Australia's Largest Bank Quizzing Customers for Details on Cash Withdrawals
Banks have asked more detail questions about cash transactions with customers (including deposits) in response to government pressure to deal with money laundering concerns.
Australian businessman Louis Christopher, co-founder of real estate data agency SQM Research, labelled some of the inquiries 'disgusting.'
He claimed he received an email asking for information on how he created his wealth, why he was making cash withdrawals, if he was holding cash at home, and why he had made certain payments to third parties.
He shared copies of further correspondence from CommBank, including a warning that his accounts could be restricted or closed within seven days if he did not respond.
The bank also threatened to stop his ability to use automatic teller machines and bank cards.
Related Stories
2/24/2025
4/30/2025
The correspondence cited Australia's Know Your Customer (KYC) obligations, which require financial institutions to verify customers' identities and understand the source of their wealth in order to comply with anti-money laundering laws.
'They were going to suspend all my accounts this week if I didn't tell them the answers ...,' Christopher
The Epoch Times has contacted AUSTRAC—the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre—for comment.
Other customers have also spoken out.
Australian academic Eva Bernat said on X she hired a lawyer after CommBank initially refused her request for a large cash withdrawal.
While Bernat was able to access her cash after lodging complaints, she said CommBank still demanded receipts to verify her purchases.
'People are leaving banks in droves, to no one's surprise,' she said.
Bernat has lodged an official complaint with the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), a dispute resolution service for banking customers. AFCA has also been contacted for comment.
Former Queensland Premier Campbell Newman said there was no point trying to stamp out financial crime by imposing red tape on honest businesspeople.
'The [anti-money laundering] laws as they stand are draconian, authoritarian, and give banks an excuse to act quite unreasonably,' he said.
Australian $50, $20, and $5 banknotes, and Australian Medicare card in a wallet in Sydney, Australia on March 25, 2025.
LisaA CommBank spokesperson said the bank was required to comply with the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing Act 2006.
'All banks operating within Australia are required to collect, verify, and maintain customer identification information,' the spokesperson said.
'In the same way that we need to comply with regulations when a customer first opens an account, we also need to comply with current law regarding the maintenance of their identification information.
'Ensuring we have a customer's most up-to-date and correct details also helps us to keep them safe and protect them from fraud.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
3 minutes ago
- UPI
Qantas ordered to pay record fine over COVID-19 layoffs
Qantas has been ordered to a nearly $60 million fine over mass layoffs during the COVID-19 pandemic. File Photo by Brent Winstone/EPA-EFE Aug. 18 (UPI) -- An Australian court on Monday fined national flag carrier Qantas nearly $60 million for illegally firing more than 1,800 ground workers and then outsourcing their jobs during the COVID-19 pandemic. Australia's Transport Workers Union said in a statement that it was the largest employer penalty in Australian corporate history. "Against all odds, TWU members have sent a $90 million warning to corporate Australia: you can't break the law and get away with it," the union said, referring to the amount Qantas was fined in Australian dollars. Federal Court Justice Michael Lee said a little more than half of the penalty should be paid to the TWU, while the recipients of the remaining sum will be decided at a later hearing, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation reported. Lee said that while Qantas has expressed "genuine regrets" about the situation, he believes that "this more likely reflects the damage this case has done at the company rather than unique remorse for the damage done to the affected workers." He said that the airline "resisted until it could resist no more." Qantas said the Monday judgement holds the company "accountable for our actions." "We sincerely apologize to each and every one of the 1,820 ground handling employees and to their families who suffered as a result," Qantas Group Chief Executive Officer Vanessa Hudson said in a statement. "The decision to outsource five years ago, particularly during such an uncertain time, caused genuine hardship for many of our former team and their families. The impact was felt not only by those who lost their jobs, but our entire workforce." The ruling brings an end to a five-year fight by the TWU over Qantas's firing of some 1,800 workers and then outsourcing their jobs in 2020. Qantas appealed through the Australian court system, with the High Court affirming that the airline had acted illegally by outsourcing the employment. The Monday fine is on top of the roughly $78 million that Qantas agreed to pay eligible workers in December, after its failed bid arguing that it should not have to offer workers compensation. "Qantas was not sorry to workers when it illegally outsourced these workers, many finding out they'd lost their jobs over loudspeaker in the lunch room. It was not sorry when it dragged them all the way to the High Court, or when it argued it should have to pay them no compensation at all," TWU National Secretary Michael Kaine said in a statement. "Qantas is only sorrow now that it has to pay the larges penalty fine of any employer in Australian corporate history." The announcement comes about 14 months after Qantas reached a settlement with the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission to pay a multi-million-dollar fine for booking flights that had previously been canceled.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tengku Zafrul: Malaysia controlling stream of rare earth in bid to keep value, keeping both US and China at bay
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 18 — Malaysia is banning exports of unprocessed rare earths while at the same time attempting to court downstream investment to retain their value added at home, Investment, Trade and Industry Minister Datuk Seri Tengku Zafrul Aziz said. Speaking in an interview with US-based CNBC's 'Squawk Box Asia', Tengku Zafrul said Malaysia has discussed its rare-earth strategy with both Washington and Beijing during broader negotiations. 'Today, we engage both sides. And to be fair, both China and US have never said that you can't supply to the other, right? You can't not do business with the other,' he said. He also said that both countries have reminded Malaysia that it cannot have two different standards on rare earth exports. 'So we have to be consistent, to be neutral. You have to consider, we can't have policies which differentiates our relationship with one party to the other, to one country to another. 'So that's, I think, key. Once you do that, then it's very hard to defend that neutrality position,' he added. Tengku Zafrul pointed to the moratorium on rare earth elements exports, highlighting Australian miners Lynas as among firms operating under rules that permit exports after processing. 'So what we are doing now is we're saying that, look, we invite all companies to come to Malaysia and to be part of the supply chain to invest in the downstream activities of rare earth, and then we can then export the value-add of those right now,' he said. Tengku Zafrul argued the approach maximises economic spillovers and strengthens the case for keeping processing domestic. He also framed the policy as a way to anchor higher-value activity in Malaysia while staying open to all buyers under equal rules. Earlier this month, Tengku Zafrul announced that Malaysia will no longer allow the export of raw rare earth minerals, in a move to promote local downstream development. Tengku Zafrul said Malaysia remains open to foreign investment, but it must involve local processing, job creation, and technology transfer.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TD Cowen Reiterates Buy Rating on Molina Healthcare (MOH) Stock
Molina Healthcare, Inc. (NYSE:MOH) is one of the Oversold Fundamentally Strong Stocks to Buy Now. On July 28, Ryan Langston, an analyst from TD Cowen, reiterated a 'Buy' rating on the company's stock, and the associated price target was lowered to $203.00. The analyst noted that Molina Healthcare, Inc. (NYSE:MOH) continues to effectively manage the medical costs in the challenging environment, mainly in Medicaid, where it is witnessing pressures in behavioral, pharmacy, and inpatient/outpatient care. A doctor in scrubs shaking hands with a patient, representing the healthcare services provided to individuals and families. Molina Healthcare, Inc. (NYSE:MOH) continues to actively work with state partners in order to restore Medicaid rates to appropriate levels. It has considered increased cost trends in the Medicare and Marketplace bids for 2026. Despite challenges, Molina Healthcare, Inc. (NYSE:MOH)'s strategic efforts and adjustments in rate filings reflect growth potential, justifying the analyst's rating. For FY 2025, the Premium revenue is expected to be ~$42 billion, reflecting an increase of ~9% from FY 2024. Molina Healthcare, Inc. (NYSE:MOH) expects its FY 2025 GAAP earnings to be no less than $16.90 per diluted share. Oakmark Funds, advised by Harris Associates, released its Q2 2025 investor letter. Here is what the fund said: 'Molina Healthcare, Inc. (NYSE:MOH) is a leading managed care company. The company is the fourth largest player in managed Medicaid and has consistently delivered industry-leading margins historically. In our view, this is thanks to Molina Healthcare's exceptional management team and culture of operational excellence. Moreover, we think Molina Healthcare has a long runway for growth given its small scale relative to peers and untapped opportunities in their Medicare and Marketplace business segments. Recently, the Medicaid industry has come under substantial pressure due to a challenging redetermination cycle and additional headwinds from legislation under the current administration. This provided the opportunity to, in our view, purchase shares in a best-in-class managed care company at depressed valuation on trough earnings.' While we acknowledge the potential of MOH as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 13 Cheap AI Stocks to Buy According to Analysts and 11 Unstoppable Growth Stocks to Invest in Now Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
