
I'd never paid a bill until my divorce at 57!
A few months after my divorce, my mother asked me who my car insurer was. I just looked at her blankly. I didn't have car insurance, I hadn't got an MOT on my car – I later realised I didn't have home insurance either. None of it had crossed my mind. I was extraordinarily lucky nothing went wrong.
At the age of 57 I hadn't paid a household bill or had any handle on my finances since I had married almost 30 years earlier. Now divorced, I didn't have a clue where to start.
Rob and I married on my 30th birthday – I wanted to get married before I turned 30. We had four children – my stepson and three children of our own. All of that time, Rob managed our money and I didn't question it.
I just put my earnings in our shared account and that was that.
I kick myself now for being stupid and naive. But my dad had looked after my mum and Rob looked after me. It felt like a sort of safety net for me.
I had a full-on job in the travel industry, then setting up a complementary health centre and as a yoga teacher – and to be honest the household finances never interested me.
Every so often I would ask him: 'How are our finances?' but it would often be late at night and he'd reply: 'Why are you talking about this now?'. I'd say just because I was a bit worried, but then I'd wake up the next morning and not think about it again.
We never defaulted on payments and weren't having anyone knocking on the door. But he was not always entirely reliable – that could be very tough.
My oldest son definitely had a bit of a chequered education because we kept running out of money and so we had to move him to other schools. But he's done fine – they're all OK.
Then during Covid we were in lockdowns and couldn't be out and about doing our thing. And if relationships are already not working as they should, they become even more fractious and difficult in those conditions. It damaged a lot and soon after we separated.
Once our finances were split I had to learn to do things for myself. I didn't even know what that meant. I've always been useless at maths – when I sat down to do my maths O-Level, I walked into the exam, wrote my name at the top of the page, drew a triangle and walked out because I didn't know it or want to do it.
So I was terrified at the thought of sorting my finances.
Around that time at a yoga retreat in Greece, I was speaking to a lovely fellow and confided in him that I really missed my dad because he would have known how to help me. And he told me about his financial adviser, Louisa, who was good at explaining and talking you through things.
So I built up the courage to see her. And to my surprise I immediately felt safe with her – I could sense that she knew how to talk with people like me who are a bit rudderless and useless on finances. Strangely, the thing I was most terrified of was feeling like a fool. It makes you feel so vulnerable.
She helped me to set up an Isa and explained that I should move my allowance of £20,000 from my savings into my Isa every year to protect it from tax.
Louisa also helped me track down a pension that was started for me when I was working for a hotel group at age 27. You don't think about them at the time, but even small sums can be worth something meaningful years later if they've been invested.
She talked me through how risk works and worked out how to invest my pension in a way that means it is growing but doesn't keep me up at night worrying about it.
My confidence has grown and I know how to read the regular statements I'm sent about my pension. I look for the balance and how much it has grown – by 14 per cent last year – but I also know that sometimes it can fall and not to panic about it.
I also know how to get help when I need it – I'd rather stab myself than do my tax return, but even though my accountant does it I know how to check my cash flow – my incomings and outgoings.
Now that I've got my ducks in a row – I know who my insurance is with, where my mortgage is for my home in south London, how my pension is growing – I feel so much lighter. I still would rather play tennis than look at spreadsheets, but I now know how to do it.
I'd advise anyone who leaves the finances to their spouse to share the responsibility – I wish I had. You never know what is around the corner – divorce or worse.
My mother was also left in the same position as me when my father died, because he always looked after their finances and she hadn't learned how to do it. Make sure your bank accounts and investments are in both of your names so that you both receive the statements and see what you have.
Even if there are household bills that your spouse pays, make sure you know what they are so you would know what to do if you had to take over the responsibility.
When you're married to someone you share bringing up your children, you share cooking, you share your bed, you share your life – you should share your finances. I think it's part of your commitment to one another.
So share the load, have an open mind and be willing to learn. Even if your husband or wife is good at managing the money, don't feel intimidated to ask: shouldn't this be a shared responsibility?
Start managing your money
'It is not unusual for people to start thinking about their finances for the first time when they get divorced,' says Charlotte Ransom, chief executive of wealth manager Netwealth
'Being widowed, retirement, selling a business or getting an inheritance are also common triggers – as well as things in the news such as a Budget statement.
'Women in particular find themselves in this position after a divorce, because the husband is more likely to already have had a wealth manager. It's never too late to start. Often people come to me and say, 'I'm embarrassed that I didn't take charge of this earlier.' But the important thing is that you've done it now.
'When people do engage with their finances and find out they won't stretch to the things they want to do, they still go out feeling good. They have some control and transparency about what they have and can plan. What is terrifying is when you're just playing around in the dark.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The exact amount of money you need for a 'moderate' retirement - so will YOU have enough? Our experts crunch the numbers and reveal how you can hit the goal at any age
Working out if you're on track for the retirement you dream of is essential to avoid running out of cash in older age. But the calculations are far from straightforward. That's why we've called on experts at investment platform AJ Bell to crunch the numbers to find out how much you need to be saving at every age to stand the best possible chance of attaining your ideal retirement.


Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
White House warns Downing Street against letting China build 'super embassy' near sensitive financial sites
The Oval Office has urged Downing Street against giving a Chinese embassy the green light to be built near London financial centres. Previously, proposals for the 'super-embassy' were rejected by the Conservative government amid concerns from British intelligence. However, the plans have been reintroduced following lobbying from China 's very own President Xi Jinping. But fresh warning have since emerged, as due to the Royal Mint Court's locality to a sensitive hub of essential communication cables, it poses a great risk for an attack. The suggested site is also situated between several major financial hubs in Canary Wharf and the City as well as three crucial data centres. It is understood US President Donald Trump has warned Sir Keir Starmer against giving the embassy the go-ahead. The matter is believed to have been discussed during trade talks, as Britain and its Atlantic allies discuss how they will implement a trade deal to avoid UK steel producers being lumbered with 50 percent import tariffs by July 9. According to the Times, US diplomats would be trepidatious about sharing intelligence with Britain if the embassy went ahead. A senior US official told the publication: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' It comes after a claims 'dark cabling' running beneath the proposed site 'feeds the City of London' were given in a memo to the United States' National Security Council by members of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (Ipac). John Moolenaar, the Republican head of the House of Representatives' China committee said if these reports were 'accurate' that the site would 'pose an unacceptable risk' to both the UK and US. 'The Chinese Communist Party has a clear track record of targeting critical infrastructure.' he said. 'This development would raise serious concerns in the United States and could be viewed as an act of strategic overreach by Beijing and a curious error in judgment by London.' The executive director of IPAC, Luke de Pulford dubbed the matter as a 'flashpoint' in US-UK trade talks, adding that it was 'staggering' the White House had to corroborate the cabling risk to 'defend its own financial system. 'It's time to send Xi Jinping a clear message: no matter the pressure or coercion, the UK and US won't trade away national security, and this embassy isn't happening,' he said. China has been attempting to revise plans for the Royal Mint building, which neighbour the Tower of London, since they were purchased in 2018. It is believed the Chines foreign minister, Wang Yi, brought up the matter with foreign secretary, David Lammy, while visiting London last year. According to The Times, President Xi had also discussed the same issue with the Prime Minister in a phone conversation. The proposal for the embassy, which would be China's largest in Europe, was previously rejected by Tower Hamlets council in 2022. But two weeks after Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves came back from a visit to China earlier this year, both the council's and Scotland Yard's objections were dropped. Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, described China as a 'dangerous threat to the national and economic security of our country'. She said the Conservative party continued to stand 'firmly' against the embassy proposals, stating her party would never put the UK's 'financial centre or country at risk.' Next Monday, three of Trump's aides are scheduled to meet with their Chinese peers in London for discussions in a bid to solve the current trade war between the two economic powerhouses. The Treasury secretary Scott Bessent, the commerce secretary Howard Lutnick and the trade representative Jamieson Greer will act as representatives for the US, Trump has declared on Truth Social. Yesterday, China 's foreign ministry confirmed vice-premier He Lifeng will be on British shores from June 8 until June 13, adding that talks would with the US would take place. Previously, a Chinese embassy spokesperson has quashed spy allegations, stating: 'Anti-China elements are always keen on slandering and attacking China.' A government spokesman said: 'Applications for a new Chinese embassy in Tower Hamlets have been called in for ministers to decide. A final decision will be made in due course.'


The Sun
4 hours ago
- The Sun
Fury as ‘disgusting' Cadbury cuts size of popular multipack from six bars to four but keeps price the SAME
CHOC-lovers are fuming after Cadbury reduced the size of its Dairy Milk Little Bars multipacks by a third. New packs of four are being sold for £1.40, even though packs of six cost the same last month. 1 The change has been blasted by shoppers, including many parents who bought them as kids' snacks. One fumed on the Tesco website: 'Advertised as new, only thing new is you get 4 instead of 6!! For the same price. Disgusting!' A second said: 'Stop reducing how much is in the packet and charging the same price!!!' A third added: 'Was a six pack now a four pack for the same price, a third less chocolate, unacceptable shrinkflation.' It comes after Cadbury reduced packs of Freddos from five to four and Cadbury Dairy Milk multipacks were cut from nine bars to seven. Cadbury said: 'We understand the economic pressures that consumers continue to face and any changes to our product sizes is a last resort for our business. 'However, as a food producer, we are continuing to experience significantly higher input costs across our supply chain, with ingredients such as cocoa and dairy, which are widely used in our products, costing far more than they have done previously. 'Meanwhile, other costs like energy and transport, also remain high. This means that our products continue to be much more expensive to make and while we have absorbed these costs where possible, we still face considerable challenges 'As a result of this difficult environment, we have had to make the decision to slightly reduce the weight of our Cadbury Dairy Milk Little Bars multipacks so that we can continue to provide consumers with the brands they love, without compromising on the great taste and quality they expect.' Dan Coatsworth, analyst at the investment firm AJ Bell, explained: 'The cost of producing chocolate has gone up a lot in recent years, driving up prices and prompting firms to make products smaller. We've outdone ourselves with this one' say Cadbury Ireland as they reveal new limited edition bar 'coming soon 'When production costs rocket, companies only have a limited range of options. 'They can pass on the costs to the customer through higher prices, which is difficult with a product like chocolate where people are often looking for a cheap treat. 'Another option is to reduce the size of the product in order to reduce the manufacturing cost for each bar of chocolate. Or they can try a combination of the two. 'As a last resort, companies may have to tolerate lower profit margins, especially if consumers refuse to tolerate price rises and stop buying.' The British Retail Consortium said global cocoa prices are around three times higher than in 2022, after being badly affected by poor harvests in parts of Africa.