logo
50 Years Since Emergency: What Really Fuelled Indira Gandhi's Insecurity

50 Years Since Emergency: What Really Fuelled Indira Gandhi's Insecurity

NDTV8 hours ago

On the eve of the 50th anniversary of June 25, the day in 1975 when, setting aside all norms, the Emergency was imposed, it may be worthwhile to recapitulate the events in the fortnight preceding that day as well as the events of the two years that preceded it.
Gujarat's Navnirman Movement (December 1973-April 1974) was spurred by high mess bills in college hostels. This inspired the Bihar movement (from March 1974), which ultimately was led by Jayaprakash Narayan (JP) on the plank of 'Total Revolution', seeking change in polity.
An all-India strike by railwaymen in April-May 1974, led by George Fernandes, the head of the National Coordination Committee of Railwaymen's Struggle (NCCRS), added to the chaos preceding June 1975.
In January 1975, Railway Minister Lalit Narain Mishra was killed in a bomb blast on the platform of the Samastipur railway station in Bihar. This case is yet to be solved - a petition filed by his grandson, Vaibhav Mishra, seeking the reopening of the investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), was admitted by the Delhi High Court recently.
Poverty, food shortages and unemployment fanned these tensions and shook the Indira Gandhi regime, which till 1972 had been basking in the glory of victory over Pakistan in the Bangladesh Liberation War of 1971.
The roots of the political crisis that led to Emergency lay in the factional politics of Congress. In 1964, the political ambitions of Morarji Desai and Jagjivan Ram to succeed Jawaharlal Nehru were thwarted by the popularity of Lal Bahadur Shastri, whom Nehru had covertly groomed.
Shastri made Gandhi a minister as he wanted to have the tag of 'Nehru legitimacy'(initially, Gandhi had been reluctant, but faced with the prospect of Shastri opting for her aunt, Vijayalaxmi Pandit, instead, she agreed).
When Shastri passed away in Tashkent in January 1966, the choice fell upon Gandhi. Morarji lost out yet again. He challenged her again after the 1967 general election, which saw the Congress retain the Lok Sabha by a slender majority and lose power in the entire Indo-Gangetic plains to Opposition coalitions. Yet again, Gandhi prevailed.
Morarji was a pivot of the Navnirman Movement and a prominent face of the JP agitation. He replaced Gandhi as Prime Minister in March 1977. The Congress split in 1969 began with her dropping Desai from her cabinet.
The internal bickering in the Grand Old Party led to its split in 1969. A veneer of ideology was sought to be put on the split, but the intrinsic reason was a clash of personal ambitions. A section of the party wanted to throw off the Nehru yoke.
The 1969 split made Gandhi lose the majority in the Lok Sabha, though she survived, thanks to the support extended by DMK and CPI leaders.
To overcome this handicap, Gandhi called for elections one year before they were due, in 1971. Opposition united in what came to be known as the 'Grand Alliance' to challenge her. But the Congress, which had a slender majority in 1967, returned with over 350 seats in 1971.
Irrepressible socialist leader Raj Narain, who had later defeated Gandhi in 1977, lost to her at Rae Bareli in 1971. He challenged the result in a petition before the Allahabad High Court on the grounds that Gandhi had used unfair practices to win.
Raj Narain was represented by Shanti Bhushan, while Gandhi was defended by eminent jurist Nani Palkhivala. The latter had to take the witness stand in this case, which she lost on June 12, 1975. Palkhivala quit the case in protest when the Emergency was imposed as a consequence.
Judge Jagmohan Lal Sinha dismissed charges of bribery but held that Gandhi had misused official machinery as her aide, Yashpal Kapoor's resignation had not been formally accepted when he began campaigning (Kapoor had resigned before leaving Delhi, but the formality of acceptance was pending).
Justice Sinha gave the Congress 20 days to elect someone to discharge Gandhi's duties. Her resignation was demanded overtly by the opposition parties, but there were murmurs within the Congress as well.
Initially, Gandhi toyed with the idea that Sardar Swaran Singh, who had been a minister since Nehru's days in 1952, be sworn in as Prime Minister while she stepped down and got herself cleared by the Supreme Court.
Babu Jagjivan Ram, who was minister since his induction in the Interim Government of 1946, felt he should be chosen instead, though Gandhi was not confident that he would step aside when she won her case. This despite the fact that in 1969, she had relied upon Jagjivan Ram to head her faction of the Congress. The Election Commission's 1971 results record two Congress parties - the Indira faction's overwhelming 350+ results are credited to Congress (Jagjivan Ram), and 16 seats are credited to Congress (Organization).
After the Emergency was imposed, on July 5, Jagjivan Ram moved the official resolution in Parliament for its approval. And after Gandhi relaxed Emergency on January 20, 1977, to hold elections, Jagjivan Ram on February 2 walked out of the Congress to form Congress for Democracy (CFD), which became an ally of the Opposition combine that ousted the Indira regime in March 1977.
Apart from Jagjivan Ram, the then Congress President, Dev Kanta Barooah, who later was to be remembered for his 'India is Indira' slogan, raised Gandhi's suspicion by suggesting that till she is cleared by courts, she could swap places with him, making him the Prime Minister with she heading the party. This suggestion apparently had gained currency at a meeting of MPs held at 12 Safdarjung Road, the residence of Minister Chandrajit Yadav.
Indira Gandhi's Principal Secretary, Prof PN Dhar, has recorded in his memoirs that the then Intelligence Bureau (IB) Director, Atma Jayram, had submitted a report suggesting that not more than 159 of the 350 party MPs would support Gandhi if there were to be a show of strength. The rest of the MPs' loyalties were divided - with Yashwant Rao Chavan heading the list with 17 supporters, and others having even less.
In 1972, in the Shimla session of Congress, 'Young Turk' Chandrashekhar created history by getting elected to the Congress Working Committee despite Gandhi's opposition. The IB's report to Dhar stated that Young Turks had the biggest block - of 25 MPs - opposed to Gandhi's continuation.
Chandra Shekhar was arrested as Emergency was imposed. When the Janata Party was launched on May 1, 1977, he became its President. He also briefly served as Prime Minister in 1990-91 after the fall of the VP Singh government.
Thus, it was not merely JP's call to the army, police and government servants on June 25 from the Ramlila Ground - ' Aap roti ke tukdo par bikey nahin hain,aapne imaan nahin bech diya hai ' - which prompted the Emergency, as was cited by Home Ministry documents placed before Parliament on July 21, 1977, to justify the action. Internal threat to her leadership from within the Congress also played a part.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Retirement Trust Fund Depletion: Social Security benefits may shrink by 2033. Here's why, how it may affect you, what can be done to avert crisis and how to prepare for future
Retirement Trust Fund Depletion: Social Security benefits may shrink by 2033. Here's why, how it may affect you, what can be done to avert crisis and how to prepare for future

Time of India

time31 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Retirement Trust Fund Depletion: Social Security benefits may shrink by 2033. Here's why, how it may affect you, what can be done to avert crisis and how to prepare for future

A recent government report has raised concerns about the future of Social Security. The Social Security Board of Trustees now says the retirement trust fund could be depleted by 2033. This is one year earlier than its last estimate. Millions of Americans who rely on these benefits may see reduced payments if no action is taken, media reports said. Trust Fund Depletion Expected in 2033 The Social Security Board of Trustees released its 2024 annual report. It shows that the retirement trust fund may run out by 2033. This change was shared with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The new timeline increases concerns for future retirees. If Congress does not take steps soon, benefits could be reduced. A 23% cut may occur. This would affect many Americans who depend on the system. Also Read: Baba Vanga World War 3 Prophecy: Did Bulgarian mystic predict war between Iran and Israel? Here's how she said it would end How It May Affect You? The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund is at risk. This fund gives monthly checks to retired workers and their families. If the fund runs dry, payroll taxes will only cover about 77% of scheduled payments. This would mean smaller checks for millions of retirees. Live Events Many people use these payments as their only income. A cut in benefits could create serious challenges for these households. Why is it Happening? Several issues have caused the trust fund to weaken faster. One factor is the Social Security Fairness Act. This law helped nearly 3 million retired public workers by improving their benefits. However, it also added pressure to the trust fund. Demographic changes are also a factor. More people are retiring as baby boomers age. People are living longer and having fewer children. This means fewer workers are paying into the system while more people collect benefits for longer. Also Read: Never Before Ever: US President lashes out at Israel for violating ceasefire with Iran. See how did Trump criticize Netanyahu What Can be Done to Avert Crisis? Lawmakers have suggested different ways to strengthen the fund. One idea is to raise the Full Retirement Age . It is now 67, but some propose increasing it to 70. Early retirement age could also move from 62 to 65. Another idea is to raise the cap on income subject to Social Security taxes. At present, only income up to $176,000 is taxed. Increasing this limit could mean higher contributions from high earners. How to Prepare for Future? Financial experts believe millennials and Gen Z may not receive full benefits. Some may receive only partial benefits or none at all. These groups are advised to start preparing now. Retirement planning experts recommend early saving. Starting a Roth IRA or increasing contributions to a 401(k) are good options. These actions help build personal savings to rely on later in life. FAQs What happens if the Social Security trust fund runs out in 2033? If the fund runs out, only 77% of scheduled benefits will be paid. Retirees may face a 23% cut unless Congress takes action to fix the issue. How can younger people prepare for reduced Social Security benefits? Younger workers should save more through Roth IRAs or 401(k)s. Financial planners suggest preparing for retirement without depending on full Social Security payments.

India cannot develop with single ideology or leader; Emergency was bid to end multi-party democracy: Amit Shah
India cannot develop with single ideology or leader; Emergency was bid to end multi-party democracy: Amit Shah

The Hindu

time43 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

India cannot develop with single ideology or leader; Emergency was bid to end multi-party democracy: Amit Shah

Union Home Minister Amit Shah said on Tuesday (June 24, 2025) that a country cannot develop if it is made to follow a single ideology or a single leader and leaves no scope for diverse opinions and ideas. He added that the foundations of democracy are so deep in India that if any dictator tries to shake it, he will do nothing but ruin his future. Speaking at an event marking 50 years after the Emergency, Mr. Shah said that was the name of the 'conspiracy' to convert a multi-party democracy into a 'dictatorship by one person', which was strongly opposed by many people at that time, even at the cost of personal loss. It was not a result of circumstances and compulsion but a product of dictatorial mentality and hunger for power, he said. The Constitution has strengthened democracy and India is a land of people that has respected diversity for thousands of years, the Home Minister said at the event, organised by the Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Trust. It is not only courts and Parliament that are responsible for protecting the spirit of the Constitution, he said, emphasising that the responsibility lies with the people too. 'Terrible consequences' 'Democracy was born first in India. No dictator can dismantle democracy, which is at the core of this country,' Mr. Shah said, recalling that 1.11 lakh people were arrested during the Emergency period imposed by then-Prime Minister Indira Gandhi on June 25, 1975. Also read: Congress should apologise for imposing Emergency in 1975, says former Vice President Venkaiah Naidu Noting that the Emergency was only supported by a coterie who benefited from the move, Mr. Shah said: 'It is the sycophants who, with their sycophancy, end the run of dictators.' The Union government has decided to commemorate 'Samvidhan Hatya Diwas' so that the country can remember the terrible consequences that ensue when a government becomes dictatorial, the Home Minister said. 'Killed the Constitution' Though the Emerency was imposed citing the security of the nation, its main purpose was to ensure the protection of power, he said. 'A number of incidents and protests and movements against unemployment, price-rise had shaken the chairs and foundations of the government elected by a majority. There was neither any external nor any internal threat to the security of the country. They had just won the Bangladesh war,' Mr. Shah said. Pointing to the current Opposition, Mr. Shah noted that parties like the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and the Samajwadi Party who were affected by the Emergency are now sitting with the same Congress party which killed the Constitution. 'She (Indira Gandhi) made so many changes to the Constitution; even the Preamble was changed and the basic structure of the Constitution was changed. The judiciary was pliant. Agencies were misused,' he said. The Constitution, which was drafted through discussions, sacrifices and penance, was rejected in a minute by the order of the 'kitchen cabinet', he said. 'Longest night' 'The night of June 24, 1975 was the longest night in the history of independent India because its morning came after 21 months, and it was also the shortest night, because that night, the exercise of two years, 11 months, and 18 days was cancelled in a moment,' the Minister said. No sensible citizen who lived during the Emergency would have liked it, Mr. Shah said. Those who were under the illusion that no one could challenge them were defeated in the elections held after the Emergency was lifted, and a non-Congress government was formed for the first time since Independence, he said.

Congress questions govt over Asean issue and US travel advisory
Congress questions govt over Asean issue and US travel advisory

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Congress questions govt over Asean issue and US travel advisory

New Delhi: Targeting Union commerce minister Piyush Goyal once again for terming the Asean nations as "B-team of China", Congress on Tuesday said the Asean co-chair for India FTA review ticking off Goyal for his remarks was yet another blow to Indian diplomacy . Referring to the ET report about the Asean co-chair for India FTA review ticking off Goyal, Congress spokesman Jairam Ramesh said: "India has very close civilizational, cultural, economic and political ties with the 10-nation Asean Group. Asean, that came into being almost six decades ago, has a combined GDP just slightly lower than that of India. The Union commerce and industry minister dismisses them as the B-team of China. Asean now ticks him off. Indian diplomacy suffers yet another blow. This was needless." Meanwhile, some Congress leaders are also sensing a rift between the external affairs ministry and the commerce ministry over Goyal's remarks. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like An engineer reveals: 1 simple trick to get all TV channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo Congress also took exception to the US government's recent travel advisory on India, cautioning American citizens, especially women, against travelling to India alone, and the party said it was ironic that it came when the US President was rolling out a "red carpet" to the Pakistan Army chief. Asking why the Modi government was keeping mum on US travel advisory , Congress spokesperson Supriya Shrinate said: "These are very damning advisory and yet the Modi government is absolutely quiet... We demand that the Indian government, at the highest level, should register its protest. On one hand, you (USA) are issuing advisories against India, but zilch on Pakistan. Pakistan, which is a terror state, is going absolutely scot-free. We are being hyphenated."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store