logo
I've always paid my own way — but my younger sister is a spoilt brat

I've always paid my own way — but my younger sister is a spoilt brat

Metro7 days ago
Sibling rivalry can be intense at the best of times. But when you add in favouritism (or even the belief that one side's getting preferential treatment) things get really ugly.
Nina, a 41-year-old Metro reader from Glasgow, has long believed her sister is babied by their parents.
While her mum and dad play down their youngest daughter's financial dependence to avoid conflict, Nina's worried about what'll happen when they're older and need support themselves.
In this week's Money Problem, personal finance journalist and consumer champion, Sarah Davidson, shares her perspective.
If you've got a money problem you'd like Sarah to look into, fill in this online form or email sarah.davidson@metro.co.uk, providing as much detail about your situation as possible.
No issue is too big or small, and all submissions will be treated with the strictest confidence.
My sister is only nine years younger than me, but she might as well be a child when it comes to money – and our parents enable her helplessness, much to my annoyance.
While I've worked since I was 16, moved out by 18 and have never taken a handout from my mum and dad (not that they've ever offered) she's still living at home and can't seem to hold on to a job for more than a few months at a time.
She doesn't pay a penny in rent and my dad covers all her bills and spending, which I know for a fact he can't really afford. I could probably accept this if she at least helped them out in other ways but she barely lifts a finger, as if it's her right to be bankrolled and waited on around the house.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Whenever I mention how spoilt she is, my mum and dad tell me not to be spiteful. But why is she allowed to sponge off them while I've had to graft? Are they really going to spend their retirement funding her mistakes? And what happens when they can't take care of her anymore – will I be expected to take her in? It's all so unfair.
Dear Nina,
The fate of the elder sister – you're the first to grow up, push your parents' boundaries, get into trouble and to take responsibility for yourself.
To eldest siblings everywhere (and I count myself among you) it can sometimes seem like a tough deal. If I totted up how much money I spent at 25 buying loo roll for my brother, then 22 and living with me in London for 'just a few weeks' (two years), well…
But spare a thought for younger siblings too – they're constantly being compared to you. Either they don't do as well or they feel under pressure to outperform you. They're not only being bossed around by your parents, but also by you. Their big achievements aren't a first for your family – you and any other siblings you share have probably already got that T-shirt.
And middle children? Let's not even go there. At least the youngest is the baby of the family and, like your own sister it would seem, is indulged where the rest of you were perhaps expected to stand on your own two feet rather sooner.
As you correctly identify, it's all so unfair. But then, you don't need me to tell you life isn't fair.
Most brothers and sisters want their parents to treat them the same. However, rather than focusing on feeling hard done by, maybe look at it another way. I'd argue that parents are inherently programmed to nurture their children according to their needs – and different children have different needs.
You're feeling put out because you perceive your sister as being given exactly what she wants. Your parents might see it differently. Consider this: is being at home for now actually be what she needs? It sounds like you are a self-starter and she isn't. Why is that? Does she need a little bit more support?
Now, it may be that your sister is taking advantage of your parents here. She wouldn't be the first. But forget her for a moment. What is it you're really annoyed about in this situation?
'Are my parents really going to spend their retirement funding her mistakes,' you ask. 'Why is she allowed to sponge off them while I've had to graft? And what happens when they can't take care of her anymore – will I be expected to take her in?'
This isn't about your sister. It's about you. What you really mean is, why are they spending your inheritance on her ?
All of this comes down to choices, Nina. Ultimately, this isn't your decision to make. It's your parents' money and they're entitled to spend it on whatever they like. Obviously, right now they want to spend it on your sister.
Whatever the reason and whether it's fair or not, it's their choice and you should probably respect it. If you don't, it will inevitably harm your relationship with them and, even, with your sister.
Instead of fretting, consider why you care about this situation so much. Do you need some help with money? Are you feeling neglected by your parents? Or your own relationships at home? Are you equating money with love? More Trending
Try talking to them about how you feel. Do it with grace and lay out your reasons for being uncomfortable with the situation. And before you start, have in mind what outcome you want from this.
Nobody likes a spoilt brat, but nobody likes a moaner either.
Sarah Davidson is an award-winning financial editor and head of research at WPB .
View More »
Got a money worry or dilemma? Email sarah.davidson@metro.co.uk
Do you have a story to share?
Get in touch by emailing MetroLifestyleTeam@Metro.co.uk.
MORE: No parent should feel the need to apologise when their child cries
MORE: I tried to give Gran a hug – her reaction still haunts me
MORE: Pass the parcel? My child is invited to parties with hummers and helicopters
Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

American Airlines jet with 182 people on board goes up in flames
American Airlines jet with 182 people on board goes up in flames

Metro

time19 hours ago

  • Metro

American Airlines jet with 182 people on board goes up in flames

To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video An American Airlines plane with 182 people on board was forced to abort takeoff due to a fire. All 176 passengers and six cabin crew members evacuate the airplane via the emergency slide on the runway at Denver Airport, Colorado as smoke billowed from the fuselage. The Boeing 737 MAX 8, bound for Miami, was preparing to take to the sky when a technical issue with a tyre required pilots to abandon the takeoff. Footage shows flames engulfing the rear end of the aircraft as passengers slid down the slide, running away in the opposite direction. One person on the flight was taken to hospital where they were treated for minor injuries, ABC News reported. Audio from Air Traffic Control shows the captain being informed of smoke and flames coming from the plane after aborting the takeoff. They were told by a controller: 'You've got a lot of smoke'. One passenger, Mark Tsurkis, 50, said he heard a 'loud boom' before the aircraft suddenly slowed down. 'When the plane stopped about 30 seconds to a minute later, somebody said, 'Smoke, fire.' And then a lot of people, of course, started panicking', he added. A statement from the FAA said: 'American Airlines Flight 3023 reported a possible landing gear incident during departure from Denver International Airport around 2.45 ppm local time Saturday, July 26. 'Passengers evacuated on the runway and are being transported to the terminal by bus. 'The Boeing 737 MAX 8 was headed to Miami International Airport. The FAA will investigate. Contact the airline for additional information.' More Trending American Airlines said it had arranged a replacement flight to Miami for the passengers, which departed later on Saturday. A spokesperson for the airline said: 'American Airlines flight 3023 experienced a maintenance issue prior to takeoff at Denver International Airport. 'All customers and crew deplaned safely and the aircraft was taken out of service to be inspected by our maintenance team. 'We thank our team members for their professionalism and apologise to our customers for their experience.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Pastor and wife took $3,400,000 from congregation in crypto scam attributed to God MORE: The 'best' restaurant in the US is officially coming to London MORE: Man pockets £1,500,000 after accidentally buying two identical lottery tickets

My lover praised my oral skills - but I wasn't happy
My lover praised my oral skills - but I wasn't happy

Metro

time3 days ago

  • Metro

My lover praised my oral skills - but I wasn't happy

As I watched Dennis* trying to catch his breath, a smile spread across my face. He had enjoyed the blowjob I had just given him, that much was obvious. It was our first time having sex and we had just ended an hour-long penetrative session with a little bit of oral. 'That was a real treat, most women I've slept with aren't usually that keen to give head,' Dennis chuckled. I stayed silent as I contemplated what my lover had just said. Most women that I know aren't opposed to oral sex – far from it. In fact, they often receive far less head than they give. It's not about being 'keen'. It's about communication. But what bothered me more was how Dennis talked about oral sex as if it was some sort of rare reward I had bestowed upon him. Love reading juicy stories like this? Need some tips for how to spice things up in the bedroom? Sign up to The Hook-Up and we'll slide into your inbox every week with all the latest sex and dating stories from Metro. We can't wait for you to join us! I wasn't offended by his words – he was clearly trying to compliment me – but his delivery was clumsy. This old experience came to my mind earlier this month, when I received some truly excellent head from my current boyfriend. Alex and I have been together for two years, so he knows that I rarely orgasm from penetrative sex and like to use my – or his – hands to finish the job. But recently, he has also started giving me head during our sessions. He'll randomly throw this into the mix at any given point, which is partly why I like it so much – there's no big fuss. And that, for me, is the key. I have never really understood why some sex acts are considered a special occasion, whether that be Valentine's Day anal or a Birthday Blowjob. So here's my controversial opinion: Oral sex is just sex. And treating it as anything else could actually have a detrimental impact on your sex life. A few years back, I was chatting to a male friend of mine who shared that his partner only gives him head on special occasions. Similarly, I have another friend who desperately wants more oral sex from her other half but doesn't know how to raise it – because it's a huge deal in their relationship. It's not an everyday occurrence, which pushes it further out of reach. I do understand how giving head can become exceptionally significant. Funnily enough, I actively made a point of telling men I wasn't into oral when I was younger. 'I'd rather have sex, it feels better,' I told them. This wasn't necessarily a lie – I do prefer penetrative sex to oral on most days, even now – but looking back, I also didn't enjoy the pressure that came along with it. Many of my lovers wanted a pat on the back afterwards, whether they were talented or not. It was as if they expected me to be grateful, again like it was a treat. One former funbuddy, Jonny, was so blown away by my oral sex gusto that he told me he 'preferred' me giving him head to having sex – which was apparently high praise (though I didn't take it that way). He would go out of his way to not-so-subtly hint that he was keen for more head every time we met up. The expectation got so tiresome that I eventually stopped having sex with him altogether. I never raised it with him. We had a very casual relationship, so I didn't really feel the need or obligation – though I did roll my eyes on more than one occasion. But that's the thing with any so-called special event. If you build it up too much, it can turn into a loaded situation, like a big birthday or a New Year's Eve party. By contrast, one of my favourite-ever experiences of getting head was actually during a one-night-stand. Vince was younger than me, so I hadn't expected the sex to be as good as it was, nor had I thought I'd receive oral. He took me by surprise. We had just finished having penetrative sex, when I bent over to pick up something from the floor – and he promptly told me to 'stay where you are' before proceeding to give me oral. Afterwards, we briefly discussed what he had done and I made a point to say it was nice. 'It's not a big deal,' he replied. It was refreshing to hear from a man, and he was absolutely right. More Trending Even if I didn't fully get it back then, I do now. Getting or receiving head is not an indulgence or the Holy Grail. We'd all be better off if we stopped treating oral as a big name special guest appearance on the show that is our sex life. It's just a beloved series regular. View More » *Names have been changed Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing Share your views in the comments below. MORE: Search for 'migrant hotels near me' has rocketed – it's chilling MORE: The way you watch porn is changing today — here's everything you need to know MORE: I love Sherlock but a reboot would be the worst idea ever

British families of Air India victims sent wrong bodies ‘commingled' in coffins
British families of Air India victims sent wrong bodies ‘commingled' in coffins

Metro

time5 days ago

  • Metro

British families of Air India victims sent wrong bodies ‘commingled' in coffins

Grieving loved ones of those who were killed in the Air India crash are being sent the wrong bodies. Some of the remains of the 261 victims have been wrongly identified before being repatriated to families in the UK. The relatives of one victim was even forced to abandon their funeral plans after being told the coffin contained the body of an unknown passenger. In one case the remains of two victims who have been 'commingled' together have also been placed in the same casket. They had to be separated before the funeral took place. Inner West London coroner Dr Fiona Wilcox has ordered all repatriated bodies to be matched with DNA samples provided by the families. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video So far there have been two confirmed cases of mistaken identity. An inquiry has opened between British and Indian authorities, with Prime Minister Keir Starmer set to raise concerns to his counterpart Narenda Modi on his state visit to Britain this week. Some 52 passengers on the flight 171 were Britons departing Ahmedabad for London Gatwick when the aircraft lost power on June 12. Aviation lawyer James Healy-Pratt who is representing many of the families said the bodies of 12 British nationals have been repatriated back to the UK. He told The Mail: 'I've been sitting down in the homes of these lovely British families over the last month, and the first thing they want is their loved ones back. 'But some of them have got the wrong remains and they are clearly distraught over this. It has been going on for a couple of weeks (and) I think these families deserve an explanation.' Altaf Taju, from Blackburn, whose parents Adam, 72 and Hasina, 70, died in the crash along with their son-in-law Altafhusen Patel, 51, said he was not able to look at any of the remains to check. He said: 'They just said, 'This is your mother or father', and gave us a paper label with an ID number on it. We had to take their word for it. It's horrific that this could have happened, but what could anyone do?' One family, who he referred to as Family X, had to cancel the funeral service after being given the wrong person in the casket. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 'Family X have no-one to bury because it was the wrong person in their casket. And if isn't their relative, the question is, who is it in that coffin? Presumably it's another passenger and their relatives have been given the wrong remains,' he added. More Trending Recovery teams used sniffer dogs and search equipment to find the bodies, with locals also volunteering to help sift through the smoldering remains. Within three days all of the victims were believed to have been found, but most bodies were burnt beyond recognition. A government spokesperson said: 'Formal identification of bodies is a matter for the Indian authorities. 'We understand that this is an extremely distressing time for the families, and our thoughts remain with them.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Airline founded by UK millionaire 'parks' only plane — after two return flights MORE: easyJet's summer 2026 sale is here – these are the best destinations to book now MORE: British airport announces 'major redesign' including new restaurants and runway views

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store