£13.5m centre at Peterborough College aims to boost green skills
He said: "Everyone's finding it quite hard [to get jobs] but it is giving me a lot of confidence doing my plumbing here."
The Inspire Education Group's facility was designed to ensure learners, employers and the community could adapt to the demands of a low-carbon future.Green jobs are projected to reach over 440,000 by 2030 and employer demand for green skills grew by 46% last year.
Baroness Taylor said she wanted young people in the region to get jobs that could help protect the environment."Colleges like this, whether it is in green technology or other fields, are magnificent at doing that [involving, encouraging and enthusing young people with jobs]," she said."[They] help support our young people to get into the jobs, apprenticeships and training places that they need to start them off in their future lives and give them the hope they need for the future."
The centre has industry-standard facilities and immersive technology, including a virtual reality wall. Rachel Nicholls, chief executive officer at the Inspire Education Group, said the centre was a "key milestone".She said it "reflected a commitment to creating campuses of the future, where learners gain the skills they need, employers find the talent they're looking for and communities benefit from inclusive, sustainable growth". The Mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, Paul Bristow, said it was tough for people who did not have the right training for the new jobs on offer."Few people are aware that the Combined Authority has a big role on skills," he said."It's put nearly £3m into getting these impressive facilities open."I want our skills funding to mean two things: getting a job and getting a better job. Given its close links with employers, the Centre should be a real boost for Peterborough and the region."
Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
a few seconds ago
- Daily Mail
England hit by kit supplier blunder on eve of Women's Rugby World Cup in major blow to fans
England supporters looking to buy the team's official Women's Rugby World Cup shirt are set to be left disappointed after a blunder by new RFU kit supplier Castore. John Mitchell's side are firm favourites to seal global glory on English soil and will kick-off the tournament against the USA at Sunderland 's Stadium of Light on Friday. But Daily Mail Sport has learned there has been a shortage in the production of the replica jerseys, which will be worn by players like Ellie Kildunne and Natasha Hunt, by Castore. England's Women's Rugby World Cup kit is not available on the RFU's official online store. It also cannot be bought in sports and leisure shops up and down the country. A small number of official shirts will be on sale at the Stadium of Light and other England tournament match venues. But they are expected to sell out very quickly and won't then be available anywhere else. 'We can confirm official England Rugby World Cup shirts are now in short supply as fans continue to show their amazing support for the Red Roses,' Castore said in a statement. 'Online stores are now sold out, but stock will be available at England game match venues. 'There is a wide range of other Red Roses products available for fans to buy, including official Rugby World Cup branded merchandise with additional products to be launched in the coming weeks. This is all available on the England Rugby store online. 'We're confident Red Roses fans will have plenty of product to purchase and we thank supporters for their amazing support.' The fact such small numbers of England World Cup kits are available before a ball has even been kicked in the hotly-anticipated tournament reflects badly on Castore's support for the women's game. Castore became official kit supplier to the RFU earlier this year, replacing Umbro. It is understood Castore's shortfall is down to a logistical issue which resulted in not enough shirts being ordered by the company. The 2025 Women's Rugby World Cup is set to be the biggest yet, with nearly 500,000 tickets sold and the September 27 final at Twickenham already at capacity. England's women's regular match shirt, with sponsor O2 on the front, can still be bought online. But the tournament jersey, with red trim and no sponsor, cannot. World Cup rules state teams aren't allowed to showcase brand deals on their kits. However, the Castore shortfall of World Cup shirts means organiser World Rugby has allowed the RFU to sell its regular women's jerseys, with O2 on the front, at match venues. It is understood the RFU has been left hugely frustrated by the kit supplier mix-up and has looked to rectify it but with no immediate joy. Other England Women's Rugby World Cup merchandise, including the team's new range of Barbie-inspired clothing, can still be bought. The RFU is also soon to release a clothing partnership with the Spice Girls. It is hard to escape the fact, however, that a shortage of England kit simply would not happen in the men's game, especially on the eve of a home World Cup. Castore's error brings back memories of Nike's decision not to put the shirt of former England women's football goalkeeper Mary Earps on public sale ahead of the 2023 World Cup. Earps, now retired from international duty, described it at the time as 'hugely disappointing and very hurtful.' After England's Lionesses lifted their second consecutive European Championship trophy last month, their rugby counterparts are now looking to emulate that success. It is a shame, however, many of those watching on in the stands and at home in the weeks to come won't be able to be decked out in team merchandise.
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Average five-year mortgage falls below 5% for first time since May 2023
The average five-year fixed-rate mortgage has dipped below 5% for the first time since May 2023, according to new figures. Financial information website Moneyfacts said the average five-year fixed homeowner mortgage rate on Thursday was 4.99%. It is the lowest average since it was 4.98% on May 3 2023, according to the platform. The cost of borrowing has steadily dropped over the past year amid further reductions in interest rates by the Bank of England. The central bank voted to reduce the base interest rate from 4.25% to 4% earlier this month in the third rate cut so far in 2025. Economists have predicted that the interest rate is likely to drop to about 3.5% before steadying. Last week, the average two-year fixed-rate mortgage dipped below 5% for the first time since before former prime minister Liz Truss's so-called mini-budget in September 2022. On Thursday, Moneyfacts said the average two-year fixed residential mortgage rate was 4.97%. Data also showed that lenders are offering more mortgage options for potential customers, with 7,031 residential mortgage products available, up from 6,992 on the previous working day. Earlier this week, official figures showed that house price inflation accelerated last month. The average UK house price increased by 3.7% to £269,000 in the 12 months to June. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) announced an uptick in price growth after a 2.7% rise was reported in the 12 months to May. Meanwhile, average UK monthly private rents increased by 5.9%, to £1,343, in the 12 months to July, the statistics body said.
The Guardian
31 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Who decides when and where you work? The battle is raging in Whitehall, and the result may affect us all
Remember Jacob Rees-Mogg, Brexit opportunities and government efficiency minister, lurking round Whitehall offices to leave sarcastic printed cards on any empty desk: 'Sorry you were out when I visited. I look forward to seeing you in the office very soon. With every good wish'? The following year his government ordered the entire civil service to attend the office a minimum of 60% of the time. That has led to strikes and disputes over hybrid working, including at the Land Registry, among Metropolitan police civilians and at the Office for National Statistics (ONS). Covid taught many lessons: one of the best was discovering that people can work flexibly, need not waste time and money commuting, and can take jobs far from home while employers recruit the best from anywhere. The ONS is in so much trouble, from top to toe, you might think they would hasten to resolve this morale-lowering dispute, which appears symptomatic of what went wrong with its recently departed leadership. This week it hit yet more trouble, delaying crucial retail sales figures to carry out further data 'quality assurance'. Public and Commercial Services Union (PCS) members have voted yet again to continue their 18-month-old dispute with the ONS: 68% voted for strike action on a 71% turnout. It's been an oddly quiet dispute: staff went on working their usual hybrid patterns, for their usual pay. But ONS bosses feel obliged to follow the 2023 civil service edict to dragoon staff into the office. This time staff are taking zero-attendance action. 'What impact has hybrid working had on the ONS?' I asked the ONS spokesperson: the nation's statisticians should have the best grasp on any research. Being an honest outfit, the press officer said: 'We don't know … We suspect there might be a bad impact, especially on younger staff, but it's hard to quantify.' He said there was flexibility, and department leaders made special arrangements for some. Indeed, I spoke to one half of a couple working for the ONS, who were mystified as to why one of them could work from home while the other had to attend five days a week. The PCS general secretary, Fran Heathcote, argued last year that 'applying arbitrary targets on office attendance doesn't increase productivity and is unpopular with staff'. She said that if the government 'want a motivated, hard-working workforce, ministers should trust their own employees to have some say over their working conditions'. The employees are mostly data analysts, many not only with maths or science bachelor degrees, but masters too: I spoke to one among many with PhDs. They are hard to recruit and harder to retain: other government departments pay more and the private sector a lot more. That makes flexibility and good treatment especially valuable. Autonomy and flexibility are so highly prized that research from the global expert Nick Bloom, a British professor of economics at Stanford University, suggests that people value it as much as an 8% pay increase, making them happier and more productive when working partly from home. Women are far more likely to quit if forced back to full-time office working: compelling a daily commute narrows their choices and widens the pay gap. This is a dilemma mostly of the higher-paid. About 60% of the workforce are fully at their place of work: you can't serve in a shop, teach, nurse, care, cook, keep the sewers and electricity flowing or build from home. From scaffolders to surgeons, many have no choice, but the office-based are more likely to be graduates. WFH has settled into an average of a quarter of all working days, a revolutionary five-fold increase on pre-Covid figures. At first sight, Nigel Farage seems again to miss the popular heartbeat when he pledges 'no more working from home' in the 10 councils his party controls. It was enjoyably typical that his party was caught out advertising nine organising jobs as 'home working with occasional travel'. But he does catch that macho management spirit, anti-civil service, anti-office workers, anti-graduates by implication. It's a class gesture. It chimes with the Trump-Musk assault echoed among the titans: JP Morgan Chase, BlackRock, Amazon and UPS re-imposed five days in the office. Google's co-founder Sergey Brin sent a memo claiming, '60 hours is the sweet spot of productivity'. Like most posturing, this suggests insecurity and incapacity among managers: if they can't see hands on keyboards, how do they know work is done? Some employers need to catch up with Angela Rayner's radical shift in power towards the workforce, arriving soon with her employment rights bill. Employers will need to give good reasons for refusing what the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) predicts will be more than a third asking for flexible and hybrid working. For those rooted to their workplace, they suggest alternatives such as compressed working in four-day weeks. Many employers do get the message: 41% tell a CIPD survey that increased home/hybrid working has led to increased productivity/efficiency; only 16% say the opposite. In a country where the best jobs are concentrated in London and the south-east, where housing is beyond the reach of most, hybrid working opens the door to the most competitive roles without the associated housing and commuting costs, letting employers choose from far afield. Flexibility has to work both ways – but most people want good contact with their offices. Sadly I hear of young people with London jobs wanting to work more from their office but unable to afford the commute. The ONS could lead the way out of this Rees-Mogg nonsense. Its confession that neither its employment figures nor its wealth statistics are reliable enough to use follows a devastating inquiry by the Commons public administration committee whose chair described a grossly dysfunctional hierarchy where the chief statistician behaved like a 'hybrid of a Medici prince and Blofeld' in a 'boosterish chumocracy', while the ONS itself reported poor communication between the leadership and junior staff. Earlier this month the ONS acquired a new permanent secretary, with a chance to blow away old management and civil service attitudes. The PCS is optimistic. Abandoning needless presenteesism, the ONS might win back prizes it used to earn as a 'best place to work'. All this is a destructive and pointless tug of war over power. Managers may prefer to see people at desks, but for many who take jobs while carefully calculating rents, house prices, commuting costs and childcare complexities, flexibility is not a nice-to-have feature but the difference between taking and leaving a job. It matters far more to the staff than to the Rees-Mogg/Faragist macho management poseurs. Roll on Rayner's new law. Polly Toynbee is a Guardian columnist
