IPS, IAS officers challenge single judge order on ‘Bhoodan land'
2
Hyderabad: A group of senior IAS and
IPS officers
, along with their spouses, approached the Telangana HC Tuesday seeking a stay on a single judge's order that flagged their residential plots in Nagaram village in Rangareddy district as Bhoodan land.
The officers, who were served notices by the court earlier, argued that the land was lawfully purchased and not part of any Bhoodan endowment, as alleged. It can be recalled, the single judge heard a petition filed by Birla Mallesh of Maheswaram mandal and directed the state authorities to keep the land in survey numbers 181, 182, 194 and 195 under the prohibition list until further orders.
IPS officers Mahesh Bhagwat, Soumya Mishra, Swathi Lakra, Rekha Sharaf, wife of Umesh Sharaff, Tarun Joshi, Renu Goyal, wife of Jitender Goyal, and BK Rahul Hegde, along with Rahul Busireddy, son of former IAS officer and former TGPSC chairman B Janardhan Reddy, filed the pleas questioning the single judge order that termed the land as Bhoodan land.
They contended that this is a ryotwari land which they bought from the rightful owners. Citing an order from the Bhoodan board, they said land in survey number 194 is not being claimed by the board, and they bought land that fell within the purview of this survey number.
Businessman V Goutam Reddy, another recipient of HC notice, also filed an appeal against the single judge order.
The single judge had ordered notices to several officials, including principal secretary of revenue Navin Mittal, Rangareddy district former collector Amoy Kumar and several private persons. While police are already probing into some of the issues pertaining to this land, the HC in its order sought to know the stand of the CBI and ED on the plea of the petitioner seeking a deeper probe into the issue.
The bureaucrats and their spouses said in their pleas that the single judge went beyond the contents of the petition and sought a stay on his order. The case is likely to come up for hearing in a day or two.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
RTE Act: HC seeks compliance affidavit from Punjab
The Punjab and Haryana high court (HC) has sought a comprehensive affidavit from the Punjab government on a contempt petition moved by a trust alleging violation of the HC's directions of February 2025, whereby the court had ordered implementation of Right to Education (RTE) provisions by private schools in the state. Taking note of the submissions, the high court has posted the matter for September 1, directing the government to file a comprehensive affidavit as regards to February 19 order and also about the directions issued by high court on April 9. The contempt petition was moved by the KS Raju Legal Trust, on whose public interest litigation the February order was passed. In the fresh plea, the petitioner mentioned that on February 19, the HC ordered all private unaided schools to reserve 25% of class 1 seats for students from the economically weaker section and directed the state to ensure compliance from the 2025–26 session. It was also told that on April 9 the court had asserted that that RTE Act-2009 be followed to the hilt while making admissions in class 1 and in case, there is any conflict between the provincial rules of 2011 and the Central Act of 2009, then the provisions of the Central Act would prevail. However, the orders have not been complied with by the state in letter and spirit, the plea stated. Taking note of the submissions, the high court has posted the matter for September 1, directing the government to file a comprehensive affidavit as regards to February 19 order and also about the directions issued by high court on April 9. Notably, in July, the high court also issued notice to Punjab on a plea from the same petitioner demanding a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) into alleged lapses in the implementation of Right to Education (RTE) provisions by private schools.
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Dadar Kabutarkhana row: Activists raise insider-outsider issue over pigeon feeding
MUMBAI: The outsider-insider debate surfaced yet again on Wednesday as members of Marathi Ekikaran Samitee converged at the Dadar Kabutarkhana to protest the Jain community's recent resistance towards a ban on pigeon feeding. Around 100 members of the Samitee turned up at the spot, blaming 'outsider Jains from Gujarat and Rajasthan creating unnecessary controversy over pigeon feeding'. Mumbai Police detained workers of the Marathi Ekikaran Samiti during a protest at Dadar Kabutarkhana. (Raju Shinde/ HT Photo) The activists alleged that when protests by the Jain community broke out last week against the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation's (BMC) efforts to implement the Bombay High Court (HC) ban on pigeon feeding, 'police chose to remain silent spectators'. The activists also alleged that police purportedly detained members of the Samitee on Wednesday who only wished to give a memorandum to them stating that 'police should not allow anyone to take law into their own hands like the Jain community's protest last week, and should it occur again, stringent action should be taken'. Established on June 6, 2015, the Samitee claims to be a non-political outfit, but a civil society group formed to protect Marathi language, Marathi pride, Marathi schools and jobs that lead to the progress of Marathi people. It however drew the spotlight on itself in July 2025 when it organised a march in Mira Road, which was joined by Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) and Shiv Sena (UBT) workers, following a row between Marathi and non-Marathi speaking traders, after a shopkeeper was allegedly assaulted by a local activist for failing to speak in Marathi. The Samitee, staged the protest on Wednesday against attempts being made to connect a social issue related to public health with religious sentiments. Gowardhan Deshmukh, chief of the Samitee, along with other activists were detained by police. One of the detained activists said, 'Closing Dadar Kabutarkhana is not a religious issue but a social and health issue. A Jain monk had put out a warning that they would use weapons. Against whom? This should be stopped. No one should give a religious colour to a judicial decision. Unfortunately no Marathi minister came in support of us and people affected by pigeons.' Deshmukh slammed police for using force against the activists and showed how he hurt his hand in the process. 'The Jains in Maharashtra have lived peacefully for centuries but those who came from Gujarat and Rajasthan are damaging social harmony,' Deshmukh said, warning, 'the Samitee will organise a protest march if the pressure tactics do not stop'. The Jain monk that the activist referred to is Nileshchandra Vijay. After the HC order on Wednesday asking BMC to seek suggestions and objections on pigeon feeding, Vijay said, the community will move Supreme Court (SC) to lift the ban, 'and should SC rule against it lakhs of people from the Jain community along with me will go on an indefinite hunger strike, which is the biggest weapon'. Clarifying his stance of last week, Vijay said, 'When I said we will take up arms, it was misunderstood. Protests by the Marathi organisation were politically motivated with eye on local body polls. Our struggle is to save the lives of animals.' Last week, around 1000 people from the Jain community gathered at the Dadar Kabutarkhana and tore down the plastic sheet put up by the civic body with knives and blades. Later, however, both the Dadar Kabutarkhana Trust and the elders of the Jain community claimed they were not responsible for the vandalism. Speaking up on the issue, chief minister Devendra Fadnavis said: 'Some people are trying to polarise society ahead of the local body election.' He added, 'Measures will be taken to create separate spaces for pigeons away from human habitat, which will not hurt religious sentiments (as suggested by minister Mangal Prabhat Lodha last week). Those trying to create conflict will not succeed.' On the other hand, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Sanjay Raut said: 'So-called animal lovers should think about people who suffer from health problems due to pigeons and those affected by dog bites.'
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Pradeep Gharat willing to rejoin as SPP in Dr Payal Tadvi case, state tells HC
MUMBAI: Two days after the Bombay High court asked the state government to check if senior advocate Pradeep Gharat would consider returning as special public prosecutor (SPP) in the 2019 Dr Payal Tadvi suicide abetment case, the state government on Wednesday told the HC that Gharat has expressed willingness to rejoin the case, which has seen multiple delays over the past five years. Pradeep Gharat willing to rejoin as SPP in Dr Payal Tadvi case, state tells HC Additional public prosecutor Shreekant Gavand informed a division bench of justices Ravindra Ghuge and Rajesh Patil that he had spoken to Gharat, who confirmed that he was ready to resume his role as SPP in the matter. On March 7, 2025, the state government removed Pradeep Gharat from the case. In his place, the state had appointed advocate Mahesh Manohar Mule as special public prosecutor. Dr Payal Tadvi's husband, Dr Salman Tadvi and her mother Abeda Salim Tadvi opposed the new appointment. In November 2024, while serving as SPP, Gharat filed an application before the special court seeking to make Dr Yi Ching Ling Chung Chiang — then head of the obstetrics and gynaecology department — a co-accused in the case. Gharat argued that Dr Chiang had failed to act on repeated complaints of harassment lodged by Payal and her family, despite an obligation to intervene. The application relied on findings of the hospital's anti-ragging committee and an early written complaint by Payal's mother. On February 28, 2025, the special court allowed the application, paving the way for Dr Chiang's prosecution alongside the original three accused. Barely a week later, however, the state government abruptly replaced Gharat with advocate Mahesh Manohar Mule. The decision was neither explained in the official notification nor conveyed to Payal's family, prompting her mother to move the high court challenging the move. Dr Payal Tadvi, a 26-year-old postgraduate medical student from the oppressed Bhil tribal community, died by suicide on May 22, 2019, allegedly after facing prolonged caste-based harassment and ragging by three senior colleagues — Dr Hema Ahuja, Dr Bhakti Meher and Dr Ankita Khandelwal — at the Topiwala National Medical College and BYL Nair Hospital. Her death sparked national outrage, leading to the arrest of the three doctors under provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the Maharashtra Prohibition of Ragging Act, and the Indian Penal Code. They are currently out on bail. Despite the gravity of the allegations, the trial is yet to commence. In earlier hearings, the court had voiced displeasure over Gharat's removal and asked the state to ascertain whether he would be willing to return to the case. The matter will now be heard further in light of the state's statement that Gharat is ready to rejoin as SPP.
