&w=3840&q=100)
Unable to represent constituency due to court rider: Engineer Rashid to HC
Press Trust of India New Delhi
Jammu and Kashmir MP Engineer Rashid, accused in alleged terror funding case, on Wednesday informed the Delhi High Court that he was unable to represent his constituency owing to a rider imposed on him to pay daily costs to attend the parliamentary session.
Appearing before a bench of Justices Vivek Chaudhary and Anup Jairam Bhambhani, Rashid sought the modification of an order passed by a coordinate bench.
The order directed him to deposit Rs 4 lakh with the prison authorities as travel expenses for attending Parliament.
During the hearing, the bench remarked that when custody parole is granted, it is ordinarily at the cost of the person.
At this, senior advocate N Hariharan, appearing for Rashid said the condition was unreasonable because "he (Rashid) is an elected representative of the people of a parliamentary constituency and unable to represent them due to inability to pay the same".
Hariharan continued, "If the condition imposed is such that he is unable to go (to the parliament), we are interfering with the basic elements of democracy in this country."
He claimed when Rashid took the oath, "the state never asked for expenses".
"These are conditions imposed to somehow see to it that the voice of my constituency is not heard there," the senior lawyer added.
The counsel pointed out he was not seeking a review of the order but "only the modification of the conditions".
"The order is he be taken into custody, subject to conditions. I am saying the condition is erroneous amounting to defeating the order itself," he said.
The bench posted the matter for August 12.
The Baramulla MP, who defeated Omar Abdullah in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls, is facing trial in a terror funding case with allegations that he funded separatists and terror groups in Jammu and Kashmir.
He has been lodged in Delhi's Tihar Jail since 2019 after the NIA arrested him in the 2017 terror-funding case. He was granted interim bail for one month in September last year to campaign in the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly election.
The NIA's FIR alleged Rashid's name cropped up during the interrogation of businessman and co-accused Zahoor Watali.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
28 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Uttarakhand Monsoon Session adjourned after overnight opposition sit-in as government rushes through nine bills
DEHRADUN: The Uttarakhand Assembly's Monsoon Session, which began on Tuesday in Bhararisain, the state's summer capital, was abruptly adjourned indefinitely on Wednesday, just two days into its scheduled five-day run. Lasting only two hours and forty minutes over both days, the brief session was marked by vociferous protests from the opposition Congress, while the ruling party swiftly pushed through nine key bills and a supplementary budget. From the outset, the opposition demanded a discussion on the state's disaster management and law and order under Rule 310. Their protests escalated within the Assembly hall, with members tearing papers, shaking microphones, and raising slogans against what they described as a 'dictatorial government' and 'vote theft.' Failing to secure a debate, Congress MLAs, led by Leader of Opposition Yashpal Arya and Pritam Singh, staged an unprecedented overnight sit-in inside the Assembly building. Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami's efforts to pacify them reportedly proved futile. The second day mirrored the first in its tumultuous nature. Despite the uproar, the government managed to pass nine bills and a supplementary budget of Rs 5,315.89 crore. Among the significant legislations approved were the Uniform Civil Code (UCC) Amendment Bill, the amended Conversion Law, and the Uttarakhand Minority Bill, paving the way for major state-level changes. The UCC (Amendment) Bill, passed by voice vote, introduces stricter provisions for live-in relationships, including increased penalties for misuse or violations. The amended Conversion Law has been made more stringent, now providing for a life sentence for those found guilty of forced or fraudulent conversions. Furthermore, the Uttarakhand Minority Bill seeks to establish an authority for all minority communities in the state, while also facilitating formal recognition for madrasas, with the aim of strengthening their operations and educational framework.
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
28 minutes ago
- First Post
Why India wants to ban online real-money games like fantasy sports, lotteries
The Centre introduced the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday. The proposed legislation seeks to ban online games played with money and impose stricter penalties on celebrity promoters. On the other hand, the government wants to promote e-sports and online social games India is planning to ban online games played with money, in a major setback for an industry that has attracted billions in investment but remains controversial. On Wednesday (August 20), Union Minister of Electronics and Information Technology Ashwini Vaishnaw introduced the Online Gaming Bill in the Lok Sabha. The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025, seeks to prohibit real-money online gaming, imposing stricter penalties on such platforms and their celebrity promoters. It also aims to encourage e-sports and online social games. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Let's take a closer look. What's in the Online Gaming Bill? The Online Gaming Bill seeks to ban online gaming platforms, citing psychological and national security concerns. It defines 'online money game' as 'an online game, irrespective of whether such game is based on skill, chance, or both, played by a user by paying fees, depositing money or other stakes in expectation of winning which entails monetary and other enrichment in return of money or other stakes; but shall not include any e-sports'. If passed, the bill would outlaw all online betting and gambling, including fantasy sports and Poker, Rummy and other card games, as well as online lotteries, the Ministry of Electronics and IT said in a statement, as per ANI. Section 2(h) of the bill defines 'online money gaming service' as a service offered by a person for entering or playing an online money game. The proposed ban applies to all money-based online games, whether based on skill or chance, and advertisements for such platforms. The draft bill also prohibits banks and financial institutions from facilitating financial transactions on these gaming platforms. Violators can face up to three years in prison and a fine of up to Rs 1 crore for offering or facilitating online money gaming. The Centre's bill proposes to ban all money-based online games, whether based on skill or chance. Representational Image/Pixabay The bill also proposes punishing those promoting these platforms, such as social media influencers, who can be imprisoned for two years and face a penalty of Rs 50 lakh. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Major gaming platforms, such as Dream11, Games24x7, Winzo, GamesKraft, 99Games, MPL, KheloFantasy, and My11Circle will be directly hit by the proposed ban. E-sports to be promoted The Online Gaming Bill exempts e-sports from the ban. The government wants to recognise e-sports as a legitimate form of competitive sport in the country. To encourage e-sports, the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports will set up a dedicated framework. The government could also mull promoting and recognising 'online social games' for educational and recreational purposes. While these could include a subscription fee for entry, there will be nothing in the form of a stake or wager. Notably, the Online Gaming Bill empowers authorised officials to conduct search operations at physical and virtual places, even without a warrant. '…any (authorised) officer…may enter any place, whether physical or digital, and search and arrest without warrant any person found therein who is reasonably suspected of having committed or of committing or of being about to commit any offence under this Act,' the Bill states. Why ban on online money gaming The government says it wants to ban such online games as they cause financial harm and are addictive. As per the Bill, the unregulated expansion of online money gaming services has been associated with 'unlawful activities including financial fraud, money-laundering, tax evasion, and in some cases, the financing of terrorism, thereby posing threats to national security, public order and the integrity of the State'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It said the law was needed due to the 'deleterious and negative impact of online money games on the individuals, families, society and the nation and given the technical aspects including the very nature of the electronic medium used for online money games, the algorithms applied and the national and transnational networks.' Reflecting the Government's commitment to a safe, secure, and innovation-driven Digital India, the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 strikes a balanced path—encouraging innovation and youth engagement through safe and positive online gaming, while firmly… — Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (@MIB_India) August 20, 2025 The Statement of Object and Reasons of the Bill read that 'the unchecked and widespread proliferation of online money games which readily accessible through mobile devices, computers, and the internet, and offering monetary returns in exchange for deposited funds has led to grave social, economic, and psychological consequences across the country'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'These platforms often promote compulsive and addictive behaviour, resulting in financial ruin, mental health disorders, and increasing incidents of fraud and exploitation', the Bill said, adding such games often use 'manipulative design features, addictive algorithms, bots and undisclosed agents, undermining fairness, transparency and user protection, while promoting compulsive behaviour leading to financial ruin'. Reactions to the proposed ban The government's plan to put a blanket ban on online money gaming has sparked criticism from various quarters. The All India Gaming Federation (AIGF) has warned of a devastating fallout for the industry if the bill is implemented without changes. Seeking Union Home Minister Amit Shah's intervention, it said there was a need for 'progressive regulation' and not a ban. 'Such a blanket prohibition would strike a death knell for this legitimate, job-creating industry, and would cause serious harm to Indian users and citizens. We firmly believe that progressive regulation and not prohibition is the way forward for the legitimate Indian industry. With your guidance, India can set a global example by building a safe, transparent, and thriving digital gaming ecosystem,' AIGF said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD An industry insider told that the government's approach is 'misguided' and could be more harmful than beneficial. 'A blanket ban will not protect Indians, it will harm them. It will kill jobs, drive users to illegal gambling, and violate the Constitution,' the source said, warning that a ban will only boost illegal offshore operators, which they described as 'one of the biggest national security threats to the country today.' India's online gaming industry is valued at $3.7 billion today, depending largely on real-money games (RMG). It is expected to further grow to $9.1 billion by 2029. Industry estimates that it creates Rs 31,000 crores in annual revenue and pays Rs 20,000 crores in direct and indirect taxes. The sector has attracted foreign direct investment of more than Rs 25,000 crore till June 2022. It also supports over two lakh direct and indirect jobs. E-sports stakeholders have hailed the bill, emphasising the need to draw a line between gaming and betting. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Speaking to Hindustan Times, Akshat Rathee, Co-founder and Managing Director of NODWIN Gaming, said: 'The government's intent to recognise and promote e-sports, as highlighted in the recent bill, is an encouraging step towards building a structured and globally competitive ecosystem. However, for this vision to truly materialise, it is critical that the terminology used in the bill, particularly the distinctions between e-sports, online gaming, online social gaming, and online money gaming be clearly defined and uniformly understood.' Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has also criticised the ban on online money gaming, saying it would only push the industry underground and bolster criminal networks. 'I had written a very long article on the argument that by banning online gaming we are simply driving it underground, whereas it could be a useful source of revenue for the government if we legalise it, regulate it and tax it,' he was quoted as saying by PTI. Tharoor also pointed out that several countries have analysed the issue in detail and concluded that regulation and taxation can generate funds for social causes, while prohibition merely enriches 'criminal mafias'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He said on X that the bill should at least have been referred to a parliamentary committee 'to consider all the pros and cons before rushing it into law'. With inputs from agencies


NDTV
28 minutes ago
- NDTV
Everything You Need To Know About Online Gaming Bill 2025
The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 was passed in the Lok Sabha today. The proposed law seeks to encourage e-sports and social games, while prohibiting real money gaming and online betting that could lead to addiction, financial loss, and security risks. Online Gaming Bill 2025: What It Aims To Do Encourage Positive Gaming: Promote e-sports and safe social or educational games. Ban Risky Money Games: Stop online gambling, betting, and real money games that can cause addiction or financial loss. Protect Citizens and Security: Safeguard users, especially youth, from fraud, money laundering, and other online risks. Support Innovation: Provide rules and guidelines to grow India's gaming industry responsibly. Provisions Of The Bill E-sports: Recognised as a legitimate sport; Ministry of Sports to set guidelines, run awareness campaigns, and support training academies and research centres. Social and Educational Games: Government can register and support safe, age-appropriate games that promote skill, culture, and digital literacy. Harmful Online Money Games: Complete ban on money games, their promotion, and related financial transactions; unlawful platforms can be blocked. Online Gaming Authority: Central government to oversee gaming, categorise games, determine money games, handle complaints, and issue guidelines. Offences And Penalties Offering/facilitating online money gaming: up to 3 years imprisonment and/or Rs 1 crore fine. Advertising money games: up to 2 years imprisonment and/or Rs 50 lakh fine. Financial transactions related to money games: up to 3 years imprisonment and/or Rs 1 crore fine. Repeat offences: 3-5 years imprisonment and fines up to Rs 2 crore. Certain offences are cognisable and non-bailable. Officers may investigate, search, and seize digital/physical property linked to offences. Powers to enter, search, and arrest without warrant in certain cases. Companies and officers held liable unless due diligence is proven. Independent or non-executive directors not involved in decision-making are protected. Pros Of The Bill Boosts Creative Economy: Positions India as a global hub for gaming exports, innovation, and jobs. Empowers Youth: Encourages skill-based gaming and e-sports participation. Ensures Safety: Protects families from predatory real-money gaming. Global Leadership: Strengthens India's role in responsible gaming and digital policy. Criticism Surrounding The Bill Opposition leaders have criticised the bill for being rushed, lacking stakeholder consultation, and potentially undermining regulation. Congress MP Karti Chidambaram said on X, "The proposed online gaming bill, The Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 is being introduced without industry consultation, is a knee-jerk reaction that could prove counterproductive... The government should refer the bill to a select committee and hold public hearings to ensure a balanced and informed approach." Congress leader Priyank Kharge argued that regulation was a better solution than banning something altogether. He said, "Regulation is the only way to safeguard our citizens, without it, they'll be pushed to playing on offshore servers in China or other countries which is beyond our reach of protection." Congress MP Shashi Tharoor spoke to reporters about the lack of proper parliamentary debate. "In my view, many countries have studied this issue in great detail and concluded that legalising and taxing online gaming allows governments to generate funds that can be used for various worthy causes... With Parliament not functioning effectively, the bill will likely be passed without any proper discussion," he said. Cons Of The Bill Industry and Jobs at Risk: According to Priyank Kharge, over 2,000 gaming startups and more than 2 lakh IT, AI, and design jobs could be affected. Karti Chidambaram has said that up to 4 lakh jobs may be at risk due to the bill. Threat to Foreign Investment: The bill could wipe out $6 billion in investments and push users to offshore platforms, Mr Chidambaram said. Revenue and Tax Loss: India could lose around Rs 20,000 crore annually from GST and income tax, as per Mr Chidambaram. Online gaming is currently subject to 28% GST and 30% tax on net winnings. Underground Markets And Addiction: Banning online gaming may push users to unregulated platforms, increasing the risk of illegal activities. National Security Risks: Offshore platforms may facilitate money laundering, terror financing, and data theft. Ecosystem Collapse: Priyank Kharge said Rs 7,000 crore spent annually on ads, data centres, sponsorships, and cybersecurity could vanish, affecting India's gaming innovation. Policy Concerns: A blanket ban without stakeholder consultation may create illegal markets and threaten national security.