Gisborne council to investigate returning ancestral land to Ngāti Oneone
Members of Ngāti Oneone have inhabited Te Pā Eketū Shed, a warehouse-sized property on Gisborne's Hirini St, for almost two months as part of a protest movement they have called "a reclamation of whenua".
Their original Te Poho-o-Rāwiri Marae and Pā once stood on the land, now owned by Eastland Port, before they were removed to develop the Gisborne Harbour under the Public Works Act, almost a century ago.
Mayor Rehette Stoltz addressed the councillors and the crowd of hapū members and supporters, saying, "Ngāti Oneone are only asking for little bits of land back... which are not used.
"But the real question and the real thank you... is how much they have given to our community."
ADVERTISEMENT
The council voted to approve the development of a "statement of intent," which would investigate the future of the council-owned land and vested land within Ngāti Oneone's rohe.
Many in the public seats were visibly touched by the meeting's outcome.
Stoltz acknowledged it would be "a clunky journey," with various legislation to work through and more meetings likely.
"But I think I speak on behalf of this council when I say there is good intent from us to want to work with you."
The council's decision was a response to Ngāti Oneone's online petition, which has called on the council, Trust Tairāwhiti and Eastland Port to return lands not used for core business.
More than 2500 people had signed the petition as of this morning.
Ngāti Oneone chairwoman Charlotte Gibson told the council, "In times of disaster, you trust us with your most prized possession, which is your people", noting Ngāti Oneone's support during Covid and severe weather events.
ADVERTISEMENT
"Homelessness is still happening on our side of town... We think we can do something about it. Please trust us... We're good at looking after people."
Ngāti Oneone chairwoman Charlotte Gibson presenting to Gisborne District Council on Thursday morning. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting)
Ngāti Oneone's protest movement began on May 5. It was 185 years to the day since Ngāti Oneone's tīpuna, Rawiri Te Eke Tu, signed "ae ra" on Te Tiriti o Waitangi, said Gibson.
"In this day and age – it is 'ae ra' [meaning] – Get it, do it! Support Ngāti Oneone."
Councillor Rawinia Parata said the council could not continue to ask things of Māori and give nothing back.
"That's not what partnership is – [partnership] is walking hand and hand."
Councillor Ani Pahuru-Huriwai thanked the hapū for its "graciousness in opening [its] doors" and meeting with the landowner groups under Trust Tairāwhiti, as well as councillors, and everyone who had been to the protest movement at Te Pā Eketū Shed.
ADVERTISEMENT
"A lot can be solved by having a cup of tea and a kōrero around a fire. We should have done this a long time ago."
She noted other councils had taken action to support returning Māori land around the country.
"This is not new, but it is a step in the right direction in terms of what Treaty partnership truly looks like and that we're not afraid to go there."
Deputy Mayor Josh Wharehinga said the statement was consistent with previous council decisions, noting the decision in 2021 to support the return of land taken under the Public Works Act in Tokomaru Bay.
Council chief executive Nedine Thatcher Swann said the statement of intent was a framework for how the council would proceed.
"That will be in negotiation with Ngāti Oneone around what this will look like, and what their priority areas are.
"We may be able to find some easy wins in this... we have 265 parcels of land. Some will be reserves, some will be public works.
ADVERTISEMENT
"[It's] going to be difficult to navigate, but I am sure we will work in a partnership way."
In its petition, Ngāti Oneone described its tribal lands as "from Pouawa in the north of Gisborne to Te Toka a Taiau, Turanganui awa, including the lands known as Kaiti/Kai Iti/Puhi Kai Iti".
Council landholdings within this area comprise 265 individual land parcels, including Titirangi Reserve and its surrounds, according to the meeting's report.
"The number of parcels and variety of types of land and ways it was acquired and is held mean that there can be no 'one size fits all' process.
"Even if parcels are grouped and prioritised, consideration of the request from Ngāti Oneone will be complex and will require significant time and resources."
In the report, the council acknowledged that other iwi and hapū may also have interests in some of the lands and commits to engaging in a principled and inclusive manner, ensuring all rights and relationships to the whenua are considered.
The report says the statement of intent will signal the council's intent to "explore the return or vesting of land to the rightful owner/s where there is no longer a genuine public need, or where ongoing stewardship and use would be more appropriately held by tangata whenua".
ADVERTISEMENT
Additionally, the council will engage in good faith with Ngāti Oneone and ensure "the process is transparent, timely, and upholds and enhances the dignity, integrity, and mana of those involved".
The statement of intent will be presented to the council for adoption on August 14.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Ōhau wall issues raise Lake Rotoiti water quality concerns
The $11 million structure was expected to last 50 years but showed signs of corrosion as early as 2014. Chairman Wallace Haumaha said the ongoing issues with the Ōhau Channel diversion wall were 'yet another symptom of a broken, Crown-led water management system that continues to ignore our role as kaitiaki'. Earlier this year, the Bay of Plenty Regional Council said it would 'accelerate' trials to address the problem. Haumaha welcomed this progress but said all voices, especially those of mana whenua, needed to be part of the decision-making process. 'As we work together to find solutions, it is vital that all voices, especially those of kaitiaki and local communities, are included in the decision-making processes that impact our waterways and the wellbeing of our people,' he said. Under the Te Arawa Lakes Settlement Act, the trust is responsible for the rights and obligations that come with lakebed ownership, including existing structures, commercial activities and public utilities. In June, over 60 Māori land trusts, representing more than 150,000 landowners, hapū and iwi, filed legal proceedings in the High Court against the Crown. They allege the Government has repeatedly failed to uphold Māori rights and responsibilities over freshwater. Te Arawa Lakes Trust is a part of this claim. 'This is about restoring balance and our ability to exercise proper kaitiakitanga. Māori have never relinquished our relationship with our ancestral waters,' Haumaha said. 'This collaborative approach is the driving force behind the coalition Wai Manawa Whenua, which brings together Māori landowners, hapū, iwi collectives and national organisations such as the Federation of Māori Authorities (FOMA) who together have filed legal proceedings in the High Court to hold the Crown accountable to ensure that Māori rights and responsibilities over freshwater are upheld, fostering a responsible stewardship that benefits everyone,' Haumaha said. In a statement to RNZ, Toi Moana Bay of Plenty Regional Council chief executive Fiona McTavish said the Ōhau diversion wall remained 'structurally sound and is compliant with its resource consent', though microbial corrosion has created holes in the top metre of the sheet piling. 'It continues to divert most of the flow from the Ōhau Channel [Lake Rotorua] to the Kaituna River, bypassing Lake Rotoiti.' Potentially toxic algae bloom was found near Ōhau Channel. Photo / Bay of Plenty Regional Council McTavish said the water quality of Lake Rotorua has 'markedly improved' since the Ōhau wall was installed in 2008, because of alum dosing, catchment land use and land management change. 'This means that even without the corrosion, the wall would not be having the same water quality benefit as it did when it was installed.' Last week, McTavish said the regional council adopted a strategy which uses a 'dynamic adaptive pathway approach to decision making,' focusing on making decisions in a flexible way that adapts to changing circumstances, rather than relying on rigid, long-term plans. 'This enables regional council to make the best informed and most timely decisions about the ongoing investment in the wall, ensuring those decisions are good environmental decisions that will deliver water quality benefits, but are also financially practical. 'Under this strategy, decisions about the future of the wall are timed to consider updated science and engineering advice, community voices and alignment with central government expectations.' She said making good environmental decisions that were also financially sensible was critical. 'We want to ensure that any investment delivers the outcome the community desires, is based on the best information and is not unnecessarily rushed.' McTavish said Ngāti Pikiao Environmental Society, representing mana whenua Ngāti Pikiao and Te Takinga, had been briefed and 'continue to support the wall so long as it is providing benefit to lake water quality'. 'Regional council staff will continue to work with Ngāti Pikiao Environmental Society on the decision making in respect of the wall and ensure that decisions made about the wall are informed by the best available science regarding water quality.' The working relationship between Te Arawa Lakes Trust (TALT) and regional council governance, leadership and staff continues to be productive and positive, McTavish said. 'Regional council staff have briefed Te Arawa Lakes Trust kaimahi regarding the wall and sought their guidance on how Te Arawa Lakes Trust would like to provide advice regarding the issue. 'TALT staff have advised they will brief their Komiti Taiao as a first step, we have offered support for this briefing and await further direction from Te Arawa Lakes Trust kaimahi.' – RNZ
The Spinoff
an hour ago
- The Spinoff
Echo Chamber: The big ‘G' word that Luxon doesn't want to say about Palestine
While cabinet spends the next month deciding whether to recognise Palestinian statehood, the opposition is more eager to know if New Zealand's done too little, too late. Echo Chamber is The Spinoff's dispatch from the press gallery, recapping sessions in the House. Columns are written by politics reporter Lyric Waiwiri-Smith and Wellington editor Joel MacManus. The government seemed wholly deflated during Tuesday's question time. Education minister Erica Stanford let the opposition drown her out with heckles while she tried to boast about receiving positive feedback like 'woohoo', building and construction minister Chris Penk bragged about sheds, and Andy Foster showed up with a big bandage on his head. Why? Foster never replied to a text from The Spinoff, so we'll never know. Speaker Gerry Brownlee seemed particularly fed up with the vibes, which was perhaps a bad omen of troubles to come. When Labour leader Chris Hipkins posed his usual starter question (does he stand by his government's statements and actions) to prime minister Christopher Luxon, who replied with just a 'yes', Brownlee asked the House, well, what's the point of that? 'What more can there be?' Brownlee wondered, with an air of desperation. 'Well, if you hold your breath, you'll find out,' Hipkins replied. Give it a go, Brownlee encouraged him, but there are still four more questions on this list that ask the same thing. After Hipkins followed up with a supplementary on whether Luxon stood by finance minister Nicola Willis saying that people who have lost their jobs 'shouldn't take it personally', Brownlee let him know his work was 'skillfully done'. But Luxon didn't want to talk about that. He pointed to a recently released Treasury report, highlighted earlier in the session by housing minister Chris Bishop (who wore three different ministerial hats while two of his caucus mates were away), which put the cost of Aotearoa's Covid-19 response at $66bn. And while Chippy was still keen to chat about employment, Luxon was stuck on the impacts of the Covid hangover, and let Hipkins know everyone should start calling him the '66 billion dollar man!' 'Because when I grew up as a kid, there was a show called The Six Million Dollar Man, and this member is the 66 billion dollar man!' Luxon paused for effect, but when he received very little reaction from his coalition members, Labour's Kieran McAnulty used the moment to outshine him: 'No one laughed!' Next up was Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick, who questioned Luxon over the government's recent announcement that it would consider recognising Palestinian statehood. His position, as he's oft repeated, is that Hamas must release their Israeli hostages, but Swarbrick wanted to know whether he was aware of the attempts to release these hostages, and the 10,000 Palestinians living in Israeli prisons. 'That's not what I've been briefed on,' Luxon replied, while NZ First's Shane Jones was more gung-ho about his point of view on the matter. 'Fiction!' Jones cried repeatedly. And when Swarbrick questioned whether Luxon was aware of Aotearoa's obligations under the Genocide Convention, he warned her not to throw that 'genocide' term around so willy nilly. So, she pressed him on whether he believed that was the appropriate term, but the PM couldn't quite wrap his lips around it, so he went with 'humanitarian catastrophe'. And then deputy prime minister David Seymour, puffed up on his perch next to Luxon, decided to butt in as usual. 'Point of order, Mr Speaker,' Seymour started – this member [aka Swarbrick] has just returned to her seat which is adorned with a Palestinian scarf, and I invite you to consider what this House might look like if everyone took a side in a global conflict and made that visible. 'No member should be allowed to do such a thing, particularly when you yourself have forbidden members from wearing tiny pins on their lapels,' he finished, while his caucus colleague Simon Court hastily removed his Act Party pin. 'I think you make a very good point,' Brownlee began, until a defiant Swarbrick swiped the keffiyeh draped over her seat and wore it around her neck instead. 'Stay warm,' Brownlee told her. 'We'll move on.' In a House where there are clear favourites in the eyes of the speaker, Swarbrick is indefinitely near the bottom of his list. Later, Te Pāti Māori's Debbie Ngarewa-Packer made her own attempt to pull Luxon's heartstrings over Palestine. But her questions on whether the PM could 'justify the targeted killings of journalists in Gaza' were shot down by Brownlee and Luxon, who told her that the prime minister of New Zealand is only responsible for New Zealand, and Seymour let her know she was 'slow on the rules'. Fair (not from Seymour), as question time is the opportunity to hold ministers to account on the issues that fall within their ministerial responsibilities. But a humanitarian catastrophe, as described earlier, can understandably leave a lot of people looking for leadership, and the barracking from the opposition showed that the government's pussyfooting around Israel has made them look, in their eyes, kinda pussy. 'Surely you can condemn that?' cried the Greens' Steve Abel, also adorned in a keffiyeh. 'Genocide apologist!' And when Luxon tried to remind the House the government had already committed $37m in humanitarian aid, the opposition simply wanted to know 'how much of it got in?', but Luxon didn't seem to be briefed on that. Eventually, the heckling from the opposition turned into roars for Luxon to 'grow a spine', 'show some spine' and not be 'spineless' – it's just ironic that the quietest person, who is usually the loudest, was the one later reprimanded for bringing any spine into the conversation at all.
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Education minister bans Māori words from junior books
Education Minister Erica Stanford. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Education Minister Erica Stanford has imposed a near total ban on Māori in new additions to a series of books used to teach five-year-olds to read. An Education Ministry report shows Stanford decided in October last year to exclude all Māori words except for characters' names from any new books in the Education Ministry's Ready to Read Phonics Plus (RtRPP) series. The paper showed the decision was driven by concern Māori words were confusing for children learning to read English though evidence of that was mixed. Stanford told RNZ the decision affected only 12 books that would finish the series, after which the series, including 27 books with Māori words, could be reprinted. The ministry's report said: "Under this option, we would not include kupu Māori in all phases of the RtRPP scope and sequence for any future books. The 13 RtRPP books currently in development do not contain any kupu Māori, apart from character names." It was not clear in the paper whether the books would be reprinted. "As noted above, the RtRPP resources are expected to have a lifespan in schools of approximately 10 years, so it would take several years for the books containing kupu Māori that are currently in circulation to be replaced in practice." The document showed Stanford also instructed the ministry to develop a teaching sequence in the English curriculum to help teachers prepare children to read Māori words from their second year at school. Stanford told RNZ that would stop teaching children in mainstream classrooms to pronounce and read Māori from being "left to chance". The ministry's document said currently from Year 4, Māori words were included in the curriculum with increasing frequency and complexity. Stanford told RNZ she considered rewriting the 27 books that contained Māori words to retain only the proper nouns in Māori, but later decided against it. "These are very early readers that teach children to learn to read and there are already 'heart' words in there that children have to memorise in English and if there are some te reo words in there as well, then that's okay and we'll leave them as they are," she said. She described the decision as the middle position between conflicting advice. The minister's October decision included reprinting one of the books, 'At the Marae', as a big book but not as a 'reader' for children to take home - something that angered many teachers and principals in the past week. The document showed Stanford raised the issue after "experts in structured literacy approaches" told her that including two different languages in the books could confuse learners and make it harder for them to master English phonetics. The ministry's paper said evidence about that was mixed but there was a case to consider the amount of Māori words in books for children learning to read. Literacy experts told RNZ this week Māori words were part of everyday New Zealand English and did not present problems for beginning readers because their spelling was regular and their vowel sounds matched some of the English vowels. The document said 26 of the 75 Ready to Read books had up to three Māori words and a 27th, 'At the Marae', had six Māori words. A hand-written note on the document showed the minister wanted te reo Māori introduced when children stopped using "decodable" books like the Ready to Read series, usually at the end of their first year at school or early in their second year. "I want to include in the NZC (English) a section on Te Reo vowel sounds and pronunciation to ready students for reading te reo words in school journals as previously discussed," she wrote. Stanford also noted that: "Interestingly - I asked kura leaders if they would accept English words in te reo Māori decodable books and they no. So it would be consistent to keep one language only in very early Year 1 decodable books, except for names." The ministry's paper said the Ready to Read series was designed to teach the reading of English "and the sound-letter correspondences in English". "Our advice to schools is to teach kupu Māori in RtRPP books as "told" words. The foundational skill of phonic decoding within the resoruces is based on the English language and students are not expected to decode the kupu Māori," it said. The paper warned the options could result in pushback from schools. "If we discontinue the use of kupu Māori (apart from character names) in RtRPP books, there may be a negative response and media attention. [REDACTED] In particular, recalling existing books has the potential to generate pushback." The minister wrote in response: "It's only in Year 1 decodable books that teach English and it would align with the approach taken in te reo decodables. Te Reo would be introduced immediately after the use of decodable stops which is typically end of Year 1 early Year 2 where students move on to journals."
