Lok Sabha: Gaurav Gogoi targets govt over Pahalgam terror attack; BJP hits back
'Today, US President Trump claimed that 5-6 (fighter) jets were shot down. One jet costs millions. Therefore, we want (defence minister) Rajnath Singh to tell the truth. How many jets were shot down? India has the courage to listen to the truth,' Gogoi said.
Gogoi cited the remarks of India's defence attache to Indonesia, Captain Shiv Kumar, who allegedly claimed that the Indian Air Force 'lost fighter jets' in the initial stage of Operation Sindoor because of the orders of the government to hit only terror infrastructure in Pakistan and the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishments and their air defences.
He further said Lt General Singh had informed that the number of targets was reduced from 21 to 9. 'What were the political reasons for reducing the number of targets?' Gogoi asked.
Criticising the Centre's counter-terrorism response, Gogoi questioned the intent behind Operation Sindoor, India's military operation targeting terror infrastructure. Responding to Rajnath Singh's statement that India did not seek war or territorial gain, Gogoi asked, 'If we do not claim Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir today, then when?'
He pointed out that similar rhetoric followed past attacks in Uri and Pulwama, yet Pakistan dared to strike again. 'Rajnath Singh had said in 2016 that our strikes would destroy terrorist infrastructure. He repeated this in 2019. But today, the operation remains incomplete because Rajnath Singh hinted that Pakistan may act again in the future – how long will this cycle continue?' Gogoi asked.
He further raised doubts about the ceasefire with Pakistan. 'On May 10, our ambassador said India would respond. By evening, a ceasefire agreement was announced. If Pakistan was truly on its knees, why did we stop? Whom did we bow before?'
Gogoi also cited US President Donald Trump's statement claiming credit for mediating the ceasefire and alleging that jets were shot down. 'The people of this country have the right to know the truth. Rajnath Singh must clarify – not just for the citizens, but also for our soldiers who are being misled.'
He also took aim at India's foreign policy posture, arguing that the disagreement in the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit joint declaration was because a few associate nations in the group hyphenated India and Pakistan. 'You are happy with the playfulness of the words at the BRICS summit. It was only the attack in Kashmir that was condemned in their declaration, not Pakistan. If that is the case, what do you have to say about the $1 billion IMF and $800 million ADB packages to Pakistan?'
'Do not mistake us for enemies of the nation. We are speaking for India and its soldiers. Let us know the truth. We will keep asking questions every time you try to spread confusion,' Gogoi concluded.
Responding to Gogoi, union minister and NDA ally JDU's Lalan Singh said,' There was nothing in his speech. I thought he would have done a proper analysis and spoken but his speech had nothing in praise of our armed forces.' Responding to Gogoi's charge of multiple terror attacks during the Modi regime from Pulwama to Pathankot, Singh said that while the UPA had chosen to deal with terror with a soft touch, it was the Modi government which came up with surgical strikes to counter such attacks. 'Why didn't you condemn the Pakistan government for their role? It's because you do politics for vote while Modiji does it for the country.'
Singh also responded to Gogoi's charge about the number of aircrafts that were allegedly brought down by the enemy. ' You keep asking how many aircraft but that's not important. We destroyed their system and that's the point,'' said Singh.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
16 minutes ago
- India Today
Rs 67,000 crore plan approved to enhance operational capability of Armed forces
The Defence Acquisition Council (DAC), chaired by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, on Tuesday approved proposals worth approximately Rs 67,000 crore to upgrade the operational capabilities of the Indian Armed Forces. The decisions cover key acquisitions and upgrades for the Army, Navy, and the Air Force, an official statement the Army, the DAC approved the procurement of Thermal Imager-based Night Sights for drivers of BMP infantry vehicles. This move is aimed at enhancing the nighttime mobility of mechanised infantry units, improving their operational effectiveness during low-visibility Navy will get a boost with the procurement of Compact Autonomous Surface Craft (CASC), which are designed for anti-submarine warfare. These unmanned vessels will boost the Navy's ability to detect, identify, and neutralise underwater threats. Additionally, the Navy will receive updated BrahMos missile fire control systems and launchers, along with an upgrade to the existing BARAK-1 missile system, improving its point defence a significant move to enhance air surveillance and defence, the Air Force will procure advanced Mountain Radars. These radars are designed to improve monitoring and threat detection along India's mountainous DAC also cleared the upgradation of the SAKSHAM/SPYDER weapon systems, allowing them to be integrated with the Integrated Air Command and Control System, thereby strengthening the overall air defence three services—Army, Navy, and Air Force—will benefit from the acquisition of Medium Altitude Long Endurance Remotely Piloted drones are capable of carrying multiple weapons and payloads, and can operate over long distances for extended durations. Their deployment will significantly enhance surveillance, reconnaissance, and combat readiness around the addition to new acquisitions, the DAC also approved long-term maintenance and support measures for critical existing systems. This includes support for the Air Force's C-17 and C-130J transport aircraft fleets, as well as a comprehensive annual maintenance contract for the S-400 long-range air defence missile the proposals fall under the 'Acceptance of Necessity' category, marking the first step in the procurement approvals reflect India's continued push towards enhancing self-reliance in defence and strengthening the capabilities of its armed forces across all domains.- Ends
Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
For Pakistan & US, it is back to doing business
There is a discernible sense of satisfaction within Pakistan's strategic fraternity at the undeniable uptick in the US-Pakistan interface over the past few months. Some may dispute the extent, but given how the relationship had eroded in the past decade-and-a-half, any improvement represents a big change. Given the transactional nature that dominates the US, there is the temptation to find direct factors for the upswing in US-Pakistan relations. (AP) The principal milestones of the US-Pakistan downturn are well known. For Pakistan, the US detection and killing of Osama bin Laden in 2011 in Abbottabad was a betrayal and a public humiliation. For many Pakistanis, that the US acted clandestinely deep inside Pakistan superseded the enormity of the fact that Osama had been living there all the time under the very noses of the Pakistan military. The free fall continued with mounting US frustrations over Pakistan's double game in Afghanistan. President Trump's 2018 New Year Day tweet exemplified this view. The tweet underlined US foolishness in giving Pakistan billions of dollars in aid in return for deceit and lies! This was consistent with emergent US narratives about Pakistan, but that it was from the President himself made it doubly significant. Through the Biden tenure matters crystallised at a low plateau of bad blood and mutual recriminations. The US's final withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021 in disorder and disarray added another layer to the deep strategic mistrust and suspicion that now characterised the relationship. President Biden did not have even a telecon with Imran Khan during the time he was PM and Imran Khan in turn blamed the US for his premature ouster from power. In the meantime, most US military and security assistance was suspended. What perhaps hurt Pakistan the most was the impact this had on training programmes for Pakistan military officers in the US. All this happened also when the India-US relationship seemed effortlessly to go from strength to strength. This further highlighted the distance between Washington and Islamabad. The past few months appear quite different. The change was animated quite dramatically by Field Marshal Asim Munir being hosted by President Trump in June 2025 in the immediate aftermath of Operation Sindoor. It is most unusual — perhaps even unprecedented — for a US president to host a chief of a foreign military who is not a head of State or government. This shift also coincides with new ambiguities in the US-India interface — perhaps triggered by President Trump's constant reiteration of having prevented further escalation in the India-Pakistan conflict during Operation Sindoor. To many in Pakistan, this has 'internationalised' Kashmir and highlighted the importance of third-party intervention as equally that even the US was skeptical about India's claims and demands. There had been earlier indicators of change beginning with President Trump's acknowledgement of Pakistan's counter-terrorism assistance in his State of the Union Address in March 2025. The allocation of a significant financial package as assistance to Pakistan for maintaining its F16 aircraft despite an otherwise stringent foreign aid cutback, was another. Alongside, more even-handed references to the India-Pakistan dynamic, meetings and telephone conversations between the US secretary of State and senior Pakistan leaders further underlined this shift. The announcement of a US-Pakistan Trade Agreement, albeit with a 19% tariff on imports from Pakistan, and Trump's enthusiastic references to hydrocarbon exploration and investment, are but the latest in this trend. The trade agreement may not be the best deal Pakistan could have got, but it is not as bad as could have been, and in any case some deal was better than no deal as far as the government of Pakistan was concerned. It may well be argued that there is nothing particularly significant in these transitions, but for most Pakistanis they suggest a return of their country to the US's radar after a long period of being out in the cold. What explains this shift? Given the transactional frame of mind that dominates the US, there is always the temptation to look for a direct and material factor. Numerous reasons are, therefore, assigned for this shift in US policy. Pakistan's counter-terrorism potential and the assistance it can offer is one. That the US is keen to have some relationship with Pakistan given the growing spread of China in the region is another. There is also the view that recommendations of the US Central Command on Pakistan's military potential vis-à-vis Iran in terms of its geographical location and the value of its air bases may have registered on the Presidency amid the current situation in West and South West Asia. Some argue that this shift in policy was also pushed along by crypto currency deals, and by US interest in potential Pakistani reserves of rare earth minerals. Each of these explanations may have some merit but perhaps the weight of any or all of these should not be exaggerated. Instead, it is useful to refocus on some basics. Pakistan is the fifth largest country in the world in terms of population with some 250 million people. It is riven by instability. It has nuclear weapons. It is situated in a sensitive geo-political location, almost in a global fault line. Given these attributes it was always only a matter of time that the long downturn in US Pakistan relations would reverse and US interest in Pakistan would reignite. We are at that stage now. All major powers decide on policies based on an appreciation of their own interests and their own understandings of evolving situations. To think that the long downturn in US Pakistan relations would have simply continued or that the US would see developments from our perspective alone is, and never was, a realistic assessment. We should take this shift in our stride. If some in India feel betrayed or dismayed at this turn of events, they have only themselves to blame. TCA Raghavan is a former Indian high commissioner to Pakistan. The views expressed are personal.
The Hindu
16 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Ernakulam awarded 86 projects worth ₹472 crore under Amrut 2.0, says Union Minister
Ernakulam district has been granted 86 projects worth ₹471.96 crore under the Atal Mission for Rejuvenation and Urban Transformation 2.0 (Amrut 2.0), Minister of State for Urban Affairs Tokhan Sahu said in the Lok Sabha. He was responding to a set of questions by Ernakulam MP Hibi Eden. Among the projects granted were 39 drinking water projects worth ₹222.12 crore, including 15 projects for the Kochi Corporation accounting for ₹122.50 crore, and three septage management projects worth ₹225.90 crore. Another 16 projects worth ₹8.77 crore have been granted for the development of parks or green spaces. Kalamassery municipality has been allocated a drinking water project worth ₹14.41 crore. A project for Thripunithura worth ₹12.50 crore, two for Thrikkakara worth ₹7.04 crore, one for Eloor worth ₹7.35 crore, and one each for North Paravur (₹5.18 crore) and Maradu (₹1.74 crore) are the other projects, the Minister said. Contracts have been awarded for a majority of projects, while notices inviting tender have been issued in the rest. A project worth ₹2.50 crore to provide functional household tap connection to urban households in Kothamangalam municipality has been completed. Incidentally, Kothamangalam municipality has been awarded the second largest number of projects — nine projects worth ₹11.34 crores under Amrut 2.0.
