Micah Parson stays silent as contract dispute with Cowboys continues
Parsons only said, "my mouth is closed," as he left the field after watching the team workout.
Jones resisted feigning optimism about a breakthrough in talks when the team breaks training camp and heads back to Dallas from Oxnard, California.
"I don't know that necessarily talks will," Jones said. "But we've got a game coming, and he's under contract."
Jones said there is "nothing" standing in the way of the team negotiating with Parsons, who said he formally and directly requested a trade out of Dallas to executive vice president Stephen Jones, Jerry Jones' son, earlier this month.
"I stayed quiet but again after repeated shots at myself and all the narratives I have made a tough decision I no longer want to play for the Dallas Cowboys," he wrote in a social media post on Aug. 1. "My trade request has been submitted to Stephen Jones personally."
Jerry Jones said Wednesday there is no deadline for the two sides to come to terms on a deal when asked if he could see negotiations ceasing before the regular-season opener on the road against the Philadelphia Eagles on Sept. 7.
"You don't have a deadline when you're playing under contract," he said.
Parsons, 26, was present on but never took the field as the Cowboys went through their final padded practice of camp on Wednesday.
The two-time All-Pro and four-time Pro Bowl selection is in the final year of his rookie contract and scheduled to be paid $24 million this season.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Times
2 hours ago
- Japan Times
ESPN will not air Spike Lee's docuseries on Colin Kaepernick, citing 'creative differences'
Director Spike Lee's multipart documentary series for ESPN Films about former NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick, who sparked a national debate when he protested racial injustice nearly a decade ago, will not be released, the filmmaker and ESPN said. "ESPN, Colin Kaepernick and Spike Lee have collectively decided to no longer proceed with this project as a result of certain creative differences," ESPN said in a statement on Saturday. "Despite not reaching finality, we appreciate all the hard work and collaboration that went into this film." Lee said Friday that the series was not going to be released. "It's not coming out. That's all I can say," Lee said on the red carpet ahead of the Harold and Carole Pump Foundation dinner, a fundraiser for cancer research and treatment, in Beverly Hills, California. Asked why, the Oscar-winning director declined to elaborate, citing a nondisclosure agreement. "I can't. I signed a nondisclosure. I can't talk about it." Kaepernick played for the San Francisco 49ers from 2011 to 2016. He ignited a national debate in 2016 when he knelt during the U.S. national anthem to protest systemic racism and police brutality. The 37-year-old athlete has not played in the NFL since that season. Many experts believed his political activism, which triggered a movement that drew the ire of U.S. President Donald Trump, was the key reason teams were wary of signing him. He later filed a collusion grievance against team owners, which was settled with the league in 2019. A representative for Kaepernick said the player had no comment about the docuseries on Saturday. Production on the series began in 2022, with Walt Disney-owned ESPN touting it as a "full, first-person account" of Kaepernick's journey that would feature extensive interviews with the player. In September, Puck News reported the project faced delays amid disagreements between Kaepernick and Lee over the direction of the film, and that ESPN Chairman Jimmy Pitaro was open to allowing the filmmakers to shop it elsewhere.
Japan Times
3 hours ago
- Japan Times
Canada moves to end Air Canada strike, seeks binding arbitration
The Canadian government on Saturday moved to end a strike by Air Canada's cabin crews and require binding arbitration to break their contract impasse, an action that the country's largest carrier had sought but unionized flight attendants fiercely opposed. Thousands of Air Canada flight attendants walked off the job for the first time since 1985, just before 1 a.m. Eastern Time after months of negotiations over a new contract. In anticipation of the stoppage, the airline canceled nearly all of its 700 daily flights, forcing more than 100,000 travelers to scramble for alternatives or stay put. The most contentious issue in the contract negotiations has been the union's demand for compensation for time spent on the ground between flights and when helping passengers board. Attendants are largely paid only when their plane is moving. Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu said at a news conference she had asked the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) to impose binding arbitration on both sides and order an immediate end to the strike. Still, she told reporters it may take 24 to 48 hours for the board to complete that work, while Air Canada has said restarting operations after a strike would take a week to complete. "This is not a decision that I've taken lightly, but the potential for immediate negative impact on Canadians and our economy is simply too great," Hajdu said. Air Canada had asked Prime Minister Mark Carney's minority Liberal government to make the request, but the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) said it wanted a negotiated solution, as binding arbitration would take pressure off the airline. The union said it has asked the CIRB's chairperson to recuse herself from hearing the case in a virtual session on Saturday afternoon because she has worked in the past as a senior counsel at Air Canada. The carrier declined comment on Hajdu's decision and hearing as the process is underway. Hajdu said the government preferred negotiated settlements to labor disputes, but the current impasse showed the two sides would not find a solution soon enough to spare the economy further damage. She said Canada had already experienced "unprecedented attacks on trade," referring to tariffs imposed by Washington on U.S.-bound shipments. Minutes after the announcement, the union blasted the government's decision. "The Liberal government is rewarding Air Canada's refusal to negotiate fairly by giving them exactly what they wanted," it said in a statement posted on X. Henly Larden, an Air Canada flight attendant and a vice president at CUPE, called the government's move "incredibly disgusting." "Air Canada should come and join us in good faith and address the matters that really resonate with our members,' a visibly emotional Larden said in a shaken voice at Vancouver airport. CUPE spokesperson Hugh Pouliot said that the strike will end only when the CIRB issues a binding arbitration notice to the parties. The board is likely to grant the government's request. While passengers have generally voiced support for the flight attendants on social media, Canadian businesses — already reeling from a trade dispute with the U.S. — have urged the federal government to impose binding arbitration and cut short the strike. "With both parties declaring an impasse in negotiations, with valuable cargo grounded and passengers stranded, the government made the right decision to refer the two sides to binding arbitration," Matthew Holmes, chief of public policy for the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, said in a statement. While the most contentious topic was compensation for time spent on the ground, there was also disagreement over broader wage issues. The carrier had offered a 38% increase in total compensation for flight attendants over four years, with a 25% raise in the first year, which CUPE said was insufficient. The union has said Air Canada offered to compensate flight attendants for some work that is now unpaid at 50% of their hourly rate. A source close to the negotiations said the union was looking for parity on wages with Canadian leisure carrier Air Transat. Its flight attendants approved a contract last year that provided for total compounded increases of 30% over five years, making them the highest paid in the industry in Canada. According to union data, a Transat flight attendant would start at an hourly rate of 40.38 Canadian dollars ($29.22), effective November 2025, compared with an entry level wage of CA$26.42 at Air Canada's low-cost service Air Canada Rouge or around CA$30 at the mainline carrier. Air Canada did not confirm if such a proposal had been put forth by the union. Earlier in the day outside Toronto Pearson International Airport — the country's busiest — hundreds of cabin crew waved flags, banners and picket signs. Union officials called on members to assemble outside all of the country's major airports, including in Toronto, Montreal, Calgary and Vancouver. Montreal-based Air Canada had said the suspended flights included those operated by Air Canada Rouge. Flights by Air Canada's regional affiliates — Air Canada Jazz and PAL Airlines — were operating as usual. Air Canada flies to more than 200 destinations, including Haneda Airport, Narita Airport and Kansai International Airport in Japan. Hajdu told reporters she had also asked the country's industrial relations board to extend the terms of the existing collective agreement until a new one is determined by the arbitrator. The Canada Labour Code gives the government the right to ask the industrial relations board to impose binding arbitration in the interests of protecting the economy. Under Justin Trudeau, Carney's predecessor, the government intervened quickly last year to head off rail and dock strikes that threatened to cripple the economy.
Japan Times
5 hours ago
- Japan Times
The AI talent war is the stuff of Steve Jobs' nightmares
You wouldn't have exactly called the late Steve Jobs a "man of letters,' but he certainly loved a searing email. One of Apple's co-founder's most famous writings is this 2005 memo to Bruce Chizen, Adobe's chief executive officer at the time. Bruce: Adobe is recruiting from Apple. They have hired one person already and are calling lots more. I have a standing policy with our recruiters that we don't recruit from Adobe. It seems you have a different policy. One of us must change our policy. Please let me know who. Steve The email, along with many others, was submitted as evidence in a fascinating legal saga between the Department of Justice's antitrust unit, eight Silicon Valley companies and tens of thousands of tech employees who contended their earnings were repressed because of this collusion between company bosses. The companies — Apple, Adobe, Google, Intel, Intuit, eBay, Pixar and Lucasfilm — were ultimately forced to pay almost $500 million in settlements. Thanks to his way with words, Jobs made himself the center of attention in what is surely one of the most caught-red-handed cases in the history of the U.S. tech industry. "I would be very pleased if your recruiting department would stop doing this,' he wrote to Google President Eric Schmidt in 2007, forwarding a cold email from Google's recruiting team. The recruiter was promptly fired. In a separate incident, Google co-founder Sergey Brin told colleagues he had an "irate' call from Jobs who had threatened "war' if Google continued to try to recruit talent from Apple's web browser team. Offers to any more people should stop until they "get permission from Apple,' Brin instructed. "There was no question they were colluding,' recalled economist Orley Ashenfelter, who testified as a witness in one of the civil cases. The legal fallout "sent a lesson to the human resources people in the various companies as to what is really appropriate to do. The question is: How long does that lesson last?' Today, as some of the same players become locked in AI talent wars, we're starting to get a sense of what Jobs was so afraid of: A no-holds-barred fight for the best people, with employees holding all the cards. Top engineers are being courted like starting pitchers and star quarterbacks. Meta Platforms, for instance, is going after talent with "pay packages of up to $300 million over four years,' reported Wired, citing internal sources. (Meta disputes the framing.) Whatever the size of the packages, the aggression is causing considerable anguish among company leaders. "I feel a visceral feeling right now, as if someone has broken into our home and stolen something,' wrote OpenAI's chief research officer, Mark Chen, in a memo obtained by Wired. Few will have much sympathy for those at the top, I suppose, but other risks affect the rank-and-file. Such outlandish packages upend the compensation scales that give some semblance of fairness across a company, Ashenfelter said. Deedy Das, an AI investor with Menlo Ventures, told Business Insider there's a "sense of jealousy, envy and helplessness.' But OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, while fiercely competitive, knows better than to try to do what Jobs did and stop companies from poaching his talent with quiet backroom deals. For one thing, the main players seem to have a growing contempt for one another. And more significant, the option for talented AI engineers isn't limited to the largest companies. "Compared to the past,' points out Firas Sozan, CEO of tech recruitment group Harrison Clarke, "you don't need as many engineers to build a product. I think partly why Mark Zuckerberg is doing this is because an amazing engineer will just end up speaking to Intel Capital or Andreessen Horowitz and get term sheets to start their own company.' Maybe, as a result of all this, we'll start to see a swing back to tech companies trying to convince workers that their role isn't a job but a calling that's greater than the number of commas in their paychecks. "Are we seeing the reasons for joining companies less about the compensation and more about what's actually being built? 100%,' Sozan says. OpenAI's pitch to prevent its workers from leaving is to make the case that artificial general intelligence is the company's one and only true goal, and every part of its work is dedicated to achieving it, whereas those working on Meta's AI will spend at least some of their time thinking about how it can be used to better serve up shoddy viral videos to your grandmother. "Missionaries will beat mercenaries,' Altman said to staff in a memo. Ilya Sutskever, an OpenAI co-founder who left to launch his own startup, Safe Superintelligence, reassured employees that he would not be entertaining efforts to sell the company amid rumors Meta tried to buy the entire team. "We have the compute, we have the team and we know what to do,' he wrote. "Together we will keep building safe superintelligence.' Nevertheless, he appears to have lost his CEO, Daniel Gross, to Meta. The bring-your-whole-self talk went a little out of fashion in the post-pandemic layoff era — which for those outside AI teams is still happening — but I wouldn't be surprised to see a new variant. AI companies can't rely on the bully tactics employed by Jobs to keep employees from seeking better and more lucrative opportunities. Instead, leaders must convince employees that their AI work is the one that will matter most in the history books. Whether employees will buy it is another thing. Dave Lee is Bloomberg Opinion's U.S. technology columnist.
