Will the Bank of Canada cut interest rates? What economists expect
Many Canadians are eagerly watching the Bank of Canada's interest rate announcement this week to see if it could mean a bit more breathing room for their finances.
But many experts believe the current rates for those who make regular payments on loans like a mortgage won't be changing any time soon.
This is partly to do with how U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs are impacting Canada's economic landscape.
Canada's central bank could potentially change interest rates on Wednesday. Although most experts believe that amount won't rise in the near future, they say it is more likely rates will stay the same rather than come down.
'The Bank of Canada has little confidence in the outlook,' Bank of Nova Scotia vice-president and head of capital markets Derek Holt says.
Story continues below advertisement
'GDP is tracking a little firmer than anticipated and (the Bank of Canada) is in no rush to react.'
1:55
Tariff fears boost Canada's Q1 exports but hurt consumer spending
What is the Bank of Canada and how does it affect the economy?
Unlike regular banks — like those on Bay Street, for instance — the Bank of Canada acts in the interest of the economy as a whole rather than for its own profit, and is independent of the government and its policies.
Story continues below advertisement
Its mandate is to maintain economic stability, and it does so by regulating money supply and interest rates — the amount regular banks and other lenders can charge customers to borrow money.
Several times a year, the Bank of Canada updates interest rates when it sets monetary policy.
Regular banks set their own interest rate, known as the 'prime' rate, off of the benchmark or overnight rate, the rate floor that is set by the Bank of Canada.
The central bank's benchmark rate is currently set at 2.75 per cent, and could be updated on Wednesday.
4:11
First Ministers' meeting set to discuss interprovincial trade and U.S. relations
How does the Bank of Canada determine interest rates?
The central bank uses a combination of economic reports and surveys on business and consumer sentiment to determine monetary policy.
Story continues below advertisement
One of the key metrics is inflation, the main example being the consumer price index.
Get weekly money news
Get expert insights, Q&A on markets, housing, inflation, and personal finance information delivered to you every Saturday. Sign up for weekly money newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
This is a measure of the increasing prices for consumer goods and services. CPI in April showed that prices overall didn't rise as much as most economists predicted, but that was overshadowed by how much gas and energy prices fell from the removal of the consumer carbon price.
The underlying inflation gauge known as 'core' inflation actually showed an increase in April.
'We are a bit hesitant on (rate cuts) after the April CPI report,' says senior economist Jennifer Lee at the Bank of Montreal.
'The Bank of Canada is very focused on inflation — they have to make sure that they get inflation under control.'
The job market is also monitored closely, and has also been showing signs of weakness as businesses brace for rising costs from tariffs, and in some cases this has meant rising unemployment and job losses.
TD Bank has warned that the economy could see thousands of more jobs lost this year in addition the heightened recession risk, citing the trade war and tariffs.
On Friday, Statistics Canada will release the jobs report for May.
Story continues below advertisement
'The next jobs report two days after the Bank of Canada's decision is likely to post another loss,' Holt says.
The Bank of Canada also closely monitors the country's economic growth, including gross domestic product.
The GDP report for March and the first quarter of the year came in better than most economists expected, but they noted that a lot of the increased production output was businesses potentially stockpiling shelves and warehouses in anticipation of the financial impacts of the trade war.
'We are still expecting Canada to be hit negatively by the trade war and all of the uncertainty,' Lee says. 'We're still looking for a technical recession, which is two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth.'
0:55
Joly lays out Canada's plan forward at Aluminium Summit after Trump says tariffs will double to 50%
What could a rate cut mean for Canadians and the economy?
The Bank of Canada took a cautious approach at the last announcement, opting to leave rates as they are.
Story continues below advertisement
For many Canadians, changes to interest rates could mean the difference between paying off balances in full and struggling to make payments.
If someone has a variable-rate mortgage, for instance, and the Bank of Canada chooses to cut interest rates, then those mortgage holders will see their monthly costs come down.
Another example is if someone is applying for a mortgage or even a car loan, the rate they pay on that loan now may decrease the day after the central bank announces a rate cut.
'In Canada, we're sensitive to interest rates. But interestingly, I actually think lower rates are not the issue at all here,' says mortgage expert and broker Elan Weintraub at Mortgage Outlet.
'The issue is, (for borrowers,) 'Am I going to get laid off?' So I actually don't think interest rates are playing as big of a role.'
A cut to interest rates by the central bank could, in theory, make it more affordable for companies to hire new workers and boost production.
'The (Bank of Canada) should really be resuming interest rate cuts to buffer the Canadian economy,' says principal economist Andrew DiCapua at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce.
'I don't see a lot of upside inflation risks just given how much the Canadian economy could head into a recession in the coming months.'
Story continues below advertisement
4:27
Ontario, Saskatchewan sign free trade agreement in effort to boost economy amid Canada-U.S. tensions
How likely is a rate cut on Wednesday?
Many economists have been predicting a rate cut for Wednesday, but the odds have come down slightly given some of the recent economic data and trade war developments, including Trump's threat to increase steel and aluminium tariffs by 50 per cent.
'We are no longer looking for the Bank of Canada to cut rates this week,' Lee says.
Story continues below advertisement
'This new added uncertainty of a doubling of tariffs on steel and aluminum was a little bit of a wrench thrown into the mix.'
Holt also predicted no rate cut this time, saying, 'Markets now only have a one-in-five chance of a cut priced after backing away from what had been pricing for more than a quarter of a percentage point cut around early April.'
Although most economists aren't expecting a rate cut this time, many still feel that the central bank should consider cutting interest rates sooner than later.
'It's kind of a 50-50 call,' DiCapua says.
'They're waiting for this shoe to drop, so to speak — one clear data point that's showing the sort of widespread economic shock has begun, but there is more cutting that will need to be done this year.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
23 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
With Trump's budget bill looming, here's how U.S. foreign withholding tax works
Canadian investors may not be aware that when they earn income from a foreign investment, they may also be effectively paying a withholding tax to a foreign country. As countries cannot collect taxes from non-residents directly, most will hold back part of the income a foreign investor receives from a company incorporated in that country. 'It's just the simple way to make sure the government gets their tax,' says Karl Dennis, partner and national leader of the U.S. corporate tax team for KPMG in Canada. Now, a provision in U.S. tax legislation passed by the House of Representatives threatens to raise taxes on investors in Canada and in other countries that impose taxes, such as a digital services tax, that the U.S. deems unfair to U.S. corporations. Under section 899 of U.S. President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill, Canadians who hold U.S. securities or invest in U.S. companies through Canadian investment funds could see the rate of U.S. foreign withholding tax on dividends they receive rise significantly. At this point, cross-border tax experts have different interpretations of just how much the increase would be. Some understand the bill as increasing the rate of U.S. foreign withholding tax by a maximum of 20 percentage points, either to 35 per cent from the 15 per cent rate available under the Canada-U.S. tax treaty, or to 50 per cent from the 30 per cent statutory foreign withholding tax rate when a taxpayer is ineligible for the treaty rate. Others interpret the ceiling as 50 per cent, or a maximum of 20 percentage points above the statutory rate of 30 per cent, starting from the treaty rate of 15 per cent, where applicable. Tax experts say they're monitoring the progress of the bill and suggest the provision could be revised before its possible enactment. John Natale, head of tax, retirement and estate planning services, wealth, at Manulife Investment Management, says investors should speak with their financial advisors or tax advisors rather than sell U.S. investments solely because of the proposed legislation. 'Sometimes, people are eager or panic,' Mr. Natale says. Here's a brief overview of how U.S. withholding tax currently affects Canadian investors based on the types of investments and where those investments are held. (The tax implications for U.S. citizens who live in Canada aren't addressed in this article, as those investors would be treated differently.) Under the Canada-U.S. tax treaty, the U.S. imposes a withholding tax of 15 per cent on dividends paid from U.S. companies to Canadian investors, which is half the default rate of 30 per cent under U.S. tax law. To access the reduced treaty rate, a Canadian investor holding U.S. investments in a non-registered account needs to complete a U.S. W-8BEN form. The withholding tax applies to dividends but, in general, not to interest from bonds or savings accounts, or to capital gains realized on the sale of U.S. investments. (One exception is real estate: Canadians pay U.S. taxes on interest earned from U.S. rental property and on capital gains from selling U.S. real estate.) In a non-registered, taxable account, a Canadian investing directly in U.S. companies is subject to U.S. withholding tax on the dividends they receive. When a Canadian invests in a Canadian mutual fund or exchange-traded fund that invests in U.S. equities, the fund itself is the taxable entity in terms of U.S. withholding tax. The fund then distributes the foreign dividend income to the unitholder and reports the amount of foreign withholding tax. For example, a Canadian investor who is allocated $100 in U.S. dividends would receive $85, with the financial institution remitting $15 to the U.S. Internal Revenue Service. The financial institution would then issue a tax slip – either a T3 or a T5 – reporting $100 in foreign dividends and $15 of foreign tax paid. The investor would then report the $100 dividend on their income tax return and claim a foreign tax credit for $15. Under the proposed U.S. tax bill, the withholding rate would increase by five percentage points for every year the foreign country continues to charge an 'unfair' tax. (Cross-border experts have different interpretations on whether the increases would max out at 35 per cent or 50 per cent, where a treaty rate of 15 per cent is available.) Josée Baillargeon, director of taxation policy at the Securities and Investment Management Association, says it's unclear whether any additional taxes imposed under section 899 above the treaty rate would be eligible for a foreign tax credit or a deduction from income in Canada. 'We're currently seeking clarification on this matter from the Canada Revenue Agency,' Ms. Baillargeon said in a statement sent by e-mail. The U.S. doesn't recognize the tax-deferred status of Canadian registered plans that aren't retirement accounts, such as the tax-free savings account (TFSA), the registered education savings plan (RESP), the registered disability savings plan (RDSP) and the first-home savings account (FHSA). That means Canadians who invest in U.S. companies or hold Canadian mutual funds and ETFs that invest in U.S. equities held in TFSAs and RESPs are subject to U.S. foreign withholding tax on dividends, just as they would be if they held those investments in a taxable account. However, as these plans are tax-sheltered accounts in Canada, the Canadian investor doesn't receive a tax slip reporting the foreign dividends and foreign withholding tax, nor can they claim the foreign tax credit in Canada to offset the withholding tax. That means the 15 per cent U.S. withholding tax is a net cost to the investor that can't be recovered. The U.S. does recognize RRSPs, RRIFs, life income retirement accounts (LIRAs) and life income funds (LIFs) as retirement accounts and tax-deferred accounts. That means Canadians who invest in U.S. companies, or who hold ETFs listed on a U.S. exchange that invest in U.S. equities, are exempt from U.S. withholding tax on the dividends they receive. Adam Seliski, partner, international tax and transaction services with EY Canada, says it's unclear whether retirement accounts would continue to have access to their exempt status if section 899 were enacted. 'That's something we're monitoring very closely,' Mr. Seliski says. Even under current rules, the retirement account exemption isn't available for Canadian investors who hold Canadian mutual funds and ETFs that invest in U.S. equities. Canadian U.S. equity funds held in retirement accounts are subject to U.S. withholding tax, and investors don't have access to a foreign tax credit to offset, representing a drag on fund performance. While there may be an advantage to holding a U.S. investment directly in a registered retirement account in terms of avoiding U.S. foreign withholding tax, Canadian investors who own U.S. assets must also consider annual Canadian foreign reporting obligations, U.S. estate tax implications, and the cost of currency conversion.
Winnipeg Free Press
40 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Canadians divided on whether U.S. is an ‘ally' or ‘enemy' country: Poll
OTTAWA – Faced with a trade war they didn't start, Canadians are divided on whether they see the United States as an 'enemy' or an 'ally,' a new poll suggests. The Leger poll, which was conducted online and can't be assigned a margin of error, surveyed more than 1,500 people between May 30 and June 1. Almost a third of respondents said they view the U.S. as a 'neutral country,' while 27 per cent said they consider it an 'ally' and 26 per cent see it as an 'enemy country.' Just over a third of men said they consider the U.S. an ally, compared with one in five women. Almost 30 per cent of women said they view the U.S. as an enemy, compared with 22 per cent of men. Older Canadians, those at least 55 years of age, were more likely to consider the U.S. an enemy than younger Canadians. Regionally Albertans were most likely to consider the U.S. an ally while Ontarians and British Columbians were most likely to see it as an enemy. The difference is starkest between political party supporters, with 44 per cent of Conservative supporters saying they view the U.S. as an ally, compared with 17 per cent of Liberal supporters and 12 per cent of NDP supporters said the same. Comparatively 16 per cent of Conservative supporters said they view the U.S. as an enemy country, while 36 per cent of Liberal supporters and 41 per cent of NDP supporters said the same. U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order Tuesday to double his levies on steel and aluminum to 50 per cent. He claimed the measure will protect the country's national security and domestic industries. Prime Minister Mark Carney has said his government will need to take 'some time' to craft a response to the increased U.S. tariffs. The number of Canadians that report seeing the U.S. as an enemy country has dropped by six points since mid-March. At that time, 32 per cent of survey respondents told Leger they viewed the country as an enemy. The number of Canadians that view the U.S. as an ally also decreased by two percentage points since March, from 29 to 27 per cent, while the number that view it as a neutral country increased by six percentage points, from 24 to 30 per cent. Andrew Enns, Leger's executive vice-president for Central Canada, said that, broadly speaking, the patterns haven't changed much since the organization asked the question in February — when 27 per cent of respondents said they viewed the U.S. as an enemy and 30 per cent said they viewed it as an ally. Enns said the decline in the number of people saying the U.S. is an enemy likely reflects the overall sentiment on tariffs. 'It's still obviously there and, you know, clearly now we're dealing with higher steel tariffs, but the commentary coming from the White House and the Trump administration seems to have dissipated a bit and that's probably helping just tone things down,' he said. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Enns said Canada also has a new prime minister with a mandate that might 'take the edge off things.' 'I think that just keeps things more at a moderate level, and I think that reflects in people maybe feeling a little less threatened by the U.S.,' Enns said. Enns said political and business leaders have also sent a consistent message that the U.S. remains an important trading partner. He said that may encourage Canadians to believe there's a way to 'work things out.' The polling industry's professional body, the Canadian Research Insights Council, says online surveys cannot be assigned a margin of error because they do not randomly sample the population. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 5, 2025.
Winnipeg Free Press
40 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Canadian men, children held in Syria pursue human rights complaints against Ottawa
OTTAWA – A dozen Canadian men and children detained in Syria are complaining to the Canadian Human Rights Commission that Ottawa is discriminating against them by not assisting their return to Canada. The Canadians are among the foreign nationals who have endured squalid and dangerous conditions for years in camps and prisons run by Kurdish forces that reclaimed the war-ravaged region from militant group Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Some Canadian women and children have been repatriated in recent years with help from Canadian officials and the co-operation of Kurdish authorities. There are 12 complainants in the human rights commission case — five Canadian men and seven children aged five to 12. Lawyer Nicholas Pope, who launched the complaints, said federal policy guiding the repatriation of Canadians from the region discriminates based on age, sex and family status. Pope said the policy gives less favourable treatment to Canadian children whose mothers were not born in Canada. Canada has insisted that the remaining detained Canadian children, who were born to three non-Canadian mothers, be forcibly separated from their mothers and become orphans in Canada in order to receive repatriation services, he said. In addition, Ottawa has declined to help repatriate Canadian men. 'Every Canadian has the right to be treated equally,' Pope said in a statement. 'This is a rare situation in which the detaining authority holding Canadians abroad is actually pleading with us to end the detention, but it is Ottawa that is selectively refusing to let some Canadians return home.' Among the men complaining to the human rights commission is Jack Letts, who became a devoted Muslim as a teenager, went on holiday to Jordan, then studied in Kuwait before winding up in Syria. The Federal Court of Appeal ruled two years ago that Ottawa was not obligated under the law to repatriate Letts and three other Canadian men. The Supreme Court of Canada then declined to hear an appeal of the ruling. In accordance with the Canadian Human Rights Act, the human rights commission receives and screens complaints from people who believe they have experienced discrimination or harassment. The commission helps resolve disputes through mediation or conciliation, and sometimes refers complaints to the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, an independent body that can decide whether there is discrimination. Pope said the commission 'has put the files on a fast-track' and is requiring the government to participate in conciliation, which is in the process of being scheduled. The human rights commission did not respond to a request for comment. Global Affairs Canada spokeswoman Charlotte MacLeod said that due to confidentiality the department is unable to comment on cases before the human rights commission. The complaint filed last August on behalf of Letts says he suffers from anemia and experiences considerable pain from a potentially life-threatening kidney disorder, but he cannot access adequate medical treatment. 'The Complainant is held in prison in a small cell that is overcrowded and unsanitary,' the form reads. 'He lacks adequate food and medical attention. He has never been given any legal process to challenge his detention.' It notes that Canada has repatriated women and children from northeastern Syria under federal policy, but not any men, even though their conditions are more dire than those of the repatriated women and children. 'The blanket ban on repatriating adult males perpetuates the stereotype that men are more dangerous than women and children,' the complaint says. In a response filed with the commission concerning Letts's case, the federal government says the commission should refuse to deal with the complaint because 'the assessment of the complainant's situation is ongoing and a decision whether to provide extraordinary assistance has not yet been made.' The government also denies the allegation that Letts was not given repatriation assistance because of his sex or age. A statement of reply to the commission on behalf of Letts says the government has twice made determinations to refuse him repatriation services. In a response to the commission concerning the complaints involving children, the government denies the federal policy is discriminatory towards them on the basis of family status. MacLeod said Global Affairs continues to evaluate the provision of extraordinary assistance, including repatriation to Canada, on a case-by-case basis. 'Canadian consular officials remain actively engaged with authorities and international organizations operating in Syria for information on and assistance to Canadian citizens in custody,' she said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 5, 2025.
