Japan PM says win-win trade deal with US may be hard to implement
'Some say that carrying the trade deal out is harder than agreeing on it. I humbly seek your continued support on this,' Ishiba said on Monday (Aug 4) in response to questions in parliament.
At the same session of parliament, Japan's chief trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa acknowledged criticism over the lack of having anything in writing.
'It's my understanding that having something on paper would be helpful,' Akazawa said, adding that there's also nothing in writing related to Washington's deals with the EU and South Korea.
The comments underscore the vast uncertainties related to the raft of global trade deals, even after a deadline for higher tariffs was reached on Aug 1. Washington agreed to assess a 15 per cent across-the-board levy on imports from Japan, a lower rate than the previously threatened 25 per cent. The fate of auto tariffs is still unclear.
Ishiba, under pressure after last month's setback in the upper house election, has vowed to stay on as premier in order to ensure the trade deal is fully implemented. A few days after the election, Ishiba secured the surprise trade deal that delivered relatively better results to Japan compared with other nations.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
The car tariffs, currently at 27.5 per cent including a pre-existing 2.5 per cent rate, have delivered a major blow to the Japanese economy as the sector is the biggest source of exports to the US and accounts for roughly 10 per cent of economic output.
'We should first devote all our efforts to properly lowering automobile tariffs, which are most closely related to our national interests, and to getting a presidential order issued,' Ishiba said.
Support for Ishiba's Cabinet rose four percentage points to 36.8 per cent in a poll conducted over the weekend by JNN. Support for Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party nudged lower from the previous month's survey to 20.4 per cent, while the right-wing Sanseito party saw its support rise four points to 10.2 per cent, making it the second most-popular party.
Pressed on when the government might implement subsidies meant to help households cope with soaring living costs, Ishiba said that it would depend on discussions with other parties.
The setback in last month's election resulted in the government losing its majority in the upper house, after it lost its lower house majority last October. It's the first time in 70 years that an LDP-led coalition is having to govern without a majority in either house of parliament. BLOOMBERG
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
7 minutes ago
- Straits Times
EU to suspend US tariff countermeasures for 6 months
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox BRUSSELS - The European Union will suspend its two packages of countermeasures to U.S. tariffs for six months following a deal with U.S. President Donald Trump, a Commission spokesperson said on Monday. The EU-U.S. agreement leaves many questions open, including tariff rates on spirits, and Trump's executive order last week setting tariffs on most EU goods at 15% did not include carve-outs such as for cars and car parts. EU officials have said they expect more executive orders to follow soon. "The EU continues to work with the U.S. to finalise a Joint Statement, as agreed on 27 July," the spokesperson said in a statement. "With these objectives in mind, the Commission will take the necessary steps to suspend by 6 months the EU's countermeasures against the US, which were due to enter into force on 7 August." The retaliatory tariffs are in two parts: one in response to U.S. steel and aluminium duties, and the other to Trump's baseline and car tariffs. REUTERS
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Tesla approves share award worth US$29 billion to CEO Elon Musk
[AUSTIN] Tesla has granted CEO Elon Musk shares worth about US$29 billion, in a new pay deal aimed at keeping the billionaire entrepreneur at the helm during a crucial pivot from its struggling core auto business to robotaxis and humanoid robots. The company described the grant of the 96 million new shares as a first step, 'good faith' payment to honor Musk's more than US$50 billion pay package from 2018 that was struck down by a Delaware court last year. A longer-term CEO compensation plan will be put to a vote at its annual investor meeting on Nov 6. The Delaware ruling had cited flaws in the board's approval process and unfairness to investors. Musk kicked off an appeal against the order in March, claiming a lower court judge made multiple legal errors in rescinding the record compensation. The world's most valuable automaker is at a turning point, with Musk, its largest shareholder with a 13 per cent stake, positioning it more as an AI and robotics company amid falling sales in its mainstay auto business and a slump in its share price. The share award is designed to gradually boost Musk's voting power, something he and shareholders have consistently insisted was key to keeping him focused on Tesla's mission, said a special committee Tesla formed earlier this year to consider Musk's compensation. It consists of chair Robyn Denholm and independent director Kathleen Wilson-Thompson. 'While we recognise Elon's business ventures, interests and other potential demands on his time and attention are extensive and wide-ranging... we are confident this award will incentivise Elon to remain at Tesla,' the committee said in Monday's (Aug 4) filing. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The new shares vest only if Musk remains in a key executive role through 2027. They also have a five-year holding period, except to cover tax payments or the purchase price of US$23.34 per share, which is equal to the exercise price of the 2018 award. If the Delaware courts fully reinstate the 2018 CEO Performance Award, the new interim grant will either be forfeited or offset and there will be no 'double dip,' according to the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 'This is simply a repackaged version of what was done years ago and was ruled improper by a judge,' said Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware. 'It renders the Delaware court decision effectively meaningless,' said Elson, who had filed amicus briefs supporting the Delaware Court's decision to void Musk's 2018 award. Auto business struggles Gary Black, a longtime Tesla investor who sold his position recently, said on X the award should be viewed 'very favourably' for the company as it aligns Musk's incentives with the shareholders and removes uncertainty about him leaving. Tesla shares rose more than 2 per cent in premarket trading. They have gained almost 2,000 per cent in the past decade, far outperforming the around 200 per cent increase in the benchmark S&P 500 index. But the stock has come under pressure this year, losing about a quarter of its value as Tesla grapples with a sales decline wrought by its aging vehicle line-up, tough competition and Musk's political stances that have alienated some buyers. The challenges have been worsened by US government cuts in support for EVs. Musk said at a post-earnings call last month the waning subsidies could lead to a 'few rough quarters' before a wave of revenue from self-driving software and services begins late next year. Analysts expect Tesla to post another annual sales decline in 2025 after its first one last year. S&P Global Mobility data shared exclusively with Reuters showed on Monday that Tesla's brand loyalty had plunged since Musk endorsed US President Donald Trump last summer. The world's most powerful person and its richest had a falling out earlier this year. And Musk has raised fears about whether he will be able to devote enough time and attention to Tesla after he locked horns with Trump by forming a new political party. The company also faces a long regulatory road to its robotaxi bet. It started a small trial of its robotaxis in Austin, Texas, June with about a dozen Model Y SUVs. But it lacks permits to offer the service in California, where it last week launched a ride-hailing service in the San Francisco Bay Area without indicating whether it would be using self-driving vehicles that power its Austin operations. REUTERS
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Brexit's parallels with Trump tariffs tell a tale
In figuring out why the US tariff shock has not sent the economy or financial world into a tailspin, Britain's exit from the European Union trade bloc provides something of a playbook – and without a particularly happy ending. Aside from vast differences in economic scale and global reach, the two episodes bear some comparison in how they upended years of deeply integrated free trade and possibly in how business, the economy at large and financial markets reacted. The 2016 Brexit referendum and US President Donald Trump's tariffs this year were each widely billed as economic shocks that would send the financial world into paroxysms. They did not, at least not at the outset. To be sure, both were followed by dramatic downward lurches in the two countries' respective currencies. But to some extent, sterling's steep drop after the referendum vote and the US dollar's plunge on Trump's tariff plan this year helped offset some of the wider impact – at least on stock markets that are loaded with global firms with outsized foreign revenue. More broadly, however, the difficulty in isolating their immediate net impact means no 'big bang' economic crisis unfolds to prove critics right – even if their enduring legacy turns out to be a slow burn of economic potential and lost output, often obscured by multiple other crosswinds. Slow burn In Britain's case, the seismic effects of the Covid-19 pandemic distorted any attempt to easily assess Brexit when it actually happened. Tortuous negotiations with the EU meant the UK's departure eventually occurred on the eve of the health crisis in 2020, and the new trade rules did not come into force until a year later. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up But in the four years between the referendum surprise and the pandemic, the UK economy never entered a recession nor recorded a negative quarterly gross domestic product print – confounding pro-EU supporters at the time and bolstering the Brexit lobby. Emerging from the twin hits, however, the economy has almost flatlined since. FTSE 100 stocks, helped by the weaker pound, kept pace with the S&P 500 and world indexes for about a year after the referendum before chronic underperformance set in. Since 2018, the UK market has lagged MSCI's all-country index by some 35 per cent. What is more, it has taken more than eight years for the pound's effective exchange rate to recover its pre-referendum levels. Few mainstream economists now doubt that Brexit has taken a serious toll on the UK economy – even if blame for that gets sprayed in multiple directions – and oceans of ink have been spilled trying to disentangle the precise impacts. One academic study by a number of Bank of England economists earlier this year concluded that uncertainty following the referendum resulted in little change in goods exports and imports before the exit was finalised. But after the new rules hit, UK imports fell 3 per cent and overall exports fell 6.4 per cent, largely because of the 13 per cent hit in exports to the EU. While this slump seems relatively modest compared to the official forecasts of the longer-term hit, the pain has been borne disproportionately by small businesses. Additionally, these findings exclude the Brexit hit to services and London's finance sector, which registered a much bigger economic dent. And the cumulative damage to London and the service sector over the next 10 years continues to worry the city. 'Lighting a fire' The US tariff story is of a completely different order, of course, as it will reverberate across the world economy. But there are some parallels, not least in certain aspects of the market reactions and the initial resilience. Economists estimate that the tariffs could lop anywhere from 0.5 per cent to 1 per cent off US GDP over time. That is a US$150 billion to US$300 billion hit which, though painful, would not be an instant crisis for an economy that is growing at a roughly 2 per cent annualised rate, where imported goods represent just 11 per cent of GDP, and where tech and artificial intelligence trends are generating considerable tailwinds. But as former White House economic adviser Jason Furman pointed out in a New York Times essay last week, the tariff damage is likely not a one-off hit. The loss of 0.5 per cent of GDP, he argued, is 'the equivalent of every household in America taking around US$1,000 and lighting it on fire – then doing it again every year. Forever.' In the end, the main point of the British comparison is to show how extreme partisan arguments on the pros or cons of such giant economic policy changes do not necessarily get resolved cleanly in adaptive, hardy and hyper-complex modern economies. The upshot is there is rarely a big crash to prove a point. And that in itself is unnerving if politically-motivated policies then appear workable on the surface and resist instant pushback – only to act as a drain on the economy over a protracted period. Many observers reasonably argue that sovereign democratic politics should always trump economic conventions and even directions. But do people eventually notice when it goes wrong? The latest YouGov opinion poll shows 56 per cent of Britons now think it was wrong to leave the EU – some nine years after their narrow vote to leave. The jury on Trump's tariffs is still out. REUTERS
