Mandelson ‘looking forward' to bringing down more US tariffs
On Friday, Donald Trump's press secretary insisted that the president will stand firm on the blanket 10% tariff on most UK imports into the US, telling reporters that he is 'committed' to the levy.
The deal announced on Thursday cut taxes on car imports of 100,000 a year from 27.5% to 10%, and also reduced tariffs on steel and aluminium through quotas. The baseline 10% rate for other goods remains in place but officials are still trying to negotiate on it.
Lord Mandelson told Newsnight: 'I'm very pleased with what we've achieved. It's taken many months of very tough negotiation, and it's also a platform going further and opening up more trade opportunities.'
He added: 'We're going to negotiate further and bring down further tariffs and remove further barriers to trade between us, that's what we're committed to, and I'm looking forward to doing that.'
Karoline Leavitt told a White House press briefing that the US president is 'committed to the 10% baseline tariff' imposed in April 'not just for the United Kingdom, but for his trade negotiations with all other countries as well'.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds told reporters on Thursday that the UK's conversations with the US about 'those wider tariff lines and the 10% reciprocal tariff' were continuing.
It comes as Sir Keir Starmer did not rule out the possibility of changes to the digital services tax as part of any future trade agreement and said that discussions on other aspects are 'ongoing'.
It imposes a 2% levy on the revenues of several major US tech firms. Previous speculation suggested that the UK could revise the measure as part of a deal.
Speaking to broadcasters on board HMS St Albans during a visit to Norway, Sir Keir said: 'The deal that we signed off yesterday doesn't cover that.
'That's predominantly focused on steel and aluminium, and reducing those tariffs on car manufacturing and reducing the tariffs there, and then future-proofing for pharmaceuticals, three really important sectors, and that, as I say, will be measured in thousands and thousands of jobs that will be protected, saved and will thrive as a result of this.
'On digital services, there are ongoing discussions, obviously, on other aspects of the deal, but the important thing to focus on yesterday is the sectors that are now protected that the day before yesterday were very exposed.'
Lord Mandelson said that digital services were brought up during the negotiations for this week's agreement, and told the BBC that 'what they suggested wasn't acceptable to us, so it's not in the deal'.
The deal on Thursday is the first struck by the US since the new tariffs were unveiled last month, and comes after weeks of transatlantic talks.
Sir Keir told the Independent that he has 'struck up a good relationship' with the president.
'I am the sort of person that tries to have constructive and positive relations with people,' he said.
Kemi Badenoch has said she is 'concerned' about the prospects of the UK going on to strike a full free trade agreement in the wake of Thursday's agreement.
Speaking to reporters during a visit in Essex on Friday, the Conservative leader was asked whether she thought Thursday's deal was a success.
'It's not a huge success at all,' she said. 'It's not even a trade deal, it's a tariff deal, and we are in a worse position now than we were six weeks ago.
'It's better than where we were last week, so it's better than nothing, but it's not much.
'One of the things that concerns me is that we will probably now not get a comprehensive free trade agreement.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
‘He's a great negotiator and diplomat': Starmer praised as UK outshines EU in Trump trade talks
As Donald Trump signed a new trade deal with the EU, many Independent readers were less focused on Brussels – and more surprised by how well the UK had done in comparison. With Keir Starmer securing lower tariffs and a visibly warmer reception from the US president, some asked: how did Britain get a better deal than the EU? Commenters were quick to praise Starmer's calm, measured style. One reader described him as a 'great negotiator and diplomat' with a 'forensic' grasp of detail, while another said Trump 'genuinely likes him' and respects that he 'stands up for himself' rather than fawning. In contrast, Europe's performance was seen as lacklustre, with the bloc 'unable to mount an effective response'. The EU-US deal itself drew criticism for being weak and symbolic, accused of rewarding Trump's coercive tactics and reframing tariffs as legitimate economic tools. Several readers lamented that the UK's apparent success would be used to claim a 'Brexit benefit' – while others were content to see the EU embarrassed. Here's what you had to say: A great negotiator and diplomat There's a lot of criticism of Starmer, and some is justified. While he might not be the greatest leader Labour we have had, there's no doubt he's a great negotiator and diplomat. What also helps him is that he has a strong sense of fairness, decency, and dignity. Then there's his obvious legal background, which you see in his forensic thoroughness when debating issues. Can you imagine Kemi Badenoch and that useless lot negotiating with Trump... he'd have a field day. DHC How do you feel about the UK's trade deal compared to Europe's? Share your thoughts in the comments and join the conversation below. Trump is half Scottish Trump is half Scottish and he seems to have a little more respect for his mother's native country. We also don't manufacture anything, and we have long given up the future capacity to be a producing nation. We are customers; Europe, on the other hand, is a competitor. 227detius A weak EU capitulating to Trump The deal has been widely criticised on the European side, viewed by some as a weak EU capitulating to Trump's demands, unable to mount an effective response. While that perception is difficult to counter, the reality is much more complex and nuanced. It's worth noting that the deal isn't a fully fleshed-out trade agreement but, for the time being, one of the many symbolic political deals Trump has announced in recent months. Yet it's not meaningless. It pauses what could have escalated into a full-scale transatlantic trade war and defuses a major source of volatility and anxiety. That said, the real challenge lies ahead – hammering out the details. Without legally binding documents, the door remains open to misinterpretation. We've seen this play out recently with the US-Japan agreement, hastily concluded a few days ago, and already sparking differing interpretations. The same could easily happen with the EU-US deal. The deal is being widely perceived as a big political win for Trump and a defeat for the EU, negatively affecting its image both domestically and worldwide. Unfortunately, this interpretation ultimately praises and legitimises an approach based on aggression and coercion, rewarding tactics that undermine trust and cooperation. Sadly, tariffs – long discredited as a blunt and damaging economic tool – are now being recast as effective policy instruments, which the EU should also wield. It's astonishing how, in only a few months, Trump has managed to frame such a confrontational strategy and unsound economic policies as a success – even with Europe. It's simply self-defeating. But whatever the "final outcome", the misery of this GileadUS administration will continue to affect the lives of billions of people! LeeisBlue I ignore all the Faragist, Corbynite vitriol Starmer really has done well in his dealings not only with Trump but also the EU and his Gaza stance. Additionally, his policies are really changing and improving our lives – e.g. the NHS is performing much better (my wife has benefitted from this). Frankly, I ignore all the Faragist, Corbynite vitriolic attacks on Starmer and co and research for myself what's ACTUALLY happening. All this Reform/Farage/Corbyn propaganda is a distraction, largely irrelevant. voxtrot UK sacrificed bioethanol sector The UK's largest trade partner, by far, in goods is the EU. Don't think EU's higher tariffs from the USA have no effect on the UK. The UK also sacrificed the bioethanol sector, and allowed US beef into the UK, to the detriment of home agriculture, to get those reduced tariffs. I know there is some desperation in some quarters to try and claim some form of #BrexitBenefit, and hope the utter disaster and failure that it is gets forgotten. wolfie Nothing to do with Starmer It's got nothing to do with Starmer. The UK got a better deal with the US than the EU despite Starmer, not because of him. The UK is an independent, sovereign nation again and no longer anchored to the failing, anti-democratic EU political union thanks to Brexit, and we're one of the US's closest allies. Our bond with the US will grow even stronger once the current shambles of a Labour government – that appears to be doing its best to suppress free speech – is booted out at the next election. Kingswood Diversifying the EU's trading partners Yes, but every trading country/bloc has the opportunity of improving their prospects by diversifying their trading portfolio. Perhaps this is what Ms von der Leyen had in mind when making a deal with Trump – i.e. to force the EU to diversify its trading partners. In the longer term, that might be the best solution. Hungubwe Trump swallowed the carrot of a state visit All to do with the vanity of Trump. The state visit was the ultimate carrot that Starmer dangled, and Trump swallowed it hook, line, and sinker. He likes the sense of self-importance which this state visit will bestow on him, and all the pomp and ceremony. Beyond this, it shows that as long as you pander to him, he's happy to tolerate most things. Charles's views on the climate and compassion for migrants would normally have him called a radical lefty by Trump, and likewise, Starmer would also get short shrift, but because they are praising Trump, he's lapping it up – for now. The only constant has been the unapologetic support for Netanyahu, and ultimately it will come to a head when the ethnic cleansing plan is put in place. At that point, the world will have to decide to confront Trump directly or capitulate under fear of tariffs, leaving NATO, etc. I fear the capitulation. Truthonly With Trump you always follow the money The UK has a trade surplus with the USA of about £2 billion. The EU's trade surplus is about £200 billion. That's the difference – it's nothing to do with love of the UK or a Scottish mother or the tactics of the UK government. With Trump, you always follow the money. He does hate the EU's society because it is so much better than the US, so he feels compelled to drag it down to his level. He also knows he can play the UK like a banjo, whereas he fears the EU. We all know he will change his mind at any minute. AnonyMousse Starmer has done well on international issues Starmer has done well on international issues. The problem is that his focus on those things has left his inexperienced underlings to preside over domestic affairs. We have to remind ourselves who they replaced though. Compared to 14 years of Tory corruption and chaos, they are paragons of efficiency. Inkling
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
School's out forever! Labour's VAT raid sees more than 50 private schools announce closures so far this year
More than 50 private schools have closed or announced plans to do so this year after Labour 's VAT raid came into force in January. The new 20 per cent tax on fees has hit school budgets partly due to families being priced out and leaving the sector. New analysis shows at least 54 private schools have folded since January 1, when the tax became effective. These include top prep schools, sixth-form colleges and those serving children with special educational needs (SEN). Julie Robinson, chief executive of the Independent Schools Council, told The Times: 'We remain concerned about children falling through the cracks as specialist schools are threatened or become out of the reach of the parents who have depended on them.' Among those affected was the century-old Moorlands School in Leeds, which blamed Labour's tax raid on fees and other rising costs when it announced closure last month. Also closing were nearby Fulneck School in Pudsey, and Queen Margaret's School for Girls, based in Escrick, York. In the south, Park Hill School in Kingston, Surrey, and Falcons School, in Putney, southwest London, both announced closures due to falling pupils following the tax change. Critcis say the closures have put extra pressure on local state schools, where pupils are having to migrate. Last month, it was revealed state schools in Kent received almost 100 inquiries from parents about places in just 48 hours after Bishop Challoner School announced closure. The latest government figures show that in January, there were 582,477 pupils in independent schools in England, down from 593,486 the previous year - a sharper decline than expected. While the number of independent schools still rose over the same period, from 2,421 in January last year to 2,456 in January this year, the increase would probably have been higher were it not for the introduction of VAT on school fees, according to sector insiders. The Government has insisted the policy is not causing significant disruption. It says approximately 50 mainstream private schools typically close each year anyway, due to a range of reasons. A Department for Education spokesman said: 'Ending tax breaks for private schools will raise £1.8 billion a year by 2029-30 to help fund public services, including supporting the 94 per cent of children in state schools to achieve and thrive.' 'The number of children in independent schools has remained steady, while the most recent data shows the rate of families getting a place at their preferred secondary school is at its highest in almost ten years.' In June parents and private schools lost their legal battle against VAT on fees in the High Court. They argued the policy was discriminatory against children with SEN, and other special characteristics. Independent schools support more than 100,000 children with SEN. Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, has said the money raised will pay for 6,500 new teachers and other state school improvements. However, Keir Starmer has also appeared to suggest on Twitter the money could be siphoned off to pay for housing.
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
Britain's workers are being bled dry to nourish a new elite class
Britain is on its way to establishing a new elite of public sector workers and creating a clear division between those who belong to that class and the rest of us who pay for it. Last week, the Government relaxed rules around civil servants' severance pay. This means civil servants can now receive up to £100,000 in a 'golden goodbye', even if they leave by choice, which previously would have required Treasury approval. Earlier in July, Labour removed the need for ministers to approve salaries above £150,000, abandoning an important layer of democratic oversight from the process. Only earnings above £174,000 and bonuses more than £25,000 must now be signed off, rising from previous thresholds of £150,000 and £17,500 respectively. Sir Keir Starmer's administration has brought in a host of policies which puts into stark contrast the Government's treatment of public and private sector employees. From salaries to pensions, the difference is becoming worryingly pronounced. In one of her first actions since taking office, 'the Chancellor accepted the independent Pay Review Body recommendations and confirm[ed] pay uplifts averaging 5.5pc for public sector workers'. This, we were told, would 'provide certainty for public sector workers and help put an end to devastating strikes costing billions of pounds'. But all this early inflation-busting pay rise achieved was to send out a signal that going on strike pays in Rachel Reeves' Britain. The Government appears to have been on the back foot ever since negotiating with public sector workers over pay disputes and industrial action. Train drivers, junior doctors and teachers have all secured above-inflation pay rises. It will not have escaped readers' notice that the strikes have continued despite these deals. Those familiar with Anglo-Saxon history might have even foreseen this predictable consequence of the Government's negotiation tactics. What makes Labour's stance even more ill-advised and short-sighted than that of Æthelred the Unready, is the fact that, while bending over backwards to accommodate the demands of public sector employees, they appear to be squeezing the life out of the private sector. With the impact of increases in national minimum wage and National Insurance contributions hitting businesses hard, bosses are at their most pessimistic since 2016. They feel worse than during the Covid lockdowns, fraught Brexit negotiations and the aftermath of Liz Truss's mini-Budget, according to a survey published by the Institute of Directors last week. The majority – 85pc – of business leaders think that government policy so far will be unsuccessful in driving up desperately-needed economic growth. According to a House of Commons Library paper on public sector pay, in April 2024, median weekly earnings for full-time employees were £765 in the public sector compared to £714 in the private sector, 'making earnings 7pc higher in the public sector'. This was the case before Labour took power; adding pensions to the mix makes the disparity even more stark. Last year alone, taxpayers were hit with a record £47bn bill to fund public sector pensions. HM Revenue and Customs data showed pension contributions from public sector employers such as schools and hospitals (ultimately paid for by taxpayers) hit a record high in 2024, eclipsing those made by businesses in the private sector. This is despite the private sector employing four times more people than the public sector. While the average employee in the public sector enjoyed an average increase of £9,320 on the value of their future pensions, a private sector employee only managed £3,230. This yawning gap between the two sectors is unsustainable both economically and societally. The Government needs to act before even the most resilient of businesses fail and resentment sets in towards a system that has created an elite class at the expense of a once-thriving private sector.
