Mis-selling: RBI looks at tighter rules
RBI Deputy Governor M. Rajeshwar Rao
MUMBAI:
RBI
may introduce tighter regulations to curb mis-selling of financial products, especially in cases where customer suitability and appropriateness are overlooked.
"It is concerning that such mis-selling without regard to suitability and appropriateness would beget distrust in schemes aimed at providing a safety net," said RBI deputy governor Rajeshwar Rao, cautioning that such practices could weaken trust in the formal financial system.
To address this, the central bank is considering enhanced disclosure norms, stricter product suitability frameworks, and mandatory audits of sales processes followed by regulated entities. Rao said regulated entities need to "analyse the gaps and strengthen their processes to reverse the trend".
Speaking at a financial inclusion forum recently, Rao said access to finance should not be treated as charity but as a strategic necessity.
"Financial inclusion should not be viewed as an act of philanthropy, but rather as a strategic investment in the nation's economic and social development," he said.
"Even lenders having access to low-cost funds have been charging margins higher than the rest of the industry and which in several instances appear to be excessive," said Rao
RBI is also examining the possibility of mandating product suitability assessments, especially when dealing with vulnerable or first-time users.
"It is important that products meant for vulnerable sections are not sold with a 'one-size-fits-all' approach," Rao said. He added that financial inclusion should not compromise appropriateness.
The surge in consumer complaints, which rose 33% year-on-year, has prompted RBI to consider strengthening grievance redress mechanisms. Rao pointed to the increase in complaints received by the ombudsman and said this called for "better complaint handling mechanisms, possibly with time-bound resolution and automated complaint tracking."
He indicated that penalties may be introduced for non-compliance with revised grievance norms.
On the tech front, RBI may update its guidelines to regulate the use of AI, ML, and blockchain in financial services. Rao said responsible innovation must be guided by principles of fairness, transparency, and data protection. The proposed Unified Lending Interface is expected to move closer to implementation.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Markets in wait-and-watch mode amid global crosswinds: Punita Kumar Sinha
"People are taking a relook at markets given the RBI cut. So, for the moment things seem to be fairly stable and macro conditions are benign. But one never knows given the global situation what could come next," says Punita Kumar Sinha , Pacific Paradigm Advisors. So much is happening globally. You have US versus China trade talks that are going on. Internally within the US we have seen some softening in job reports. You have Musk versus Trump that is going on. Where do we really begin talking about all of these and give us a sense of amid all of this that is happening, where does India stand right now? Punita Kumar Sinha: Well, first of all, India stands in a good place because we have the least amount of risk compared to some of the other countries amongst the large economies, especially being on President Trump's radar for tariffs and some other issues, immigration, etc. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Experte warnt: beachte das, wenn du Thyroxin nimmst Mission Schilddruese Mehr erfahren Undo So, I mean, the data is mixed. There are positives and then there are negatives. So, the positives, we are beginning to see for India is that obviously rate cuts and plenty of liquidity has been injected by the RBI, the monsoons are good which will help the rural economy, the trade talks are sort of not looking that harsh for India at the moment or at least it is not on the radar as much as some other countries, and the geopolitical situation seems to have calmed down, so that is on the positive front. On the negative side, economic data is still mixed. The economy still needs to show sign of further strengthening. The RBI rate cuts now mean that potentially since the stance is now neutral, that there may not be any further cuts or further liquidity injections for the remainder of the year and then, another negative is that geopolitics could become an issue again and the trade discussions could again come into the forefront for India as well. And the other negative is that valuations are now, after the markets have rallied the valuations are not that great once again. So, it is kind of a balance between the positives and negatives. And given that, the markets could be choppy, rangebound, but we could have some good months and maybe not so good months depending on data and news flow. So, I think the momentum is there right now. People are taking a relook at markets given the RBI cut. So, for the moment things seem to be fairly stable and macro conditions are benign. But one never knows given the global situation what could come next. Live Events So, let us address that big overhang, the taco trade which is currently playing out and all eyes are on London, what is going to happen between US and China? I mean, even though US says that they are willing to actually remove restriction on some of their tech exports in exchange for China easing their limits on rare earth minerals, but how do you think that is going to really pan out because it seems like both parties are willing to negotiate, but it is literally like who is going to bell the cat first. Punita Kumar Sinha: Well, it is in no one's interest to have an adverse outcome. So, I am hopeful that there will be some negotiation that will be positive for both, otherwise the outcome could be negative and the markets are not pricing in a big negative outcome. The markets are pricing in a neutral to positive outcome, which is why the markets are being strong across the board, whether it is US, whether it is Chinese markets, Asian markets, emerging markets . So, I think that is the risk as well that the markets are not pricing in a bad scenario. Just wanted to have your take on the Indian markets valuation per se because I remember almost a month back when we interacted with you, you were of the view that the Indian market valuations are still not very cheap, but given all the fundamental triggers you just highlighted, now do they look reasonable and what is your overall take? Punita Kumar Sinha: No, I mean I think they are still on the high side because the markets have rallied but, of course, India has underperformed some of the other emerging markets, particularly Latin America and some of the other Asian countries and also India has underperformed Europe. So, relative valuations compared to some of these other markets has improved. But if you look at versus its own history, Indian market valuations are not cheap and we are still trading over 20 times multiples and while growth would start picking up particularly on the rural side with the rate cuts and a better monsoon, so there could be some better numbers coming on the denominator, but I still do not think that the valuations are that attractive relative to its own history, they are not cheap, I mean they are neutral to high.
Economic Times
35 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Markets in wait-and-watch mode amid global crosswinds: Punita Kumar Sinha
Markets are stable due to the RBI cut and benign macro conditions. Global events like US-China trade talks and internal US economic softening are key factors. India faces mixed economic data, with positives like rate cuts and good monsoons balanced by concerns about valuations and geopolitics. Market momentum exists, but choppiness is expected. Valuations are neutral to high. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads "People are taking a relook at markets given the RBI cut. So, for the moment things seem to be fairly stable and macro conditions are benign. But one never knows given the global situation what could come next," says Punita Kumar Sinha , Pacific Paradigm first of all, India stands in a good place because we have the least amount of risk compared to some of the other countries amongst the large economies, especially being on President Trump's radar for tariffs and some other issues, immigration, I mean, the data is mixed. There are positives and then there are negatives. So, the positives, we are beginning to see for India is that obviously rate cuts and plenty of liquidity has been injected by the RBI, the monsoons are good which will help the rural economy, the trade talks are sort of not looking that harsh for India at the moment or at least it is not on the radar as much as some other countries, and the geopolitical situation seems to have calmed down, so that is on the positive the negative side, economic data is still mixed. The economy still needs to show sign of further strengthening. The RBI rate cuts now mean that potentially since the stance is now neutral, that there may not be any further cuts or further liquidity injections for the remainder of the year and then, another negative is that geopolitics could become an issue again and the trade discussions could again come into the forefront for India as well. And the other negative is that valuations are now, after the markets have rallied the valuations are not that great once it is kind of a balance between the positives and negatives. And given that, the markets could be choppy, rangebound, but we could have some good months and maybe not so good months depending on data and news flow. So, I think the momentum is there right now. People are taking a relook at markets given the RBI cut. So, for the moment things seem to be fairly stable and macro conditions are benign. But one never knows given the global situation what could come it is in no one's interest to have an adverse outcome. So, I am hopeful that there will be some negotiation that will be positive for both, otherwise the outcome could be negative and the markets are not pricing in a big negative outcome. The markets are pricing in a neutral to positive outcome, which is why the markets are being strong across the board, whether it is US, whether it is Chinese markets, Asian markets, emerging markets . So, I think that is the risk as well that the markets are not pricing in a bad I mean I think they are still on the high side because the markets have rallied but, of course, India has underperformed some of the other emerging markets, particularly Latin America and some of the other Asian countries and also India has underperformed Europe. So, relative valuations compared to some of these other markets has improved. But if you look at versus its own history, Indian market valuations are not cheap and we are still trading over 20 times multiples and while growth would start picking up particularly on the rural side with the rate cuts and a better monsoon, so there could be some better numbers coming on the denominator, but I still do not think that the valuations are that attractive relative to its own history, they are not cheap, I mean they are neutral to high.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Have issued norms to monitor use of loan money by builders: RBI to SC
NEW DELHI: As many banks and financial institutions have come under scanner for harassing homebuyers in connivance with real estate companies particularly in case of subvention plan and facing Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe on direction of the Supreme Court, banking regulator RBI has virtually shrugged off its responsibility and told SC that it has over the years issued various guidelines and circulars to monitor use of loan amount by developers to prevent misuse and siphoning of funds. It also said that it had directed banks not to resort to intimidation or harassment of any kind for recovery of loan amounts from buyers. Under the subvention scheme, banks disburse the sanctioned amount directly to the the builders, who then have to pay EMIs on the sanctioned loan amount, until possession of the flats is handed over to homebuyers. As many builders did not complete construction and started defaulting in paying the EMIs to the banks as per the Tripartite Agreement, the banks started action against the buyers to recover the EMIs and it is the SC which came to their rescue by ordering a probe into the alleged 'unholy' nexus of builders and banks. In an affidavit filed in the apex court, RBI referred to various directions and guidelines issued by it from time to time and said, "RBI has performed its duty in discharge of its statutory obligations under the various statutes, including those under the BR (Banking Regulation) Act." The regulator said it had way back in 2015 taken cognisance of the practices such as Subvention Schemes and had issued guidelines as per which disbursal of housing loans sanctioned to individuals should be closely linked to the stages of construction of the housing project and upfront disbursal should not be made in cases of incomplete or under-construction housing projects. In a relief to many homebuyers who booked flats under subvention plan and have not got possession of their flats because of inordinate delay by developers, SC had in July last year directed that no coercive action could be taken against them by banks or builders regarding payment of EMI and no complaint shall be entertained against them for cheque bounce cases. Seeking intervention, hundreds of homebuyers had moved the SC against banks and builders.
