
Oil steadies as concerns about tariff impacts vie with Russian supply threats
Brent crude futures rose 4 cents, or 0.06%, to $71.74 a barrel by 1201 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude rose 1 cent, or 0.01%, to $69.27.
Still, Brent prices are set to gain 4.9% for the week while WTI is set to climb 6.4% after U.S. President Donald Trump earlier this week threatened to place tariffs on buyers of Russian crude, particularly China and India, to coax Russia into halting its war against Ukraine.
On Friday though, investors were more focused on Trump's imposition of new, and mostly higher, tariff rates on U.S. trading partners set to go into effect on August 1.
Trump signed an executive order on Thursday imposing tariffs ranging from 10% to 41% on U.S. imports from dozens of countries and foreign locations including Canada, India and Taiwan that failed to reach trade deals by his deadline of August 1.
Some analysts have warned the levies will limit economic growth by raising prices, which would weigh on oil consumption.
On Thursday, there were signs that existing tariffs are already pressuring prices higher in the U.S., the world's biggest economy and oil consumer.
U.S. inflation increased in June as tariffs boosted prices for imported goods such as household furniture and recreation products. This is supporting views that price pressures would pick up in the second half of the year and delay the Federal Reserve from cutting interest rates until at least October.
Maintaining interest rates would also impact oil as the higher borrowing costs can limit economic growth.
At the same time, Trump's threats to impose 100% secondary tariffs on Russian crude buyers have supported prices because of concerns that would disrupt oil trade flows and remove some oil from the market.
JP Morgan analysts said in a note on Thursday Trump's warnings to China and India of penalties on their ongoing purchases of Russian oil potentially puts 2.75 million barrels per day of Russian seaborne oil exports at risk. The two countries are the world's second- and third-largest crude consumers, respectively.
"The Trump administration, like its predecessors, will likely find sanctioning the world's second-largest oil exporter unfeasible without spiking oil prices," the analysts said, referring to Russia.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Indian Rupee Weakens Amid 25% Tariff Warning
Indian rupee(INR) slides to a fresh low of ?87.79 after Trump threatens 25% tariffs. The rupee gave up more ground from Monday's ?87.65 close as traders brace for penalties over India's discounted Russian oil imports, echoing a wider emerging-market stumble this week. Trump took to Truth Social to accuse New Delhi of scooping up cheap Russian crude and flipping it for big profits, vowing a substantial tariff hike and even dubbing India a dead economy. India shot back, calling the threats unjustified and unreasonable. India imported 1.7 M bbl/day of crude in Q1, with roughly 40% coming from Russia. If the U.S. follows through, refiners may scramble to buy more Middle Eastern and Atlantic Basin barrels, driving up import bills and domestic fuel prices. A weaker rupee could swell India's $100 billion import bill, pinch corporate margins and stoke will eye the RBI's Aug 8 policy review and any fresh U.S. tariff updates for clues on the next move. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Plans New Semiconductor Tariffs to Boost U.S. Chipmaking
President Donald Trump said Tuesday he plans to unveil new semiconductor tariffs within the next week, aiming to expand U.S. chip manufacturing and reduce reliance on overseas suppliers. Speaking on CNBC's Squawk Box, Trump said the tariffs would target semiconductors and chips as a separate category, underscoring his push to keep production in the U.S. The announcement follows an executive order imposing fresh duties on imports from multiple countries, with Taiwanese goods now set to face a 20% tariff down from the 32% initially floated in April. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with CPNG. The move comes as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (TSM, Financials) continues to dominate global production of advanced chips for major customers, including Apple (AAPL, Financials), Nvidia (NVDA, Financials), Qualcomm (QCOM, Financials) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD, Financials). Trump also signaled additional tariff hikes could be coming in other sectors, saying pharmaceutical duties might eventually reach 250%. The administration's trade agenda has increasingly leaned on tariffs as a way to influence supply chains and strengthen domestic production capacity. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Melden Sie sich an, um Ihr Portfolio aufzurufen. Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten Fehler beim Abrufen der Daten
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's firing of the labor statistics chief could lead to a financial crisis
Donald Trump's firing of Bureau of Labor Statistics Commissioner Erika McEntarfer for releasing truthful employment figures showing a faltering U.S. economy is clearly not good news. But the consequences might be even worse than you think. Trump's actions weren't based on a methodological disagreement. He fired McEntarfer because he doesn't like the U.S. government releasing accurate numbers about the state of our economy — at least not when they make him look bad. In the short run, with luck, the impacts could be relatively modest. In the long run, without reforms to ensure quality data, this will lead to significantly slower economic growth than in other countries, and perhaps even a financial crisis. After McEntarfer's firing, government economic data can no longer be trusted or relied upon under this administration. Trump will not be able to appoint anyone with credibility to take over as BLS commissioner when it's already clear that person could be fired for releasing accurate data. The same goes for other statistical agencies, too. This doesn't mean all government data will be fraudulent going forward, but it does mean it will be less trustworthy. Government data analysts will do their best to produce credible reports, and much of what they publish will be accurate, but these workers will be increasingly subject to political pressures, or outright meddling. Reputational damage has already been done — and the decline in trust carries real consequences. The free availability of high-quality economic data from the government is an important part of how our economy operates. Businesses, entrepreneurs and families can't make good plans based on untrustworthy information. In practice, politicized data means the economic advantages Americans have long enjoyed — such as lower borrowing costs than the rest of the world — will begin to erode. Indeed, some experts and investors are already questioning whether higher interest rates will be necessary to compensate for the increased risks in the American economy brought about by Trump's firing of the BLS commissioner. This could lead to higher costs for both the U.S. government's debt payments and Americans' mortgages. Data reliability problems also create an uneven playing field for data, subtly undermining economic competition and growth. There will still be plenty of economic information available—it's just that the best data available won't be as good, and it won't be available to as many people. Private data companies will produce their own reports, but they simply aren't capable of the same scale as the government's current data collection efforts, and some of their reports will only be available to those who can pay. Established corporations that can afford alternative data sources will have a greater economic edge. Entrepreneurs won't have the same level of information to help them challenge more established players, so they'll do so less frequently and with less success. Worse, only Trump and his cronies will know whether, and how, government data has been juiced. This will give their companies a competitive economic advantage, further stifling competition. It also creates an additional incentive for corruption — and there is overwhelming evidence that corruption hinders growth in the long-run. Most troublingly, bad data can lead to financial crises because it allows political leaders to steer their countries into worse economic trouble than they would otherwise be able to. It's harder for investors, political opponents and anyone else outside the executive branch to warn about an inflationary or debt crisis if they don't know about it. Bad data can also exacerbate crises, as people are more likely to panic based solely on rumor. More and more, the United States looks like the countries we don't want to emulate. Firing the BLS commissioner echoes early warning signs from Argentina and China where gutting independent economic institutions paved the way for major economic collapse. Reliable data is but one of the many reasons democracies are generally rich and autocracies often are not. Autocrats try to erase facts that don't fit their preferred narrative. They get rid of people who tell the truth, including government experts, and use fear to stop dissent. Unsurprisingly, then, autocracies also frequently suffer deep economic crises. Firing the BLS commissioner may seem like a modest change in all the chaos the Trump administration has created, but it is not. Real damage has already been done. Still, most of the harmful economic consequences will be felt in the long term. This means there's still time for Americans to push back, and ensure the next administration can't cook the books. This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword