Price war sparks EV financial crisis concerns in China
BYD, the world's largest electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer, is facing growing challenges from an intensifying price war and a change in supplier payment regulations in China, raising market concerns about the company's financial stability.
On May 23, the Shenzhen-based EV maker initiated a price war in China by offering discounts of 10 to 30%. It priced some affordable models under 150,000 yuan (US$20,890), and the Xia MPV (multi-purpose vehicle) at around 200,000 yuan. It also offers its Ocean range's Seagull at a starting price of 55,800 yuan, down from the official guide price of 69,800 yuan.
BYD's Hong Kong-listed shares have fallen by 15.5% from their peak of HK$155 (US$19.7) on May 23. The company's market cap has decreased by some US$22 billion over the period.
BYD executive vice president Stella Li told Bloomberg in an interview on June 12 that the 'very extreme, tough competition' in the Chinese EV market is unsustainable.
Li did not say whether BYD would scale back its discount program, but she stated that the company will invest up to $20 billion to expand its operations in Europe over the next few years. She highlighted Germany, the United Kingdom and Italy as BYD's key European markets.
'If we decide to do something, we put all our resources behind it,' she said, referring to the company's commitment to after-sales service in Europe. 'We want to ensure it's successful in the long run.'
Last October, the European Union imposed tariffs ranging from 17% to 35.3% on Chinese EVs (BYD: 17%, Geely: 18.8%, SAIC and others: 35.3%). China suggested setting minimum prices for the EVs it ships to the EU. Both sides are still negotiating the matter.
In March, BYD said it is considering setting up its third European assembly plant in Germany. It has a factory in Hungary and is building another in Turkey.
When BYD announced its price cuts on May 23, one of its rivals warned of a possible Evergrande-like debt crisis in China's auto sector on the same day. (Evergrande is China's highly indebted property company that has come to epitomise the sector's ongoing crisis.)
'An Evergrande of the auto industry already exists, though it has yet to explode,' Wei Jianjun, chairman of Great Wall Motors, said in an interview without naming any company.
'The current automobile industry is facing a serious problem of being coerced by capital,' Wei said. 'Some automakers are addicted to burning money for market share.'
He said some Chinese automakers over-rely on financing from the capital market to boost production scale and market share, but ignore their profitability and technological innovation.
He said these firms' capital chains will break if the market environment changes. He stated that the bankruptcy of any large auto firm would result in many people losing their jobs, harm upstream and downstream companies, and negatively impact the Chinese economy.
Li Yunfei, general manager of BYD's brand and public relations division, responded to Wei's comments in a Weibo post on May 30.
'Following the stunning comments made by Great Wall Motors' Wei, many articles and videos said BYD is an Evergrande in the auto sector,' Li said. 'I feel confused and angry, and find these comments laughable.'
'If BYD's debt-to-asset ratio (70%) is a sign of high risk, are Ford (84%), General Motors (76%), and Geely (68%) all at risk?' he said.
He said many malicious commentators ignored that BYD's interest-bearing debts and accounts payable are lower than many other players. He added that Chinese EVs have become mainstream products overseas and will continue to see good prospects.
The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) said on May 31 that automakers should avoid disorderly price wars and maintain fair competition.
The People's Daily commented that consumers would not benefit from price wars, which would drive automakers to use low-quality parts, reduce after-sales service and cut research and development expenses. Citing industry data, the newspaper reported that the average net margin of Chinese automakers fell to 4.3% in 2024, down from 5% in 2023.
For 2024, BYD's net profit rose 34% to 40.3 billion yuan, while revenue grew 29% to 777.1 billion yuan.
At the end of 2024, the company's total debt rose 10.3% to 584 billion yuan, and its total assets increased 15.3% to 783 billion yuan. Its debt-to-asset ratio, or debt ratio, fell 3.2 percentage points to 74.64%.
For the same period, Nio, a Shanghai-based EV maker, had a debt ratio of 87.45%, and Great Wall Motors' was 65.96%. Heavily indebted Chinese property developers have around 60-90% debt ratios.
However, accounting consultancy GMT Research said in January that BYD's net debt might be 323 billion yuan as of mid-2024, contrasting with the official figure of 27.7 billion yuan.
It stated that the company's Dilink platform, a supply chain financing system, may conceal a substantial amount of off-balance sheet debt. In other words, BYD may have delayed supplier payments.
Wang Guo-chen, an assistant researcher at Taiwan's Chung-hua Institute for Economic Research (CIER), said BYD is only one of the many Chinese firms struggling to survive in an oversupplied market.
On March 25, China's State Council amended the Regulation on Ensuring Payments to Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, requiring companies to pay their suppliers within 60 days, effective June 1.
BYD said on June 11 that it will standardize its payment period for suppliers to 60 days. Observers said automakers may thus report higher debt ratios in the second half.
Read: Sugon, its suppliers hit by US sanctions, to merge with Hygon
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asia Times
8 hours ago
- Asia Times
World's most powerful ex-New Yorker gets a DC military parade
Donald Trump's plan for a military parade on June 14, 2025, officially to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army as well as coinciding with the president's 79th birthday, is yet another indication of his affinity for authoritarian leaders and regimes. Although the parade, which will include 6,000 soldiers, 150 military vehicles and 50 helicopters − and will temporarily close Reagan National Airport and cost more than US$45 million − is ostensibly to celebrate the military, the idea is pure Trump. When pressed about his desire for the parade, the president has explained his reasoning for having the parade. 'We had more to do with winning World War II than any other nation. Why don't we have a Victory Day? So we're going to have a Victory Day for World War I and for World War II.' While big military parades in Washington, D.C., other than immediately following a major military victory, are largely without precedent, there is another American city that has a much richer tradition of parades. That city is New York. New York is a parade town. It's also a city with which Trump has a long, complex relationship. Trump was born in New York and began his business career there. Before Trump was a politician, or even a reality TV star, he was a fixture in the New York tabloids. His marriages, divorces, dating life and business successes and failures were splashed across more headlines than can be easily counted beginning in the early 1980s, but Trump was always presented as a clownish figure, albeit a very rich one. In those years, continuing into the first decade of this century, the local media always presented him as gaudy, loud and not quite as business savvy as he claimed – hence the coverage of his bankruptcies. While much of the rest of the country bought the Trump narrative that he was a brilliant businessman surrounded by beautiful women, doting staff and fawning celebrities, many New Yorkers never did. New Yorkers, including me, remembered an earlier Trump who almost ran the family business into the ground over many years. Nonetheless, New York has always been important to Trump. Although he still is a well-done steak with ketchup kind of guy, while New York is a soup dumplings, or bagels and lox, or arroz con pollo, or even caviar kind of town, Trump still has a connection to this city and wants to be celebrated here. And the city celebrates with big parades honoring everything from sports championships, which used to be much more common for New York teams, to the U.S. winning wars, most recently following the first Gulf War in 1991. Additionally, New York has parades for many of the hundreds of ethnic groups that make up the city. For decades on Thanksgiving Day, as they roast their turkey, prepare the stuffing and finalize preparations for the traditional feast, millions of Americans have watched the Thanksgiving parade, which is always held in Manhattan, frequently referred to as the Macy's Day parade because Macy's has long sponsored the event. In many of New York City's legendary parades, including those celebrating LGBTQ+ pride, the Puerto Rican Day Parade, St. Patrick's Day, West Indian American Day and others, politicians march, often in the lead, alongside their constituents. Some, like the Thanksgiving parade, have their own rituals, such as watching the balloons being inflated behind the American Museum of Natural History on the evening before Thanksgiving. However, the most famous of all parade types in New York is the ticker-tape parade. Dating from the days when paper, not computers, dominated trading floors and offices, people would throw ticker tape and other papers out their windows as the parade passed through the Financial District area that became known as the Canyon of Heroes. Not all New York parades are the same. Some, like the Thanksgiving parade, are simply fun and celebratory. Ticker-tape parades honor individuals or groups that have accomplished something significant, like landing on the Moon or winning the Super Bowl. They can recognize important foreign guests and dignitaries, while other parades celebrate the contributions of various peoples or groups of New Yorkers. But New Yorkers never throw parades for their politicians and tend to favor drums and floats rather than tanks and soldiers at these events. An avalanche of confetti rains down on Aug. 13, 1969, honoring the three astronauts of the Apollo 11 mission, who became the first people to walk on the Moon. Bettman/Getty Images While there are parades for all kinds of people and events in New York, there has never been a parade there for Donald Trump. There was a pretty massive street party in the city when it was announced that Trump had lost the 2020 election. Although Trump changed his primary residence to Florida in 2019, Trump was a New Yorker for many years and like many longtime residents had the chance to see many heroes – Mickey Mantle, John Glenn, Tom Seaver, Derek Jeter, Eli Manning, Nelson Mandela, American war veterans, numerous foreign leaders and many others – feted with a parade down the Canyon of Heroes. Jeter was celebrated five times, John Glenn and Mickey Mantle twice. It is impossible to know Trump's motivations for pushing the parade in the nation's capital. But we also know that he is a man who holds himself in high regard and craves attention. Trump will likely never get a parade in his erstwhile hometown, so Washington must be the next best thing. Trump's newfound parade fetish underscores his love-hate relationship with New York. New York is the city that made him famous and made his family, primarily because of his father's work, very rich. It is also the city that has repeatedly rejected Trump. It is the home of some of his worst real estate deals, the place where the business community lost patience with his antics and unwillingness to pay contractors, and where three times the voters turned out in huge numbers against him. A Washington, D.C., parade celebrating an unappreciated New Yorker who years ago decamped to Florida and Washington is a pale imitation of the Canyon of Heroes, where New Yorkers honor beloved leaders, war heroes, explorers and their favorite sports stars. But it is all Trump has. Lincoln Mitchell is a lecturer, School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Asia Times
11 hours ago
- Asia Times
When Trump and Albanese talk defense
Ahead of a prospective meeting between Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and US President Donald Trump at the G7 Summit Canada, two key developments have bumped defense issues to the top of the alliance agenda. First, in a meeting with Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles late last month, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth urged Australia to boost defense spending to 3.5% of gross domestic product (GDP). This elicited a stern response from Albanese that 'Australia should decide what we spend on Australia's defense.' Then, this week, news emerged that the Pentagon is conducting a review of the AUKUS deal to ensure it aligns with Trump's 'America First' agenda. Speculation is rife as to the reasons for the review. Some contend it's a classic Trump 'shakedown' to force Australia to pay more for its submarines, while others say it's a normal move for any new US administration. The reality is somewhere in between. Trump may well see an opportunity to 'own' the AUKUS deal negotiated by his predecessor, Joe Biden, by seeking to extract a 'better deal' from Australia. But while support for AUKUS across the US system is strong, the review also reflects long-standing and bipartisan concerns in the US over the deal. These include, among other things, Australia's functional and fiscal capacity to take charge of its own nuclear-powered submarines once they are built. So, why have these issues come up now, just before Albanese's first face-to-face meeting with Trump? To understand this, it's important to place both issues in a wider context. We need to consider the Trump administration's overall approach to alliances, as well as whether Australia's defense budget matches our strategy. Senior Pentagon figures noted months ago that defense spending was their 'main concern' with Australia in an otherwise 'excellent' relationship. But such concerns are not exclusive to Australia. Rather, they speak to Trump's broader approach to alliances worldwide – he wants US allies in Europe and Asia to share more of the burden, as well. Trump's team sees defense spending (calculated as a percentage of GDP) as a basic indicator of an ally's seriousness about both their own national defense and collective security with Washington. As Hegseth noted in testimony before Congress this week, 'we can't want [our allies'] security more than they do.' US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, right, welcomes Australian Deputy Prime Minister and DefenSe Minister Richard Marles, left, before the start of their meeting at the Pentagon in February 2025. Photo: Manuel Balce Ceneta / AP via The Conversation Initially, the Trump administration's burden-sharing grievances with NATO received the most attention. The government demanded European allies boost spending to 5% of GDP in the interests of what prominent MAGA figures have called 'burden-owning.' Several analysts interpreted these demands as indicative of what will be asked of Asian partners, including Australia. In reality, what Washington wants from European and Indo-Pacific allies differs in small but important ways. In Europe, the Trump administration wants allies to assume near-total responsibility for their own defense to enable the US to focus on bigger strategic priorities. These include border security at home and, importantly, Chinese military power in the Indo-Pacific. By contrast, Trump's early moves on defense policy in Asia have emphasized a degree of cooperation and mutual benefit. The administration has explicitly linked its burden-sharing demands with a willingness to work with its allies – Japan, South Korea, Australia and others – in pursuit of a strategy of collective defense to deter Chinese aggression. This reflects a long-standing recognition in Washington that America needs its allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific perhaps more than anywhere else in the world. The reason: to support US forces across the vast Pacific and Indian oceans and to counter China's growing ability to disrupt US military operations across the region. In other words, the US must balance its demands of Indo-Pacific allies with the knowledge that it also needs their help to succeed in Asia. This means the Albanese government can and should engage the Trump administration with confidence on defense matters – including AUKUS. It has a lot to offer America, not just a lot to lose. But a discussion over Australia's defense spending is not simply a matter of alliance management. It also speaks to the genuine challenges Australia faces in matching its strategy with its resources. Albanese is right to say Australia will set its own defense policy based on its needs rather than an arbitrary percentage of GDP determined by Washington. But it's also true Australia's defense budget must match the aspirations and requirements set out in its 2024 National Defense Strategy. This is necessary for our defence posture to be credible. This document paints a sobering picture of the increasingly fraught strategic environment Australia finds itself in. And it outlines an ambitious capability development agenda to allow Australia to do its part to maintain the balance of power in the region, alongside the United States and other partners. But there is growing concern in the Australian policy community that our defence budget is insufficient to meet these goals. For instance, one of the lead authors of Australia's 2023 Defence Strategic Review, Sir Angus Houston, mused last year that in order for AUKUS submarines to be a 'net addition' to the nation's military capability, Australia would need to increase its defence spending to more than 3% of GDP through the 2030s. Otherwise, he warned, AUKUS would 'cannibalize' investments in Australia's surface fleet, long-range strike capabilities, air and missile defence, and other capabilities. There's evidence the Australian government understands this, too. Marles and the minister for defense industry, Pat Conroy, have both said the government is willing to 'have a conversation' about increasing spending, if required to meet Australia's strategic needs. This is all to say that an additional push from Trump on defense spending and burden-sharing – however unpleasantly delivered – would not be out of the ordinary. And it may, in fact, be beneficial for Australia's own deliberations on its defense spending needs. Thomas Corben is research fellow, foreign policy and defense, University of Sydney This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Asia Times
14 hours ago
- Asia Times
Price war sparks EV financial crisis concerns in China
BYD, the world's largest electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer, is facing growing challenges from an intensifying price war and a change in supplier payment regulations in China, raising market concerns about the company's financial stability. On May 23, the Shenzhen-based EV maker initiated a price war in China by offering discounts of 10 to 30%. It priced some affordable models under 150,000 yuan (US$20,890), and the Xia MPV (multi-purpose vehicle) at around 200,000 yuan. It also offers its Ocean range's Seagull at a starting price of 55,800 yuan, down from the official guide price of 69,800 yuan. BYD's Hong Kong-listed shares have fallen by 15.5% from their peak of HK$155 (US$19.7) on May 23. The company's market cap has decreased by some US$22 billion over the period. BYD executive vice president Stella Li told Bloomberg in an interview on June 12 that the 'very extreme, tough competition' in the Chinese EV market is unsustainable. Li did not say whether BYD would scale back its discount program, but she stated that the company will invest up to $20 billion to expand its operations in Europe over the next few years. She highlighted Germany, the United Kingdom and Italy as BYD's key European markets. 'If we decide to do something, we put all our resources behind it,' she said, referring to the company's commitment to after-sales service in Europe. 'We want to ensure it's successful in the long run.' Last October, the European Union imposed tariffs ranging from 17% to 35.3% on Chinese EVs (BYD: 17%, Geely: 18.8%, SAIC and others: 35.3%). China suggested setting minimum prices for the EVs it ships to the EU. Both sides are still negotiating the matter. In March, BYD said it is considering setting up its third European assembly plant in Germany. It has a factory in Hungary and is building another in Turkey. When BYD announced its price cuts on May 23, one of its rivals warned of a possible Evergrande-like debt crisis in China's auto sector on the same day. (Evergrande is China's highly indebted property company that has come to epitomise the sector's ongoing crisis.) 'An Evergrande of the auto industry already exists, though it has yet to explode,' Wei Jianjun, chairman of Great Wall Motors, said in an interview without naming any company. 'The current automobile industry is facing a serious problem of being coerced by capital,' Wei said. 'Some automakers are addicted to burning money for market share.' He said some Chinese automakers over-rely on financing from the capital market to boost production scale and market share, but ignore their profitability and technological innovation. He said these firms' capital chains will break if the market environment changes. He stated that the bankruptcy of any large auto firm would result in many people losing their jobs, harm upstream and downstream companies, and negatively impact the Chinese economy. Li Yunfei, general manager of BYD's brand and public relations division, responded to Wei's comments in a Weibo post on May 30. 'Following the stunning comments made by Great Wall Motors' Wei, many articles and videos said BYD is an Evergrande in the auto sector,' Li said. 'I feel confused and angry, and find these comments laughable.' 'If BYD's debt-to-asset ratio (70%) is a sign of high risk, are Ford (84%), General Motors (76%), and Geely (68%) all at risk?' he said. He said many malicious commentators ignored that BYD's interest-bearing debts and accounts payable are lower than many other players. He added that Chinese EVs have become mainstream products overseas and will continue to see good prospects. The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) said on May 31 that automakers should avoid disorderly price wars and maintain fair competition. The People's Daily commented that consumers would not benefit from price wars, which would drive automakers to use low-quality parts, reduce after-sales service and cut research and development expenses. Citing industry data, the newspaper reported that the average net margin of Chinese automakers fell to 4.3% in 2024, down from 5% in 2023. For 2024, BYD's net profit rose 34% to 40.3 billion yuan, while revenue grew 29% to 777.1 billion yuan. At the end of 2024, the company's total debt rose 10.3% to 584 billion yuan, and its total assets increased 15.3% to 783 billion yuan. Its debt-to-asset ratio, or debt ratio, fell 3.2 percentage points to 74.64%. For the same period, Nio, a Shanghai-based EV maker, had a debt ratio of 87.45%, and Great Wall Motors' was 65.96%. Heavily indebted Chinese property developers have around 60-90% debt ratios. However, accounting consultancy GMT Research said in January that BYD's net debt might be 323 billion yuan as of mid-2024, contrasting with the official figure of 27.7 billion yuan. It stated that the company's Dilink platform, a supply chain financing system, may conceal a substantial amount of off-balance sheet debt. In other words, BYD may have delayed supplier payments. Wang Guo-chen, an assistant researcher at Taiwan's Chung-hua Institute for Economic Research (CIER), said BYD is only one of the many Chinese firms struggling to survive in an oversupplied market. On March 25, China's State Council amended the Regulation on Ensuring Payments to Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, requiring companies to pay their suppliers within 60 days, effective June 1. BYD said on June 11 that it will standardize its payment period for suppliers to 60 days. Observers said automakers may thus report higher debt ratios in the second half. Read: Sugon, its suppliers hit by US sanctions, to merge with Hygon
