US-EU tariff deal: Both sides can claim victory, but devil may be in detail
For the US that equates to the expectation of roughly $90bn (£67bn) of tariff revenue for government coffers – based on last year's trade figures - plus there's $600bn of investment now due to come into the country.A lot of other big numbers have been thrown around in terms of how much the EU will invest in the US, but the devil will be in the detail.Questions like exactly when those investments will be made, and in what areas, are for now, unanswered.This deal is being sold as a landmark moment in relations between the US and the EU.It has not been easy getting to this point.Washington and the 27-nation bloc have both played hardball and neither was ready to give in easily, which is why these talks went down to the wire.But neither side wanted these negotiations to drag on beyond the 1 August deadline.For years, the US president has railed against what he regards as Europe's unfair trade practices.The first part of that is the deficit. Last year that meant the US bought $236bn of goods more from the EU than it sold to the bloc.Trump takes the somewhat simplified view that this is American wealth needlessly leaving the country. The reality is that international trade is a more complex affair.The other complaint has been that the EU's strict regulations on everything from cars to chickens make it harder for American companies to sell their products in the EU than the other way round.When we get more details of this deal, we may know how much has been done to address that.But European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen seemed to acknowledge the need to tackle the deficit.In announcing the agreement, she said: "We have to rebalance it. We have an excellent trade relation."It's a huge volume of trade that we have together. So we will make it more sustainable."This deal shows how serious President Trump is about renegotiating how the US, the world's biggest economy, does business with everyone else.Given the EU consists of 27 very different countries, it has seemed one of the trickier trade agreements to pull off.It comes days after the US struck another major agreement with Japan - there have also been deals with the UK, Vietnam and Indonesia.The other big ones still on the table are with the three biggest US trade partners - Mexico, Canada and China.And with the US president in a deal-making mood, there could be more positive news for the global economy over the next 48 hours.For the third time in as many months, the US and China are holding their next trade talks in Stockholm, Sweden, on Monday and TuesdayThere is some expectation that higher tariffs could be suspended for another 90 days.A few days ago Trump said the US was "getting along with China very well" and implied that the major sticking point of rare earth metals exports had been overcome.With the broad outlines of an EU agreement in the hold, Washington's trade negotiators have the wind in their sails going into talks with Beijing.But China has so far taken a more uncompromising approach than other US trade partners. And if talks between the world's two biggest economies falter, global trade could still be heading for choppy waters in the months ahead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
20 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump broke royal protocol over 'tricky' rule Royal Family rule says ex-butler
Donald Trump was seen breaking royal protocol during his visit to Scotland earlier this week as an ex-royal butler has now weighed in on the US president's faux pas A former royal butler has suggested that Donald Trump committed a major blunder that broke royal protocol during his visit to Scotland earlier this week. Following his arrival on Scottish territory last Friday (July 25), the controversial American president spent four hectic days opening a new golf course and fielding questions from journalists alongside Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer. During one of his media exchanges, the president at one point addressed King Charles and Queen Camilla using only their first names. This represents a blunder that is commonly understood to violate established royal protocol regarding how the monarch and his queen consort should be addressed. Outlining the rule, ex-royal butler Grant Harrold explained: "You should never call the Royal Family by their first names, even family use their correct titles, like 'Your Majesty'. " The former palace employee offered the president some leniency, suggesting there could be a minor exception given the American leader's citizenship. He continued: "Trump really should be referring to them as King Charles and Queen Camilla. It's a tricky one because, being American, he doesn't need to refer to them by their titles, but out of politeness and in the name of good etiquette, he should." Grant went on in his discussion with Slingo: "To call the royals by their first names, I would consider that a breach in protocol. The King won't be so bothered by it, but I can imagine the courtiers will not be best pleased." Meanwhile, Trump claimed the historic trade deal between the US and EU was the "biggest deal ever made" during a meeting with Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission. He was also spotted launching another course at his Trump International Golf Links venue that opened in Aberdeenshire in 2012. Speaking to reporters at the ribbon-cutting ceremony, he declared: "It's going to be a special day, it's going to be a special year, a special decade." Addressing those gathered at the event he added: "I hope everyone in Scotland, and well beyond Scotland enjoys it (the golf course) for many, many years to come." The 79-year-old has deep ties with Scotland after his mum, Mary Anne Trump, was born and brought up on the Isle of Lewis, which sits in the north west of the country. In 2006, his bond with the nation strengthened further when he bought land in Aberdeenshire to construct his Trump International Golf Links.
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Voters will agree with Donald Trump, not Ed Miliband about wind farms
Who's right about wind farms? Donald Trump or Labour and the SNP? The question arises because the wheels of Air Force One had barely touched down back in the USA before his opponents started singing the praises of wind farms. After Trump's pretty savage attack in which he described them, variously, as 'ugly' and as bird killers, ministers from both the British and Scottish Governments queued up to disagree with him. Labour and the SNP heaped praise on the decision to allow the development of what may turn out to be one of the world's biggest wind farms – with 307 turbines – at what's known as Berwick Bank, off the coast of East Lothian. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray welcomed the decision taken by the SNP – an extremely rare event – and said it tied in with his determination to prioritise more clean energy jobs in Scotland. And he said that the Berwick Bank project had the potential to make a 'huge contribution' to the UK Government's energy policy. Mind you, I don't for a second think that Mr Murray's priorities played any part in the Nats' decision. Energy Secretary Ed Miliband also praised the SNP decision saying that it meant the British Government was now 'within touching distance' of its offshore wind targets to deliver clean power by 2030. He added that the Berwick Bank decision was helping secure Britain's energy security. However, it's pretty certain that the relevant SNP minister, Kate Forbes, while acknowledging the gratitude of her political enemies, would prefer to hail her decision as a major contribution to Scotland's – and not necessarily Britain's – energy future. With opponents of this huge venture insisting that a wind farm on this scale would result in the death of thousands of sea birds – including everyone's favourite, puffins – Scotland's Deputy First Minister insisted that her final approval was subject to a 'detailed seabird compensation plan', to show how the birds could be saved. How's that for a bit of typical SNP 'havering' and trying to keep everyone sweet – from hungry developers to bird lovers? But Kate Forbes is at least one of the more practical nationalists and said that this project was a major step in Scotland's progress towards achieving net zero and tackling the climate crisis, as well as supporting national energy security and growing our green economy. During his recent Scottish visit Trump returned to his frequently expressed view that wind turbines were 'ugly, costly and harmful to wildlife', while large scale wind farms were 'a con job'. Both Labour and the SNP are super-keen on renewables, but while voters might still be persuaded about a rosy future for wind power, ministers in both parties would be mad to sneer at Trump's words about North Sea oil and gas being a 'treasure chest' for the UK. I'm certain that a great many voters agree with him, and will vote accordingly in next year's Scottish Parliament election.
Reuters
20 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump trade war: tariff deadlines and key upcoming events
July 31 (Reuters) - The twists and turns in U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff policies have not only rattled global financial markets but also taken investors on a roller-coaster ride. Adding to the uncertainty are tariff-related legal challenges and Trump's assertion that he will hammer out bilateral deals with trade partners. Last week, the U.S. struck a framework trade agreement with the European Union, halving the earlier threatened rate to a 15% import tariff on most EU goods and averting a bigger trade war between the two allies that account for almost a third of global trade. Earlier this week, Donald Trump imposed a 50% tariff on certain copper imports and suspended the "de minimis" exemption on low-value commercial shipments, the White House said. With a blitz of tariff announcements this week, ranging from changes to previously threatened levies on imports from Brazil and South Korea to the 25% tariff rate on goods from India, Trump presses on with his bid to reshape global trade. Here is a timeline for key upcoming events and dates that could have a bearing on U.S. tariff policy: August 1: A higher tariff rate on imports from several countries is set to take effect, following a postponement from the original July 9 implementation date. August 8-10: Trump said the United States would start imposing tariffs and other measures on Russia "10 days from today", if Moscow showed no progress toward ending its war in Ukraine. August 12: Trump will decide whether to extend a trade truce with China that expires on August 12, or potentially let tariffs shoot back up to triple-digit figures, escalating a trade war between the world's two biggest economies that threatens global growth. August 29: Under an executive order suspending the "de minimis" exemption, packages valued at or under $800 sent to the U.S. outside of the international postal network will face "all applicable duties".
