2026 BMW M3 Pricing Revealed
2026 M3 Gets Away With Relatively Small Increase
The current tensions surrounding the ongoing tariff deliberations and revisions are causing German automakers to sweat. Although BMW has been doing its best to keep consequent price adjustments from impacting its customers' wallets, there's only so much that can be done while still keeping shareholders happy. After all, BMW is a business and needs to turn a profit. And when shoppers are already forking out over $100k with all the options for the current M3, a $2,380 increase across the range (compared to the launch price) isn't anything to loosen one's collar over. If you're one of those individuals, the configurator for the 2026 model year will soon go live, and it's always plenty of fun to play with. If not, read on, and we'll break the new pricing down.
The 2026 BMW M3 Still Sneaks In Below $80k
That's right. For the new model year, that $2,380 price bump means a base MSRP of $78,400, according to a pricing guide obtained by Bimmer Post. If you want the added bragging rights that come with the M3 Competition, however, you'll pay at least $82,600. And if you want the extra power that is now offered by the M xDrive-fitted M3 Competition, you'll be forking over a minimum of $87,700. Before you even think about options, you need to add the automaker's destination and handling fee of $1,175 to the equation. That's actually come down from the 2025 model, which was set at $1,195. Here's the overall difference with respective destination charges applied:
Model 2024 Price 2025 Price Difference M3 $77,195 $79,575 +$2,380 M3 Competition $81,395 $83,775 +$2,380 M3 Competition w/ M xDrive $86,495 $88,875 +$2,380
Optional Packages Can Push Final Price Near $120K
To complete the aggressive look, you may want to take a look at the Carbon Package, adding another $15,300 for the regular M3 and $14,300 for Competition variants. That does not include the carbon bucket seats you get as standard in a CS-badged Bimmer, so set aside another $4,500. If you really want to impress BMW fanatics, consider the gold brake calipers, because those indicate $8,500 carbon-ceramics. To unlock the full capabilities of your new M3, tick the box marked 'M Driver's Package' for $2,500, moving the speed limiter's needle from 155 mph to 180. Tick all those boxes (and choose a plain color inside and out), and you'll just sneak in below $120,000.
2026 BMW M3 Production Begins Very Soon
So why isn't the configurator live just yet if pricing guides are becoming available? Well, BMW is only expected to begin production of U.S.-bound 2026 M3 sedans in July, and the pricing guide gives its dealers a heads-up, allowing them to plan their pricing strategies for the coming month.
In the meantime, Bimmer Post has full pdf documents of both the new pricing guide and the ordering guide, so if you intend on reserving a special optional extra that will add to your build time, head over to your nearest BMW dealer soon and put your name down. Alternatively, wait until the 2026 models hit the lots and take advantage of deals and incentives on low-mileage and unsold 2025 models. Those should come in considerably cheaper, and any opportunity to get over 500 horsepower and an iconic badge is worth considering.
Oops! We're unable to load this content right now.
View directly on Instagram
About the Author
Sebastian Cenizo View Profile
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Ford Ranger PHEV review — plug into the pick-up revolution
T he world of cars has become stupidly complicated. Every niche seems to have been filled, and some vehicle types seem to have been shoehorned in between two traditional categories for no obvious reason. Think of the coupé SUV, for example: hulking great vehicles taking up the same amount of space as a small house but with the back sliced off in a vain attempt to improve the looks and aerodynamics. In reality it does little to either, but does have the effect of reducing the car's potential for carrying luggage. Better to have two cars: a gorgeous lightweight sports car for fun and a small van or estate for load-lugging. Perhaps a 4×4 for those adventurous families who like to get off the beaten track at the weekend. • Read more expert reviews, news and insights on cars and motoring Better still is one vehicle that can do it all. A pick-up truck, for example. Some see these types of vehicle as the automotive equivalent of a mullet, except instead of being 'business at the front, party at the back' a pick-up is business during the week and party at the weekend. With a double cab (five-seat) version, small business owners can throw their tools in the load bed, collect colleagues on the way to a worksite and treat it roughly from Monday to Friday, then head to the beach with the family on Saturday and go mountain biking on Sunday. A four-wheel drive model adds go-anywhere flexibility. Ford has added a PHEV version to the Ranger, which is the bestselling vehicle in its class in the UK and across Europe Which sounds appealing, but which to go for? Of the many pick-up options out there — Toyota Hilux; VW Amarok; Isuzu D-Max; KGM Musso — the Ford Ranger is the one most buyers gravitate towards. It's the bestselling vehicle in its class in the UK and across Europe, while in Australia they love Ford's 'ute' so much that it outsells every other vehicle full stop. Fair dinkum. And now there's a new version that Ford reckons is going to further its appeal: the Ranger PHEV (plug-in hybrid electric vehicle). This combines a 2.3-litre Ford Ecoboost petrol engine — proven in Rangers outside Europe and found in the UK under the bonnet of non-V8 Mustangs — with a 75kW electric motor and a lithium ion battery, which can be charged up by plugging into a power socket or by the petrol engine during use. Why? Well, there are a number of claimed advantages for the owner, which we'll come on to. But it surely can't have escaped your attention that car makers are being made to reduce the overall CO₂ output of their combustion vehicles while also increasing the proportion of fully electric options for consumers. And going plug-in hybrid means Ford can continue selling the Ranger until 2035, five years after sales of new cars powered by more traditional petrol and diesel engines are banned. The Ford Ranger PHEV can tow up to 3.5 tonnes Not that Ford mentioned any of that on the vehicle launch, of course. Instead we were simply told about how, in developing the Ranger PHEV, the engineers wanted zero compromises compared with the existing powertrains, and that, in fact, the PHEV outperforms the rest of the Ranger stable in almost every regard. To look at, it's business as usual. Same length, same wheelbase, same ground clearance and overhangs as the other Ranger double cabs (you can't get the PHEV in single cab configuration). There's a small reduction in load-bed capacity, as the 11.8kWh battery pack sits under the floor, raising it by 20mm. But you barely notice, and the Ranger PHEV has all the same capabilities as the diesel Ranger — a payload of up to one tonne (and resulting business tax breaks); the ability to tow up to 3.5 tonnes; and four-wheel drive with a low-range gearbox. Inside the Wildtrak version I tested, there's a pleasing mix of digital screens and proper buttons (actual dials for the temperature and volume controls!), with a reassuringly chunky drive select lever and more physical controls for the drive modes and off-road settings. The cockpit is well organised, and the digital display features a 12in vertical touchscreen We'll knock marks off for a slightly low-rent rotary dial for those drive modes (Normal; Eco; Sport; Tow; Slippery; Mud/Ruts; Sand), which had a distinctly bargain bin squeak when you turned it, but it did function properly, and the multiple camera views and 4×4 info available on the touchscreen was top notch. While some of the controls might not be 'premium' in feel, there's a high level of sophistication to the ride of the Ranger PHEV. Out on the road, it feels more like a car than a commercial vehicle, with accurate steering and suspension that is pliant over bumps but not overly rolly in corners. Ford has always had a knack for this stuff, and it makes the Ranger amazingly adaptable — capable of handling pretty tricky off-road terrain, potholes and road humps, while also being pleasing to steer on silky-smooth asphalt. There's a reassuringly chunky drive select lever and more physical controls for the drive modes and off-road settings The drivetrain is smooth, too, despite having two power sources, four wheels to send that power to, and eight gears to send it through. Hybrids are nothing new, it's true, but this is a particularly sophisticated set-up, despite the Ranger's workhorse roots, and the way the car switches between electric and petrol is almost seamless. You barely even perceive the engine and gear changes most of the time, so creamy is the management of it all. The new Ranger's seats are plush and comfy, and the vehicle is perfect for taking the family out at the weekend Ford told us at the press briefing that Ranger customers are small business owners who like to balance work with play, using their vehicle for jobs during the day and then for taking the family out over the weekend. Well, the engineers nailed it, because it's a beast on the rough stuff (we tried it out off-road in Iceland), with a tough chassis and hard-wearing materials inside, yet the seats are plush and comfy and the refinement in the cabin is SUV-like. That includes hushed noise from the tyres, wind and engine. There was even a Bang & Olufsen sound system in our bright orange Wildtrak test car. Obviously the ability to run without pumping out exhaust emissions for up to 27 miles could be an advantage if you need to access a zero emission zone. But perhaps more useful for owners is the fact that the electric motor results in more torque (twisting force) than even the diesel models produce. That's not only about bragging rights on a building site; it genuinely makes a difference when it comes to negotiating tricky terrain while fully loaded, or towing heavy trailers. The load bed can be divided to facilitate careful packing There's some very clever tech associated with the towing abilities, too, with smart regenerative braking that senses the weight of the payload and helps to control speed while also recouping armfuls of energy to the high voltage battery. It can then deploy that on the next uphill section of road. Even cleverer — and we got a demonstration of this — is what Ford calls Pro Trailer Backup Assist, which automatically steers trailers of all sizes into spaces behind; you don't touch the steering wheel, and instead simply use the pedals and direct the trailer left or right by twisting the drive mode dial on the centre console. Even Clarkson could back up a trailer accurately with this tech. Perhaps the biggest selling point, though, is the ability to power electrical devices directly from the vehicle, using the high voltage battery pack. There's a 2.3kW system that Ford says is ideal for 'powering weekend trips to the trails' and can comfortably charge 'multiple e-mountain bikes and a portable fridge', or a more powerful 6.9kW system designed for heavy-duty equipment and work tools. The higher power on comes with two 15A outlets in the load box that have the capacity to power a compact cement mixer, angle grinder and flood lights simultaneously. There's no danger of running out of juice, either, as you can run the engine as a generator, if required. The 6.9kW Pro Power system is enough to run a compact cement mixer and angle grinder at the same time WILL DRON (TIMES MEDIA) There's more, because Ford claims the plug-in hybrid powertrain could save you money. In a purely dreamt-up scenario, the company said a German owner could save €850 (£726) a year versus the 3-litre V6 diesel Ranger, although that does come with caveats: charging off-peak every day and having a commute of 80km, for example. A UK business owner will have to do their sums, but it probably won't take long: that 3-litre V6 is actually more expensive up front, at £49,291 before tax in Wildtrak trim, while the Ranger PHEV in the same spec costs £46,241. The diesel also has less power, less torque, is slower to 62mph, and uses more fuel while creating significantly more CO₂ (officially). It's a no-brainer, mate. The new Ford Ranger PHEV is a great all-rounder But beyond the numbers is something less quantifiable. What Ford has created here, whether as a cynical future-proofing exercise or not, is a sensational all-rounder. More rugged than any vehicle you're likely to need, more practical than most cars, and more versatile too. If you could only buy one vehicle to do everything, it would be this. In other words it's the antithesis of the niche-within-a-niche cars being snapped up by people with more money than sense, which don't seem to have a point at all.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Are interest-only mortgages too risky for first-time buyers?
Interest-only mortgages are to become an option for most first-time buyers for the first time since the financial crisis. From Monday Gen H, which specialises in loans for first-time buyers, is offering interest-only deals for those with at least a 20 per cent deposit and a minimum income of £50,000. Buyers will need to demonstrate how they will repay the loan, for example by showing that they can save the difference between the monthly costs of a repayment mortgage and their interest-only payments. Gen H will also lend to first-time buyers with as little as 5 per cent deposit on a part interest-only, part repayment basis. Many lenders have started making it easier for first-time buyers to borrow, with some lending up to seven times salary, instead of the standard limit of 4.5 times. But, in an uncertain market, with house prices stagnant in many areas, could this all be too risky? A shove up the ladder Research by the Building Societies Association (BSA), a trade body, suggests that there are 2.2 million 'missing' first-time buyers who should have bought since the financial crisis but have been unable to, either because they have struggled to save a deposit or can't borrow enough. To fill this gap, the government, as part of its drive for economic growth and increased homeownership, has prompted the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the City regulator, to lean on banks and relax the lending rules. In the past three months, almost all high street banks have reduced the interest rate at which they 'stress test' borrowers, to see if they could afford payments if rates went up dramatically. Borrowers can now also find more loans at 100 per cent loan-to-value (LTV), where you borrow what the property is worth, without a deposit — another fixture of the pre-2008 mortgage Building Society offers five-year mortgage deals to those with less than a 5 per cent deposit who can prove they have been paying rent at the same level as mortgage repayments for two years. April Mortgages, which began lending in the UK last year, has a no-deposit deal for those with a household income of at least £24,000 who are happy to fix for ten or 15 years. And the ratio of debt to income is being relaxed, with April Mortgages lending up to seven times a borrower's income on its ten or 15-year fixed-rate deals, provided they have at least a 15 per cent deposit. Skipton will lend 5.5 times a buyer's salary if they have an income of £50,000 — up from . £100,000. The downside While lenders have been praised for finding innovative ways to get more people onto the property ladder, concerns have been raised that making it easier to borrow will simply push house prices up, leaving first-time buyers having to find bigger deposits and take on even greater debt. The estate agency Savills estimated that a 1.25 percentage point reduction in stress rates by high street lenders could increase first-time buyer sales 24 per cent over the next five years, but could also push up prices between 5 and 7.5 per cent. That could be a problem when buyers are already stretching themselves. Some 7 per cent of new mortgages were at 90-95 per cent LTV in the first three months of the year, their highest share since 2008, according to the FCA. And while mortgage rates have fallen over the past year, first-time buyers are spending a bigger chunk of their cash on repayments. In March they spent an average of 22.6 per cent of income on their mortgage, the highest proportion since November 2008, according to UK Finance, a banking industry body. 'I'm nervous,' said Neal Hudson from the property data firm Residential Analysts. 'There are good reasons for a bit more flexibility but I fear that lenders and the government are going too far. Now that rates are falling, that saving is being used to push up house prices rather than reducing repayments. That's not good.' Paul Broadhead from the BSA said the return of part repayment and part interest-only loans could be popular because they 'provide a lower deposit threshold but also help affordability, which we know are the two important barriers for first-time buyers'. Critics, however, believe that interest-only loans should remain limited to those with more equity and assets. Martin Stewart from the mortgage broker London Money said: 'Let's not forget that interest-only was one of the significant contributors to the crash in 2008, along with pushes for higher loan-to-value lending and excessive income multiples. Throwing all these things together to limp the housing market forward feels like a dangerous game.' How the interest-only deal works The Gen H interest-only mortgage rates will start at 5.09 per cent for a two-year fix at up to a 60 per cent LTV, with a £1,499 fee, and 5.33 per cent for a five-year fix with the same maximum LTV and fee. For comparison, the best two-year fix for a standard repayment mortgage at 60 per cent LTV is 3.95 per cent and 3.99 per cent for a five-year deal. For those with only the minimum 20 per cent deposit (80 per cent LTV) the two-year fixed rate is 5.44 per cent. For a five-year fix it is 5.38 per cent. In time, Gen H plans to make interest-only deals available to those whose parents can support them by using their investments, buy-to-let property or pension pot as the initial repayment strategy for the loan, which could change if their child was later able switch to a repayment deal. Peter Dockar from Gen H said: 'Interest-only mortgages have long been pigeon-holed as a tool for the rich. But we believe they could fill important gaps for first-time buyers and households on average incomes too. In this landscape, buyers need all the help they can get. We all need to consider how familiar tools might be used in new ways to benefit more people.' Why interest-only became rare Interest-only mortgages were common before the financial crisis, when buyers could get larger loans with few questions about how they planned to repay them. At their peak in 2007 some 51 per cent of new mortgages were either fully or partially interest-only, according to the FCA. House prices fell about 20 per cent between 2007 and 2009 during the financial crisis. This led to mortgage rules being tightened in 2014, making it harder to get interest-only deals and forcing lenders to be much stricter about repayment methods. At the end of last year the total number of home loans on an interest-only basis was 541,000, down from 963,000 in 2012, according to the trade association UK Finance. Only 8.7 per cent of new mortgages in the first three months of 2025 were fully or partially interest-only. Interest-only loans have tended to be limited to wealthier borrowers with more equity. Applicants normally need to earn at least £75,000 a year (or a total of £100,000 on a joint application) and have a 25 per cent deposit and proof of how they will repay the loan. They can only use the sale of their main home as a repayment strategy if there will be enough equity afterwards to buy somewhere else. This has made them largely inaccessible for first-time buyers — lenders including Nationwide Building Society will not give them interest-only mortgages at all. Gen H said buyers would be able to list downsizing as a repayment strategy provided that the interest-only portion of their loan was capped at 60 per cent LTV, and that they would have at least £200,000 in equity (£300,000 in London) after repaying the interest-only mortgage. This would be based on their initial deposit and the capital repayment portion of their loan, and would not assume a future rise in house prices. Other options available Paul Barnes, 40, and James Hope, 36, expected to be saving for another five years to buy their first home in Cambridge — until they found out about an unusual scheme from Cambridge Building Society. Rent to Home offered buyers the chance to enter a ballot, where they could rent a property from the building society for up to three years, after which they could get back 70 per cent of what they had paid in rent to use as a house deposit, as long as they took out their mortgage with the building society. The couple won their chance in 2023: 'We were actually hesitant when we got the call because we thought there must be a catch,' said Barnes, who works for an exam board. 'Cambridge is its own little bubble and it is quite an expensive and competitive market.' They moved into a four-bedroom townhouse in Longstanton, near Cambridge, paying rent of £1,450 a month. It means that after three years they could get about £36,500 back as a deposit. The couple are now two years in and hope that they will own their home by next summer. 'I can't believe schemes like this aren't widely available. It's a massive opportunity for people like us, who might otherwise be struggling to get a foot on the housing ladder due to the cost of living and fierce rental market,' said Hope, who works for the Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Families face £20billion tax sting as Government borrowing soars to second highest May level on record
FAMILIES face a £20billion tax hit after Government borrowing jumped last month, experts warned. The second highest figure on record for May, beaten only during the pandemic, saw borrowing surge to £17.7 billion, higher than forecast by the independent watchdog. Receipts for the Treasury were up to £82 billion due to higher income tax and the NI increase that kicked in from April. But with sluggish growth and the high borrowing costs could mean Rachel Reeves could lose her £10 billion financial cushion by the Budget. Thomas Pugh, economist at RSM UK, said the Chancellor may have to raise taxes between £10-£20 billion. He added: 'The under-performance of the economy and higher borrowing costs mean the Chancellor may already have lost the £9.9bn of fiscal headroom that she clawed back in March.' Shadow Chancellor, Sir Mel Stride said: 'Labour is spending recklessly, with no plan to pay for it. "Debt interest now costs us £100bn a year - that's almost twice the defence budget. 'Having turned on the spending taps, Labour have left themselves with only one option and that's to put up your taxes. Treasury Minister Darren Jones insisted the government had 'stabilised the economy and the public finances'. Growth forecast SLASHED in Spring Statement - sparking fears of MORE tax rises 1
