
Will I pay tax in Ireland if a US relative leaves me something in their will?
I will be bequeathing 50 per cent of my estate to my sister (with the goal of her passing it on to her children). If she predeceases me, it will go directly to her children per stirpes. My estate would be probated in the USA (Texas specifically).
What are the tax implications for my sister inheriting funds from a relative in the US? Would it be better to divide the bequest between her and her two children (1/3 each) to reduce the tax liability? Or would it be best to bequeath it directly to them in first place?
I had neglected to even consider tax consequences until reading your column recently.
READ MORE
Mr DM
The position on inheritance and taxation is very different in
the US
and in Ireland.
While most states in the US, including Texas, have no
inheritance tax
, Ireland does. It apples if the person either giving the
inheritance
or receiving it is tax resident or ordinarily resident for tax here.
Not that it matters here, but it also applies if the property subject to the inheritance that is situated in Ireland – even if neither the dead person or the beneficiary is resident here.
In general with cross-border inheritances, there are taxation agreements between Ireland and those other countries that ensure you do not pay tax twice on the same inheritance.
If the inheritance tax levied in another country is lower than the liability here, an Irish beneficiary would pay only the difference between that and the Irish liability where these double taxation agreements apply.
Where the inheritance tax bill abroad is higher than it would be here, no tax is levied here but neither do you get any refund for the amount paid in the other country that is higher than your bill would have been in Ireland.
With Texas, this is moot as you have no inheritance tax there. Apparently only five US states do have inheritance tax levied on beneficiaries.
The US does also have a separate estate tax which is levied on estates of dead people which exceed a financial threshold. Again, Texas does not have an estate tax.
There is a US federal estate tax which, if you were to die this year, would kick in if the estate you leave behind is worth more than $13.99 million (€11.9 million). That is adjusted every year: the 2025 figure is roughly $400,000 up on 2024.
So that's the very cursory general picture on cross-border inheritance. What about the position of your sister and her children if and when they inherit from you.
In Ireland, the amount you can inherit depends on your relationship with the dead person. The highest threshold – €400,000, or around $470,000 – is reserved almost solely for children inheriting from their parents.
The thresholds fall sharply from there. Category B, which covers inheritances received from siblings, grandparents and aunts and uncles by blood – the relevant threshold for your sister and her children – is just €40,000. That figure is halved again for more remote relatives, in-laws and friends.
And those thresholds are 'lifelong' – or at least they date back to any inheritance received from people in each category since December 5th, 1991. Gifts in excess of €3,000 are covered by the same regime and thresholds.
So, assuming your sister and her children have never received a large gift or an inheritance from a sibling, a grandparent or some other aunt or uncle, they can take €40,000 tax free from you if you die this year. On anything over that amount, they will pay tax at 33 per cent.
I say this year because, as with US federal estate tax, the threshold can rise and fall in Ireland from year-to-year although it is no longer linked to inflation or any other measure.
Would it make more sense to give it all to your sister with the intention that it be evenly distributed to her children on her own death or allocate it directly to your sister and her children individually?
Helpfully, that depends.
Upfront, it is fairly straightforward. I've no idea of how much money is involved here nor how many children your sister has. Let's assume she has three children and the amount involved translates as €600,000.
If that is left entirely to your sister, she will take €40,000 tax free assuming she has not taken an inheritance or large gift from anyone in Category B, as mentioned above. That would leave €560,000 subject to tax at 33 per cent – a tax bill of €184,800.
After tax, she would have a net inheritance of €415,200 (560,000 – 184,800 + 40,000).
If the money was instead split evenly and given directly in equal parts to your sister and her children, they would each get €150,000. On the same presumption as above, they take €40,000 tax free and pay €36,300 in tax on the balance of €110,000.
After tax, each would have €113,700. Between the four of them, that comes to €454,800 – or close to €40,000 more than if the money was all given initially to your sister.
Much depends on the amounts we are talking about here. If this portion of your estate comes to less than €40,000 per person, it would certainly make more sense to give it directly to your sister's children as it would not exceed each person's tax free threshold. If, using our example the €160,000 went instead initially to your sister, she would pay tax on three-quarters of it before anything can eventually be passed on to her children.
And of course, if it did all go to your sister, several new factors come into play. While it is your goal that the money goes ultimately to your sister's children, if you leave it to her it will be entirely at her discretion whether that happens and, if it does, whether it is divided equally or whether every child is included in any division.
Also, depending on what else she is leaving to her children, that money may be taxed again if it brings each niece or nephew's inheritance from their mother above the €400,000 – or whatever the threshold in place will be at that time.
Assuming the plan is for the children to benefit ultimately, one way to avoid or reduce any future tax bill would be her to avail of the small gift exemption which would allow her to pass on €3,000 each year to each child from your inheritance that she is managing on their behalf. That would clearly reduce any amount that might be subject to tax later on.
That is also an option for your right now if the amount you intend to leave amounts to more than €40,000 per person. The small gift exemption applies to the beneficiary not the donor so there is nothing to stop you gifting the equivalent €3,000 each year to each of your sister's children from the US, reducing any eventual tax bill on a future inheritance.
You'll need to manage exchange rates if you do that as anything above €3,000 in any year comes off their inheritance tax free threshold.
As a general rule, the best way to reduce tax on inheritance in Ireland is to spread it widely. The more recipients, the lower any ultimate tax bill. But of course, in this case, that is limited by the size of the family whom you wish to benefit.
Please send your queries to Dominic Coyle, Q&A, The Irish Times, 24-28 Tara Street, Dublin 2, or by email to
dominic.coyle@irishtimes.com
, with a contact phone number. This column is a reader service and is not intended to replace professional advice

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Small Irish businesses say tariffs will hurt US consumers most
Many smaller Irish exporters have mixed feelings about the trade agreement between the European Union and the United States. Last week, they understood there was still an outside chance that discussions could go off the rails with the possibility of a trade war. At the same time, they are less than impressed with the outline deal being presented in the media. Sarah Furno, of Cashel Blue, greeted the news from Scotland yesterday with a 'degree of relief' and the sense that the Tipperary cheese company can now make more definite plans for the US market. Sarah and Sergio Furno of Cashel Blue cheesemakers 'Uncertainty is impossible and disabling especially in a prolonged manner,' she says. 'Overall we feel it could have been worse. It's a relatively even playing field for imports and there is enough light to keep doors open. READ MORE 'Of course it will hurt the average American most'. Ms Furno said the 30 per cent rate threatened by US President Donald Trump would have pushed Cashel products off US shelves. Leo Cummins, of Hazelbrook Confectionery in Co Kildare, decided earlier this year to shun the US market due to the uncertainty. On hearing the news of the agreement, he said he was even more convinced that ignoring the US market in the short term was 'the right thing to do'. 'Obviously one has a concern that the deal as it stands looks quite lopsided in favour of the US,' he says. Leo Cummins of Hazelbrook Confectionary in Newbridge, Co. Kildare. Photograph Nick Bradshaw 'I personally think that American candy sales will decline in Ireland, the UK and Europe over the next three years as consumer sentiment towards America becomes more negative. 'Whilst it appears that there will be no tariffs on US candy imports into Europe, American candy manufacturers will have to pay extra for their cocoa and other ingredients that are not produced in America and that will push their costs higher and hence their prices to European customers.' Mr Cummins says more expensive US confectionery will open doors for Hazelbrook in the UK and Europe as importers there will look to find cheaper alternatives. Whiskey manufacturers were particularly concerned at the possibility of trade talks failing. Brendan Carty, of Killowen Distillery in Co Down, will now have to contend with two different trade deals – the EU deal at 15 per cent and the UK one at 10 per cent. As Irish whiskey is bottled and bonded on both sides of the Border, it presents new headaches for the likes of Killowen. 'If a distillery sells 50 per cent distilled in Killowen and 50 per cent distilled in the Republic, I suppose our tariffs will be complicated and will fall between the two,' says Mr Carty. 'That's the nature of navigating a global market. It's always changing and very complex. It's the consumers who will take the hurt in the end. 'It's always a navigation exercise working things out with overseas partners, part and parcel of the business, so we won't get too upset about it'. The Irish Whiskey Association still hasn't ruled out the chance that the agreement could yet see the return of 'zero-for-zero' trade in spirits. Director Eoin Ó Catháin says the 10 per cent rate currently being applied, along with a weakened US dollar, has forced some operators to shut their doors. 'We are hopeful that, as we learn more about this deal and discussions on its implementation continue, a mutually beneficial arrangement and the removal of tariffs can be secured,' he says. The overriding sentiment from many exporters is that the deal represents an unwanted regression. With no upsides for Irish businesses – other than avoiding even worse terms – it is the new price of doing business with the US.

Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
EU-US trade deal: Ireland ‘no doubt' in challenging position over tariffs, says Minister
There is 'no doubt' that Ireland is in a challenging position in relation to tariffs but the recently announced agreement does bring 'some clarity', the Minister for Enterprise has said. Peter Burke said the deal reached on Sunday, which will lock in tariffs of 15 per cent on most EU imports to the US , had avoided a 'direct trade war'. Speaking on RTÉ Radio 1's Morning Ireland on Monday, Mr Burke said the EU was four days away from 30 per cent tariffs, which would have been 'significant', while the Government is awaiting more details to emerge. The final terms of the deal were worked out during a meeting between European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and US president Donald Trump at his Turnberry golf resort in Scotland on Sunday. READ MORE The accord effectively sees the EU accepting import taxes of 15 per cent on most of its huge volume of trade with the US. The two sides agreed that no tariffs would be charged on imports of aircraft, certain chemicals and some agri-food goods, though the finer details of what agricultural products will benefit from these exemptions are still to be worked out. [ EU-US trade deal analysis: Tariffs have a price for both sides. Trump was willing to pay it Opens in new window ] Mr Burke said there would be a number of 'carveouts' for particular sectors such as aviation, agri-foods and spirits. He said the Government was concerned about the 'stacking mechanism', which refers to the cumulative effect of multiple tariffs applied to the same imported product. 'All of those areas have been called out for separate carveouts, so we have to see what that will look like and what will that amount to on paper, and that's where the devil is going to be in the detail,' he said. 'But the critical thing is that at all costs we have to avoid escalation because it would be devastating in terms of the impact because the scale of the market is so huge.' The Fine Gael TD said the Government had been 'very clear that tariffs are bad'. 'They constrain supply, they drive prices up. They're not good for the US economy, or indeed for the Irish economy,' he said. 'Ireland's position is very clear – we always favour an open, rules-based fair trade at every hand's turn. When you have the talk of tariffs and a deal like this, it is going to be challenging, and I think we have to be very honest about that.' [ EU-US trade deal represents 'substantial burden' for Irish businesses Opens in new window ] The deal includes EU commitments to purchase set amounts of US oil, nuclear power and liquefied natural gas annually. In terms of Ireland buying US oil or gas, Mr Burke said he was not aware of it at this point in time but could not 'give a definitive answer'. Mr Burke added that a deal between China and the US had yet to happen, which would affect Irish exports and they would also have to see what separate carveouts will emerge. 'Until we get flesh on the bones in all those areas over the coming weeks, we'll be in a better position then to really put forward what the budgetary parameters will end up with.' He also said he and the Government remained committed to cutting the hospitality VAT rate to 9 per cent and that it was in the programme for government, which had been agreed by all parties.


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Paul Coulson to get €108m payment from Ardagh creditors to cede control of group
Irish financier Paul Coulson has agreed to cede entire control of Ardagh Group , the glass bottles and drink cans giant he built up over the past 25 years, to a group of its bondholders in exchange for a share of a $300 million (€257 million) pay-off. The company at the top of Ardagh Group corporate tree has an estimated $12.5 billion of debt, which became unsustainable after its earnings were hit since the Covid-19 pandemic by inflation, soaring interest rates, and soft consumer demand on both sides of the Atlantic. Ardagh Group's customers range from Coca-Cola and Heineken to Swiss group Nestlé. Mr Coulson (73) effectively has a 36 per cent stake in the business, with the rest largely in the hands of management and a group of small investors that date back to Ardagh's previous existence on the Dublin stock market. On that basis, he will end up with a €108 million payment to walk away from the business. READ MORE The major debt restructuring will see senior unsecured bondholders and holders of high-risk payment-in-kind notes swap $4.2 billion of debt for equity in Ardagh Group. The senior unsecured creditors will end up with 92.5 per cent of the equity in the group, and holders of the PIK Notes will hold 7.5 per cent. [ Meet Paul 'the Cooler' Coulson: One of the godfathers of leveraged finance Opens in new window ] 'Ardagh Group is pleased to have achieved this significant milestone in agreeing a comprehensive recapitalisation transaction with its key financial stakeholders,' said group chairman Herman Troskie. 'The transaction will preserve the group's ownership of its glass and metal packaging businesses and puts in place a sustainable capital structure, with significantly lower leverage and an enhanced maturity profile. Together with the injection of new capital, Ardagh will be well-placed to deliver our business plan in partnership with our future shareholders.' Mr Coulson entered the glass bottle business in 1998 by buying an initial stake and taking over as chairman of the Irish Glass Bottle Company, which traces its roots back to 1932. After renaming the company Ardagh, he orchestrated a series of overseas acquisitions, fuelled by high-cost debt raised on the international junk-bond market, that would create one of the world's largest packaging groups with annual sales of more than $9 billion. The original bottle-making factory in Ringsend in Dublin was closed in the process, in 2002. Mr Coulson controls Ardagh through an 18.8 per cent direct stake in its ultimate parent company and a 52.4 per cent interest in a vehicle called Yeoman Capital, which owns 33.9 per cent of the group. He effectively owns 36.6 per cent of the equity. The $300 million Mr Coulson and the other investors will share is a fraction of Ardagh Group's market valuation. In 2021, it peaked at almost $6.7 billion. That valued the businessman's holding at about $2.4 billion. Ardagh Group was delisted later that year, after it decided to float its drink cans unit, Ardagh Metal Packaging (AMP). Mr Coulson stepped down as chairman of the group in late 2023, but remained a director and its major shareholder. Still, long-term investors in the group made handsome returns over the years as Ardagh Group distributed hundreds of millions of euros, often funded by the issuance of debt. While earnings have improved significantly in recent quarters in AMP as customers increasingly favour aluminium cans over glass and plastic packaging, the bottle-making business has remained under pressure. AMP's chief executive, Oliver Graham, signalled in April that the business had 'turned a corner', helped by a rebound in demand for energy drinks, sparkling water and health segments. AMP reported on Thursday that its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda) rose 18 per cent in the second quarter to $210 million. The company upgraded its full-year earnings forecast for a second time and now sees Ebitda rising to $705 million-$725 million from $672 million for 2024. It had started out the year predicting that earnings would fall between $675 million and $695 million. Ardagh Group typically reports results on the same day as AMP. However, it held off on publishing its figures as the debt restructuring talks reached a pivotal stage.