US Senate bill's clean energy cuts draw backlash from labor, business
The pushback, which includes a swipe from Trump ally and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, comes as senators started voting on a potentially long list of amendments to the bill on Monday morning, giving renewable energy advocates on both sides of the political spectrum a last window to push for changes.
"Taxing energy production is never good policy, whether oil & gas or, in this case, renewables," said Neil Bradley, policy director of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, in a post on X over the weekend. "Electricity demand is set to see enormous growth & this tax will increase prices. It should be removed."
"This would be incredibly destructive to America!" Musk posted on X, saying the cuts could endanger the development of energy-hungry artificial intelligence technology, among other things.
Trump has said he intends to maximize U.S. energy production, with a focus on fossil fuels, in part to ensure the power industry can supply the AI industry's growth. But he has also promised to wipe out subsidies for renewables.
The Senate bill would roll back incentives for wind, solar, batteries and other clean energy technologies created by President Joe Biden's 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, and add a new tax on these projects if they cannot prove their products are made without Chinese parts.
Those provisions were harsher on the credits than the previous Senate version and even the House version.
Sean McGarvey, president of the North America's Building Trades Unions (NABTU), which represents over 3 million construction workers, blasted the bill's impact on jobs.
"If enacted, this stands to be the biggest job-killing bill in the history of this country. Simply put, it is the equivalent of terminating more than 1,000 Keystone XL pipeline projects," he said in a statement, referring to an oil pipeline project blocked by Biden's administration.
Republican Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, one of two Republicans who voted against advancing the bill, also blasted the bill on the Senate floor overnight and warned that it will cause power shortages by hamstringing renewable energy and battery storage.
Tillis drew ire from Trump for voting against the motion to advance the bill and has since said he does not plan to run for re-election.
"What you have done is create a blip in power service, because there isn't going to be a gas-fired generator anytime soon," he said on the floor.
Tillis had worked as a consultant covering the utility industry and said the bill ignores the reality of the soaring demand for power by data centers.
Brian Schatz, a Democratic Senator from Hawaii, also railed against the bill's impact.
"This bill will increase prices. The 500-GW less energy in the next decade is pretty much exactly the amount we will need to meet rising demand," he said.
"You don't have to love clean energy or be an environmentalist to understand that this is a basic question of supply and demand," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
36 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Senate Republicans pass Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill
Senate Republicans on Tuesday passed a major tax and spending bill after weeks of negotiations, bringing Donald Trump's megabill one step closer to enactment. The US president, who was in Florida holding a press conference on a highly controversial new migrant detention facility, said the news of the vote was 'music to my ears'. The Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer, called the bill a 'a big, ugly betrayal'
Time Out
41 minutes ago
- Time Out
Yes, rents will officially increase for 2 million New Yorkers—here's who
It's official—New York's rent-stabilized tenants are getting hit with another rent hike. In a 5–4 vote Monday night, the NYC Rent Guidelines Board approved increases of 3-percent for one-year leases and 4.5-percent for two-year leases, impacting over one million apartments across the five boroughs starting Oct. 1. That's roughly 2 million residents who'll be digging deeper into their wallets this fall. The annual vote, always a flashpoint in the city's affordability crisis, drew fierce protests from tenants and housing advocates, who packed the meeting at El Museo del Barrio in East Harlem chanting 'Freeze the rent!' Mayor Eric Adams, who appointed the board members, had urged more modest increases (1.75-percent and 3.75-percent), but tenant advocates say even that would have been too much. Adams' mayoral rival Zohran Mamdani—fresh off a lead in the Democratic primary—blasted the hike as yet another example of the mayor 'placating real estate donors' and doubled down on his campaign promise to freeze rents if elected. Even landlords weren't pleased. While tenant reps on the board voted no because the increase was too high, landlord reps also voted no, because it wasn't high enough to offset skyrocketing insurance and maintenance costs. City Comptroller Brad Lander called the increase 'unaffordable' and the Legal Aid Society warned it would deepen homelessness and displacement. For stabilized renters, whose average rent hovers around $1,500 (compared to $2,000 for market-rate units), the bump adds strain in an already brutal housing market. And in case you're wondering: No, this doesn't apply to everyone. These increases affect only those in rent-stabilized apartments renewing leases on or after Oct. 1. If you're in a stabilized hotel or SRO unit, your rent stays flat.
Reuters
41 minutes ago
- Reuters
Billionaire H&M founding family speeds up share purchases
LONDON/STOCKHOLM, July 1 (Reuters) - The billionaire Persson family has picked up the pace of share purchases in the H&M ( opens new tab fashion empire it founded, regulatory filings showed on Tuesday, potentially boosting speculation the company may eventually be taken private. The family's Ramsbury Invest holding company, primarily owned by Sweden's richest man Stefan Persson, bought 42.75 million H&M shares in the first half of this year, according to the Swedish financial regulator, with the most recent transaction on Monday. That is a faster pace so far than in 2024, opens new tab, when Ramsbury Invest purchased 56.85 million shares over the year as a whole, and in 2023, when the family bought 55.65 million shares. "As the family owns more shares they have a higher dividend to reinvest which would support increased share purchases," said Deutsche Bank analyst Adam Cochrane, who expects the family to take H&M private by 2030. The Persson family and its related companies owned more than 64% of H&M's shares at the end of May, according to the company's website. H&M referred Reuters' questions about the share purchases to a spokesperson for Ramsbury Invest, who declined to comment on the stake-building or on the possibility of the company being taken private. "I think they will, in due time, take it private - the question is, is it now, or in ten or 20 years?" said Peter Magnusson, portfolio manager at Cicero Fonder in Stockholm. The family would likely need to find external financing or partners to buy the whole company, Magnusson added. H&M's market value is around 187 billion Swedish crowns ($19.7 billion). Investment bankers expect more publicly-listed retailers to go private, since U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs have dented share prices and driven market volatility. H&M's share price is down 9% since the start of this year. H&M was founded by Erling Persson in 1947, and his son Stefan took over as CEO in 1982, staying in the role for 27 years before handing over to his son Karl-Johan Persson in 2009. In 2020, H&M got its first chief executive from outside the family, with Karl-Johan becoming chair. ($1 = 9.4806 Swedish crowns)
