
US military adjusts Africa strategy – DW – 06/10/2025
The US military is urging African countries to be more responsible for their security as the Trump administration focuses on domestic policies. But could the move fuel militant groups and undo counterterrorism progress?
Africa should take greater ownership of its own security challenges. That was the message recently communicated by Gen. Michael Langley, head of US Africa Command (USAFRICOM). The unit is part of the US Department of Defense and is responsible for all Department of Defense operations and security cooperation on the African continent.
The announcement comes as the United States rethinks its military strategy in Africa, signaling a significant shift in its approach to security on the continent.
This adjustment aligns with a broader strategic pivot under the Trump administration, which is prioritizing homeland security and a leaner, more lethal military force, while reducing the US military footprint overseas, including in Africa.
But could it mean for the continent?
Africa's global relevance
Africa is strategically important to European countries and the United States for its growing population and vast natural resources.
"Africa is a strategic partner with a large and growing youth population — projected to double by 2045 according to the African Economic Outlook," Adib Saani, a foreign policy and security analyst told DW. "The continent is rich, holding vast mineral resources and strategic reserves like uranium that both Western and Eastern countries heavily rely on." The continent is also home to 11 of the world's 20 fastest-growing economies in 2024.
"The US and others engage with Africa not just out of goodwill but because these resources are vital for running industries worldwide," Saani said. "This makes the relationship mutually beneficial — a win-win for Africa and the rest of the world."
However, the Trump administration's defense strategy has shifted focus away from protecting the US from threats emanating from abroad, including countering terrorist organizations such as the "Islamic State" (IS) militant group and al-Qaeda, which have expanded their presence and capabilities in Africa.
How USAID cuts are fueling Africa's humanitarian crises
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
'Sharing the burden' of security operations
Previously, US military efforts in Africa combined defense, diplomacy, and development. "America has been a close partner in countering violent extremism, especially in Eastern and West Africa,' Saani explained. "We have relied heavily on US logistics, training, and intelligence sharing to address these threats. In terms of human security, the US hasalso contributed through USAID and other programs that have helped lift many out of poverty."
US Marine Corps Gen. Michael Langley said the military's priorities now focus on homeland protection. He instead encouraged "burden sharing" with African partners. He said the goal is to build local military capacity to enable independent operations and reduce reliance on US forces. This shift was evident during the 25th African Lion joint military exercise. The annual event is the largest military exercise on the continent and emphasizes combined air, land and sea operations with more than 40 participating nations. It lacked the US-led efforts usually apparent and instead focused on collaboration and cooperation.
Historically, the US has played in a major role in security operations on the continent, including in Somalia Image: Senior Airman Kristin Savage/Combined Joint Task Force - Horn of Africa/AP Photo/picture alliance
What could reduced US involvement mean?
Yet foreign policy analyst Adib Saani warns that a diminished US presence could create a power vacuum, emboldening militant networks and undermining years of counter-terrorism efforts. "If the US withdraws its support, it would hit us hard. It could embolden terrorists to carry out more lethal and audacious attacks, knowing there is no major power backing our fight. This would also dampen the morale of our soldiers who face these threats daily, and place significant economic pressure on affected countries."
USAFRICOM currently deploys roughly 6,500 personnel across Africa and has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in security assistance. With that gone, Saani worries that Africa will not be able to be fully indipendent when it comes to security: "It will be difficult in terms of logistics and technology — we are simply not there yet. Security is a shared responsibility and works best when it involves multiple actors. In my opinion, Africa cannot do it alone."
Exploiting Africa — the hunt for raw materials
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Russia and China step in
African countries will need to look for other allies – both new and old, say experts. China has already launched extensive military training programs for African forces, replicating aspects of the US military model, while Russian mercenariesestablish themselves as key security partners in North, West, and Central Africa.
"China'sapproach in the past has mainly been economic," Saani explained. The US, he points out, has primarily focused on military support, in addition to economic help. "The Russians have strong presence with both economic and military involvement. It feels like everyone is competing for attention. The clear message is that there's a need to diversify partnerships. We can't rely solely on the US; we may also need to engage with the Russians and others."
Niger: US military operations across the Sahel are at risk
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Can succeed alone?
Some voices say that the lack of US support could be a wake-up call for African countries that forces them to consider their own resources and rise to the challenge.
African nations can now take the opportunity to review their security resources, Saani says, and collaborate more closely. "Building up our defense industry is also critical. This means developing industrial capacity and enhancing the capabilities of our armed forces," adds the analyst. "We also need to tackle corruption to ensure that funds are not getting lost in people's pockets but are instead used to improve people's lives."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
an hour ago
- DW
US shifts Africa security strategy amid global pivot – DW – 06/10/2025
The US military is urging African countries to be more responsible for their own security as the Trump administration focuses on domestic policies. Could the move fuel militant groups and undo counterterrorism progress? Africa should take greater ownership of its own security challenges. That was the message recently communicated by General Michael Langley, head of US Africa Command (USAFRICOM). The unit is part of the US Department of Defense and is responsible for all defense operations and security cooperation on the African continent. The announcement comes as the United States rethinks its military strategy in Africa, signaling a significant shift in its approach to security on the continent. This adjustment aligns with a broader strategic pivot under the Trump administration, which is prioritizing homeland security and a leaner, more lethal military force, while reducing the US military footprint overseas, including in Africa. But what could it mean for the continent? Africa's global relevance With its growing population and vast natural resources, Africa is strategically important to Europe and the United States. "Africa is a strategic partner with a large and growing youth population — projected to double by 2045 according to the African Economic Outlook," Adib Saani, a foreign policy and security analyst, told DW. "The continent is rich, holding vast mineral resources and strategic reserves like uranium that both Western and Eastern countries heavily rely on." The continent was also home to 11 of the world's 20 fastest-growing economies in 2024. "The US and others engage with Africa not just out of goodwill but because these resources are vital for running industries worldwide," Saani said. "This makes the relationship mutually beneficial — a win-win for Africa and the rest of the world." However, the Trump administration's defense strategy has shifted focus away from protecting the US from threats emanating from abroad, including countering terrorist organizations such as the so-called "Islamic State" (IS) militant group and al-Qaeda, which have expanded their presence and capabilities in Africa. How USAID cuts are fueling Africa's humanitarian crises To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 'Sharing the burden' of US-Africa security operations Previously, US military efforts in Africa combined defense, diplomacy and development. "America has been a close partner in countering violent extremism, especially in Eastern and West Africa," Saani explained. "We have relied heavily on US logistics, training and intelligence sharing to address these threats. In terms of human security, the US has also contributed through USAID and other programs that have helped lift many out of poverty." USAFRICOM head Langley said the military's priorities now focus on homeland protection, encouraging instead "burden sharing" with African partners. He said the goal is to build local military capacity to enable independent operations and reduce reliance on US forces. This shift was evident during the latest African Lion joint military exercise. The annual event is the largest military exercise on the continent and emphasizes combined air, land and sea operations with more than 40 participating nations. The latest edition, in May, lacked the US-led efforts usually apparent and instead focused on collaboration and cooperation. Historically, the US has played in a major role in security operations on the continent, including in Somalia Image: Senior Airman Kristin Savage/Combined Joint Task Force - Horn of Africa/AP Photo/picture alliance What could reduced US involvement mean? Yet foreign policy analyst Adib Saani warned that a diminished US presence could create a power vacuum, emboldening militant networks and undermining years of counterterrorism efforts. "If the US withdraws its support, it would hit us hard. It could embolden terrorists to carry out more lethal and audacious attacks, knowing there is no major power backing our fight. This would also dampen the morale of our soldiers who face these threats daily, and place significant economic pressure on affected countries," he said. USAFRICOM currently deploys roughly 6,500 personnel across Africa and has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in security assistance. Without that, Saani worries that Africa will not be able to be fully independent in terms of security. "It will be difficult in terms of logistics and technology — we are simply not there yet. Security is a shared responsibility and works best when it involves multiple actors. In my opinion, Africa cannot do it alone." Exploiting Africa in the hunt for raw materials To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Russia, China step in to fill security vacuum African countries will need to look for other allies — both new and old, say experts. China has already launched extensive military training programs for African forces, replicating aspects of the US military model, while Russian mercenaries have established themselves as key security partners in North, West and Central Africa. "China's approach in the past has mainly been economic," Saani explained. The US, he pointed out, has primarily focused on military support, in addition to providing economic help. "The Russians have strong presence with both economic and military involvement. It feels like everyone is competing for attention. The clear message is that there's a need to diversify partnerships. We can't rely solely on the US; we may also need to engage more with the Russians and others." Niger: US military operations across the Sahel are at risk To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Can Africa succeed alone? Some voices say the lack of US support could be a wake-up call for African countries, forcing them to consider their own resources and rise to the challenge. African nations must now take the opportunity to review their security resources, Saani said, and collaborate more closely. "Building up our defense industry is also critical. This means developing industrial capacity and enhancing the capabilities of our armed forces," he added. "We also need to tackle corruption to ensure that funds are not getting lost in people's pockets but are instead used to improve people's lives." Editor: Sarah Hucal


DW
3 hours ago
- DW
US military adjusts Africa security strategy – DW – 06/10/2025
The US military is urging African countries to be more responsible for their own security as the Trump administration focuses on domestic policies. Could the move fuel militant groups and undo counterterrorism progress? Africa should take greater ownership of its own security challenges. That was the message recently communicated by General Michael Langley, head of US Africa Command (USAFRICOM). The unit is part of the US Department of Defense and is responsible for all defense operations and security cooperation on the African continent. The announcement comes as the United States rethinks its military strategy in Africa, signaling a significant shift in its approach to security on the continent. This adjustment aligns with a broader strategic pivot under the Trump administration, which is prioritizing homeland security and a leaner, more lethal military force, while reducing the US military footprint overseas, including in Africa. But what could it mean for the continent? Africa's global relevance With its growing population and vast natural resources, Africa is strategically important to Europe and the United States. "Africa is a strategic partner with a large and growing youth population — projected to double by 2045 according to the African Economic Outlook," Adib Saani, a foreign policy and security analyst, told DW. "The continent is rich, holding vast mineral resources and strategic reserves like uranium that both Western and Eastern countries heavily rely on." The continent was also home to 11 of the world's 20 fastest-growing economies in 2024. "The US and others engage with Africa not just out of goodwill but because these resources are vital for running industries worldwide," Saani said. "This makes the relationship mutually beneficial — a win-win for Africa and the rest of the world." However, the Trump administration's defense strategy has shifted focus away from protecting the US from threats emanating from abroad, including countering terrorist organizations such as the so-called "Islamic State" (IS) militant group and al-Qaeda, which have expanded their presence and capabilities in Africa. How USAID cuts are fueling Africa's humanitarian crises To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 'Sharing the burden' of security operations Previously, US military efforts in Africa combined defense, diplomacy and development. "America has been a close partner in countering violent extremism, especially in Eastern and West Africa," Saani explained. "We have relied heavily on US logistics, training and intelligence sharing to address these threats. In terms of human security, the US has also contributed through USAID and other programs that have helped lift many out of poverty." USAFRICOM head Langley said the military's priorities now focus on homeland protection, encouraging instead "burden sharing" with African partners. He said the goal is to build local military capacity to enable independent operations and reduce reliance on US forces. This shift was evident during the latest African Lion joint military exercise. The annual event is the largest military exercise on the continent and emphasizes combined air, land and sea operations with more than 40 participating nations. The latest edition, in May, lacked the US-led efforts usually apparent and instead focused on collaboration and cooperation. Historically, the US has played in a major role in security operations on the continent, including in Somalia Image: Senior Airman Kristin Savage/Combined Joint Task Force - Horn of Africa/AP Photo/picture alliance What could reduced US involvement mean? Yet foreign policy analyst Adib Saani warned that a diminished US presence could create a power vacuum, emboldening militant networks and undermining years of counterterrorism efforts. "If the US withdraws its support, it would hit us hard. It could embolden terrorists to carry out more lethal and audacious attacks, knowing there is no major power backing our fight. This would also dampen the morale of our soldiers who face these threats daily, and place significant economic pressure on affected countries," he said. USAFRICOM currently deploys roughly 6,500 personnel across Africa and has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in security assistance. With that gone, Saani worries Africa will not be able to be fully independent when it comes to security. "It will be difficult in terms of logistics and technology — we are simply not there yet. Security is a shared responsibility and works best when it involves multiple actors. In my opinion, Africa cannot do it alone." Exploiting Africa in the hunt for raw materials To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Russia, China step in to fill security vacuum African countries will need to look for other allies — both new and old, say experts. China has already launched extensive military training programs for African forces, replicating aspects of the US military model, while Russian mercenaries have established themselves as key security partners in North, West and Central Africa. "China's approach in the past has mainly been economic," Saani explained. The US, he pointed out, has primarily focused on military support, in addition to providing economic help. "The Russians have strong presence with both economic and military involvement. It feels like everyone is competing for attention. The clear message is that there's a need to diversify partnerships. We can't rely solely on the US; we may also need to engage more with the Russians and others." Niger: US military operations across the Sahel are at risk To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Can Africa succeed alone? Some voices say the lack of US support could be a wake-up call for African countries, forcing them to consider their own resources and rise to the challenge. African nations must now take the opportunity to review their security resources, Saani said, and collaborate more closely. "Building up our defense industry is also critical. This means developing industrial capacity and enhancing the capabilities of our armed forces," he added. "We also need to tackle corruption to ensure that funds are not getting lost in people's pockets but are instead used to improve people's lives." Editor: Sarah Hucal


DW
4 hours ago
- DW
World Cup 2026: Could cohost politics have an impact? – DW – 06/11/2025
A year out from a football World Cup across three countries, tensions between the USA, Canada and Mexico hang over preparations. From travel bans and trade wars to presidential grandstanding, politics could play a part. A year out from the World Cup in the USA, Canada and Mexico, host city Los Angeles is engulfed in protests related to the deportation of Mexicans and other minorities, an ever-shifting trade war threatens relations between the three hosts and a travel ban will prevent some fans attending. While the whims of US President Donald Trump make predictions perilous, fans, players and national teams must already start to make plans for one of sport's biggest events, one secured in Trump's first term when relations between the countires were much more harmonious. The ongoing riots are an immediate safety concern for the Club World Cup in the USA, with European champions Paris Saint-Germain set to meet Atletico Madrid in LA on the tournament's opening day on June 15 while the same city will host the first US game of the 2026 World Cup on June 12, a day after the tournament opens in Mexico. Trump's travel ban, which came in to effect on Monday, bars citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo-Brazzaville, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen from entering the US. An exception was made for "any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the secretary of state" but not for fans. Iran have already qualified for the World Cup but currently fans would not be able to travel to support them in the USA. Trump sees opportunity in sport The same is not yet true for citizens of Mexico and Canada. And for Andrew Zimbalist, Professor Emeritus of Economics at Smith College in the United States and author of "Circus Maximus: The Economic Gamble Behind Hosting the Olympics and the World Cup," putting on a good show to burnish his own reputation is likely to be at the forefront of Trump's mind. Trump issues travel ban for people from 12 countries To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video "Mr. Trump has shown a willingness to make exceptions when there's pressure. And I think further that Trump cares. He's a sports fan. He cares about his international image. He cares about the attention that that will come to him when both the Club World Cup in 2025 and the real World Cup in 2026 happen. These are photo opportunities for Trump to bask in in the game's glory," he told DW. Zimbalist added that with Trump, things can always change quickly. "There's a tremendous amount of tension and a tremendous amount of uncertainty about how Mr. Trump will behave, and we never know." World Cup cohosts Canada and Mexico were, along with China, the first countries targeted in the evolving tariff war that began soon after Trump took office. Zimbalist doesn't predict the uneasiness at governmental level will have a significant impact on the tournament, arguing that there will be enough fans prepared to travel for games that any discouraged from doing so will not be noticeable. He also believes that relatively new leaders in Claudia Scheinbaum (Mexico, elected October 2024) and Mark Carney (Canada, elected March 2025) will not allow their countries to become marginalized. "I think both with Carney in Canada and Scheinbaum in Mexico, that he has met his real enemy. These leaders are not bowing down to him, and they're both very, very smart, very well prepared, and at the moment, are popular in their countries. And so they have the latitude to take on Trump." Mexican fans uncertain on match travel Nevertheless, for Mexican fans in particular, traveling across the border to World Cup, or indeed Club World Cup games, in the USA is a fraught business. "I don't feel afraid to go to the United States but it feels little bit like going to someone else's house where you are not welcome," said Alan, a Pachuca fan talking to DW ahead of his team's participation in the Club World Cup. Iran fans will not be able to travel to World Cup games in the USA as things stand Image: Ismael Adnan Yaqoob/Anadolu/picture alliance Other Pachuca fans complained that significant visa processing delays, some up to two years, meant they would have been unable to travel to support their team even without the current safety concerns. "Appointments were delayed and then the president said that some Mexicans shouldn't go there, I think that has a big influence on why they're taking so long with the visas," said Axel. "I would feel a little unsafe around the police and everything government-related and that side of the United States." While demand for, and interest in, the World Cup will be on a different level to the revamped Club World Cup, which has proved controversial in some quarters, and stands may be filled with foreign nationals who live in any of the North American countries, it does seem like political relations will have some impact on fans, even if the stands will be full. Canada and Mexico more able to stand up against Trump While Canadians are not quite as central to the current events in LA, the USA's northerly neighbors have been at loggerheads with the Trump administration. The Star Spangled Banner was booed at ice hockey games in Canada in recent months and Carney's surprise election was partly ascribed to his willingness to take on Trump and his plan to make Canada the 51st state of the USA. "Having met with the owners of Canada over the course of the campaign in the last several months, it's not for sale. Won't be for sale, ever," Carney told Trump when the pair met in May in a meeting that was otherwise relatively cordial despite clear tensions. For those hoping to plan a visit to, or participation in, the World Cup, judging the political mood – and the implications of changes in it – have become as important as waiting for results from qualifying. "I could see it happening along the way that if Scheinbaum becomes a little bit more aggressive than Trump wants her to be, or challenges some of Trump's immigration moves, that he would say: "You know what? I might not let Mexico participate in the World Cup, or I might not let this happen or that happen.' So I can see threats like that, but I'd have to believe that they wouldn't be carried out," said Zimbalist, musing on what might play out in the next year but speaking ahead of the LA protests. The Club World Cup, which starts on Saturday and is hosted solely by the USA, is perceived by some as a test of elements of the country's readiness to host the World Cup. But the development or deterioration of relations between the three cohosts will be critical to next year's tournament's success. Edited by: Chuck Penfold