Thousands of petals fall in cathedral as 52 victims of July 7 remembered
Ms Edwards stifled a sob and paused as she read her mother's name.
The moving tribute was paid during a memorial service on Monday that included readings by Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan, as well as a 1,200-strong congregation including bereaved relatives, survivors and emergency workers who were there on the day.
Four bombers targeted three Tube trains and a bus in the worst single atrocity on British soil, killing 52 and injuring hundreds more.
The service was opened with a bidding prayer read by Dean of St Paul's Cathedral the Very Reverend Andrew Tremlett, who said: 'We gather in this Cathedral Church to mark the solemn anniversary of an act of terror inflicted on our city on this day twenty years ago.
'Together with friends from many other regions and nations, we continue to commemorate a moment in time that left deep scars in the soul of our capital.
'We come to honour the memory of those who died, to stand alongside the survivors, to give thanks for those who responded with courage and compassion, and to renew our shared commitment to peace, justice, and reconciliation.
'Here, beneath the dome of this great church, so often a symbol of resilience in the face of adversity, we hold in our hearts the grief of the past and the hope of the future.
'We give thanks for the spirit of this city: its openness, its endurance, and its steadfast refusal to let the hatred prevail.'
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, Sir Sadiq, the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh, and Home Secretary Yvette Cooper were among those who attended the service.
Four candles representing the site of each attack were carried through the cathedral by representatives of the emergency services and placed in front of the altar.
They were carried by emergency responders Victor West from Transport for London; Helen Skeggs from the Metropolitan Police Service; Guy Tillotson from London Fire Brigade and Tracy Russell from London Ambulance Service.
Readings were given about the history of each of the parts of London that were targeted in the attacks.
Ellie Patsalos, wife of survivor Professor Philip Patsalos – who was around three feet from the bomb that went off in a train between Kings Cross and Russell Square, read the first passage.
This was followed by readings from Tony Silvestro, an emergency responder from British Transport Police who was called to Aldgate; Reverend Julie Nicholson, mother of musician Jennifer Valda Ann Nicholson who was killed at Edgware Road; and George Psaradakis, the driver of the bus that was blown up in Tavistock Square.
A conclusion was then read by Graham Foulkes, father of David Foulkes, who died at Edgware Road.
He said: 'These four pieces of London epitomise what is great about this city: an international cross roads of diversity and ingenuity, tolerance and respect, challenge and opportunity. When four bombs exploded on July 7 2005, lives were destroyed and the flame of hope faltered for what seemed like an eternal moment.
'For many people nothing was the same again and yet everything was the same because the good which is in Londoners and the countless visitors whom they host at any given moment is not erased by hatred or threat but rather is fostered to produce a harvest of hope for each generation.'
Later, prayers were given by those affected by the attacks – Azuma Wundowa whose mother Gladys Wundowa was killed in Tavistock Square; Philip Duckworth who survived the Aldgate bomb; Ken McAulay, Steve Keogh and Tony Moore from the Met Police, and Jo Dover, support expert for victims of terrorism.
A group of faith leaders also made a statement to say 'we stand united in our determination to resist and overcome the evil of terrorism'.
They were the Bishop of London Dame Sarah Mullally; Islamic Scholar Shaykh Mohammed Mahmoud; Rena Amin from Hindu temple BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir; Rabbi Jason Kleiman from Pinner United Synagogue; Harmeet Singh Gill, General Secretary of Sri Guru Singh Sabha Southall; and the Right Reverend Paul McAleenan, Auxiliary Bishop of Westminster.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
44 minutes ago
- The Guardian
What we know about the secret Afghan relocation scheme
Details have emerged for the first time of an enormous accidental data breach by a British official in 2022 that put 100,000 Afghans at risk of torture and death, and the huge efforts by successive governments to keep the blunder secret, citing the risk of Taliban reprisals. Thousands of Afghan people – some of whom had worked with British forces in the country – have been secretly relocated to the UK as a direct result of the leak, at an additional cost of more than £850m. The breach has been subject to a superinjunction since August 2023, meaning journalists were banned from disclosing anything about it – or even the fact that an injunction existed. The superinjunction, which is the first ever requested by a British government and the longest in history, was lifted by the high court on Tuesday, which is why details of the leak and response can now be revealed. The leak in February 2022 was the result of an error by a defence official, who had been tasked with verifying applications to the Afghanistan Resettlement and Assistance Policy (Arap) resettlement scheme, designed for Afghans who had worked for British forces in the country. Working outside authorised government systems, he contacted a number of Afghans in the UK, believing he was sending a list of 150 names. Instead, he had emailed a copy of the entire list of applicants, from where it was passed on to others in Afghanistan. The Times reported the official was a British soldier based at Regent's Park barracks, the headquarters of the UK special forces. The leaked dataset contained the personal details of 18,800 individuals who were applying for resettlement along with their family members, including their phone numbers and in some cases addresses, amounting to 33,000 lines of data. Some emails of British government officials were also disclosed. It was discovered in August 2023 by an activist who was helping Afghans who had worked for UK forces. One of her contacts alerted her in alarm saying that an anonymous member of a Facebook group had said he had the database and was threatening to post it in full. She immediately contacted the MoD, saying: 'The Taliban may now have a 33,000-long kill list – essentially provided to them by the British government. If any of these families are murdered, the government will be liable.' The discovery was 'simply bone-chilling', she wrote. The realisation sparked panic in Whitehall, and an immediate hunt for the source of the leak. At the same time, UK officials contacted 1,800 Arap applicants in Pakistan warning them that they might be in danger. The MoD asked Facebook to remove the post, citing the 'risk of physical harm'. It then launched a top secret initiative, named Operation Rubific, to secretly evacuate to the UK those deemed most at risk of Taliban assassination – although tens of thousands would be left behind. After a number of journalists became aware of the leak within days of its disclosure to the MoD, Ben Wallace, then the defence secretary, asked the high court for an order banning any mention of the breach. On 1 September 2023 the judge Mr Justice Knowles granted a three-month superinjunction 'against the world', rather than named individuals, the first of its kind. Another judge extended it the following February, saying there was a 'real possibility that it is serving to protect' those named in the leaked database. However he cautioned: 'What is clear is that the government has decided to offer help to only a very small proportion of those whose lives have been endangered by the data incident and that the decisions in this regard are being taken without any opportunity for scrutiny through the media or in parliament.' The injuction was later extended further, despite challenges from four media organisations. The government cited concerns of retribution from the Taliban against those named. In December 2023 a covert new scheme called the Afghanistan Response Route (ARR), was set up to evacuate to the UK some individuals on the list who were ineligible for Arap. Though it was initially set up to resettle around 200 'principals' and their families, to date 900 individuals and 3,600 family members have been brought to Britain or are in transit via ARR, at a cost of £400m. Taking into account the wider schemes, other official figures show that so far the government has relocated 35,245 Afghans to Britain, of whom 16,156 were among those affected by the data leak. The present defence minister, John Healey, had been briefed on the leak while in opposition, but said on Tuesday that other cabinet members had only become aware of the situation after Labour was elected to government in July 2024. On taking office he 'began straightway to take a hard look at the policy complexities, costs, risks, court hearings and the range of Afghan relocation schemes being run across government', he told parliament on Tuesday. In January, he commissioned a former senior civil servant, Paul Rimmer, to conduct an independent review. He concluded that, nearly four years into Taliban rule of Afghanistan, the leaked data 'may not have spread nearly as widely as initially feared', and 'there is little evidence of intent by the Taliban to conduct a campaign of retribution' against those on the leaked list. The review concluded that the ARR scheme 'may now be disproportionate to the actual impact of the data loss'. As a result, the government told the high court on Tuesday that the superinjunction should be discontinued. In his ruling, Mr Justice Chamberlain described the cost of the plans as amounting to 'the sort of money which makes a material difference to government spending plans and is normally the stuff of political debate'. The ARR has now closed, Healey told MPs, although he said 600 'invitations' that had already been granted to individuals and their families would be honoured. 'When this nation makes a promise, we should keep it,' he said. He also offered 'a sincere apology on behalf of the British government', which was echoed by the Conservative shadow defence minister, James Cartlidge. MoD figures published on Tuesday show that across several Afghan resettlement schemes, the numbers of those who have already come to the UK and those who have not yet travelled total 56,100 people, including family members. The estimated total cost of all resettlement schemes is now £5.5-6bn. The covert ARR scheme set up specifically in response to the leak is expected to cost £850m.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
'Every Afghan hero deserves a UK passport. This country has failed them at every turn'
Today, the super-injunction protecting the story behind thousands of Afghans' secret evacuation has ended. And it is time to thank them for their service. We owed them our loyalty and their safety. Thousands of brave Afghans who fought alongside British troops, translated for our officials, and worked for Britain before the Taliban swept back into power. Instead – having abandoned their country in a dishonourable, chaotic retreat – it can now be revealed that we betrayed our Afghan allies once again. This time when a British military official accidentally disclosed the personal details of more than 33,000 people, putting them at risk of murderous reprisals. This scandal was covered up by the Conservative government while 18,500 Afghans whose data was compromised were flown to Britain as part of a peacetime evacuation mission. It was the right thing to do to avoid catastrophic loss of life. But, in the wake of disinformation following the Southport murders, men, women and children were then retraumatised by riots sweeping across the country where they had come to seek sanctuary. These are people whose sacrifice has more than earned them a British passport. But instead of a thank you – they faced petrol bombs, screaming crowds and their accommodation being set on fire in last summer's riots. During the worst outbreak of racial violence in the UK for decades, we now know areas with larger Afghan resettlement numbers were targeted. Even now, there are fears of copycat rioting greeting the news of the covert operation to bring these people to safety. The smallest of the lessons we need to learn from this sorry tale is about keeping data safe. We need a new way forward for communities in our country, a properly funded, grown up political strategy that addresses the tensions and division the Tories encouraged to fester. The alternative is rule by a racist mob. Thousands of Afghans have been living quietly in our country unable to tell their neighbours they had to come to the UK because our government put them in danger. Today, the super-injunction protecting the story behind the Afghans' secret evacuation has ended – and it is time for Britain to say sorry. Not just sorry for disclosing their identity. Not just sorry for abandoning their country and prioritising flights of dogs and cats while ministers were on a sun lounger. But thank you for their courage and sacrifice – and sorry for the welcome we gave them.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Yes supporters need to avoid the rhetoric of nihilism and despair
I want to state quite categorically that placing Scotland within that anti-colonial radical tradition is a nonsense. Why? From 1707 around 50-plus MPs have been sent down to London to warm the green benches of Westminster as the lawful political representatives of an acquiescent 'nation'. READ MORE: Legal arguments grounded in international covenants remain symbolic So calling Scotland a colony of the UK or England is intellectually absurd. (Martinique sends deputies to the French Parliament so it is a 'departement of France', not a colony.) Scotland has participated in the colonial 'British' historical process managing and 'book-keeping' the Empire. However, the British parliament under devolution exercises sovereignty over Scotland with the authority of parliamentary power within British law (see the Supreme Court decision). This Westminster power leaves Scotland dormant with a wholly subaltern status within the UK, even with Holyrood and its neo-colonial devolutionary settlement. This neo-colonial occupation of Scotland by the British imperial Westminster Parliament is a damaging reality. So the focus of political action is not Scotland's colonial status but rather its subaltern position vis a vis the UK. There are three subaltern characteristics that help shape Scotland's current dilemma. One is the cultural resistance movement led by numerous public intellectuals, writers, artists and progressive academics. But this is a resistance that participates in a challenging oppressive cultural ambience, characterised by London-centric power and lack of serious liberating funding. This bleak outlook can only be resolved when cultural resistance takes on a political role rather than obscuring the political challenges with idealism. READ MORE: Would a Scottish sovereign wealth fund be possible after independence? The second task within the current climate is the urgent need to avoid the rhetoric of nihilism and despair. Avoidance of surrender is critical. Too many independence 'supporters' have succumbed to the nihilism of helplessness or sought solace in the weedy pastures of tiny protest organisations. This leads on to the third role for the broad independence movement under the current oppressive British state represented by the failed British Labour Party. How, and in what political manner, can pro-indy people understand and cope with the psychological stresses provided by the failure to gain sovereignty? Subjection is the dominant mode within nation semi-states like Scotland and can only be resolved by winning sovereignty. Hope, redemption, resolution, 'positive futurism' are all urgent priorities in this subordinate time. Yet we cannot frame the current struggle within a wholly negative paradigm of oppression. Arguing that Scottish history is all misery and degradation simply ads to the negative paradigm that needs overthrowing. WE CAN WIN even if we accept the condition of subjection; it can be defeated. Scotland needs to overcome negative tropes and become something new and positive with much greater focus on the future rather than the past. That is a task of a devolved Scottish Government led by the SNP. READ MORE: Explosive new poll puts Corbyn-Sultana party level with Labour Time is not on our side. Global capitalism will not sit back and admire Scotland's vulnerability of size; rather it consumes fragile states. Asserting sovereignty is the urgent requirement that will need young people to move on from their virtual-game-based world and work to build their real future. Our current 'phoney-sovereignty' will only make our country poorer and our future darker . London only funds Scotland sufficiently to let it fail. Only by harnessing the social and political energy of our young people (and others) will we be able to overcome the present political malaise. Unfortunately the flawed engine of renewal, hope and redemption is the SNP. It is the only political engine that can drive the independence movement to sovereignty. There are some who might need the 'peg on the nose', but 2026 is the last-chance saloon. Objectively, only the SNP and the Scottish voters can deliver independence with the support of progressive patriots. Thom Cross Carluke
