logo
Stocks diverge, as US inflation puts focus on Trump's tariffs

Stocks diverge, as US inflation puts focus on Trump's tariffs

Al Etihada day ago
15 July 2025 18:33
LONDON (AFP)Global stock markets went in different directions on Tuesday, as an uptick in US inflation suggested President Donald Trump's tariffs could be beginning to feed into the American economy.New York was generally trading higher on the back of healthy results from major US banks and buoyant news in the tech sector.The S&P 500 and Nasdaq were up, though the Dow Jones was struggling.Most Asian indices rose but Europe's stock markets slipped into the red late in the day.The US consumer price index for June showed an acceleration to 2.7 percent from a year earlier, in line with economists' forecasts.While US inflation remained relatively tame, analysts said businesses were working through stockpiles amassed in anticipation of Trump's duties and further price rises could be expected later this year.Since April, the United States has imposed a baseline 10-percent tariff on goods imported from almost all trading partners, with steeper levies on steel, aluminium and cars.Trump has threatened 30-percent tariffs on European Union and Mexican goods from August 1 if they do not cut trade deals.The US Federal Reserve, which has an inflation target of two percent, could cut rates in September -- but not if the tariffs also end up putting a brake on US economic growth.China, which has negotiated a US tariff truce, issued economic growth data that met expectations, largely thanks to an April-June export surge to get ahead of Trump's levies.But the US president on Monday warned of new tariffs of up to 100 percent on Russia's trading partners -- which include China -- if Moscow does not end its war on Ukraine within 50 days.Even though Russia is a major crude producer, oil prices dropped after Trump's announcement and continued lower on Tuesday.Meanwhile, OPEC said in its latest monthly market report it expected its production forecasts for this year and next to hold, despite uncertainties generated by the US tariffs.It forecast that oil demand would rise by 1.3 million barrels in 2025 and again in 2026."Continued robust global economic growth is expected... despite ongoing US-centred trade challenges and geopolitical uncertainties," it said.In corporate news, US banks JPMorgan Chase and Wells Fargo posted better-than-expected second-quarter results.JPMorgan boss Jamie Dimon described the US economy as "resilient" while facing "significant risks", including over tariffs uncertainty.And tech darling Nvidia's share price jumped after it said US export restrictions will be eased to allow it to sell its H20 artificial intelligence chips to China.That gave fuel to the Nasdaq, which had closed on Monday on another record high.
Bitcoin slid on likely profit-taking, after having hit a record high above $123,200 on Monday, thanks to optimism over possible regulatory changes for crypto assets in the US.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

South Africa car exports to US plunge as Trump tariffs bite
South Africa car exports to US plunge as Trump tariffs bite

Zawya

time3 hours ago

  • Zawya

South Africa car exports to US plunge as Trump tariffs bite

South African car exports to the United States dropped sharply in the first quarter of 2025, and tumbled more than 80% in April and May after import tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump hit automakers' sales, industry association Naamsa said. Vehicles awaiting export are scanned at the dock of the car terminal at the port of Durban, South Africa, on 10 April 2025. Reuters /Rogan Ward The United States is South Africa's second-largest trading partner and key destination for vehicles manufactured in the country, which have long benefited from duty-free access under the US African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa). Auto exports to the US sank 73% in the first quarter compared to the same period last year, followed by declines of 80% in April and 85% in May, Naamsa said. The industry body said the sharp decline would be difficult to recover from in the short term. "This is not just a trade issue - it's a socio-economic crisis in the making," Naamsa CEO Mikel Mabasa said. Trump has this month escalated the global trade offensive he launched in April, announcing tariffs on more than a dozen countries, including South Africa, which faces a 30% rate from 1 August. This is separate from the 25% duty imposed on cars in April, which has since May also applied to automotive parts. Before the July tariff announcement from Trump, South Africa had proposed a trade package including a duty-free quota of 40,000 vehicles per year to be exported from South Africa and duty-free access for automotive components sourced locally for US production. In 2024, South Africa's automotive sector accounted for 64% of all Agoa trade with the US, generating R28.6bn ($1.60bn) in export revenue, Naamsa said. Mabasa said the tariffs threaten thousands of jobs and risk economic devastation in communities reliant on the sector, such as East London, a coastal city where the auto industry is central to the economy. "If we cannot retain export markets like the US, we risk turning vibrant industrial hubs into ghost towns," Mabasa said, warning of ripple effects across the automotive supply chain, from component manufacturers to logistics providers. Export diversification is critical but cannot happen overnight, Mabasa added, noting that global competitors are already redirecting their exports into markets traditionally served by South Africa. This mounting pressure will force South Africa-based automakers exporting to the US, including Mercedes-Benz, to absorb rising costs, scale back production, and reconsider future investments, Mabasa said.

China's rise is exposing the cost of America's alliance with Israel
China's rise is exposing the cost of America's alliance with Israel

Middle East Eye

time3 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

China's rise is exposing the cost of America's alliance with Israel

The rivalry between the United States and China has emerged as the defining feature of 21st-century geopolitics. As American global dominance frays after three decades of unipolarity, China's steady rise as an economic, military and diplomatic soft power signals a tectonic shift in the global order. At the same time, the US continues to entangle itself in regional struggles - particularly in the Middle East - that no longer yield strategic dividends but instead deepen perceptions of decline. Nowhere is this clearer than in America's unwavering support for Israel, especially after the 7 October attack, which has begun to reshape global perceptions of the legitimacy of both US power and the Zionist enterprise. Together, these developments mark the decline of US primacy and the emergence of a new international order no longer shaped solely by American imperial dominance. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Strategic patience Since the end of the Cold War, China has pursued a long-term strategy of "strategic patience" - a multidimensional approach that emphasises economic growth, military modernisation and multilateral engagement. The Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is the flagship of this strategy, aiming to weave a web of infrastructure, trade and investment agreements across Eurasia, Africa and Latin America. The initiative has allowed China not only to secure vital resources and influence global trade routes, but also to export its development model while bypassing western-dominated institutions. China's explosive growth has allowed it to secure vital resources, shape global trade routes and bypass western-dominated institutions China's economic growth has been staggering. In 1992, its GDP was just 6 percent of that of the US, at $367bn, while the US stood at $6.52 trillion. Today, it exceeds 65 percent, at $20 trillion compared with $30 trillion for the US. This explosive growth has funded an equally impressive military modernisation programme. While China has not yet supplanted the US as the dominant global military power, it increasingly asserts itself regionally, particularly in the South and East China Seas. With a military doctrine focused on anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities, China seeks to deter US intervention near its borders - an essential step towards becoming the dominant power in East Asia. In parallel, China has actively contributed to alternative international institutions that challenge western hegemony. Through Brics, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), and financial bodies such as the New Development Bank, China and its partners are steadily constructing a multipolar world order - one that erodes the primacy of the US-led liberal international system. US grand strategy After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the US emerged as the world's sole superpower - a unipolar moment it was determined to extend indefinitely. Since 1991, US grand strategy has revolved around preventing the rise of peer competitors, especially in the world's most critical regions: East Asia, Europe, and the Persian Gulf-Middle East. The logic was simple: if no other power became dominant in its own region, none could challenge American global supremacy. Trump's Middle East moves revive the question of who's in charge Read More » To that end, the US pursued two major policies to weaken its potential rivals in Europe and East Asia - both of which ultimately failed. In Europe, it expanded Nato eastward from 16 members in 1991 to 32 today, attempting to contain or politically transform Russia. The inclusion of post-Soviet states and support for pro-western movements such as the "colour revolutions" were intended to undermine Moscow's influence. Instead, these actions triggered a powerful backlash. Viewing Nato enlargement as an existential threat, Russia reasserted itself, culminating in the 2022 invasion of Ukraine - a conflict that has shifted in Moscow's favour despite massive western military aid and economic support for Kyiv. Since the 1990s, the US has pursued a policy of engagement with China, assuming that economic integration would inevitably liberalise the Chinese political system and bind it to the US-led international order. China was admitted to the World Trade Organization in 2001 and became a hub for US and global investment. But rather than transforming into a neoliberal democracy, China retained its authoritarian governance structure while amassing extraordinary economic wealth and technological power. This, in turn, enabled a surge in military spending and regional assertiveness - precisely what Washington had hoped to prevent. Imperial overreach The third pillar of US hegemony lies in the Persian Gulf and the broader Middle East. Control over this oil-rich region has long been central to US strategic planning - not only for energy access but to maintain the primacy of the US dollar. After its 1971 delinking from gold, the dollar's status as the global reserve currency was sustained by petrodollar recycling. Ensuring that oil is traded in dollars and that regional regimes remain friendly and under American influence has been critical. After 9/11, US foreign policy took an ambitious and hubristic turn towards social engineering. It invaded Afghanistan and Iraq under the banner of democratisation, regime change and national security. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war As former Nato commander General Wesley Clark revealed in 2003, the Pentagon had plans to attack seven Muslim countries in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran. But these grand designs unravelled in the deserts and mountains of the region. The US was defeated in both Iraq and Afghanistan, despite massive military expenditures and the loss of thousands of soldiers. The dream of remaking the Middle East in America's image collapsed into chaos, insurgency and failure. Strategic liability A central dimension of US Middle East policy has always revolved around its relationship with Israel. Since Israel's 1967 victory over three Arab states, it has been viewed by the American establishment as a valuable strategic ally. But Israel is not merely a foreign policy concern; it is deeply embedded in American domestic politics through the influence of the Israel lobby. The rise of the neoconservatives in the early 2000s - figures such as Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, Scooter Libby, Elliott Abrams and Richard Perle - marked the increasing convergence of US strategic goals with those of the Israeli and Zionist-American right. Ever since, American "Israel-firsters" have not merely knocked at the door of policymaking; they now occupy multiple seats at the table. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's 2023 speech at the UN encapsulated Israel's ambitions. Promoting the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), Netanyahu positioned Israel as a central node in global trade and infrastructure, while completely ignoring the Palestinians. The speech embodied Israel's hegemonic aspirations and bid to solidify normalisation with Arab and Islamic states, particularly Saudi Arabia, Indonesia and Pakistan. But this disregard helped provoke the 7 October 2023 attack by Hamas - an operation that shattered the illusion of Israeli invincibility and triggered a cascade of strategic losses for the Zionist project. Historic rupture The Toufan al-Aqsa operation marked a historic rupture in the region's balance of power. Despite possessing one of the most technologically advanced armies in the world and a vast intelligence apparatus, the Zionist regime was caught entirely off guard. The operation exposed deep failures in Israel's deterrence strategy, military doctrine and internal cohesion. In response, Israel launched one of the most devastating genocidal campaigns in modern history, reducing Gaza's civilian infrastructure to rubble. Despite 21 months of bombing, siege and genocide, the Palestinian resistance remains undefeated - waging a war of attrition and negotiating from a position of resilience Tens of thousands of Palestinians were killed - two-thirds of them women and children - while hundreds of thousands were injured and millions displaced. Yet despite 21 months of continuous bombing, siege and genocide, the Palestinian resistance remains undefeated. It continues a painful war of attrition and engages in negotiations from a position of resilience. Israel's military goal of achieving "total victory" by dismantling Hamas, exiling its leaders or disarming its military structures remains unrealised. This has led to a strategic crisis. Israel's deterrence doctrine - inflicting overwhelming punishment to deter adversaries - has failed. Its regional image has eroded. Its intelligence services have lost credibility. Social cohesion within Israel has fractured under the weight of prolonged war and economic strain. Military morale has plummeted, while thousands of Israelis have either been displaced or emigrated due to growing instability. Internationally, Israel's narrative of victimhood has crumbled. Graphic footage of massacres, starvation and mass destruction has flooded social media. Public opinion has shifted dramatically, particularly in the US and Europe, with millions taking to the streets - including significant numbers of Jewish youth - to stand in solidarity with Palestinians. Major institutions such as the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court have taken unprecedented steps, issuing genocide warnings and arrest warrants for senior Israeli officials, including Netanyahu. Calls for boycott, divestment and sanctions are growing. The economy has suffered major setbacks, tourism has collapsed, and reverse migration threatens long-term demographic stability. Fractured alliance While Washington and Tel Aviv share strategic aims - defeating Palestinian resistance, containing Iran and preserving regional primacy - they diverge in their long-term goals. Israel seeks regional hegemony, driven by maximalist visions such as the "Greater Israel" project. Why Netanyahu is frantically trying to pull the US into Israel's war on Iran Sami Al-Arian Read More » This includes expanding settlements in the West Bank, as championed by extremist cabinet member Bezalel Smotrich, and provocative moves around the al-Aqsa compound, pushed by racist minister Itamar Ben Gvir. The destruction of Gaza and escalating settler violence in the West Bank appear calculated to induce mass Palestinian expulsion to "solve" Israel's demographic dilemma and avoid permanent apartheid. The US, by contrast, prefers managed stability - weakening Iran, securing energy markets, curbing Russian and Chinese influence, and preserving a compliant regional security order with allies like Israel and Saudi Arabia. With Israel's failure to subdue the resistance militarily, Washington aims to end the war while still realising its objectives and preserving the regional order. New order The rise of Trump's nativist "Maga" movement, the collapse of US strategic credibility, the emergence of China as a peer competitor, and the regional unravelling of Israeli deterrence have together created an opening for a historic reorientation of global power. For the Arab and Muslim world, this moment presents an urgent imperative: to break free from foreign domination and Zionist hegemonic control. The western-led international system has shown itself unwilling or unable to hold Israel accountable for its crimes - despite overwhelming evidence of genocide, war crimes and ethnic cleansing. This exposes a structurally unjust order in which sheer power, not law, determines legitimacy. The fundamental interest of Arab and Muslim peoples lies in dismantling this system and moving towards a multipolar order grounded in justice, sovereignty and human dignity. More critically, the unifying struggle today must be the eradication of foreign domination and Zionist influence. Without this, no revival - whether based on democracy, economic reform, scientific progress, Islamic governance or civilisational renewal - can succeed. For the Arab and Muslim world, this moment presents an urgent imperative: to break free from foreign domination and Zionist hegemonic control Israeli hegemony, backed by US military, political and financial support, is designed precisely to thwart any movement towards independence, unity or development. It is a blockade against the future. Only by confronting and dismantling these structures of domination can the region begin a genuine renaissance. Sovereignty and self-determination cannot coexist with fragmentation, dependency and occupation. This struggle must take precedence over all others - not as a vague ideal, but as a strategic necessity. The twilight of American primacy may not come overnight, but it is clearly underway. Its uncritical alignment with Israeli extremism risks sparking another wave of regional unrest - an Arab Spring 2.0 - directed not only at domestic autocrats, but also at dismantling Zionist racist structures and the US imperial order that sustains them. In this critical moment, the peoples of the Arab and Muslim world must chart a new course - one that asserts agency, reclaims sovereignty and redefines their place in a just and multipolar global order. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

Trump tariffs threaten US economy as much as European one, says German finmin
Trump tariffs threaten US economy as much as European one, says German finmin

Zawya

time4 hours ago

  • Zawya

Trump tariffs threaten US economy as much as European one, says German finmin

U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs threaten the American economy at least as much the European one, German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil said on Wednesday, calling for a "fair deal" with the Americans. "Trump's tariffs have only losers," Klingbeil said. The 30% tariff on European goods threatened by Trump would, if implemented, be a game-changer for Europe, wiping out whole chunks of transatlantic commerce and forcing a rethink of its export-led economic model. "We are experiencing global trade conflicts, and we are firmly and jointly convinced that European sovereignty is all the more important in these times," Klingbeil said in Berlin, speaking to the press with his French counterpart, Eric Lombard. If a deal is not possible, decisive countermeasures are needed. "To sum up: Our hand remains extended, but we will not go along with everything, possible countermeasures must continue to be prepared," Klingbeil said. "On this, France and Germany are in complete agreement." (Reporting by Maria Martinez, Editing by Miranda Murray)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store