
The 8 best gym trainers to support you through every squat, jump, press and lunge
As a fitness journalist, personal trainer and loyal gym-goer, I've tried my fair share of workout shoes. Just like a poorly fitting sports bra or overly-tight vest, the wrong pair of gym trainers can make motions like weighted exercises and HIIT-based moves feel uneasy and uncomfortable. This round-up will help you find the right pick.
Leading gym trainer brands include Rad, Adidas, New Balance and Hoka – I tested models from all these brands and more for this guide. We've focused on options in the £70-130 price range, which tend to offer good quality at a sensible cost. You can find full reviews of my top picks below, as well as answers to any frequently asked questions.
The best gym trainers: At a glance
JUMP TO REVIEWS
How to choose the best gym trainers
Much like when you're investing in a pair of running shoes for women or men, choosing your gym trainers takes careful consideration.
Stability is key. When you're doing heavy lifts such as squats or deadlifts, the last thing you need is your feet rolling side to side. With this in mind, gym trainers are a little more rigid than running trainers and have a more stable sole.
Versatility is important, too. A good gym trainer should perform across different workouts such as HIIT classes, weight training and potentially even short runs on the treadmill. This does depend on which workouts you do at the gym – some wearers might prefer a specialised pair for weightlifting, for example.
You should also think about durability, fit and comfort. No one wants to feel rubbing or pinching while they're powering through a set of walking lunges or going hard on the rowing machine.
A final (and crucial) factor is the shoes' traction and grip. From rubber mats to polished gym floors, you need trainers that let you move without slipping or sliding.
How we test gym trainers
I threw on a pair of gym leggings, strapped on my fitness tracker and headed to the gym. As a daily gym-goer, I was able to wear each pair for multiple workouts over the course of three weeks.
To test for stability, I wore the trainers while squatting, aiming to hit my maximum squat weight (65kg) without my feet feeling unbalanced. I also wore these trainers for various other exercises. I wanted to check whether they were suitable for HIIT workouts, or other types of gym-based training, and made sure to take note of comfort and responsiveness that didn't feel too stiff or too soft.
To test the durability of each of the trainers after a few weeks of wear, I inspected their uppers, midsoles and outsoles for signs of deterioration. I also assessed how comfortable the gym trainers were during my workouts and wore the shoes on different surfaces to check their grip.
Why you can trust Telegraph Recommended
Our thorough, real-world tests will always help you find the best product. No manufacturer ever sees Telegraph Recommended reviews before publication and we don't accept payment in exchange for favourable reviews, nor do we allow brands to pay for placement in our articles.
From running shoes to exercise bikes, all reviews are based on independent expert opinion and our hands-on testing. Visit our Who We Are page to learn more.
The best gym trainers of 2025
1. Best Buy Gym Trainers: Reebok Nano X5
I've been a fan of Reebok Nanos for years. They've always been reliable, sturdy and comfortable gym shoes.
The Nano X5 is the line's 15th iteration, and I'd agree with Reebok's claim that this is the most comfortable Nano to date. The interior is soft and cushioned, while the firm sole gives a grounded, stable feel that's suited to squats and deadlifts. I didn't once feel unbalanced as I took to the squat rack.
The heel features a firmer foam that adds support without sacrificing responsiveness. I had no issues with jumps or dynamic movements. The toe box isn't too hard either, so the forefoot doesn't feel stiff and it has plenty of flexibility for lunges and burpees. There's enough room for toe splay, which allowed me to press into the floor during lifts. Other exercises such as plyometric moves are also comfortable in these. Running is so-so. I could handle short treadmill runs but any further felt quite tough, with minimal bounce from the trainers.
The Reebok Nano X5 has decent arch support, which worked well for me as someone with a natural arch. Flatter feet might not suit it so well. Grip-wise, I have zero complaints. The sole gave solid traction on all surfaces and felt durable throughout testing.
My only real gripe is with the laces. They're a little long and tend to overhang. It's also important to note that the sizing runs large. I usually wear a 6.5, but could've easily gone down half a size.
Key specifications
Weight: 340g (UK size 8)
Heel to toe drop: 7mm
Fit advice: Runs large
2. Best Value Gym Trainers: Puma PWR Hybrid
Although these are the cheapest gym trainers I tested at £70, they offered performance and comfort to rival many of the pricier options. They had great cushioning while also being supportive. The ProFoam midsole delivers softness without compromising stability, which makes them versatile enough to cover short runs, strength training and dynamic workouts involving plyometric moves.
The wide heel gives good stability, and there's also a TPU clip for added support. During my heavy squat test, my feet felt grounded and didn't once shift from side to side. I found the padded collar helped to lock my feet in securely, although I did think the collar felt a little high and it may have rubbed slightly if I wasn't wearing good socks.
Although the amply-sized toe area feels slightly reinforced, there's still plenty of flexibility. When I stepped back to do lunges or while jumping, my feet didn't feel too rigid. Meanwhile, the breathable mesh upper stopped my feet from feeling too hot.
I noticed that the PumaGrip outsole tech lives up to its name, with decent grip on all sorts of surfaces. I didn't notice these trainers wear down at any point and there were minimal scuffs and marks after my frequent workouts.
Sizing-wise, these run a little large. I had too much of a gap between my toes and the tip of the shoe. Aside from this, and annoyingly long laces, which is a bugbear of mine, I cannot fault these great-value trainers.
Key specifications
Weight: 335g (UK size 8)
Heel to toe drop: 6mm
Fit advice: Runs large
3. Best Durable Gym Trainer: Nike Metcon 10
I remember the first release of the Nike Metcon like it was yesterday. Since then, they've remained a fairly reliable gym trainer, now in its 10th iteration. I tested out theis pair, which launched in July 2025, during a gym class. During the rowing, lunges, burpees and wall balls, my feet felt comfortable and fully supported. The back felt as though it would rub slightly had it not been for my thick gym socks, but other than that, the shoes fit well. The toe box of these shoes is reinforced but maintains enough flexibility to make moves such as lunges comfortable.
I also wore these for a heavy weight session. The tough sole ensures these trainers offer full stability and I wasn't rocky or unbalanced when I took to the squat rack. Plus, they have fantastic grip on all different surfaces. If you love a rope climb, these are also a good choice of trainers as there's a rope guard on the instep of the shoe which helps with grip.
While I only wore these for a few workouts, the shoes remained immaculate. The rubber outsole runs along the entirety of the shoe, which I feel adds to their durability factor.
In terms of versatility, these are great as they're flexible enough for different movements. That being said, running in these is less comfortable and I wouldn't want to run for more than a few minutes as the tough sole offers little bounce.
Key specifications
4. Best Gym Trainers for Men: Rad One V2
Rad footwear has soared in popularity over recent years, and I can see why. This pair of Rad One V2s ticked pretty much all the boxes for a decent pair of all-round training shoes.
My feet felt stable as I squatted with a heavy load on my back, and they didn't slip at all on the platform when I was lunging.
The shoe isn't overly stiff thanks to the flexible upper mesh, which makes them fairly versatile. Plyometric exercises were comfortable thanks to the SwellFoam springy EVA midsole technology, and even a short treadmill run didn't feel too clunky. However, I wouldn't rely on these as running trainers as the soles are predominantly made for weighted exercises. If you're after a pair of runners, I would recommend the Nike Pegasus 41 or Hoka Clifton 10.
In terms of comfort, I can't fault the Rad One V2s. The cushioning is soft and my feet felt well supported, while the laces tie nicely. They have a reinforced toe bumper, so exercises such as burpees and toes to bar shouldn't leave you with battered toes.
The durability of these shoes, however, is questionable. They scuffed after 30 minutes of wear, with visible marks on the spongy section around the toe area.
Key specifications
5. Best CrossFit Trainers: New Balance Minimus TR V2
From the moment I put on these light, shallow-heeled training shoes, I felt well connected to the ground – a bit like being barefoot.
The heel is secure and tough. I had complete stability through all exercises, from heavy squats through to plyometric moves. And despite that sturdiness, these still work well for short runs as well as other cardio. The classic New Balance FuelCell midsole foam drove me forward on a treadmill run and the shoes are so light, I didn't feel weighed down at all.
The downside is that my toes felt quite restrained. The top of the toe box pressed down quite hard on my big toe and I felt a slight pinching. This might be due to my foot shape, but I don't believe I have large big toes. These shoes also have a prominent arch, so flatter feet might find them uncomfortable. The toe box is slightly reinforced which protected my feet and helped to avoid the fabric from ripping.
These trainers have great traction on all floor surfaces. Plus, they are breathable and my feet didn't overheat at any point during my lifts, jumps or runs. However, if you're in the market for a pair of New Balance running trainers suitable for longer runs, check out our New Balance FuelCell SuperComp Elite v4 review.
Key specifications
6. Best Weightlifting Trainers: Adidas Dropset 3
The Adidas Dropset 3 are among the most attractive pairs of gym trainers I tested for this guide – it turns out, their performance is as impressive as their looks.
These were comfortable as soon as I put them on, with cushioning around the ankle and ample space in the toe box. The solid Dropset heel is great for weightlifting as it doesn't compress under load, so I felt grounded during squats, lunges and deadlifts. At the heel, the Geofit Sensepods stabilising foams prevent any wobble during lifts.
For anyone who has wide feet or whose feet swell when warm, these gym trainers are a great option as they come in a slightly wider fit. Plus, the breathable upper is good for keeping feet cool.
Durability-wise, these are solid. The reinforced toe cap held up well after scuffing and repeated wear, and the outsole looked like new after several gym sessions. The Traxion outsole had excellent grip across different surfaces, offering stability even during explosive plyometric moves.
I wouldn't run (or walk far) in these trainers as the rubber toe box isn't particularly flexible and the heel is tough, so I can't imagine my joints would be too grateful. This does mean that you'd need another pair of trainers for walking or running on the treadmill, but for weight-based exercises and most HIIT workouts, the Adidas Dropset 3 are a powerhouse.
Key specifications
7. Best HIIT Trainers: Skechers Slip-ins Max Cushioning Glide-Step
Even before I even put these on, I knew these would be comfortable. The chunky, bouncy-looking sole is a giveaway.
Though the sizing ran a touch large, these were an absolute joy to wear. Skechers has long been known for its comfort technology, and I now understand the hype. They're the kind of trainer you can wear all day. Plus, they're designed to slip on hands-free, which is helpful when you're dashing out or simply changing your shoes in the gym.
Stability is where I found these trainers slightly lacking. The thick sole and Skechers Max Cushioning platform enhance shock absorption and energy return, which is good for comfort but not for squat support. So, I wouldn't wear these for weighted moves, but they're well suited to HIIT workouts, classes, casual runs, and even walking (although walking boots are better for long hikes). The Natural Rocker Technology allows for a smooth heel-to-toe transition, plus the bouncy sole is great for plyometric-based moves.
The Goodyear sole delivered excellent grip across surfaces and the rubber felt durable enough to handle daily wear.
Key specifications
8. Best Gym Trainers for Women: Hoka Kawana 2
Made for running in the streets and training in the gym, the versatile Hoka Kawana 2 gym trainers work well for a range of activities.
The sole is quite chunky and it has a slight bounce, which made these unsuitable for my heavy weightlifting. I actually took them off so I could squat in my socks. That said, lighter weighted moves are comfortable in these because they do offer good stability, and the soles are tough as well as chunky.
If you enjoy a casual treadmill run, these have plenty of cushioning and feel just like running trainers. This also makes them suited to HIIT-based movements such as high knees and mountain climbers, as well as plyometric moves which are much more comfortable when there's a softer landing. There is plenty of flexibility in the upper of the shoe for easy movement.
Traction on these is good, and holes in the fabric allow for breathability. As for durability, I didn't notice any damage to the shoes after my testing. The end of the toe box is slightly reinforced, and the upper seems quite thick and able to stand up to brutal gym workouts.
I did notice the arch of the shoe seemed to dig into my foot slightly. This might not be a problem for other wearers but I found it uncomfortable, at least to start with. Other than that, these are a great pick and will carry you through many gym workouts.
Key specifications
Gym trainers FAQs

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
34 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Low-income and minority ethnic people in England most at risk from dangerously hot homes
Lower-income householders, minority ethnic people and those with young children are more likely to live in homes at risk from dangerous overheating, research has found. The UK has baked in multiple heatwaves this summer, with many people sweltering in dangerously hot homes that were not designed to withstand extreme temperatures. June was the hottest on record and in general this summer England was an average of 1.58C above average temperatures. Hot homes are dangerous for health; cardiovascular and respiratory issues, sleep disturbance, mental health problems and heat exhaustion all correlate with high temperatures in the home. Health risks spike when temperatures inside are above 25C, and there is a link between overheating homes and the risk of death, particularly for elderly people. An analysis of housing stock by the Resolution Foundation has found nearly half (48%) of the poorest fifth of English households have homes liable to get too hot – three times as many as among the richest fifth (17%). Owning your own home reduces the risk of overheating; two-thirds of socially renting households face the highest risk of their homes getting too hot compared with 55% of private rented homes and 17% of those that are owner occupied. Additionally, six in 10 of those with young children, and almost half of minority ethnic households also face the highest risk of their homes getting too hot. Overall, the research found a fifth of homes in England overheat in current summer temperatures, while one-third (32%) have attributes that put them at high risk of overheating in the future. Small flats, small homes and those that are overcrowded are all at risk of getting too hot, as are those in areas such as London that suffer from an urban heat island effect. More than half (53%) of homes in London are at risk of overheating, compared with 31% of those outside the capital. Experts have called for the government to update its upcoming future homes standard to include provisions for overheating homes. The regulations are due to be published this autumn, to come into force from 2027, but the focus has been mainly on how to keep draughty homes warm in winter, rather than to keep them cool in summer. 'The way we are building new housing is not adequate to the climate change we are already seeing, never mind the even hotter weather that's coming,' said Simon McWhirter, the chief executive of the UK Green Building Council. Zachary Leather, an economist at the Resolution Foundation, said: 'With the sweltering temperatures parts of the UK have seen recently set to become more common, we face a greater risk of overheating at home. But this risk is not spread equally – lower-income families, social renters, those with children and ethnic-minority households are more likely to live in homes at risk of overheating.' The thinktank used data from a government study that placed hundreds of sensors in people's homes to determine which types of houses were most at risk of overheating. The figures were then combined with the latest data on who lives in these homes – small flats, small homes and overcrowded properties – to identify those at the highest risk of overheating as the UK's temperature rises. Sign up to Down to Earth The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential after newsletter promotion It also analysed the dangers people face at work from extreme heat. One in four UK workers work in occupations where they are at risk of heat stress. There is an inequality aspect to this, too; those in the top third income bracket have a lower than average risk. Older workers are more likely to face heat stress at work; 31% of those in jobs liable to cause heat stress are aged over 50. The research also found that office workers in more deprived areas were less likely to have air conditioning in their workplaces. The researchers suggested 'learning from countries that have long had higher temperatures, including legal rights for maximum workplace temperatures, and better adapted buildings'. Measures that can keep homes cooler in summer include good ventilation to create through airflow that cools rooms, with well-designed windows and external shutters, and reflective paint on roofs or outside surfaces. Street trees are a simple and cost effective way to keep homes cool, the UK Green Building Council has said. It advocates a 3:30:300 approach: you should be able to see three trees from your dwelling; you should have 30% tree canopy cover within your neighbourhood; and you should be no more than 300 metres from a biodiverse green space or park. A government spokesperson said: 'We know the importance of keeping homes cool in hot weather. That's why building regulations require new homes to be built to reduce the risk of overheating and through the future homes standard consultation we are exploring how to further improve protections. This is alongside considering the use of air-air heat pumps to keep existing homes cool under the boiler upgrade scheme.'


Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ambulance services hit with bills totalling £27.5million to transport increasing numbers of obese patients
Ambulance services have been hit with bills totalling £27.5million to transport increasing numbers of obese patients. Bosses have been forced to splash out on specialist ambulances and lifting equipment or pay private providers to carry people who are too large for standard vehicles. Health leaders last night urged the government to do more to tackle the nation's obesity crisis, while campaigners warned the NHS 'cannot cope' with the burden placed on it by individuals with 'grossly unhealthy lifestyles'. North West Ambulance Service has paid almost £15million in the past five years for ambulances to carry the overweight, Freedom of Information responses show. It hopes to cut its annual payment of £2.715million to private operators by buying eight new vehicles this year for £416,976. And London Ambulance Service is investing £1million for its own fleet, having paid contractors £1.6million a year for five years. South Central Ambulance Service - which covers Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire and most of Hampshire - said it had spent £2.3million over the past five and a half years. East of England Ambulance Trust has got through more than £1.25million in two years. North East Ambulance Service said it has not spent any money on new transport for bariatric patients but all its ambulances 'include an extra wide tail lift with the lifting capacity of 500kg or 78 stone to allow bariatric patients to be transported'. John O'Connell, chief executive of the TaxPayers' Alliance, said: 'Taxpayers will be horrified to see the burden placed on NHS budgets by some irresponsible patients. 'The health service simply cannot cope with the weight placed on it by those individuals with grossly unhealthy lifestyles. 'Ministers need to start seriously considering how to ensure that patients cough up when their own choices end up impacting taxpayers.' Rory Deighton, acute director at the NHS Confederation, which represents healthcare organisations, said: 'These examples of NHS spending on bariatric ambulances highlights the reality of the increasing costs of an ageing and increasingly unfit population. 'NHS leaders will be looking to the government to tackle some of the root causes of obesity as part of its wider mission to improve the health of the nation. Being bold and legislating on contentious issues like food policy will help deliver the Secretary of State's ambition to spend less on treatment by focusing more on prevention.' Recent Government research shows nearly two-thirds of UK adults are overweight or obese. Being overweight increases the risk of heart disease, cancer, type 2 diabetes and muscular-skeletal issues. Daniel Elkeles, chief executive of NHS Providers, which represents NHS trusts, said: 'The NHS is there for everyone who needs it. 'Providing care for the most obese patients require specialist skills, equipment and ambulances 'It is right for trusts to make that investment.' The average response time in June for ambulances dealing with the most urgent incidents, defined as calls from people with life-threatening illnesses or injuries, was seven minutes and 55 seconds. This is up slightly from seven minutes and 50 seconds in May and is above the target standard response time of seven minutes. Ambulances took an average of 29 minutes and 37 seconds last month to respond to emergency calls such as heart attacks, strokes and sepsis. This is up from 27 minutes and 48 seconds in May. The Government and NHS England have set a new target for this figure to average 30 minutes across 2025/26. Response times for urgent calls, such as late stages of labour, non-severe burns and diabetes, averaged one hour, 44 minutes and 56 seconds in June, up from one hour, 34 minutes and 51 seconds in May.


Daily Mail
34 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Public support for prostate cancer screening has grown following Daily Mail campaign, poll reveals
Public support for prostate cancer screening has grown following a Daily Mail campaign, a poll reveals. Some 91 per cent of Britons now believe the NHS should offer regular prostate checks for men, as it does for breast cancer in women. This is up from 86 per cent in April when OnePoll last conducted its survey on behalf of the charity Prostate Cancer Research. The latest findings found widespread problems around the current system, which relies on men to come forward and ask GPs for tests when they already have concerns. Responses from 2,000 adults show one in five has had a male family member or close friend die from the disease. Among those, more than three quarters believed earlier diagnosis could have saved the life of their loved one. And more than one quarter of those polled had no trust, or not much trust at all, in the current NHS system to detect prostate cancer at an early stage. Prostate cancer is the most diagnosed form of cancer in England, with 55,033 cases identified in 2023, the latest figures show. Catching it early improves the odds of successfully treating the disease, which kills around 10,200 men in England each year. The Daily Mail is campaigning for a national prostate cancer screening programme, initially targeted at high risk men. This includes those who are black or have a family history of the disease. Women aged between 50 and 70 are offered mammograms every three years. More than half of those polled said their opinion of their local MP would worsen if they opposed the introduction of screening. The survey found a strong desire among its respondents for the NHS to be more proactive about collecting and sharing information about medical history. Almost seven in ten (69 per cent) said in the event they were diagnosed with prostate cancer, they would want their male family members' NHS records to be automatically updated to reflect this. There was also considerable appetite for technological innovation, with 60 per cent supporting the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to improve diagnosis, for example, by reading MRI scans faster and more accurately. Health secretary Wes Streeting has declared his support for a national prostate cancer screening programme in a major boost for the Mail's campaign. The health secretary told MPs in April that he would like to see the NHS proactively offer men tests for the disease in a move that could prevent thousands of needless deaths. He said he is 'particularly sympathetic' to the argument that this should initially be targeted at high-risk men. The call for targeted screening has also been backed by former prime minister Rishi Sunak, former home secretary Sir James Cleverly and Calvin Bailey, a Labour MP and the chairman of the all-party parliamentary group on prostate cancer. David James, the director of patient projects and influencing at Prostate Cancer Research, said: 'These poll results send an unequivocal message to policymakers: the public overwhelmingly supports the introduction of a national screening programme. 'The current system is clearly failing to meet the public's expectations for early detection and proactive management of genetic risk. 'It's time for the NHS to prioritise a targeted screening programme that could save countless lives and alleviate the long-term burden on our healthcare system.' The charity's research suggests targeted screening, focused on black men, those with BRCA1/2 mutations and those with a family history of the disease, could mean an additional 775 early diagnoses per year for those aged between 45 and 69. The research also suggests these changes could spare almost 300 men a year from a stage 4 diagnosis, in which prostate cancer becomes incurable. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesman said: 'This Government has been clear we would like to see screening in place, but the decision must be evidence-led.'