logo
Trump remittance tax to hit Africans hard – DW – 05/28/2025

Trump remittance tax to hit Africans hard – DW – 05/28/2025

DW28-05-2025

The US President's much-touted tax bill includes a plan to place significant levies on remittances leaving the country. The impact on migrants and their families will be felt across the world, including in Africa.
For Enoch Aikins, a political economist who focuses on Africa, the topic of sending money home to relatives is personal.
"I can use myself as an example, as somebody that comes from a typical village with a lot of people in my village or in my family that depend on me," he told DW.
A researcher with the Institute of Security Studies now based in Pretoria, South Africa, Enoch grew up in the small town of Agona Kwanyako, about 70 kilometers (43.5 miles) from the Ghanaian capital Accra.
Enoch Randy Aikins has personal experience of the importance of remittances Image: privat
His job means he can provide a vital source of income for many in his family back home in Ghana, whether it be for his mother's medical bills or for his cousins' education.
"Anytime there's a family problem, they call me and I have to quickly find a way to send money to them to solve an emergency crisis," he said. "Mostly it is household expenses, things like food, accommodation, school fees or to cover medical expenses."
A global impact
Enoch is one of many millions of Africans across the continent and around the world who sends remittances, which are financial transfers to their home country or region.
The importance of these financial transfers has come into sharp effect as a result of US President Donald Trump's tax bill, passed on May 22 by the House of Representatives. The measure includes a 3.5% tax on remittances made by anyone who is not a US citizen or national. The original plan was for the tax to be 5% but it was lowered before the vote.
Trump's so-called One, Big, Beautiful Bill the House of Representatives and now heads to the Senate for consideration Image: AP/picture alliance
The bill has led to fierce criticism across Latin America. It is likely to severely hurt poor migrants from Mexico, Central and South America.
Africans will also be significantly affected, according to Enoch Aikins. "We cannot tell them how to go about their fiscal business, but this is going to have a huge impact on African economies."
World Bank data shows that remittance flows into Africa were more than $92 billion (€81 billion) in 2024, with the United States alone accounting for at least $12 billion of it in that year.
According to World Bank, the US is also the largest origin country for all remittances in the world, accounting for more than $656 billion in 2023.
Trump's America: End to the American Dream for immigrants?
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Monica de Bolle, a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington D.C., says, however, here is a lack of reliable data on remittances because so much of is not sent via recorded transactions.
"People have different arrangements for sending money back home," she told DW. "Sometimes it's as official as a family member comes in visits and then they get a wad of cash and they go back home with that. And those kinds of transactions are simply unaccounted for."
Nonetheless, whatever data is available, she argues, underlines the importance of the US as a source of remittances for African and much of the Americas.
The importance of remittances to Africa
Remittances are important across Africa for three key reasons. Firstly, they represent a major chunk of income for many of the continent's economies, many of which are among the world's poorest.
Recent data suggests annual remittances now outweigh both aid and foreign direct investment (FDI) as income flows into the continent.
Aikins says that remittances is the "largest external financial flow into Africa," at the moment. "There are no bottlenecks or administrative issues that, for instance, if you are giving aid of about 100 million to an African country or an institution, more than half is gone on administration before it reaches people," he added.
Remittances are vital because unlike aid assistance they go directly to individuals and households Image: DW
Then there's the fact that it's typically lower-income groups that are most reliant on remittances from relatives or friends working abroad.
"It's extremely damaging," said Monica de Bolle. "A lot of the time, these flows are coming from low-income folks in the United States to their home countries and their families who are also not well off."
Some African countries will be hit harder than others. While the continent's big economies such as Egypt, Nigeria and Morocco account for the highest total level of remittances from abroad, some economies are especially dependent, according to Aikins.
World Bank data shows that remittances received as a percentage of GDP is around 20% for Lesotho, Comoros, Somalia, The Gambia and Liberia.
A pocketbook issue
Monica de Bolle is critical of the remittance levy, and thinks migrants will find ways of avoiding the tax. "People who are sending money back home, if they were using official channels to do this, they're now going to try to use unofficial channels to do it because they will want to evade the tax."
She points out that taxation of remittances is rare globally and thinks the policy is part of the Trump administration's campaign against illegal migration.
"The effect will be squeezing the migrants, squeezing the people who are currently living in the United States, shutting off mechanisms by which not only they sustain themselves, but they sustain their family members," said Bolle.
"Bottom line is that remittances are a pocketbook issue. You are taking money out of people's pockets."
Enoch's remittances won't be taxed as they are not coming from the US. Yet he can clearly imagine the real-life consequences for someone in a village like the one he grew up in who is dependent on a relative sending money from the US.
Enoch Randy Aikins' family home in the town of Agona Kwanyako, Ghana Image: Enoch Randy Aikins
When he gets a request for money, it's needed quickly and he thinks migrants will turn increasingly to cryptocurrency and other off-grid methods to send the money where it needs to go.
"The tax is going to have a tremendous effect on how people send money to their dependents back home."
Edited by: Uwe Hessler

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Marjorie Taylor Greene Admits She Didn't Read Trump Spending Bill: 'I'm Being Very Honest'
Marjorie Taylor Greene Admits She Didn't Read Trump Spending Bill: 'I'm Being Very Honest'

Int'l Business Times

time14 hours ago

  • Int'l Business Times

Marjorie Taylor Greene Admits She Didn't Read Trump Spending Bill: 'I'm Being Very Honest'

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) admitted she voted for President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful bill" without realizing it contained a provision she "adamantly opposes" — because she didn't read it before voting. On Tuesday, Greene came out against a controversial provision in the "One Big, Beautiful Bill" (OBBB) that places a 10-year federal moratorium on state regulation of artificial intelligence, despite voting in favor of the legislation. "We don't get the full bill text until very close to the time to vote for it," Greene claimed in her defense. "So that was one section that was two pages that I didn't see. And I'm being very transparent and honest about it with everyone." When she discovered the provision, which bars states from enforcing any law that limits or regulates AI systems in interstate commerce for a decade, Greene took her outrage to X. "Full transparency, I did not know about this section on pages 278–279," Greene wrote. "I am adamantly OPPOSED to this... I would have voted NO if I had known this was in there." Greene added that she would not support the bill if the provision remained intact when it returns to the House after Senate revisions, calling it a "violation of state rights" and warning about the dangers of unchecked AI development. The admission renewed scrutiny over lawmakers' handling of sprawling legislation with varied and far-reaching implications. Originally published on Latin Times AI Artificial intelligence

Nigeria: The true cost of separatist sit-at-home protests  – DW – 06/04/2025
Nigeria: The true cost of separatist sit-at-home protests  – DW – 06/04/2025

DW

time18 hours ago

  • DW

Nigeria: The true cost of separatist sit-at-home protests – DW – 06/04/2025

The Indigenous People of Biafra's sit-at-home protests have paralyzed southeast Nigeria. As fear grows and losses mount, what's the path to peace? Monday mornings in Onitsha, one of West Africa's busiest commercial cities, used to be the most chaotic day of the week. But these days, they unfold in eerie silence. The familiar blare of traders haggling prices has faded — replaced by an unsettling stillness as many residents of southeastern Nigeria live in fear. The outlawed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) movement — which is pushing for the independence of Nigeria's southeast — regularly calls for stay-at-home protests to demand the release of its leader, Nnamdi Kanu. Kanu is on trial on terrorism charges in the Nigerian capital, Abuja. While the IPOB claimed it had suspended the stay-at-home order, locals continued to comply due to the fear of armed groups known to attack those who defy the measure, using enforcement tactics like arson, looting and targeted killings. "Mondays now feel so empty," said Gift Chigo, a resident in Imo, one of the hardest-hit states in the region. "Businesses are shut down and shops locked down. And to be honest, we don't necessarily sit at home because we support the IPOB, but out of fear. It's not about solidarity, it's about [protecting] ourselves. What can we do? Nothing," she told DW. Nigeria labels IPOB a terrorist organization Formed in 2012 by two UK-based Nigerians, Nnamdi Kanu and Uche Mefor, the IPOB has been at the forefront of the renewed call for an independent state of Biafra. The familiar blare of traders haggling prices has faded — replaced by an unsettling stillness Image: Patrick Meinhardt/AFP Former Eastern region governor and military officer, Emeka Ojukwu, had declared the defunct state of Biafra in the 1960s following the killing of Igbos in northern Nigeria. However, that attempt to secede from the country ended with a bloody three-year civil war that led to the death of millions of people. The agitations still persist with groups like IPOB. In 2020, the IPOB launched its armed wing called the Eastern Security Network aimed at protecting the Igbos, but residents told DW it has instead inflicted more suffering on them. Since Kanu's arrest, the group has split into factions — some of which are more violent, exerting considerable influence and power, especially in rural communities, and targeting government facilities. Although IPOB has repeatedly dissociated itself from the region's violence, authorities have continued to accuse the group of several violent incidents in the area. The Nigerian government has labelled the group a terrorist organization. The cost of a sit-at-home order Apart from the sit-at-home protest every Monday, the region also observes the order on days Kanu appears in court. And, it has not only upended livelihoods and disrupted the economy of the region, but it has also led to the death of more than 700 people over the past four years. A recent report by SBM intelligence, a Lagos-based think tank, shows that the protest has resulted in economic losses of over $4.79 billion (€4.20 billion) with key sectors like transportation, trade, and micro businesses taking the biggest hit. In about 332 violent incidents, the protest's epicenter has been Imo state, where 332 people were killed, followed closely by neighboring Anambra with 202 deaths. Many of the victims were civilians who defied the weekly order or became caught up in clashes between the group and Nigerian security forces. Public institutions like schools and hospitals have also been disrupted by the protest. "I go to class three times a week even though I teach mathematics which was supposed to be taught every single day. We're seriously lagging behind due to the IPOB's order," King David, a teacher in Owerri, told DW. Former London estate agent and IPOB founder Nnamdi Kanu is on trial on terrorism charges in Nigeria's capital, Abuja Image: Katrin Gänsler/DW Schools suffer, economy stalls Dengiyefa Angalapu, a research analyst at the Centre for Democracy and Development, a think tank, shared David's concern. He noted that the educational sector has borne the most profound brunt of the sit-ins in the region. "Students preparing for exams often miss critical academic days or are even forced to travel under risky conditions," said Angalapu. "Beyond that, students missing out on school every Monday means they only have four days to learn, and I think that's really a very critical gap compared to other regions in the country." While there was a high rate of compliance with the order in 2021, representing about 83%, actual support is much lower now — about 29%. Nigeria's southeast is inhabited predominantly by the Igbo ethnic group who are known for their entrepreneurial skills. The impact of the sit-ins has been substantial, and these losses are not just contained in the southeast, said Ikemesit Effiong, head of research at the Lagos-based think tank. "People from the Niger Delta and the South South region who are looking to transit through the South East to get to other parts of the country are also materially affected because their goods cannot move over land through the region." Effiong mentioned that the loss in productivity has weakened economic competitiveness and discouraged external investments. "The economic loss in terms of reduced investability climate in the region is worrisome. Many projects that would have been greenlit have actually been held back or rerouted to other parts of the country because the cost of doing business has increased in the South East," he said. What's the way out? Dengiyefa said that, beyond economic loss, deepening unemployment and poverty, what lies ahead is even more staggering. "It's quite sad that a generation of youth are being raised in the southeast in a climate of fear and ideological extremism," Dengiyefa noted. Why don't Germans know about their part in the slave trade? To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Dengiyefa added that "with the intergenerational transfer of trauma, we're at a very big risk if this continues because we've a whole generation that has been radicalised and that's a very fundamental challenge." Dengiyefa suggested that the Nigerian government should invest in countering secessionist narratives, including engaging local leaders. "We need a non-military security presence such as community policing rather than having solely the armed forces which often escalate tensions" that would eventually lead to a peaceful dialogue for any political demands. Both analysts argued that the heavy-handedness of Kanu's prosecution could be softened through government transparency and fair judicial process. "People may not approve of Nnamdi Kanu's tactics within the region, but his message still has deep resonance. Many people see his treatment as emblematic of how Nigeria has generally treated the Southeast. So, changing that paradigm and changing that perception will be critical," Effiong added. Cash for care: Boosting infant vaccination in rural Nigeria To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Edited by: Keith Walker

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store