logo
Surjewala says HPSC removed 10 questions from ‘revised answer key'

Surjewala says HPSC removed 10 questions from ‘revised answer key'

Indian Express07-07-2025
Senior Congress leader and Rajya Sabha MP Randeep Singh Surjewala on Sunday alleged that the Haryana Public Service Commission (HPSC) has removed 10 questions from its recently released 'revised answer key' for the Assistant Professor (Geography) examination.
'Removing the questions without giving any academic basis is not only injustice to the deserving candidates, but also tarnishes the entire recruitment process,' Surjewala said.
The remarks came days after he alleged that 26 out of 100 questions from the recent HSPC exam for the post of Assistant Professor (Geography) were copied verbatim from a test conducted by the Bihar Public Service Commission (BPSC) for the same post.
Surjewala has further demanded a judicial inquiry into the recruitment process for 2,424 assistant professor positions in the college cadre, for which 1.5 lakh candidates applied.
Reacting to this, the HPSC said the recruitment process was 'completely fair and transparent', and the results were finalised by a panel of subject experts. 'A large number of representations or objections were received from candidates on the final answer key.
These objections have been examined by a committee of subject experts, and there is no change in the final answer key uploaded by the Commission on its website,' the public announcement stated.
According to Surjewala, six of the 10 removed questions — numbers 9, 17, 20, 32, 36 and 63 — were valid, with single correct answers, while the remaining four — numbers 13, 19, 52 and 76 — had two valid answers.
'When both the answers were correct, both of them should be considered valid. If a candidate chose either of the two, it should be accepted as correct or grace marks be awarded. By removing these four (numbers 13, 19, 52 and 76) questions, the validity of the entire exam has been shelved,' he alleged.
He further pointed out that in the 'revised answer key', answers to seven questions — numbers 26, 28, 35, 37, 43, 44 and 46 — were changed to 'wrong' from what were shown as 'correct' in the initial key. 'Question number 46 was also included in the 2017 Haryana Teacher Eligibility Test (HTET) exam paper. Back then, the correct answer was considered to be 'Jean Gottman', but 'Patrick Gaddes' is marked correct in the current HPSC answer key,' Surjewala claimed.
Questioning the necessity of holding a separate exam in Haryana 'if questions were merely copied from the BPSC paper', Surjewala said candidates who took the Haryana exam had already flagged similar concerns with the Commission. The Congress said Haryana's 100-question multiple-choice exam was conducted on June 8 this year, while the BPSC on April 29.
Responding to these concerns, an HPSC official told The Indian Express: 'After candidates raised objections to several questions in the exam paper, the matter was referred to a committee of experts and the result was prepared based on their opinion.
Subsequently, candidates approached the Commission again to challenge the given answers.
In response, the Commission again constituted a panel of subject experts who looked into objections raised by the students.
Thereafter, the Commission issued a public notification on July 3 this year,' the official clarified, requesting anonymity.
On allegations of questions being copied from the BPSC exam, the HPSC official defended the Commission and said 'it is humanly impossible to verify whether a question had previously been used by any recruitment agency across India's 28 states, aside from the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC)'.
Emphasising the Commission's priority to ensure 'a fair and transparent' recruitment process, the official further said: 'The HPSC strictly adheres to the syllabus, maintains secrecy, and conducts exams without leaks.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ghose commission violated CoI Act, deprived KCR and others of presenting arguments: former MP Vinod Kumar
Ghose commission violated CoI Act, deprived KCR and others of presenting arguments: former MP Vinod Kumar

The Hindu

time3 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Ghose commission violated CoI Act, deprived KCR and others of presenting arguments: former MP Vinod Kumar

Senior Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) leader and former MP G. Vinod Kumar has taken strong exception to the PC Ghose Commission for blaming former Chief Minister K. Chandrasekhar Rao for the irregularities and illegalities in the execution of the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project (KLIP), stating that KCR and his Cabinet members had been deprived of the opportunity to present his arguments before the Commission. Citing Section 8C of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952, which gives the right of cross-examination and representation by a legal practitioner, Mr. Rao said that the former Chief Minister KCR or the then Irrigation Minister T. Harish Rao had not been allowed to present their arguments to place the facts before the Commission. With regard to the Commission's observations that Medigadda was constructed against the advice of the Expert Committee constituted in January 2015, Mr. Vinod Kumar said that the advice was given in the initial report. 'But to compensate for that, it was decided to construct Annaram and Sundilla upstream barrages across the Godavari River as part of the project, as they would supplement the water needs of the KLIP,' he claimed.

Ghose Commission blames KCR for being directly and vicariously accountable for irregularities in Kaleshwaram
Ghose Commission blames KCR for being directly and vicariously accountable for irregularities in Kaleshwaram

The Hindu

time4 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Ghose Commission blames KCR for being directly and vicariously accountable for irregularities in Kaleshwaram

Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose Commission has blamed former Chief Minister K. Chandrasekhar Rao as 'directly and vicariously' accountable for the irregularities and the illegalities in planning, construction, completion, operation and maintenance of the three barrages Medigadda, Annaram and Sundilla forming part of the much-hyped Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project (KLIP). 'His involvement and directions minutely... is the cause and result of irregularities and the cause of distress to these three barrages,' the Commission said in its 665-page report which was examined by the State Council of Ministers on Monday. The commission said it could be categorically held that there was rank irregularity from the stage of conceptualisation of Kaleshwaram project till the issuance of administrative approvals on March 1, 2016 for construction of the three barrages and 'this is not the decision of the government, but of individuals'. 'The then Chief Minister (Mr. Chandrasekhar Rao) is pre-determined and bent upon to construct barrage at Medigadda at his free choice and the authorities associated with the decision making facilitated them,' Irrigation Minister N. Uttam Kumar Reddy said. The Minister, through a power point presentation, explained the highlights of the concise report prepared by the officials committee comprising secretaries of Irrigation, Law and General Administration departments constituted to thoroughly examine Justice Ghose commission's report. The commission he said was constituted to inquire into the negligence, irregularities and lacunae in Planning, Designing and Construction of Medigadda, Annaram and Sundilla Barrages. 'Mr. Chandrasekhar Rao has mortgaged the people of Telangana borrowing high interest, low tenure funds from non banking financial institutions like the Power Finance Corporation and Rural Electrification Corporation,' he said. This was after the previous government spent ₹11,000 crore, 32% of the project cost of around ₹38,000 crore on the Pranahita Chevella Sujala Sravanti project which was re-engineered. The commission had inquired into various facets of Kaleshwaram right from its conceptualisation and found that there were several lacunae in planning, design, construction and operation and maintenance of the project. It had considered reports submitted by the National Dam Safety Authority, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India, Vigilance & Enforcement and other agencies before finalising its report. 'The decision to shift the project site from Tummidihatti to Medigadda is not a Cabinet decision, but a decision of the individuals. The decision to shift the site does not appear to be sincere and honest,' he said adding the commission revealed that non-availability of water at Tummidihatti as claimed by Mr. Chandrasekhar Rao was not a correct and genuine reason. He recalled how Mr. Chandrasekhar Rao claimed in the assembly that a team of retired engineers was constituted to study the project. But, the report which recommended against construction of the project at Medigadda and other sites had been deliberately suppressed by the then Chief Minister and Irrigation Minister T. Harish Rao and officials, including then Irrigation secretary S.K. Joshi. Moreover, the barrage construction at Medigadda did not receive the consent of the Cabinet which was illegal. 'It is a sole individual decision of Mr. Rao and there was no formal decision of the government in this regard,' he said. In addition, Mr. Rao ensured that the project works were commenced much before the formal detailed project report was prepared which was tantamount to violation of every guideline. The report of the judicial commission was marked with frequent mentions about revised estimates and of the cost escalations besides the project design where construction was permitted on permeable foundations. 'There are several instances of construction defects and inadequate quality controls while Mr. Chandrasekhar Rao had directed impounding of water into the barrages at their peril. The government had also obtained completion certificates wrongfully,' he quoted the commission as saying and added that the Chief Minister, then Irrigation Minister, Finance Minister and several officials were made liable for the irregularities and illegalities in the Kaleshwaram project. While the special purpose vehicle Kaleshwaram Irrigation Project Corporation Limited was collectively responsible for releasing money at its will, the executing agencies, L&T, Afcons, Navayuga 'acted hand in glove' with the project authorities. 'They should be made liable for repairing the defects at their own cost the Commission recommended,' he said.

Commission report on Kaleshwaram will be tabled in the Assembly to decide future course of action: CM
Commission report on Kaleshwaram will be tabled in the Assembly to decide future course of action: CM

The Hindu

time4 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Commission report on Kaleshwaram will be tabled in the Assembly to decide future course of action: CM

Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy has announced that the report submitted by Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose Commission, which inquired into the alleged irregularities and illegalities in Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project, will be placed in the Assembly for a thorough discussion. The Chief Minister said the session of the legislature will be convened soon so as to elicit the views of all political parties on the future course of action that should be taken into the findings of the report. 'We will take views of all political parties. Leader of the Opposition K. Chandrashekhar Rao and his party can give their views on the report,' he said. Mr. Revanth Reddy was speaking on Monday (August 04) after the meeting of the State Cabinet which approved the Ghose Commission report. He lamented that the previous government headed by Mr. Chandrashekhar Rao shifted the location of the Pranahita Chevella project in the name of redesign and commissioned the construction of Medigadda Barrage against the recommendations of the expert committee. Two other barrages Annaram and Sundilla, forming part of the project, too developed cracks, he said adding the lopsided decisions of the previous government had resulted in damages to the project which was billed as lifeline for Telangana. He said the Congress government had appointed the judicial commission in line with the promise made in the election manifesto and the Commission conducted thorough examination of over 110 people, including Mr. Chandrashekhar Rao, then Irrigation Minister T. Harish Rao and Finance Minister Eatala Rajender, before finalising its report. 'There are no politics in this. The Commission is an independent judicial body, not a government-manned one,' he said replying to queries on charges made by BRS MLC Kalvakuntla Kavita. He said Ms. Kavita ought to have represented her case to the Commission if she had any issues rather than criticising the government now. Deputy Chief Minister Mallu Bhatti Vikramarka criticised the former Chief Minister and BRS president for misleading the Assembly with his claims on Kaleshwaram project. While suppressing the report of the expert committee against construction of the barrages, the previous government claimed that the project had approvals from the Cabinet and fulfilled all the requirements. 'It is the sole decision of the then Chief Minister to change the project site with claims that there is no availability of water at Tummidihatti. This was at a time when the then Union Jal Shakti Minister Uma Bharti approved hydrological clearance to Pranahita Chevella project on the ground that 205 tmcft water was available at Tummidihatti,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store