Australian Robert Pether released from Iraqi prison four years after being arbitrarily detained
Australian engineer Robert Pether has been released from his Iraq jail cell more than four years after he was arbitrarily detained.
Pether was working on a project to help build the new headquarters for the Central Bank of Iraq when he was detained in Baghdad in April 2021.
He had flown in for a meeting with bank officials to resolve a dispute they were having with his engineering firm, CME Consulting, over the project.
Pether was later sentenced and fined over allegations that his firm spent money that should have gone to an architect and a subcontractor.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
In a report in March 2022, the United Nations working group on arbitrary detention found Pether had been arbitrarily detained in breach of international law.
It also heard allegations that Pether and his Egyptian colleague's trials were compromised and that he had been subjected to torture-like practices. The body called for their immediate and unconditional release.
After more than four years in prison, Pether has now been released.
Pether's wife, Desree, welcomed the development and said her family were 'grateful to everyone who contributed to this happening'.
But she also warned her husband remains trapped in Iraq due to a travel ban, and urgently needs medical care.
'He's unrecognisable,' she told Guardian Australia. 'So frail and weak. He needs urgent medical care and that's not possible in Iraq.'
The foreign minister, Penny Wong, said the Australian government had raised the case with Iraqi authorities more than 200 times.
'I want to thank Australian officials for their tireless work on Mr Pether's case, including Australia's special envoy who travelled to Iraq in recent weeks to negotiate for this outcome,' she said.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
The case has prompted prime ministerial intervention, with Anthony Albanese raising Pether's detention with then Iraqi prime minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi in 2022.
In 2022, the Guardian obtained an emotional letter from Pether to his family, penned from behind bars. The letter warned his family that his prognosis was 'bleak' and that he was facing a potential 'death sentence'.
Pether also wrote of his daily torment about how he should break it to his children that he might not be coming home.
'How do you tell a little girl who loves unicorns and cats that her daddy will not be coming home? How do you tell your children that you are proud of them, but will not be sharing the accolades (and pitfalls) of their lives with them?,' Pether wrote.
'And toughest of all, how do you tell your wife, who is very much the other half of you, that you will not be keeping the promise you made to grow old together?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Scott Morrison sought advice to obstruct Nauru asylum seekers from accessing abortions, documents reveal
Scott Morrison overrode medical advice in the case of an asylum seeker in offshore detention trying to access an abortion, and had previously sought advice that would effectively prevent access to terminations entirely, ministerial advice reveals. Documents released under freedom of information laws show Morrison, in 2014 as immigration minister, had sought advice to deny the transfer of women to a hospital on the Australian mainland to access termination services before 20 weeks' gestation. Abortion is illegal on Nauru, except to save the mother's life, and carries a prison term of up to 14 years. Termination laws differ across Australian states, but if pregnant women in offshore detention were prohibited from accessing abortion services in Australia until after 20 weeks, it would be far more difficult to access those services at all. A handwritten note by Morrison, on a document dated June 2014, stated: 'I would also like advice on denying transfer pre 20 weeks for pregnant women.' In the same document, Morrison specified that women should only be transferred to Brisbane, not South Australia, the Northern Territory or Victoria for abortion services. Morrison did not respond to requests for comment, and Guardian Australia cannot confirm what advice he received. In the case of a woman, who was not identified in the redacted documents, medical advice recommended she be transferred to Victoria for an abortion, over Brisbane where she would have had to have waited a week for a hospital ethics panel to consider her case. That policy was in place in Queensland for women seeking a termination after 20 weeks' gestation. In Victoria, a woman could seek a termination without approval of a hospital ethics board until 24 weeks. Guardian Australia understands the woman was taken to Brisbane, rather than Melbourne, where the panel deliberated on her case. One senior source, who spoke to Guardian Australia on the condition of anonymity, said Morrison did not specifically target abortion access. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email David Manne, a prominent refugee advocate and lawyer, said in his view the broader immigration policy at the time was part of an 'extreme deterrence agenda'. 'Inherent in the [broader] policy was conscious, calculated cruelty,' he said. 'Clearly, [the policy] was far more than reckless indifference, it was deliberate. '[It was] part of a system that was underpinned by the extreme deterrence agenda … the basic rights and dignity of people subject to the policy were essentially irrelevant.' Jana Favero, the deputy CEO of the Asylum Seeker Resource Centre (ASRC), who was an advocate for the centre at the time, said the documents were 'outrageous' and 'consistent' with the ASRC's experience trying to help asylum seekers get medical transfers. 'It was extremely challenging and difficult for the medical transfer from people offshore, in particular women who were pregnant,' she said. Manne claimed the Abbott government was concerned asylum seekers and refugees were using medical transfers as a back door to get into Australia. Once in Australia, and in the Australian onshore detention system, an asylum seeker could go to the court to seek an injunction to prevent being sent back to offshore detention. '[They] could plead their case under law to resist being sent back to Nauru, to further dangers of the kinds that they'd already faced,' Manne said. This wasn't the only concern held by the government. Manne said the policy was based on deterrence, to stop others seeking asylum arriving by boat. 'If we make some exception, if there's a perceived crack of light in this policy, this could see the resumption of boat arrivals, that was clearly the thinking.' Later, in 2019, Peter Dutton, by then the home affairs minister in the Morrison government, accused women in Nauru refugee centres of using rape and abortion claims as a ploy to get to Australia. Over the 18 months from 1 January 2013 to 20 June 2014, IHMS, the government contracted healthcare provider for Nauru, said there were six pregnant transferees who were taken to the mainland for a termination. In June 2014, there were 289 women in detention on Nauru, according to data collated by the Refugee Council of Australia. Numerous internal and external reviews of offshore detention centres found instances of violence and traumatic living conditions, amid allegations and reports of rape, sexual assaults. An independent investigation, by the former integrity commissioner Philip Moss, commissioned by Morrison in October 2014, found evidence of rapes and sexual violence on Nauru and Manus Island, and said incidents were often under-reported. In 2016, Guardian Australia released the Nauru files, a collection of 2,000 leaked incident reports detailing harrowing instances of abuse on the island between May 2013 and October 2015. More than half of the reports (51.3%) involved children, even though children made up only about 18% of those in detention on Nauru during the time covered by the reports. Favero said the ASRC had performed its own audit on medical transfers at the time, and said it sometimes took up to 18 months for an asylum seeker to get help on the mainland. 'From the point where there was a [doctor's] recommendation for a medical transfer, sometimes it took up to 12 to 18 months for that to happen, and it only happened as a result of a huge amount of pressure including legal action,' Favero said. In February 2019, five years later, after Morrison became prime minister, Labor and the crossbench passed the medevac bill, against the Coalition government, that established a medical panel to oversee medical transfers of people from offshore detention. That law lasted less than 10 months, before it was repealed by the Morrison government in December that year. 'The decision [to transfer a patient] should have been in doctors' hands not in bureaucrats and politicians hands which is what that legislation was,' Favero said.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Rescuers save 75 people from 'house of horrors' illegal care homes in Bulgaria where residents had feet tied, were sedated and beaten senseless if they tried to leave
Some 75 people have been rescued from two 'house of horrors' illegal care homes in Bulgaria where residents had their feet tied and were sedated and beaten. The facilities, in the village of Yagoda, near city Stara Zagora, were run as so-called health centres for the elderly, offering 'rooms for rent' for around 400 Euros per month. But in reality, they were 'houses of horrors', according to Justice Minister Georgy Georgiev. Bulgarian officials announced the rescue mission today, which saved dozens of residents from being locked in rooms with no bedding and window handles removed. Shocking images show a frail, thin elderly person with their legs tightly tied together with a rag, as they lie on a dirty mattress with one sock missing. Other outrageous pictures feature variously an older person being removed from the facility on a stretcher, and a dirty, dilapidated bathroom. Five people have been arrested and an investigation opened into 'kidnapping, violence and negligence', according to the regional prosecutor's office in Stara Zagora. The office said in a statement: 'According to testimonies, one older woman had not left the establishment for four years. 'Another resident, who tried to flee, was caught, beaten and left unconscious.' The Bulgarian justice ministry added some of those rescued had 'their feet tied and were sedated' and were locked in rooms 'without bedding, the window handles removed and cut off from the outside world'. Minister Georgiev displayed disturbing images showing residents restrained and the facilities' horrific living conditions at a press conference in the region today, according to the Bulgarian News Agency (BTA). He said some victims were found in critical condition, with 18 taken to hospital by ambulance. Doctors at the hospital in Stara Zagora confirmed to BTA later today all patients admitted had been stabilised, with none in life-threatening condition. All had been treated for dehydration and malnutrition - and some for 'severe heart failure'. Officials had made several attempts in recent weeks to inspect the facilities - but they had been obstructed from doing so, Georgiev added, speaking to reporters. Some residents had been 'kept under the influence of power tranquilisers': 'Blood tests are now being conducted to determine the substances involved.' He described the hygiene in the facilities as 'appalling' - with unqualified staff administering injections and no permanent medical care on site, with doctors only attending if there was a death. Georgiev added residents had no access to their phones or ID , having been told their handsets would be returned if relatives called. The centres, registered as rental properties not licensed health or social care providers, have since been searched, with documents seized, he said. The minister emphasised the government was now undertaking widespread inspections of nursing homes and hospices to stop vulnerable individuals being targeted by property fraud. He said: 'These revelations are linked to ongoing investigations into property mafia schemes involving helpless people. 'The Executive Agency Medical Supervision and the Agency for Quality of Social Services have conducted over 100 inspections, uncovering numerous violations. 'Four licenses have been revoked, one operator voluntarily relinquished their license, and another facility is currently under a license withdrawal procedure. 'Several others have received compliance orders.' The lack of provision for older people in Bulgaria has led to the development of illegal centres in the country. Nine older people died in a fire in November 2021 at a nursing home near the city of Varna. Four others died in a similar incident in May 2022 at another facility in the same area. International organisations often criticise the poor state of health facilities in Bulgaria, the poorest country in the European Union. The Council of Europe's European Committee For The Prevention of Torture (CPT) for instance, spoke out on social care institution and psychiatric hospitals specifically in 2021. It said in a statement: 'For more than 25 years now, the CPT has consistently expressed its deep concern regarding a number of issues concerning the treatment, conditions and legal safeguards offered to patients with psychiatric disorders and residents of social care institutions.' Despite strongly recommending 'decisive action', it added: 'Unfortunately, in the course of the Committee's most recent visits to Bulgaria in 2017, 2020, and 2021, the CPT's delegations have witnessed a continuing lack of such action.'
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
As a former judge, I used to defend Britain's rights – mine are now at risk
Before being a judge, I represented a rape victim who was deaf and unable to speak. She was so badly traumatised that, in a cry for help, she took a kitchen knife out in public and tried to kill herself. She was arrested and brought to court. She did not get bail. The probation officer – before even meeting me – told me she had decided to oppose bail. A cruel pre-judgment: custody would immediately end her job and change her life. Law has no feeling; it embodied the passive-aggression of society to disabled people and women: it processed her, like meat for dogs. Two weeks ago, the UN Special Procedures group – 19 specialists in fields including freedom of peaceful assembly and association, freedom of opinion and expression, and violence against women and girls – issued a statement of human rights concern about the UK, towards transsexual and other trans people. It came in response to the infamous, deeply confused decision of the UK Supreme Court in April in For Women Scotland, where trans people and the vast bulk of women and lesbians were not heard. We were judged by a court packed with non-trans pressure groups, and human rights were scarcely mentioned. In my opinion, the Supreme Court's decision forced on women the notion that they are inescapably defined by biology, presumably basic urges and wandering wombs, for sexual relationships, free association and equal rights. It reversed more than 20 years of peaceful co-existence between the trans community and others. The UK is beyond crisis: the economy is down, inflation is up; electricity and gas are unaffordable. Violence against women is up. Men are discarded, angry. Such a country becomes vulnerable to extremism and minority-blaming. In 2021, European parliament research revealed how foreign actors use media to stir LGBT+ hate. It is in Russia's interest to damage our social fabric, rendering us dysfunctional and divided, as there is evidence it did, too, with Brexit. This LGBT+ emergency is ripping apart tolerant British values. It follows the rise of the Gender Critical Ideology Movement (GCIM). I need not go into suggestions that GCIM is sometimes used as cover for people seeking LGBT+ conversion practices – or that some groups oppose banning conversion therapy towards trans people. Let us note, however, that GCIM did not seem to exist until around 2016, when UK-US movements arose preaching traditional sex roles. Let me concentrate on the immediate UK human crisis. The government ruled that people like me, previously legally female and (still!) having female anatomy, at risk of assault as with all women, must henceforth change in men's changing rooms, use men's loos in pubs and be excluded from female rape services. Despite my female birth certificate, I am apparently a 'man'. The EHRC followed suit. The police confirmed that people who are (or seem to be, one assumes) 'trans' shall be strip searched only by men, anatomy be damned. Such sexual assault of 'unfeminine' women may now be the law on the ground. Women with mastectomies are confronted, accused of 'transness'. Trans people not 'out' at work face disclosure of pariah status. Non-feminine women are confronted by other women in loos. A database has been proposed to enforce segregation. A fund has been created support civil legal enforcement of the new 'sex-based' rights. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, wants to segregate trans people in hospitals. Bridget Phillipson, our equalities minister, is MIA. I formed the Trans Exile Network for those leaving the UK now. Heterosexual families with kids, where, say, the husband is trans, have been re-designated as 'lesbian' because the court redefined 'lesbians' as well as 'women'. Nobody asked them, of course – unlike the 2004 Act, which was with national consent and consultation. Trans people are now two sexes at once: one for equalities law (I am now unable to claim equal pay rights as a woman) and one for everything else. Nobody at the top cares: it is 'clarification', says Keir Starmer, ignorantly. Now the GCIM want this rolled out across Europe. Next stop: Ireland. I've been contacted by suicidal people and the parents of kids who have been denied medical treatment. Parents fear for the future of their kids: if not helped now, they face forced puberty against their medical best interests and a harder life. Puberty delaying hormones are reversible and have been used upwards of 20 years to 'buy time' until kids are adults and can make decisions. The court must have assumed that the EHRC is neutral. More fool the court. But the biggest victim is our country – which I served as a judge for more than 18 years – and truth and humanity in public life.
