New £5billion train line to connect two of the UK's most beautiful cities
THE Chancellor delivered the first Spending Review in nearly four years
ON TRACK New £5billion train line to connect two of the UK's most beautiful cities
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
A NEW £5billion train line is set to connect two of the UK's most beautiful cities.
The government have confirmed a £2.5 billion cash injection into continuing to deliver the plan.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
2
A new £5billion train line is set to connect two of the UK's most beautiful cities
2
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has confirmed a further £2.5 billion in funding for East West Rail
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has confirmed a further £2.5 billion in funding for East West Rail (EWR), the major infrastructure project to establish a railway link between Oxford and Cambridge.
She announced the investment in her first spending review statement to Parliament after the long-delayed scheme.
Speaking in the House of Commons Reeves said: 'I have heard representations from my honourable friends from Milton Keynes North, Milton Keynes Central and Buckingham and Bletchley.
"And I can tell the House today to connect Oxford and Cambridge and to back Milton Keynes' leading tech sector I am providing a further £2.5 billion for the continued delivery of East West Rail.'
The funding is part of a broad vision to develop the Oxford-Cambridge Growth Corridor.
A government policy paper released alongside the Chancellor's speech described a 'renewed focus' on driving growth in the area.
It also confirmed that EWR remains central to that ambition, supporting not only economic development but also enabling large-scale housing growth reports East Anglia ByLines.
Reeves reiterated the government's commitment to creating 1.5 million new homes and emphasised that new transport links like EWR would help unlock sites for housing and employment along the route.
The railway is also expected to ease pressure on roads, connect communities more effectively and stimulate local economies by making areas more attractive for investment and business start-ups.
Councillor Judy Roberts, cabinet member for Place, Environment and Climate Action on Oxfordshire County Council, said: 'We welcome the continued commitment from the government to progress East West Rail through to Cambridge," reported This is Oxfordshire.
Watch shock moment car get trapped on railway crossing before train speeds through
She added: "Which builds on previous budget commitments and delivery of the route between Oxford and Milton Keynes, expected to open soon following current train testing.
"East West Rail effectively provides a 'backbone' for developing a wider regional integrated sustainable transport network.
"And it will be important that Oxfordshire works with those on the scheme to provide high-quality first mile/last mile connectivity from key stations along the route.
'It will also be important to maximise the benefits of development for East West Rail through delivering economic, social and environmental benefits, as well as onward rail connections, for example to Swindon and Bristol.
What is the East West Rail
First conceived more than 20 years ago, the EWR project aims to establish a direct rail link between Oxford and Cambridge.
The full scheme is expected to cost at least £5 billion and includes both upgrades to existing infrastructure and construction of new lines.
The project is divided into four key segments: Upgrading the rail between Oxford and Bicester (completed in 2016).
Restoring a disused line between Bicester and Bletchley (opening later this year).
Refurbishing the existing route from Bletchley to Bedford (to be completed by 2030).
Building a brand new stretch of railway from Bedford to Cambridge (still in planning stage).
The line, once completed, will make it possible to travel from Oxford or Cambridge to most of the north of England without having to go through London.
'This includes delivery of a fully decarbonised passenger and freight railway at the next stage of development, with supporting investment in electrification infrastructure and high-quality new trains, including for use between Oxford and Milton Keynes.'
Calum Miller, MP for Bicester and Woodstock, also supported the plans and said: 'I welcome the Government's confirmation in the Spending Review of the £2.5 billion for the next phase of the East West Rail project.
'It's crucial that East West Rail deliver the funding to keep London Road open and I will continue pressing the company and Rail Ministers to commit to an underpass for all modes of light transport.'
Other announcements made in the spending review included a further £3.5 billion towards improving the TransPennine rail route that links York, Leeds and Manchester.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Starmer and Reeves are back from the brink – here's what they must do next
Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves admitted mistakes had been made during the government's difficult first year when she addressed a private meeting of the parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) after announcing her spending review. Her audience knew what she meant: her catastrophic decision on the pensioners' winter fuel allowance. Reeves was more honest in private than she is in public. Even after their spectacular U-turn, she and Keir Starmer insist last July's decision was right at the time. In her defence, the chancellor said Labour had been out of power for 14 years and in office for one – an admission, perhaps, that ministers must learn on the job. She won a good reception at the PLP for her £113bn boost to investment projects and her framing of her review, first made in The Independent, as 'Labour's choices'. But Reeves' plea for Labour MPs to 'get out and sell' the spending programme in their constituencies landed badly with some in her audience. On Westminster's summer party circuit, they grumbled about a lack of salesmanship from both Reeves and Keir Starmer. These critics have a point. Neither the prime minister nor the chancellor is a natural storyteller. They sometimes look like technocratic automatons as they prioritise the 'stability' they offered after Conservative chaos over their election-winning pitch of 'change'. Although the social democrat Reeves is more ideological than the arch-pragmatist Starmer, many Labour backbenchers complain she has become a prisoner of 'Treasury orthodoxy'. The double act of PM and chancellor works better when they complement each other. Tony Blair was a good communicator and Gordon Brown the brains behind New Labour's strategy and domestic policy. The relationship between David Cameron and George Osborne was similar, and without the corrosive personal tensions between Blair and Brown. Crucially, Blair and Cameron had a story to tell. Today, even some Starmer allies admit privately he has yet to articulate a coherent narrative about his and his government's purpose. However, ministers and Labour backbenchers sense the spending review marks the overdue start of such a process. They detect an important shift – from a technocratic approach towards Labour's traditional goal of social justice: the winter fuel U-turn, an extension of free school meals and a £39bn boost for affordable housing. The biggest symbol of this change of tack will be measures to combat child poverty in the autumn, likely to include lifting the two-child benefit cap. That would be a break with the opinion poll-driven approach of Morgan McSweeney, Starmer's chief of staff. Although the cap is supported by the public, sometimes politicians have to lead public opinion rather than merely follow it. Aides insist Starmer's pragmatism is an asset that gives him the flexibility to try different approaches if Plan A doesn't work and to correct mistakes. But the absence of an ideological anchor can be a liability. To see off the real threat from Nigel Farage, Labour will need more than attacks on Reform UK; it will require a positive vision based on Labour values to woo centre-left voters. A crusade against child poverty will unite the Labour Party, while welfare cuts divide it. Soft-left ministers have a spring in their step: 'Things are moving in the right direction,' one told me. Indeed, the spending review was not dictated by 'Treasury orthodoxy' and the short-termism which often results in cutting investment projects to balance the books. Reeves addressed at least some of the long-term challenges facing the country. Labour's poor results in last month's local elections in England encouraged the rethink. They proved that caution isn't working. What is needed now is not old Labour but bold Labour. That will require more boldness and honesty on taxation. It's an open secret that, barring an economic miracle, Reeves will have to raise taxes in her autumn Budget. Significantly, she is not ruling it out, reverting to the formula Labour used before last year's election: there's nothing here (in the manifesto/spending review) requiring higher taxes. It's the politicians' old, disingenuous friend of 'no plans" used before Reeves raised taxes by £40bn in her first Budget. Starmer and Reeves should prepare the ground now by making the case for higher taxes to deliver better public services and the higher defence spending needed in the dangerous new world of Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. If they don't, the vacuum will be filled by months of damaging headlines predicting which taxes Reeves will raise – many of which will turn out to be wrong. If Starmer and Reeves don't make the case, a right-dominated press will blame the inevitable tax rises on Labour economic mismanagement. There is another story to tell. Although the public tend to prioritise avoiding tax increases over investing in public services, Labour can win the argument by exposing the fantasy economics of Reform and Tory plans to cut taxes and raise spending. Brown won such an argument when he raised national insurance to fund the NHS in 2002. Reeves' fiscal rules can provide the 'stability' and tax rises the 'change.' Labour must deliver both. Ministers need to start the debate on tax and spending that the country should have had before last year's election. Now.
Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Letter: British pensioners are among the poorest in Europe
The Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced that pensioners with taxable incomes of £35,000 or less will still receive the Winter Fuel Payment this winter. In the year ending March 2022, pensioners in the UK paid £19.5 billion in income tax. This tax was collected from pensioners whose total income - including State Pension, private pensions, and other taxable earnings - exceeded the £12,570 personal allowance threshold. If say the £200 Winter Fuel Payment (WFP) were spread out over a full year, it would equate to approximately £3.85 per week (£200 divided by 52 weeks). Shame it could not be added to the State Pension instead then there would have been no means testing. Even with the Triple Lock system, which ensures the pension rises annually by the highest of inflation, wage growth, or 2.5%, the UK State Pension remains below the minimum wage and is one of the lowest in Europe. For example, pensions in France, Spain, and Germany tend to be significantly higher. In contrast, pensioners in Luxembourg receive up to £5,426.93 per month, significantly more than in the UK. As for the £10 Christmas Bonus has remained unchanged since it was introduced by Edward Heath's Conservative government in 1972. If it had been adjusted for inflation, it would be worth around £165 today. Some estimates suggest it could be closer to £130.
South Wales Argus
4 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Senedd hears incoming NRW chair embroiled in rail funding row
Nilesh Sachdev, the Welsh Government's preferred candidate to take the helm at Natural Resources Wales (NRW), appeared before the Senedd's climate committee on June 11. On his CV, Mr Sachdev boasts of securing £6bn of UK Government investment as chair of East West Rail (ERW) which is leading on a new railway between Oxford and Cambridge. The railway was controversially reclassified as a Wales-and-England project by the UK Treasury, denying Wales any consequential funding through the Barnett formula. Llŷr Gruffydd, who chairs the committee, asked: 'I was just wondering whether you have any qualms about… how does it look that potentially the chair of one of the biggest public bodies in Wales is actually spending Welsh money on England-only projects?' During the pre-appointment hearing, Mr Sachdev replied: 'A very fair and reasonable ask, I guess, I think I'll turn it around the other way: what a great opportunity. 'I managed to persuade, through my board and chief executive, to get the government in England to give all that money to East West Rail, I wonder what we could do here. 'So, I think there's an opportunity of saying: how can we, in Wales, put a case forward that makes sure the money that Welsh taxpayers are paying stays here?' Mr Gruffydd pressed concerns about his involvement with ERW, saying: 'I know you don't decide where the money comes from – but you're the guy signing the cheques.' Asked about his motivation for wanting to be chair of NRW, Mr Sachdev pointed to his passion on climate change and a recent move to Bristol. 'In fact, it's quicker to get here than it would be from Abergavenny in the traffic,' he said. He told the committee: 'I want to play a part in a community I dearly respect and have an affection for in an area I deeply care about.' Pressed about his local links, the father of three confirmed he has never lived in Wales but said his wife's grandparents were born in Gower and his son attended Cardiff University."
