Lebanon's PM says US proposal includes full Israeli withdrawal, state control of arms
His comments came as the deputy secretary-general of Hezbollah, Naim Qassem, rejected any notion of disarming the powerful group in exchange for Israeli withdrawals.
Salam told Lebanon's Al-Jadeed TV that the paper presented by US envoy Tom Barak, who is expected in Beirut next week, was based on the 'fundamental idea' of linking a full Israeli withdrawal with the Lebanese state extending its authority over all its territory and having a monopoly on arms.
'We are afraid of escalation,' Salam said, adding that 'engaging with Barak's paper, while improving it, is the way to avoid sliding into new confrontations.'
'What is required is to hand over the weapons to the Lebanese state instead of Israel bombing them,' the prime minister stressed. 'This stage requires the logic of the state to prevail, not the logic of militias.'
A six-member committee representing Lebanon's three top leaders (the president, prime minister, and parliament speaker) has begun studying US observations on a response that Lebanese President Joseph Aoun had previously provided to Barak.
In response to the US initiative, Hezbollah's Naim Qassem said in a televised speech on Thursday that the proposed agreement 'absolves Israel of everything it has committed during the period of aggression.'
He said the texts of the proposal meet US demands, especially regarding 'the disarmament of the party in exchange for some partial withdrawals at different times.' He questioned what the consequences would be for Israel if it violated the agreement, suggesting they would only amount to condemnations at the U.N. Security Council.
'Disarming Hezbollah is an Israeli demand, and the aggression continues because they want to take down this weapon,' Qassem said, calling Israel an 'expansionist state' and describing Hezbollah's arms as an obstacle to that expansion.
He warned that calls to disarm the group 'serve Israel' and risk sparking 'internal strife, even a civil war.' He added that Hezbollah 'will not give up its weapons.'
However, sources close to the matter indicate that Lebanon's initial response had stressed confining weapons to the state's hands but did not provide a timeline. This prompted the United States to demand in its observations a commitment to a phased timetable with 'specific dates and a clear implementation mechanism.'
The sources added that Lebanon wants guarantees from Israel, including a withdrawal from occupied territories, the release of prisoners, and a halt to ceasefire violations, in exchange for its commitment to disarm. The US is also seeking guarantees from Lebanon that Hezbollah will abide by any agreement and hand over its weapons, the sources said, adding that these mutual guarantees appear to be the biggest obstacle so far.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Egypt Independent
28 minutes ago
- Egypt Independent
Madbouly's media red line
'For every nation, newspapers serve as a benchmark of their standing in science, literature, ethics, and customs; they are the mirror reflecting all these aspects.' This quote from Ibrahim Al-Yaziji (1847-1906), founder of Cairo's Al-Diyaa magazine, came to mind when I saw Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly discuss acceptable and forbidden criticism in the media. The Prime Minister affirmed at a press conference the people's right to criticize, but set conditions: it shouldn't 'offend the image of the state.' That's how we understood his message. He alluded, without naming them, to countries that don't allow any negativity to be published about them, and even punish those who do. We certainly know which countries he's referring to, a subtle jab at ongoing skirmishes in the media and social sphere within the Arab world. However, Madbouly often misses the mark! He consistently confuses the state with the government, a grave error if you knew its significance, because the government is not the state; it is merely a government. The state is a far grander and loftier entity than any executive government. Therefore, discussions about 'the image of the state' should be left by the Prime Minister to other institutions. He should stop conflating them, something we've warned against in previous writings! Public service is a challenge, and constantly rehashing 'fourth and fifth-generation warfare,' even if true, shouldn't distract the government from its duties. It needs to look in the mirror, see itself, and discover its reality by standing before the mirror of its citizens. His remarks championed authoritarianism in media, where the government deems itself solely entitled to determine the facts and information reaching the public, all to preserve what it perceives as 'the image of the state.' This is despite the fact that times have moved on, and the circumstances have now become far more complex. According to this government-centric view, media institutions should adhere only to what is issued by the government and its entities. They should publish only the statements they receive, which often contain 'silent rhetoric' about their activities, and ignore any developments in how news and information are received. Currently, over 50 million Egyptians are active daily on social media! I honestly don't know the degree of freedom Madbouly desires for the media to be 'disciplined' (from his perspective) while simultaneously maintaining what he considers 'acceptable criticism' without veering into the 'evils of forbidden criticism.' Is acceptable criticism, then, merely adhering to the centralization of information and accepting the government's monopoly on news, interacting only with its uncommunicative messages and unrevealing reports? Because a fundamental, public expression of the government and its achievements is missing. The first lesson is to differentiate between the government and the state. I believe that, from Madbouly's perspective, 'acceptable criticism' means we should simply listen to his weekly pronouncements and report them verbatim, without any analysis or discussion. He seems to think this governmental disclosure is sufficient, despite every such announcement generating a mountain of questions, starting with its timing, duration, and topics, and extending to the government's communication skills with the public itself. Some might view the Prime Minister's remarks as a public reprimand directed at the media. However, I see it from another angle: it is, unfortunately, a tremendous opportunity for the very thing the Prime Minister fears most to proliferate—the flood of misinformation on social media. Because when professional institutional media is absent due to restrictions, the caves of disinformation on social media grow larger, seizing opportunities to prey on people's understanding and corrupt their minds. Any civilized nation must respect the press and view its vitality as being in the nation's highest interest, enabling it to learn and benefit from it in evaluating and improving public performance for the betterment of its people. As for drawing lines around 'acceptable criticism,' this would return to a practice the world abandoned long ago. Europe overcame the trials of its dark ages during the Renaissance through a true belief that transcended injustice in all aspects of society, and it all began with the word—the very same word that still seems to bother the Prime Minister. Author's bio: Alaa Al-Ghadrify has been the Editor-in-Chief of Al Masry Al Youm newspaper since October 2023, and the Executive Editor-in-Chief at ONA Media Group since 2016. He is also an opinion writer in Al-Watan newspaper and Masrawy website, and an advisor at the Egypt Media Forum. He further serves as a lecturer in television journalism and in-depth journalism for postgraduate studies at the Faculty of Mass Communication at Cairo University. He worked as Editor-in-Chief of CBC Extra channel, which he founded, as former Managing-Editor of Al Watan newspaper, and former Executive Editor-in-Chief of its website. He also co-founded the Al Masry Al Youm newspaper, the Al Watan newspaper, and the Al Ashera Masaan program on Dream TV channel, and was the Head of Program Editing at Alhurra channel.
Egypt Independent
28 minutes ago
- Egypt Independent
Israeli tanks roll into Gazan city of Deir al-Balah for first time since war began
CNN — Israeli tanks on Monday rolled into a part of central Gaza that has not previously seen ground operations in the 21-month war, according to Israeli media, aid agencies and witnesses. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) declined to comment on its operations. However, Israel Army Radio said the operation had begun. It said the IDF's Golani Brigade had 'begun a ground maneuver in the southern Deir al-Balah area,' which had been preceded by aerial and artillery strikes last night. Army Radio said that 'at this stage, the maneuver involves only one brigade, and it is expected to continue for several weeks.' On Sunday, the Israeli military ordered Palestinians to evacuate an area of nearly 6 square kilometers (2.3 square miles) and dropped thousands of leaflets in Deir al-Balah. The IDF Arabic language spokesperson said the military 'continues to operate with great force to destroy the enemy's capabilities and terrorist infrastructure in the area. It is expanding its activities in this area, operating in areas where it has not operated before.' Israeli media has reported that the IDF has been reluctant in the past to carry out ground operations in Deir al-Balah for fear of further endangering surviving hostages, who may be held there. The Hostages Families Forum said Monday that it was alarmed by reports the assault had begun and demanded the government explain why 'the offensive in the Deir al-Balah area does not put the hostages at serious risk.' The NGO Medical Aid for Palestinians (MAP), which has staff in the Deir al-Balah area, said Israeli forces had launched 'a ground and air assault' Monday. MAP's Communications Officer in Gaza, Mai Elawawda, said the situation was 'extremely critical.' 'Shelling is taking place all around our office, and military vehicles are just 400 meters away from our colleagues and their families,' Elawawda said. CNN spoke with people leaving the area Monday, against a background of explosions and artillery fire. Several said there had been intense fire and airstrikes overnight. 'We were surprised to see the tanks coming towards us directly. There was no prior warning,' said Umm Ali al-Qayed, who added that she had left a tent without any belongings. 'I am a mother of four martyrs and I have been displaced three times,' she added. Mohammed Abu Amous, who was also leaving, told CNN: 'They told us to leave. All night the artillery and strikes are falling on top of us.' Against a backdrop of persistent explosions, Attef Abu Mousa pointed to a tarpaulin sheet he was carrying. 'This tent I have put up and down 13 times. Tonight was very difficult.' Abdallah Awar said his family had left with nothing but the clothes they were wearing. 'Starvation, famine, killing, and displacement, and children dying in front of our own eyes, enough is enough,' he said. 'We ask the world to help us, we ask Hamas to stop this farce.' The United Nations said the evacuation order had 'dealt yet another devastating blow to the already fragile lifelines keeping people alive across the Gaza Strip.' The UN's Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said Monday that an estimated 50,000 to 80,000 people were in the area at the time, many of whom were already in displacement sites. The newly-designated area for evacuation includes several humanitarian warehouses, medical facilities and critical water facilities, OCHA said, warning that 'any damage to this infrastructure will have life-threatening consequences.' With this latest order, 'the area of Gaza under displacement orders or within Israeli-militarized zones has risen to 87.8 per cent, leaving 2.1 million civilians squeezed into a fragmented 12 per cent of the Strip, where essential services have collapsed,' OCHA added. 'It will limit the ability of the UN and our partners to move safely and effectively within Gaza, choking humanitarian access when it is needed most,' the UN body said. The head of the World Health Organization (WHO), Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said the agency's staff residence and main warehouse in Deir al-Balah was attacked, and that two staff members and two family members were detained. All but one of the staff members were later released, he posted to X, demanding the release of the detained staff member. He added that WHO staff and family members were forced to evacuate on foot to Al-Mawasi 'amid active conflict.' The latest evacuation order in Deir al-Balah, he said, affected several WHO premises impacting the agency's ability to operate in Gaza. 'WHO's main warehouse located in Deir al Balah is within the evacuation zone, and was damaged yesterday when an attack caused explosions and a fire inside,' the director-general said. 'With the main warehouse nonfunctional and the majority of medical supplies in Gaza depleted, WHO is severely constrained in adequately supporting hospitals, emergency medical teams and health partners, already critically short on medicines, fuel, and equipment.' CNN has reached out to the IDF for comment on WHO's remarks. This story has been updated with additional developments.
Al-Ahram Weekly
an hour ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Amnesty urges probe into Israeli strike on Tehran prison - Region
Amnesty International on Tuesday called for a war crimes investigation into Israel's deadly air attack on Tehran's Evin prison during last month's 12-day war. The strike, confirmed by Israel, killed 79 people, according to a provisional tally by Iranian authorities. It also destroyed part of the administrative building in Evin, a large, heavily fortified complex in the north of Tehran, which rights groups say holds political prisoners and foreign nationals. Amnesty International, an international non-governmental organisation that campaigns to protect human rights, called the Israeli attack "deliberate" and "a serious violation of international humanitarian law". The air strikes should therefore be "criminally investigated as war crimes", it said. "The Israeli military carried out multiple air strikes on Evin prison, killing and injuring scores of civilians and causing extensive damage and destruction in at least six locations across the prison complex," Amnesty said, basing its assessment on what it said were verified video footage, satellite images and witness statements. There was nothing to suggest that Evin prison could justifiably be seen as a "legal military objective", it said. The strike on Evin was part of a bombardment campaign Israel launched on Iranian targets on June 13 with the stated aim of stopping the Islamic republic from acquiring nuclear weapon capabilities. The victims of the June 23 attack included administrative staff, guards, prisoners and visiting relatives, as well as people living nearby. Between 1,500 and 2,000 prisoners were being held at the time in the prison. Among them were Cecile Kohler and Jacques Paris, two French nationals arrested three years ago accused of espionage. They were not injured in the attack, their families said, and have since been transferred to a different location. France, and other western governments, consider them and others to be "hostages" taken by the Iranian authorities for leverage in negotiations. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:
