&w=3840&q=100)
Gaza's shadow falls on Europe's innovation pact with Israel
On Monday 28 July, the European Commission proposed suspending funding for Israeli startups involved in technologies with potential military applications.
Horizon Europe is the EU'S key funding program for research and innovation, which Israel joined in 2021 as an associated country. Since then it has utilised the program's €95.5 billion and subsequently the EIC Accelerator program to fund startups and small businesses with disruptive innovations and emerging technologies as per the Accelerator program's objective.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Grappling with the ethics of dual-use technology
The proposal comes amid increasing pressure on the EU to take action regarding the situation in Gaza. EU and Gulf nations, including Saudi Arabia, have been increasingly aligned in calls for a ceasefire agreement. The suspension would specifically target Israeli startups developing technologies that could be used in military contexts such as cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and drone technologies.
The proposed suspension is not the first time that EU funding to Israel has come under scrutiny. Technologies developed with EU financial support have been used in military operations in Gaza, the most prominent example being the use of the Skylord Xtender drone technology by the Israeli drone manufacturer Xtend. Xtend received €50,000 as part of the EIC Accelerator program to optimize its Skylord Xtender drone technology and explore commercialization opportunities. Despite supposed prohibitions on direct EU support for military and defense projects, this drone technology was later adapted for military application by the Israeli Defense Forces. After October 7, 2023, the company shifted its focus 100% toward supporting the IDF, and the Skylord drones have been deployed in Israeli military operations in Gaza.
Human rights at the forefront
The European Commission's proposal, moreover, follows a review of the EU's association agreement with Israel. The report cites findings by EU auditors that indicate the non-alignment of Israel's actions in Gaza with the principle of respect for human rights.
If implemented, the suspension could have far-reaching implications, potentially stifling innovation and collaboration between Israeli startups and European partners. The proposal now awaits member state deliberation, potentially setting the stage for the EU's first formal funding restriction against Israel since the escalation of the Gaza conflict.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
43 minutes ago
- Indian Express
A bad trade deal: US-EU pact offers a template, which India is keen to avoid
As US President Donald Trump's new set of tariffs takes effect from August 7, there is a question that is resonating in New Delhi's policy circles: What does a bad trade deal look like? The new trade deal signed by the United States with the European Union perhaps qualifies. Critics of this pact, including politicians in EU member countries such as France, are now openly lambasting the US-EU trade agreement, claiming that 'while one side got a deal, the other side got a bill!' There is a growing sense within sections of India's government that rushing in to sign a deal on Trump's terms has its perils, and could lead to such a lopsided trading arrangement. Also, in the Trumpian scheme of things, the countries that have been called 'friends' have gotten it worse than others. Being soft has been construed as a sign of weakness by the US administration. From New Delhi's perspective, it might also be better to wait out till China signs on the dotted line, to discern in comparative terms if India is getting something favourable out of the headline tariff numbers being offered as part of a deal. Lopsided EU deal What the EU deal effectively does is that it forces the 27-nation bloc to pay a 15 per cent baseline tariff on most of its exports to the US. In exchange, Washington DC gets more access to the EU market at far lower tariff rates, and has pretty much made no concessions for that access. On top of that, Brussels has promised to ramp up investment in the US to the tune of 600 billion Euros, alongside a promise to buy more energy from America to the tune of 750 billion Euros over the next three years. How did the EU end up with this deal? This surrender has a predictable build-up to it, which is typical of the tactic that the US administration has followed with most others who rushed in to sign up early, including South Korea and Vietnam. At the start of negotiations, Brussels was offering zero-for-zero tariffs, and then at some point, it looked like they sweetened the deal by pitching zero-for-10 per cent tariffs, with some exceptions for certain sectors such as automobiles. Then came the letter last weekend from Trump, threatening a 30 per cent tariff if there was no deal reached by August 1. That seems to have been the final trigger for this final deal, which Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, said was the best agreement under the given circumstances. When Trump's tariff action started in March, it was widely believed that the US President had only had one thing in sight – a headline tariff number being thrashed out with each country. Progressively, the deals signed closer to the August 1 deadline have been broadbased to include investment commitments such as in the EU deal. Japan too has committed to invest $550 billion, and the UK has pledged to adopt a 'structured, negotiated approach' in investments, while South Korea has committed to investing $350 billion in the US in projects 'owned and controlled by the United States' and 'selected by President Donald Trump'. All this while agreeing to let in most American goods duty free into each of their countries, in return for the 15 per cent tariff. The build-up too has been predictable in all these cases – concessions being offered by the respective side, followed by a threat of a big tariff number as a deadline loomed, and eventual capitulation. According to Deborah Elms, Head of Trade Policy at the Hinrich Foundation in Singapore, while some 'napkin deals' were locked in headline rates of 15 per cent, others were less successful. Even with a deal, Vietnam got 20 per cent and an additional 20 per cent on trans-shipped goods, while others in ASEAN with no deal got 19. Switzerland had early agreement but got whacked with 39 per cent while the UK, despite its trade deficit with the US, got tariffed at 10 per cent. 'All rates can be changed at any point, so this doesn't really ensure stability'. What is striking is that those without a deal in ASEAN got a better tariff deal as compared to those who signed early, such as Vietnam. Then there is the practical aspect of these deals: beyond the headline tariff number, there are question marks over whether the other provisions included in the deals will ever come to fruition. The detailed text is not out for most of the deals signed so far. Even when the details trickle out, there is a chance that these terms will be fiddled with, tweaked and rewritten, to make them implementable. Trade deals typically run to thousands of pages and take months, if not years, to negotiate. This fast-tracked method of signing up multiple deals over a span of weeks is really mind boggling. The only deals where some degree of actual negotiations have taken place so far seem to be the one with China, and the extended talks with India. Implementation woes, legal challenges Then there is the question of the legality of what Washington DC is doing, and the implication for its trading partner too. The US threatening to, or imposing additional tariffs forcibly on goods from another country, are a violation of Article I of the General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade, apart from being in contravention of its own bound tariff commitments under Article II of GATT, which entails an assurance that tariffs will not exceed the rates mutually agreed upon by the two parties. On the other hand, the concessions that the EU has given to the US could be up for challenge from other countries, if these sops are not in line with the World Trade Organisation (WTO) trading rules. This is because under WTO rules, if the US has now been given some sort of preferential access to the EU market, Brussels needs to offer the same terms to others or could be deemed to be violating international trade laws. Then there is also the domestic legal challenge that Trump's trade-linked executive orders are facing in the US. Lastly, there is the practicality aspect. Do the EU member countries really have the scope to ramp up energy imports from the US by 750 billion Euros over the next three years? And, can the Commission guarantee that 650 billion Euros of investments into the US, given that much of this is not public spending, but private sector spending by individual companies. Then there is the big question mark over the ability of American customs department and trade officials being able to effectively monitor, police and implement these multiple country-specific provisions. The reason why the rollout of the July 31 tariffs have been delayed till August 7 was to ostensibly give time for the American Customs department to prepare for these new tariff rates. It is unlikely to be a smooth process at major US ports, given the short lead time. Anil Sasi is National Business Editor with the Indian Express and writes on business and finance issues. He has worked with The Hindu Business Line and Business Standard and is an alumnus of Delhi University. ... Read More
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
43 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Re 1 visa sale: Get Schengen, UK, US visas for just ₹1 on Atlys today
Today and tomorrow, you can get a Schengen, UK or Georgia visa for just Re 1. Atlys, a visa processing platform, has launched India's first Re 1 visa sale under its 'One Way Out' campaign. The two-day sale, which started today, will end tomorrow. Travellers can book visa applications for countries including the UAE, UK, Vietnam, Indonesia, Australia, South Africa, Egypt, Hong Kong, Georgia, Oman, Morocco, Qatar, Kenya and Taiwan for just Re 1. For destinations that require in-person appointments, such as the United States and some Schengen countries, appointment bookings are also being offered at Re 1. How does the process work? The application procedure remains unchanged. Applicants must submit their details through the Atlys website, where the discounted price will be automatically applied at checkout. However, the Re 1 offer does not cover everything. 'Consulate and biometric fees must be paid directly by the applicant at the processing centre and are not included in the promotion,' Nahta clarified. The company has not imposed a strict limit on daily applications but will manage the flow. 'To ensure a smooth and superlative experience for all applicants, appointment slots for certain countries will be released periodically in limited quotas. Users will be encouraged to regularly check the website for updates on newly available slots,' Nahta said. What's included in the Re 1 offer? 'If you book through Atlys, for select Schengen countries like Greece, France, Germany, Spain and Italy among others, we have slashed both our service fee and the appointment fees,' said Mohak Nahta, founder and CEO of Atlys. He explained how this works for France. 'The appointment fee is about Rs 2,047 and our usual service fee is Rs 2,950. As part of this offer, both the appointment fee and our service fee are reduced to just Re 1.' The offer extends to US visa applicants as well. 'For the US, the service fee, which is normally Re 19,940, is also available for Re 1 during the campaign period,' Nahta said. In the case of UK visas, Atlys is waiving even more. 'The standard UK visa fee is Re 15,850, and normally we charge a service fee on top of that. But for this sale, we have slashed all costs and are charging users just Re 1 for everything. No other fees, no hidden costs. That means travellers pay only Re 1 total, with no additional visa or processing fees,' said Nahta. Why is Atlys offering visas at Re 1? According to a 2024 report by the European Commission and Condé Nast Traveller, Indian applicants lost over Rs 664 crore globally in non-refundable visa fees that year. These include payments made for applications that were either refused or withdrawn, as well as fees kept by private agents. 'For the first time, travellers can get visas at a price that feels impossible. We want to challenge what people expect from this industry and prove that global travel can be truly within reach,' Nahta said. Over the past two months, Atlys has seen a sharp rise in interest. Search queries for destinations like Vietnam, Indonesia, Georgia, the UK and the UAE have risen between 18 per cent and 44 per cent, largely driven by Gen Z and millennial travellers from tier 1 and tier 2 cities. 'We anticipate the strongest demand for UAE visas during the sale, followed closely by the UK,' said Nahta. 'Urban millennials and Gen Z from metro cities are likely to drive the most traffic.' Nahta also said that the campaign is a way to increase awareness about Atlys. 'The sale will help us reach a wider audience and allow more users to experience our platform, the seamless application process, and the innovative technology we've integrated to simplify visas,' he said.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Gold price prediction: What's the gold rate outlook for August 4, 2025 week - should you buy or sell?
Technically, Gold on COMEX was not able to breach the important $3280 mark on the lower side, hence some upside could be seen from these levels. (AI image) Gold price prediction today: Gold prices have been volatile amidst ongoing uncertainties on the global trade front with US President Donald Trump announcing tariff rates for almost 70 trading partners. Manav Modi, Senior Analyst, Commodity Research at Motilal Oswal Financial services Ltd shares his outlook on gold prices and strategy for gold investors: Last week, gold prices started the week on a lower note and fell to a near two-week low as the US struck a framework trade deal with the EU, reducing safe-haven demand. The agreement, echoing a similar one with Japan, imposed a 15% tariff on most EU goods—half the threatened rate—easing fears of a broader trade war. Meanwhile, the US and China held talks in Stockholm, aiming to extend a 90-day tariff truce, though any decision on extension rests with President Trump. The dollar index surged from 97 to 99, pushing USDINR above 87, capping some losses for the bullion domestic front. The Fed held rates steady at 4.25%-4.50%, with Chair Powell suggesting no immediate cuts, pending further data. US economic data showed mixed signals: better-than-expected GDP, ADP payrolls, inflation—PCE rose 0.3% in June, consumer confidence also rose slightly towards 100 mark. However, US non-farm payrolls data at the end of the week was reported quite lower than expectations triggering sharp recovery from lower levels in Gold and Silver prices. Amid ongoing tariff uncertainty, including Trump's fresh levies on Brazil, South Korea, and India and mixed economic update gold is hovering in a broad range, while silver remained weak, reflecting industrial metals' broader decline. A move in USDINR will be important to keep an eye on as any further upside could support further rally on the domestic front. The economic calendar is fairly light this week, however US factory orders, PMI data from major economies, trade balance from China and RBI and BOE policy meeting will be in focus. The deadline of August 1 is over however, there is still no clarity on major trading partners. Technically, Gold on COMEX was not able to breach the important $3280 mark on the lower side, hence some upside could be seen from these levels. Stance: Buy on dips - Rs 98,000 - Rs 1,01,000 Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
