to the right on some issues. Federally, the cost has been even more clearly seen in seats taken by teal independents. The seat of Curtin, taking in Perth's leafy Western suburbs, had been as Liberal as they come until independent Kate Chaney swung the electorate in 2019 with a campaign heavily focused on climate. "I got the biggest swing in WA, five-and-a-half per cent. Pretty sure I got a strong endorsement," was Hastie's alternative view. For some though, there is also a view this issue is about more than just net zero, but ultimately the leadership of the party. While far from a universal view, there is little doubt having such a public show of disunity so early into Ley's leadership will only work against her prospects of staying in the job long-term. Hastie had been touted as a possible leadership contender after the May federal election, but bowed out early before Ley was installed. "I'd be foolish to say I don't have a desire to lead, I do have a desire to lead," he told the Curtin's Cast podcast at the time. "But the timing was all out for personal reasons." Politics is a game where little is done without an eye to the future prospects of each decision. Hastie, and others, clearly see some benefit in creating a clear point of difference with Labor over future climate policy. The question voters will decide in a few years' time is whether that is of benefit only among the party's core base, or helps win over electors more widely.