
Stonehenge's biggest remaining mysteries: The 5 key unanswered questions – as scientists crack how enigmatic boulder was transported from Wales
But scientists are now finally starting to solve some of Stonehenge's most baffling mysteries.
This week, a group of leading experts announced that they had finally settled the debate over the origin of the landmark's iconic bluestones – the group of smaller stones that are dotted around the site.
However, as much as we learn about this enigmatic structure, there are still many questions yet to be answered.
Dr Rob Ixer, an archaeologist from UCL, told MailOnline: 'In some cases we know where they came from within 100 metres or even 10 metres.
'But, in a sense, that's trivial information compared to why did they bring the stones from the Preseli Hills in Wales to the centre of Wessex.'
Likewise, scientists say we still have much to learn about the people who undertook this epic feat of engineering over 5,000 years ago.
These are the five key unanswered questions that archaeologists need to finally solve this enduring puzzle.
1. How did they move the stones?
Scientists believe that the stones which make up Stonehenge come from three distinct locations.
First are the enormous standing stones, known as the sarsens, which make up the pillars and lintels of the structure.
These sandstone blocks, weighing 10 to 30 tonnes and standing up to 23 feet (seven metres) tall, come from the West Woods, south-west of Marlborough - about 20 miles (32 km) from Stonehenge.
Second are the bluestones - smaller stones dotting the site, which weigh between two and four tonnes.
A team of researchers recently concluded that these stones came from a known neolithic quarry site at Craig Rhos-y-Felin in the Preseli Hills, Wales, about 125 (200km) away.
Finally, the most mysterious of all of the rocks is the six-tonne Altar Stone, which researchers now believe came from the Orcadian Basin in the north-east of Scotland.
This means the Altar Stone travelled at least 435 miles (700 km) before it became part of the site.
Dr Ixer says: 'People used to think that the bluestones were brought along the coast, being rafted up through the Bristol Channel.
'We now think that the stones were transported overland, along what is now the A40 and that they were carried there.'
We know from modern anthropological studies of traditional groups, such as those in Indonesia, that enormous stones can be moved without machinery, provided enough people work together.
However, we don't know the exact method that the Stone Age people of Britain used to move these stones such great distances.
To explain how the stones may have been moved, researchers at Newcastle University suggest that the Stonehenge builders could have used 'greased sledges'.
Pottery found at the nearby Durrington Walls, near Stonehenge, was discovered to have strangely high residues of pig fat soaked into the clay.
While it had been assumed that this grease was from cooking, the shape of the pottery suggests that these dishes were more like buckets than plates.
The researchers argue that this could be evidence that the Stonehenge builders used greased wooden sleds rolled over logs, which would only require 20 people.
What technology could have been used to move the bluestones?
To reach Wiltshire each of the two to five-tonne stones would need to have been dragged around 140 miles over rough terrain.
Some suggest the Neolithic builders could have used ropes and wooden rollers.
This would take a large number of people but not as many as the 500 suggested by some calculations.
To make things easier the builders may have used wooden sledges lubricated with pig fat.
Or they may have used cricket ball-sized stones on wooden runners to act like ball bearings.
However, any wooden sleds or rollers would have long since decayed, meaning the exact method will likely remain a mystery.
2. Why was Stonehenge constructed?
Archaeologists are absolutely certain that Stonehenge was built so that it aligns with movement of the sun during the summer and winter solstices.
However, this doesn't tell us why people would go to such enormous lengths to do this.
'We know that it does have this solar function, but it's an enormous effort for something that doesn't seem to be needed,' says Dr Ixer.
'The true answer is that nobody really knows why it was that they built it.'
What makes Stonehenge so puzzling is that it is far more elaborate than it needs to be to perform its astrological function.
Dr Ixer says that it is the neolithic equivalent of putting gold decoration on an astrolabe; it's vastly expensive and simply not necessary.
Stonehenge is so over-complicated that some researchers think that its shape and function were not the real reason for its construction.
Instead, the act of building this monument might have been much more important than the finished product.
Recently, researchers have suggested that the construction of Stonehenge might have been intended to unify the different groups in Stone Age Britain.
Professor Mike Parker Pearson, an archaeologist from UCL, suggests that the fact that the stones come from all the different regions of the UK means it had a political as well as spiritual purpose.
Similarly, Dr Ixer says that the best modern analogy for Stonehenge is how the spaceship Endeavour was paraded through the streets of LA.
He says: 'That really is what Stonehenge is about. It's about the ceremony, it's the taking part and the doing that's important.'
3. Why the Salisbury Plain?
Scientists believe that the Salisbury Plain might have been used for sun worship for hundreds of years before the first stones were laid.
In fact, Stonehenge would have once been at the heart of a bustling religious site.
In 2016, archaeologists unearthed a large sacred complex just 1.5 miles (2.4 km) from Stonehenge.
This settlement is believed to be 1,000 years older than Stonehenge and was a sacred place where Neolithic people performed ceremonies, including feasting and the deliberate smashing of ceramic bowls.
This 'enclosure' is one of about 70 found across England and the second in the Stonehenge landscape.
The site is unique in a number of ways that ancient people might have recognised.
For example, at this latitude, the sun rises directly in the East on the midsummer solstice and sets directly in the West during the midwinter solstice.
Likewise, there are deep natural grooves in the landscape which run along this east-west axis, travelling in line with the direction of the sun during the solstice.
However, archaeologists still aren't sure why the Salisbury Plain became important enough to bring stones from all over the country to it.
Timothy Daw, co-author of the research into the Bluestones and Stonehenge expert, told MailOnline: 'There are things about the site that are special, but is it where the different west and east cultures and tribes came together?
'Or is it a centre for people from all over the Isles and that is why they brought their stones?'
4. Why did people keep changing Stonehenge?
Perhaps one of the strangest things about Stonehenge is that it isn't one single completed structure.
Instead, what we see today is the product of thousands of years of adjustments and alterations made by successive cultures living in the area.
Dating back to around 3000 BC, the Stonehenge site was already one of the largest Neolithic burial complexes in Britain.
This original complex was made of 56 holes surrounded by a bank that may have held stones or wooden posts.
It wasn't until about 2500 BC that the sarsens and bluestones were erected at the site.
However, even this monumental construction didn't last for long.
Just 200 or 300 years afterwards, another group of people dug up all the bluestones and moved them from a circle into a large oval.
Then, a few hundred years later, another group dug up the stones again and arranged them into a horseshoe shape.
Dr Ixer says: 'They were time and time again changing the shape of it and, presumably, by changing the shape of it, they were also changing the meaning of it.
'Among the Stonehenge people, there must have been such a radical shift in belief systems that they actually pulled up all these stones and rearranged them; and we don't know why.'
5. Where are the missing stones?
As archaeologists have excavated the area around Stonehenge, they have found more and more pits which seem to have once held large stones.
Although we know that the stones had been moved, what is unusual is that there don't seem to be enough stones to fill all the holes.
Professor Richard Bevins, a geologist from Aberystwyth University, told MailOnline: '. There are currently around 45 known bluestones. It is thought that the bluestones were brought to Stonehenge around 3000 BC and placed in a circle of holes known as the Aubrey Holes, of which there were 56.
'So potentially there might be some bluestones missing.'
However, archaeologists currently have no idea where these missing stones might have gone.
Many of the stones show extensive damage from tourists chipping away chunks to take as souvenirs.
In fact, during the 19th century, visitors were said to be able to rent hammers from the nearby town of Amesbury for this specific purpose.
But this doesn't seem to account for the absence of entire six-tonne stones.
Nor do pieces of the stones show up in nearby farm walls and buildings as they do near other stone circles in the UK.
So, until one is found, the whereabouts of those enormous stones remains a complete mystery.
Britain began the move from 'hunter-gatherer' to farming and settlements about 7,000 years ago as part of the 'Neolithic Revolution'
The Neolithic Revolution was the world's first verifiable revolution in agriculture.
It began in Britain between about 5000 BC and 4500 BC but spread across Europe from origins in Syria and Iraq between about 11000 BC and 9000 BC.
The period saw the widespread transition of many disparate human cultures from nomadic hunting and gathering practices to ones of farming and building small settlements.
The revolution was responsible for turning small groups of travellers into settled communities who built villages and towns.
Some cultures used irrigation and made forest clearings to better their farming techniques.
Others stored food for times of hunger, and farming eventually created different roles and divisions of labour in societies as well as trading economies.
In the UK, the period was triggered by a huge migration or folk-movement from across the Channel.
Today, prehistoric monuments in the UK span from the time of the Neolithic farmers to the invasion of the Romans in AD 43.
Many of them are looked after by English Heritage and range from standing stones to massive stone circles, and from burial mounds to hillforts.
Stonehenge, the most famous prehistoric structure in Europe, possibly the world, was built by Neolithic people, and later finished during the Bronze Age.
Neolithic structures were typically used for ceremonies, religious feasts and as centres for trade and social gatherings.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
People with ME have key genetic differences to other people, study finds
People diagnosed with ME/chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have significant differences in their DNA compared to those without the condition, according to a 'groundbreaking' new study. Scientists said the findings offer the first robust evidence that genes contribute to a person's chance of developing the disease. The DecodeME study, said to be the largest of its kind in the world, uncovered eight areas of genetic code in people with ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) that are markedly different to the DNA of people without the condition. Researchers hope the findings will boost 'validity and credibility' for patients, and help rebuff some of the stigma and lack of belief that exists around the condition. There is currently no diagnostic test or cure for ME/CFS, which is believed to affect around 67 million people worldwide, and very little is known about what causes it. A key feature of the condition is a disproportionate worsening of symptoms following even minor physical or mental activity, which is known as post-exertional malaise (PEM,) while other symptoms include pain, brain fog and extreme energy limitations that do not improve with rest. For the new study, researchers analysed 15,579 DNA samples from the 27,000 people with ME/CFS participating in DecodeME, described as the world's largest data set of people with the disease. The eight regions of DNA where scientists found genetic differences involve genes linked to the immune and nervous systems. At least two of the genetic signals relate to how the body responds to infection, which researchers said aligns with long-standing patient reports that the onset of symptoms often followed an infectious illness. Professor Chris Ponting, DecodeME investigator from the University of Edinburgh, said: 'This is a wake-up call. These extraordinary DNA results speak the language of ME/CFS, often recounting people's ME/CFS symptoms. 'DecodeME's eight genetic signals reveal much about why infection triggers ME/CFS and why pain is a common symptom. 'ME/CFS is a serious illness and we now know that someone's genetics can tip the balance on whether they are diagnosed with it.' As a person's DNA does not change over time, experts say the genetic signals identified would not have developed because of ME/CFS and are therefore likely to reflect the causes of the disease. Populations used in the initial study were limited to those from European ancestries. DecodeME research studying DNA data from all ancestries is ongoing. ME/CFS, thought to affect around 404,000 people in the UK, affects more females than males, although researchers found nothing to explain why this is the case. The DecodeME team is now calling on researchers from around the world to access its 'rich' dataset and help drive forward targeted studies into ME/CFS. Sonya Chowdhury, chief executive of Action for ME and a DecodeME co-investigator, said: 'These results are groundbreaking. 'With DecodeME, we have gone from knowing next to nothing about the causes of ME/CFS, to giving researchers clear targets.' She also hopes the discoveries will help change the way the condition is viewed. Ms Chowdhury said: 'This really adds validity and credibility for people with ME. 'We know that many people have experienced comments like ME is not real, or they've been to doctors and been disbelieved or told that it's not a real illness. 'Whilst things have changed and continue to change, that is still the case for some people and we hear that repeatedly as a charity. 'Being able to take this study into the treatment room and say there are genetic causes that play a part in ME is going to be really significant for individuals. 'It will rebuff that lack of belief and the stigma that exists.' The findings have been reported in a pre-print publication, or unpublished study. During a media briefing about the study, researchers were asked about similarities between the symptoms of long Covid and ME/CFS. Prof Ponting said: 'It's very clear that the symptomology between long Covid and ME is highly similar. 'Not for everyone but there are substantial similarities but as a geneticist the key question for me is are there overlapping genetic factors, and we haven't found that in DECode ME with the methods that we've employed. ' One of the key things that we're doing is enabling others to use their different approaches to ask and answer the same question.' DecodeME is a collaboration between the University of Edinburgh, the charity Action for ME, the Forward ME alliance of charities, and people with ME/CFS. It is funded by the Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health and Care Research.


Times
4 hours ago
- Times
Breakthrough genetic study offers treatment hope for ME patients
Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) could have genetic roots, researchers have found, in the biggest scientific breakthrough yet into the disease. A team at the University of Edinburgh analysed DNA samples from people with ME, also known as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), in a hunt to uncover the biological roots of the illness. About 400,000 people in Britain have the disease, which leads to profound exhaustion and pain, but until now scientists knew 'next to nothing' about what causes it. The new study revealed eight 'signals' in genetic code where people with ME tended to have markedly different gene variants compared to the healthy population. It is the first robust evidence that genes predispose people to the disease and suggests that ME may be caused by processes in the immune and nervous systems.


Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
ME is a real illness, genetic study shows
A genetic cause for ME has been found for the first time, proving the illness is real. In a breakthrough that charities said finally provided 'credibility and validity' for sufferers, the University of Edinburgh found eight areas of genetic code that make a diagnosis more likely. The gene activity was seen mainly in the nervous and immune systems, suggesting that people with ME may struggle to clear infections and experience ongoing symptoms of pain, fatigue and illness that other people recover from. Sonya Chowdhury, co-investigator on the study and chief executive of Action for ME, said: 'For years, many people have been maligned and disbelieved, and our findings will change this. 'We know that many people have experienced comments like 'ME's not real'. They've been to doctors and told that it's not a real illness. 'Being able to take this study into the treatment room and to say there are genetic causes that play a part in ME is going to be really significant. It will rebuff that lack of belief and stigma that exists.' ME, or myalgic encephalomyelitis – which is often known as chronic fatigue syndrome – is a long-term illness characterised by extreme fatigue that is not relieved by rest, and may bring malaise after exercise, sleep problems, brain fog and chronic pain. About 1.35 million people in Britain are thought to suffer with some kind of ME-like symptoms, which often occur following an infection such as flu, Covid or Epstein-Barr. But the vagueness of the illness and difficulty finding a trigger has often led patients to be treated with scepticism, even by medical professionals. In the past, the condition was regularly dismissed as 'yuppie flu'. For the new study, researchers analysed the DNA of more than 15,000 people participating in DecodeMe – the world's largest database of people with the disease. They found eight regions of DNA where genetic differences were significantly more common in people with ME/chronic fatigue syndrome than in the general population. As a person's DNA does not change over time, experts say the genetic signals likely reflect the causes of the disease. Prof Chris Ponting, DecodeME investigator from the University of Edinburgh, said: 'What we are looking at is genetic variants which tilt the balance one way or another towards or away from the risk of diagnosis of ME in exactly the same way as (genes) do for diabetes or Parkinson's. 'These genetic signals lie very close to genes which are now well known to be involved in the first response to infection, and so it could very well be for some people that an infection via viruses or bacteria are less well cleared with people with ME. 'People with ME often report an infection before their first onset of symptoms. This occurs with the majority of people with ME, so overall the genetics align with what people have described.' Among the genes involved is RABGAP1L, which limits virus replication and expels bacteria, but is less active in patients with ME. Another is FBXL4, which is crucial for keeping mitochondria – the cell batteries – functioning correctly, but is under-expressed in some people with ME. Researchers say the findings are not yet ready to inform treatment or diagnosis, but offer vital clues to the disease's origins and could guide future drug development. Andy Devereux-Cooke, an ME patient who has worked as a co-investigator on the project, said the findings were important for patients who had felt 'abandoned'. 'This will be huge for the patient population,' he said. 'Even though it does not provide all the answers, it is a welcome drop in the ocean towards turning the tide.' The DecodeME team is now calling on researchers from around the world to use the dataset to develop new studies that could lead to new insights and possible treatments. They were reported in a pre-print on Wednesday and are to be submitted for publication in the coming months.