
Atlanta wasn't sold on a Southern Michelin Guide, emails show
Driving the news: Axios New Orleans' Chelsea Brasted obtained emails exchanged among Michelin staffers and tourism officials over the prestigious travel adviser's new focus on geographic regions, not individual cities.
Catch up quick: Cities and states across the South will collectively pitch in $1.65 million a year in a three-year contract bringing the Michelin Guide to the region.
Caveat: The Atlanta Convention and Visitors Bureau, which lured Michelin to Atlanta in 2023, is in the final year of its three-year, $300,000-a-year contract with the company.
ACVB spokesperson Heather Kirksey told Axios the nonprofit, which is Atlanta's tourism marketing arm, has signed an agreement for 2026 and 2027.
The annual payment for those years will reduce to $225,000. Michelin will cover the same geographic area, Kirksey said.
The intrigue: Some of the emails make reference to the push and pull among tourism agencies and concerns that some states would outshine others.
"Atlanta likes being alone in the South," Liz Bittner of Travel South USA, the marketing agency that helped coordinate the states, said in one of the obtained messages.
However, she said that ACVB president William Pate recognized the new regional guide was likely going to happen and was "willing to find a win-win."
What's inside: The emails also discuss non-disclosure agreements, "sticky" questions from the public about the agreements, and restaurants that the local tourism agencies think showcase their area's range of cuisine.
What they're saying: Kirksey shared the agency's restaurants list with Axios Atlanta. The four-page list is an exhaustive rundown of Atlanta's fine-dining (Bacchanalia) and scrappy upstarts (La Semilla).
Atlanta's relationship with Michelin, Kirksey told Axios, has "exceeded our expectations," boosted Atlanta's culinary scene nationally and internationally and even benefited restaurants that didn't receive recognition.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
6 hours ago
- Axios
The Michelin Guide is coming back to Texas
Michelin is set to update its Texas guide, revealing which restaurants earned stars and other honors across the state. Why it matters: It's a moment of recognition, honor and prestige for both the restaurants and the cities where they are located. The latest: The awards will be announced on Oct. 28 in Houston. Flashback: It's the second time the revered guide is visiting Texas. Last year, 15 restaurants across Texas earned a star, including six in the Houston area. Houston also had more than a dozen other spots featured in the guide, including many on the Bib Gourmand list, which highlights "good food at moderate prices." How it works: A group of anonymous inspectors from across the world judge restaurants on the quality of ingredients, mastery of cooking techniques, harmony of flavors, chef's vision, consistency and value. The guide includes a full list of Michelin recommendations, Bib Gourmand awards, specialty awards, star winners and honorable mentions. What they're saying: "Texas' culinary scene boasts a rich heritage, defined by its diverse flavors, unique cuisines, and remarkable talent — qualities that make it distinctly Texan," Gwendal Poullennec, international director of the Michelin Guide, said in a statement. "It offers something for every kind of traveler, and we look forward to unveiling our inspectors' findings in the coming months."


Business Journals
6 hours ago
- Business Journals
Michelin Guide takes on Texas restaurants for second year
The Michelin Guide is coming back to Houston to announce the selections for its second-annual Texas edition, which will award stars and other honors to local restaurants. Of the 15 Texas restaurants that received a Michelin star in the inaugural guide, seven are from the Austin area.


Axios
7 hours ago
- Axios
Cybersecurity's dual AI reality: Hacks and defenses both turbocharged
Underestimate how quickly adversarial hackers are advancing in generative AI, and your company could be patient zero in an outbreak of AI-enabled cyberattacks. Overestimate that risk, and you could quickly blow millions of dollars only to realize you were preparing for the wrong thing. The big picture: That dichotomy has divided the cybersecurity industry into two competing narratives about how AI is transforming the threat landscape. One says defenders still have the upper hand. Cybercriminals lack the money and computing resources to build out AI-powered tools, and large language models (LLMs) have clear limitations in their ability to carry out offensive strikes. This leaves defenders with time to tap AI's potential for themselves. Then there's the darker view. Cybercriminals are already leaning on open-source LLMs to build tools that can scan internet-connected devices to see if they have vulnerabilities, discover zero-day bugs, and write malware. They're only going to get better, and quickly. Between the lines: While not everyone fits comfortably into one of those two camps, closed-door sessions at Black Hat and DEF CON last week made clear that the primary divide is over how much security execs or researchers expect generative AI tools to advance over the next year. Right now, models aren't the best at making human-like judgments, such as recognizing when legitimate tools are being abused for malicious purposes. And running a series of AI agents will require cybercriminals and nation-states to have enough resources to pay the cloud bills they rack up, Michael Sikorski, CTO of Palo Alto Networks' Unit 42 threat research team, told Axios. But LLMs are improving rapidly. Sikorski predicts that malicious hackers will use a victim organization's own AI agents to launch an attack after breaking into their infrastructure. The flip side: Executives told me the cybersecurity industry isn't as resilient to AI-driven workforce disruptions as they once believed. That means fewer humans and more AI playing defense against the expected wave of AI-powered attacks. During a presentation at DEF CON, a member of Anthropic's red team said its AI model, Claude, will "soon" be able to perform at the level of a senior security researcher. Driving the news: Several cybersecurity companies debuted advancements in AI agents at the Black Hat conference last week — signaling that cyber defenders could soon have the tools to catch up to adversarial hackers. Microsoft shared details about a prototype for a new agent that can automatically detect malware — although it's able to detect only 24% of malicious files as of now. Trend Micro released new AI-driven "digital twin" capabilities that let companies simulate real-world cyber threats in a safe environment walled off from their actual systems. Several companies and research teams also publicly released open-source tools that can automatically identify and patch vulnerabilities as part of the government-backed AI Cyber Challenge. Yes, but: Threat actors are now using those AI-enabled tools to speed up reconnaissance and dream up brand-new attack vectors for targeting each company, John Watters, CEO of iCounter and a former Mandiant executive, told Axios. That's different from the traditional methods, where hackers would exploit the same known vulnerability to target dozens of organizations. "The net effect is everybody becomes patient zero," Watters said. "The world's not prepared to deal with that." The intrigue: Open-source AI models have blown the door wide open for cybercriminals to build custom tools for vulnerability scanning and targeted reconnaissance. Many of these models have improved rapidly in the last year, and many attackers can now run these models solely on their own machines, without connecting to the internet, Shane Caldwell, principal research engineer at Dreadnode, which uses AI tools to test clients' systems, told Axios. The rise of reinforcement learning — a method where AI models learn and adapt through trial-and-error interactions with their environment — means attackers no longer need to rely on more resource-intensive, supervised training approaches to develop powerful tools. What's next: By next year, the threat landscape could be completely turned on its head, Watters warned.