The financial heavyweight, the media guru and the abuse investigator: What next for top Irish Vatican clerics under Pope Leo XIV?
Pope Leo XIV's
Mass of inauguration in
St Peter's Square
takes place tomorrow and then the new papacy begins properly.
As the first
US
pontiff becomes the 267th occupant of the Throne of St Peter, it would not be unreasonable to consider the likely fate of those
Irishmen
working at the Vatican, particularly given the high profile that at least one of them took in the run-up to the conclave where
Cardinal Robert Prevost
was elected pope in a surprise vote.
For now, all officials there stay in place, as announced by the new pope last week. They include prominent Irish figures: Dublin-born Cardinal Kevin Farrell, who as Camerlengo
effectively ran the Vatican
between the two popes; Archbishop John Kennedy, secretary for discipline at the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, the powerful Vatican department, and Bishop Paul Tighe, secretary for the culture section of the Dicastery for Culture and Education, an administrative unit of the Curia.
There are good reasons to believe all will remain in place, if not ascend further as this papacy gets into its stride. Each is highly experienced in areas deemed critical to the Catholic Church by the College of Cardinals in discussions before the conclave: its finances, the issue of abuse and artificial intelligence (AI).
READ MORE
Cardinal Farrell (77), as Camerlengo of the Holy See, has probably become the best-known Irishman worldwide since Pope Francis died on April 21st.
[
'Wouldn't it be great if he got voted in?' The cardinal from Drimnagh tasked with organising the papal conclave
Opens in new window
]
It is unlikely Cardinal Farrell's duties as Camerlengo will be needed any time soon. However, he has much more weighty roles (in the temporal sense) at the Vatican. Last November he was appointed by Pope Francis as sole director of the pension fund for the Holy See, covering former employees of both the Roman curia and Vatican City state.
This, the Pope said at the time, was because of 'a serious prospective imbalance of the fund' leaving it unable to meet its obligations.
Cardinal Farrell has an MBA from the University of Notre Dame in the US. His appointment was due to the dire financial situation at the Vatican. Its last set of accounts, approved in the middle of last year , included an €83 million shortfall, while its pension fund shortfall has been estimated at €631 million.
Cardinal Kevin Farrell officiates in his capacity as Camerlengo as the body of Pope Francis lies in state in St Peter's Basilica last month. Photograph: Antonio Masiello/Getty
In 2020, the pope appointed Cardinal Farrell to lead the Vatican's Commission for Reserved Matters, a new office which oversees investments and spending related to sovereign or confidential diplomatic matters. That followed a scandal over the investment of more than $200 million (€179 million) by the Vatican in a London building.
In 2022 Pope Francis appointed Cardinal Farrell as chair of the Pontifical Committee for Investments with responsibility for ensuring all such were ethical and in line with Catholic teaching. And in January 2024, Pope Francis appointed Cardinal Farrell to head the Vatican's Supreme Court.
Cardinal Farrell is something of a heavyweight at the Vatican, not least when it comes to finances, one of the main subjects discussed by the College of Cardinals at their meetings before the recent conclave began.
It is clear Pope Francis had great confidence in his abilities and there is no reason to think Pope Leo might believe otherwise.
What Pope Leo may do is relieve Cardinal Farrell of his role as prefect of the Dicastery for Laity, Family and Life, which he has held since it was established in 2016, to allow him concentrate on helping to eliminate the Church's debt.
Another Irishman likely to remain in situ at the Vatican is yet another Dubliner, Archbishop John Kennedy (56) from Clontarf. He has been working at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) since 2003 where his boss was the late Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, later Pope Benedict XVI.
Currently it has two new sections: a doctrinal section and a disciplinary section, while, in 2022, the Vatican's Commission for the Protection of Minors became part of this Dicastery, but with its own staff and constitution.
In 2017 then Msgr Kennedy (he became an Archbishop last September)
was appointed head of the disciplinary section at the CDF
, becoming
secretary of the newly named Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith (DDF) in 2022
with responsibility for leading investigations into credible clerical child sex abuse allegations worldwide.
Archbishop Kennedy is the highest-ranking Vatican official on clerical abuse cases.
A line in the sand in all of this was drawn by Archbishop Kennedy himself last October when the Vatican's secretariat of state attempted to overrule his decision to laicise an Argentinian priest convicted by a church tribunal of child sexual abuse.
His decision was countermanded by the secretariat, which placed the priest under restricted ministry instead. Archbishop Kennedy went to Pope Francis and countermanded the countermand. The archbishop's action was described by one Vatican commentator as 'without precedent in the modern era'.
Pope Leo XIV has identified artificial intelligence as a focus of his papacy.
Last Saturday, in his first formal address to the College of Cardinals, Pope Leo XIV recalled how Leo XIII, with the 1891 encyclical Rerum novarum, addressed social consequences 'of the first great industrial revolution' and referred to the church's offer of 'social teaching' in response to 'the developments of artificial intelligence (AI)'.
[
Pope Leo XIV sets out vision for papacy and cites AI as critical challenge facing humanity
Opens in new window
]
On Monday last, in his first public audience with the media, he again referenced AI, speaking about the requirement for 'responsibility and discernment in order to ensure that it can be used for the good of all, so that it can benefit all of humanity'.
Few at the Vatican are as knowledgeable about AI and social media generally as Navan man and priest of the Dublin Archdiocese, Bishop Paul Tighe (67). He has worked in that area at the Vatican for 17 years.
As secretary at the Vatican's Dicastery for Culture and Education he was one of the main movers behind the Vatican document Antiqua et Nova: (Old and New) Note on the Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence and Human Intelligence, published with the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith in January.
As he put it earlier this year, in a podcast for America magazine, 'AI can handle data better than we can but what AI cannot necessarily do is answer the deeper questions that we should be posing to that data: what is it to be human, what is intelligence, what is it that makes life worthwhile.'
Bishop Paul Tighe, referred to by some commentators as 'the Vatican's media guru'. Photograph: Nick Warren/PA
Speaking to The Irish Times, Bishop Tighe recalled how the late Pope Francis feared AI would serve 'the interests only of a powerful elite'.
He has travelled widely in Africa, Asia, North America and Latin America advising church bodies working with social media and is a regular attender at the Web Summit and the Biennale in Venice.
Bishop Tighe, referred to by some commentators as 'the Vatican's media guru', has become something of link man internationally between the Church and contemporary culture in its many expressions.
Formerly director of the office for public affairs in the Archdiocese of Dublin, he was appointed secretary at the Vatican's Council for Social Communications in 2007 where he is responsible for the Church's contact with the media at an international level.
He helped lead something of a digital revolution at the Vatican where he was part of the team that instigated the Pope's Twitter/X handle,
@Pontifex
and developed the popular ThePopeApp for mobile phones, as well as the
vaticannews.va
website, which is considered invaluable for Vatican watchers.
As part of his reforms of the Roman Curia in 2013, Pope Francis set up a commission chaired by the UK peer
Chris Patten
to reform communications at the Vatican, with Bishop Tighe as secretary.
It led to the creation of a new secretariat for communications which oversees all of the Vatican's communications offices.
He did not, however, manage to revolutionise how the Vatican tells the world about the election of a new pope with smoke emerging from a chimney over the Sistine Chapel.
Speaking to the US Catholic Telegraph, Bishop Tighe said: 'Here we are talking about social media, digital media and new technologies, [while] in the church our biggest communications moment is delivered by smoke.'
He, along with Cardinal Farrell and Archbishop Kennedy, are likely to feature in the Vatican's hierarchy for some time to come.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on climate policy: Government must avoid backsliding
Methane arising from agriculture and the fossil fuel industry is a notorious greenhouse gas, contributing significantly to global warming. While it breaks down relatively quickly in the atmosphere – unlike carbon dioxide – it is a serious threat to climate stabilisation. The quicker it is reduced, the more global average temperatures can be cut. Much can be done to reduce methane releases in oil and gas production, but it is much more challenging in agriculture. Livestock exporting countries like Ireland and New Zealand are supporting a new approach to classifying methane which is gaining political traction. This is based around achieving national 'temperature neutrality', also known as 'no additional warming'. The Government has yet to take a formal position on the concept. Significantly it got the backing of the Climate Change Advisory Council, its key advisory body. It chose to interpret Ireland's legally-binding climate neutrality obligations in terms of temperature neutrality – rather than the more onerous target of 'net zero emissions'. An international study , published in the Environmental Research Letters journal this week, has questioned this approach. It says that it 'grandfathers high emissions from wealthy, livestock-exporting nations', shifts the burden of cutting emissions to others, and limits space for lower-income countries to grow food systems. The approach fails on food security grounds, with trade data showing most exports serve high-income markets. This risks locking in inequality and misses 'a critical opportunity to reduce peak warming'. READ MORE The most concerning finding was highlighted by lead researcher Dr Colm Duffy of the University of Galway: 'If every country adopted a temperature neutrality target, we'd seriously jeopardise the Paris agreement's goal of limiting warming to 1.5 degrees or even 2 degrees.' The Government is in a bind on this. How methane is regarded in policy terms has big implications for carbon budgets up to 2040, which must be signed off on soon. Climatologist Prof John Sweeney has argued that the shift, which reduces the required emissions reduction target, is not aligned with scientific recommendations and could hinder Ireland's ability to meet its climate goals. The study emphasises that governments must set targets that are internationally credible and farmers need to be supported within a national framework, rather than targeted for blame. The bottom line is that Ireland will not meet the global climate challenge by redefining climate targets. Ireland has yet to deliver an honest appraisal of what a genuinely climate-neutral, sustainable and resilient agricultural sector could look like in coming decades. Avoiding this issue would amount to backsliding on vital climate action.
Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
European leaders eye Trump-Putin talks on Ukraine with anxiety
The further east you travel across Europe, the higher the anxiety levels are in national capitals about what US president Donald Trump might do when he meets Russian leader Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. The terms of any future truce in Ukraine feel existential to EU states closer to Russia , more than the seemingly averted trade war between the European Union and the US does. Following Wednesday's online meeting with Mr Trump, European leaders were quick to put a positive spin on the outcome. German chancellor Friedrich Merz told reporters that Trump knows Europe's position and shares that 'extensively', while French president Emmanuel Macron said Trump will 'fight' for a trilateral meeting with both Putin and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy . READ MORE The reality, however, is that Zelenskiy has been kept out of the sit-down by Trump and Putin in Alaska, as have other European leaders, who fear Putin will use the opportunity to manoeuvre Trump into supporting a peace deal more favourable to Russia. France's president Emmanuel Macron, European Council president Antonio Costa, France's foreign minister Jean-Noel Barrot and France's minister for the armed forces Sebastien Lecornu attend a video conference with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy and German chancellor Friedrich Merz on Wednesday. Photograph: Philippe Magoni/AFP/Getty The EU has tried and failed to get a seat at any table discussing the possible end of the war, which Russia started when it invaded Ukraine in early 2022. The Ukrainian president has done what he can to stay on Trump's good side and had seemed to convince the US president that Putin was the real obstacle to any ceasefire. [ Trump-Putin meeting: After months strengthening its hand, Ukraine is back to square one Opens in new window ] That was the message Zelenskiy and the leaders of Germany, France, the UK, Italy, Poland and Finland stressed in their video call with Trump on Wednesday. The big fear is that Trump will come out of the Alaska talks with the outline of a deal which sells Ukraine short in a bid to bring about a quick end to the conflict. Politically, Kyiv will surely not give up any territory held by Russian forces as the price of a shaky ceasefire alone. In a worst-case scenario, the White House could pressure Zelenskiy to make significant concessions by threatening to cut off vital support the US is providing to Ukraine, from weapons to battlefield intelligence. The Ukrainian leader would then be faced with accepting a bad deal, or fighting on without the help of the US. [ Zelenskiy says Trump promised postwar security guarantees for Ukraine Opens in new window ] Officials in Brussels are concerned that a truce on Russia's terms could undermine the future of Ukraine and, by extension, the security of Europe. Despite commitments to spend huge sums on defence over the coming years, Europe still relies on the security blanket Washington has provided for the Continent since the end of the second World War. The EU has bent over itself to keep the fraying transatlantic bond from breaking altogether. Ukraine could become the latest flashpoint in those tensions. German chancellor Friedrich Merz and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskiy attend a joint press conference following a virtual meeting hosted by Mr Merz between European leaders and US president Donald Trump in Berlin, Germany. Photograph: Omer Messinger/Getty 'It's not quite a case of panic; EU capitals are taking this very seriously, but let's see,' said one Brussels-based diplomat. 'There might be something that could come of this, some dynamic that might lead somewhere.' It is fair to say nobody really knows what to expect.
Irish Times
11 hours ago
- Irish Times
Russia tries to align stars for historic deal with Trump at Alaska summit
As allies of US president Donald Trump try to reassure Kyiv and other European capitals that he will not do anything rash at Friday's summit in Alaska, Russia wants the talks to mark a dramatic – even historic – shift in relations between the nuclear powers. US secretary of state Marco Rubio has said it will be just a 'feel-out meeting', and White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt has called it a 'listening exercise,' amid concerns that Trump and Russian president Vladimir Putin could make sweeping decisions about the war in Ukraine and the continent's security without Kyiv or Europe being at the table. The rhetoric in Russia is very different. The Kremlin often says that Putin sees no point in talks for the sake of talks, and Moscow expects the summit to deliver concrete benefits that were unimaginable before Trump returned to power in January. 'The Alaska summit could be historic in terms of delivering complex solutions to key problems. Including in Russian-American relations,' said Leonid Slutsky, chairman of the foreign relations committee in Russia's lower house of parliament. READ MORE 'Most constructive politicians in the world are hoping for this ... At the same time, putting pressure on our country or speaking in the language of ultimatums is useless.' Politicians and state media in Moscow say the summit could deliver not only a favourable outcome to Russia's invasion of Ukraine, but set the stage for grand US-Russia agreements on everything from arms control to co-operation in the Arctic. Kirill Dmitriev, the senior Russian finance official and former Goldman Sachs banker who has become a key point man in Moscow for Trump's team, said the choice of Alaska as the summit venue had particular significance. 'Born as Russian America – Orthodox roots, forts, fur trade – Alaska echoes those ties and makes the US an Arctic nation. Let Russia and the US partner on environment, infrastructure and energy in Arctic and beyond,' he wrote on social media. Dmitriev described Alaska – a Russian colony from 1799 to 1867 – as the 'perfect stage' for the summit, because of its history and its location as the closest US point to Russia, where they are separated by the Bering Strait and the international date line. 'Let us go from yesterday to tomorrow in peace,' he said. [ Why Putin has good reasons to be hopeful for Friday's summit meeting with Trump Opens in new window ] Dmitriev's posts on X relentlessly amplify Maga talking points: that Trump and Putin want peace and their critics are warmongers; media that question Trump's attitude to Russia are the same ones that pushed the 'Russia hoax' about alleged collusion between the Trump camp and Moscow in 2016; advocates of tougher action against Russia are repeating the 'failed' policy of Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden. 'Neocons and other warmongers won't be smiling on Aug 15, 2025. Putin-Trump dialogue will bring hope, peace and global security,' he wrote. In a subsequent post, referring to one of Trump's books, he said: 'The Art of the Deal on Friday August 15.' The Art of the Deal on Friday August 15. — Kirill A. Dmitriev (@kadmitriev) Russia has been assiduously preparing the ground for the sort of deal, or deals, that it desires from the summit. Over several months this year, Kyiv and Europe strengthened co-ordination with the White House over the war in Ukraine, as Trump become increasingly annoyed by what he called Putin's 'bullshit' on the issue. Putin changed the mood music simply by agreeing to meet. It prompted Trump to quietly shelve plans to impose sanctions on all countries that buy Russian oil, and pitched Ukraine and Europe back into the position of trying to rein in Trump – a dynamic that is only likely to renew friction between the US and its erstwhile allies. Putin has also brought Trump to the table without agreeing to a ceasefire or any concessions. Russia still demands permanent control of five regions of Ukraine and limits on its future sovereignty, including a ban on joining Nato. Kyiv says that would be a capitulation, and European states insist borders cannot be changed by force – leaving them vulnerable to allegations from Moscow and some US politicians that they are blocking a deal and should be ignored by America's self-declared 'president of peace'. Moscow also knows that Trump wants a bigger US role in the resource-rich and strategic far north – having threatened to take over Greenland – and more than half the entire coastline of the Arctic Ocean is Russian territory. 'It is in Alaska and in the Arctic that the economic interests of our countries converge and prospects for implementing large-scale mutually beneficial projects arise,' said senior Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov. Trump said last month that he wanted to begin work on arms control with Moscow before the expiry next February of the 2010 New Start agreement, which is the last remaining US-Russia nuclear arms pact. The Kremlin flagged the issue last week by saying it had scrapped a self-imposed moratorium on deployment of short- and mid-range missiles and would now place them wherever it liked, in response to alleged US threats in Europe and Asia. On the battlefield too, Moscow is trying to strengthen its position before the summit. In recent days, Russian troops have pierced a section of the front line in eastern Ukraine and advanced about 10km near the mining town of Dobropillia, as they try to encircle the nearby small cities of Pokrovsk and Kostyantynivka and put more pressure on Kyiv's two main strongholds in Donetsk region – the cities of Slovyansk and Kramatorsk. Kyiv says these are very small groups, moving on foot or in light vehicles, who cannot hold territory but aim to sow chaos behind the front line and – above all – give the impression that Ukraine's defences are collapsing on the eve of the summit. Russian media claim Ukrainian troops are nearly surrounded in some areas, which Kyiv denies. It recalls how Trump said in March that he had asked Putin to spare the lives of 'thousands' of Ukrainian soldiers who were supposedly encircled in Russia's Kursk region. The claim was false, but no one in Trump's administration acknowledged that fact or explained why Trump was unquestioningly repeating Kremlin propaganda. While Moscow's preparations for the summit have been meticulous, Washington's look haphazard, even amateurish. The meeting was agreed when Steve Witkoff, one of Trump's special envoys, visited Moscow last week. US and European media reports say Witkoff – a real-estate developer and donor to Trump's re-election campaign – may have misunderstood Putin's position on Ukraine. He has also been accused of parroting positions espoused by the Kremlin. To compound the sense of chaos, Trump has placed inexperienced loyalists in important intelligence and foreign policy roles, and approved massive cuts at the state department that have culled many of its analysts on Ukraine and Russia. With so many factors in its favour, Russia wants to strike a deal now, not least to gain relief from western sanctions that are combining with high inflation and labour shortages to slowly strangle its economy. Ukrainian drone strikes on oil facilities are also taking their toll, and petrol prices in Russia are now at record highs despite an export ban. Russia's main stock market reflects the national mood, having surged by more than 8 per cent since the summit was announced. 'Everyone is expecting a breakthrough in Russia-US relations,' said Alexei Antonov at Moscow investment firm Alor Broker, 'and also the beginning of a resolution to the Ukrainian problem.'
