Remote contract workers share their red flags for sorting through scams
Remote job scams are on the rise as more people seek flexible work options.
Scammers often exploit inexperienced job seekers by masquerading as appealing offers.
Experts told BI that caution, careful research, and networking can help you avoid falling for scams.
Portia Moore had already been working from home for five years before the COVID pandemic made flexible schedules popular. She said sifting through scams has always come with the job.
"I got spoiled, working from home," Moore, who runs a job board that lists remote gig work that she vets, said. "Back in 2015, 2017 — it was before remote jobs were very popular. So, I kind of really learned how to find legit remote jobs that weren't scams because scams were everywhere."
They're even more prevalent now, Moore added, since "everybody's going after remote jobs."
More and more Americans are taking on extra work to cope with the rising cost of living. Communities have emerged on sites like TikTok, dedicated entirely to finding legit, lucrative side hustles. Gig remote work — such as copywriting, data entry, and one-off jobs on sites like Fiverr — often offers attractive rates of pay and flexible hours. It is enjoying a resulting boom in popularity.
Jackie Mitchell, who gained traction on TikTok for documenting her goal of making $100 a day through side hustles, said scams often advertise themselves similarly to legitimate remote jobs, luring in searchers with less experience spotting clear red flags. In particular, those in dire financial straits searching for a temporary stopgap are most vulnerable.
"I feel like the side hustle culture kind of becomes — while I need to have second streams of income at this time in my life — I think the mantra now becomes that everyone should, because why wouldn't you want more money?" Mitchell said. "And I think that becomes dangerous."
For her part, Moore has also seen plenty of scammers try to prey on her audience — and says it fits the typical pattern of bad actors aligning themselves with a legitimate brand in order to build trust.
"I just had a TikTok go viral over the weekend, and there's so many scammers in the comments saying, 'Hey, I hire data entry for $40 an hour,'" Moore said. "And I'm like, 'No, guys. That's not real.' So it's mostly people who'll say a legit, popular job title, like data entry."
Many will pretend to be real, big-name companies, Moore said — and with the advent of AI tools, she's seen the phishing websites people are redirected to become harder to distinguish for the genuine article. She's developed a series of red flags she keeps in mind when searching for listings to add to her site.
"If you're getting asked for money, that's a huge red flag," Moore said."It's a job. You shouldn't be paying. If you go to a website and something looks off, or — and I know this is hard to believe — but if someone uses the word 'kindly,' that's usually a red flag."
Kristi Roe-Owen, a freelance writer who supplements her income with gig work for companies like Data Annotation, said a green flag for her is when the sign-up and interview process is complex.
"They wanted a lot of information about my skills, my contributions, and what I had to offer as a writer," Roe-Owen said. "And then immediately after I finished that initial sign-up process, I was prompted to go through qualifications. That was green flags across the board, for me."
Roe-Owen added that building out a network of other freelancers or gig workers helps her learn about postings by word of mouth, even if it's just via a post in her Discord group.
"A green flag is also that I've actually read an experience from someone else who's doing it successfully," Roe-Owen said. "That gives me an idea of what to expect."
Mitchell agrees — a quick search on social media always helps confirm her hunches.
"I find a classic Reddit search does you wonders," Mitchell said.
Keeping your wits about you is the most important part of the process, Moore said, and added to avoid being guided by desperation. She also believes that age-old advice endures for a reason.
"If it sounds too good to be true, it most likely is too good to be true, and you want to do your due diligence," she said. "When you're looking for remote jobs, you do have to take your time. It's a numbers game. You just can't believe that somebody's selling you gold."
Read the original article on Business Insider

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
13 minutes ago
- UPI
Senators propose $15-per-hour federal minimum wage
A proposed federal act would raise the federal minimum wage law to $15 an hour on January 1, two U.S. senators announced on Tuesday. The Service Employee International Union was fighting for that wage in 2021 (pictured). File Photo by Tasos Katopodis/UPI | License Photo June 10 (UPI) -- The federal minimum wage would rise to $15 per hour, with annual cost-of-living increases based on inflation, in a proposed bipartisan measure. Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Peter Welch, D-Vt., co-sponsored the bill that they have named the "Higher Wages for American Workers Act" and would increase the federal minimum wage from its current $7.25 per hour for non-exempt workers. "For decades, working Americans have seen their wages flatline," Hawley said on Tuesday in a joint press release with Welch. "One major culprit of this is the failure of the federal minimum wage to keep up with the economic reality facing hardworking Americans every day," Hawley added. Welch said inflation and rising costs are making it too hard for families to afford basic necessities. "We're in the midst of a severe affordability crisis, with families in red and blue states alike struggling to afford necessities like housing and groceries," Welch said. "A stagnant federal minimum wage only adds fuel to the fire," he continued. "Every hardworking American deserves a living wage that helps put a roof over their head and food on the table -- $7.25 an hour doesn't even come close." "Times have changed, and working families deserve a wage that reflects today's financial reality," Welch added. Hawley said the current federal minimum wage is less than what a worker earned in 1940 when adjusted for inflation. If the proposed federal minimum wage increase is passed into law, it would take effect on Jan. 1 and allow cost-of-living increases that match inflation in subsequent years. Many states have respective minimum wage laws that exceed the current and proposed federal minimum wage, but a dozen still were at the federal minimum wage in 2024. Many large employers also have higher minimum wages, including Walmart, which has paid its workers at least $14 an hour and often more since 2023. President Joe Biden in 2021 ordered the federal government to pay contract workers at least $15 an hour. California lawmakers in 2022 raised the state's minimum wage for many fast-food workers to up to $22 an hour.


Miami Herald
14 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Is Elon Musk right to oppose the budget bill? What Americans said in a new poll
During his public falling out with President Donald Trump, Elon Musk slammed the president's proposed spending bill — dubbed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' — claiming it will balloon the deficit. It turns out, most Americans agree with his critique, new polling reveals. In the latest Economist/YouGov poll, half of respondents were asked to react to a statement from Musk on the GOP-backed spending bill, which passed in the House without a single Democratic vote. The legislation, Musk wrote on X on June 3, 'will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion and burden (American) citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' A majority of respondents, 56%, said they agreed with this statement, while just 17% said they disagreed. More than one-quarter, 27%, said they were unsure. The answers were largely linked to partisan affiliation, with Democrats largely siding with Musk for a change. Seventy-two percent of Democrats said they concurred with the billionaire's statement about the spending bill, as did 55% of independents. Among Republicans, a plurality, 44%, said they agreed. The poll — which sampled 1,533 U.S. adults June 6-9 — posed the same statement before the other half of respondents, but this time, it did not attribute it to Musk. Without reference to Musk, a slightly smaller share, 49%, said they agreed with the statement, while 23% said they disagreed. Smaller shares of Republicans, independents and Democrats agreed, though Democrats saw the largest decrease in support — from 72% to 60%. The poll has a margin of error of 3.5 percentage points. More on the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' The spending bill, which provides funding for fiscal year 2025, passed in the House in a 215-214 vote in late May and is now under consideration in the Senate. It contains many pieces of Trump's agenda, including a road map to extend the 2017 tax cuts, as well as an increase in funding for the Pentagon and border security, according to previous reporting from McClatchy News. At the same time, it slashes funding for social programs like Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Further — to Musk's point — it would increase the federal deficit by $3.8 trillion over the next 10 years, according to an analysis from the Congressional Budget Office, a nonpartisan agency. In addition to Musk, the bill has received criticism from several other prominent conservatives in Congress. One of the most vocal opponents has been Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky, who wrote on X that 'the spending proposed in this bill is unsustainable, we cannot continue spending at these levels if we want to truly tackle our debt.' Other Republican lawmakers have come out in defense of the bill, including House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has said the legislation will deliver 'historic tax relief, ensure our border stays secure, strengthen our military, and produce historic savings.' Meanwhile, Democrats have been united in their opposition. In a statement, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries labeled the bill 'the GOP Tax Scam' and said it would rip 'healthcare and food assistance away from millions of people in order to provide tax cuts to the wealthy, the well-off and the well-connected.'


New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
UES pol pushes crackdown on NYC ‘broken' emergency contracting system
An Upper East Side councilwoman wants to crack down on the mayor's ability to dole out controversial no-bid contracts after a series of high-profile boondoggles during the migrant and COVID crises. Councilmember Julie Menin is proposing two new bills in the aim to curb financial fiascos tied to such contracts — like the controversial $432 million sweetheart deal with DocGo that had taxpayers footing the bill for uneaten meals and empty migrant shelters. 'It's time for drastic change by reforming the city's excessive emergency procurement practices that lack vital checks and balances,' Menin said. The measures would cap the mayor's emergency contracting powers at 30 days and force quicker audits of the deals. 3 Julie Menin wants to fix the city's 'broken' emergency contract procurement process. Leonardo Munoz Current law allows the mayor to dole out non-competitive contracts lasting up to one year during a declared emergency. Menin said the frantic procurement process squanders billions in taxpayer dollars due to waste and malfeasance. She pointed to the COVID-19 pandemic, when then-Mayor Bill de Blasio extended emergency declarations over 100 times, spending an eye-popping $7 billion on emergency supplies with little oversight. It led to New York City loading up on mountains of the supplies, which became unnecessary when the crisis ended. 3 The de Blasio administration spent billions on non-competitive emergency contracts during the COVID pandemic. RICHARD HARBUS Under one COVID-era contract, the city spent as much as $7.50 per cloth mask, Menin said. When city officials auctioned off $225 million leftover PPE supplies, they only recouped $500,000. 'These are reforms to a broken contracting system which has price gouged our government,' Menin said. Mayor Eric Adams has also faced intense scrutiny over the emergency contracts handed out during the emergency he declared over the influx of migrants arriving to the city. The Adams administration awarded DocGo contracts worth hundreds of millions of dollars — without a bidding process to hear from other firms — to operate migrant shelters, despite the company having little experience on the matter. 3 The Adams administration doled out more than $5 billion in emergency contract during the migrant crisis. Michael Nigro Reports showed the contractor used unlicensed security guards, tossed thousands of uneaten meals and underutilized shelter space — eventually leading to an investigation by the state Attorney General's Office and the termination of the deal. 'The failures surrounding DocGo for a critical service only reinforced the need for reforming our broken emergency procurement process,' Menin said. One of Menin's bills would also mandate public disclosure of subcontractors, with penalties of up to $100,000 for failing to report financial relationships. 'Recent mayoral administrations have shown no appetite for good government contracting practices and it's time for the City Council to advance vital legislation to save taxpayer dollars, be fiscally responsible and root out corruption,' she said.