French cops FINALLY drag small boat packed with migrants back to shore… with BBC crew conveniently on hand to film it
For months, the officers across the Channel have been slammed for refusing to get their feet wet and watching on as dinghies packed with migrants leave their shores.
6
6
6
6
Critics say that £500million of taxpayer cash given to France has only turned its beaches into 'the world's most expensive sieve'.
It was widely reported last month that the French were stopping a record low number of migrants from crossing, intercepting fewer than 40 per cent of people.
Last month, French boarder guards were pictured standing on a beach taking pictures as yet another boat-load of migrants set sale.
Patrols with jeeps, quad bikes and drones were pictured on the sand earlier this week - but smugglers still managed to launch more dinghies.
In chaotic scenes today - with a BBC camera crew on hand to film - officers finally appeared to intervene and slashed the boats with knives.
With a reporter and cameras on hand to film the action at Boulogne-Sur-Mer this morning, cops were whipped into action.
The officers are first seen arming themselves with the knives as they arrive on the beach in buggies - paid for by the UK - before the camera cuts to them slicing the side of the boat.
Migrants and smugglers can be heard screaming and shouting at the officers as as the rubber dinghy begins to sink.
They have repeatedly claimed that entering the water is legally complex and too dangerous for the migrants.
The number of arrivals to the UK has hit a record 20,000 since the start of the year.
On Monday alone, 879 reached British shores, the third biggest daily total in 2025.
Sir Keir Starmer has faced pressure to deliver on his promise to ' smash the gangs ', fuelling the crisis.
The Prime Minister and French President Emmanuel Macron are due to meet in London next week for a State visit and a summit focused on tackling the crossings.
The UK first signed a deal with France under the last Tory government, with nearly £500million committed to extra patrols, surveillance drones, vehicles and riot vans.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage said: 'Record numbers of young undocumented males have crossed this year thanks to French beaches being the world's most expensive sieve — this is a disaster for the country.
'They are costing us money, making us less safe, and they bring a terrorist threat.
'This will only get worse under the weakest Prime Minister I have ever seen.'
The leaders are also preparing to unveil a new 'one in, one out' migrant returns deal — sending some Channel arrivals to France in exchange for Britain accepting migrants with family reunion rights.
But the Tories have branded the plan a 'fantasy' and demanded their Rwanda scheme be reinstated.
Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'One year into Labour 's government and the boats haven't stopped, they've multiplied.
'It's become a free-for-all.
'We need a removals deterrent so every single illegal immigrant who arrives is removed outside Europe.
'The crossings will then rapidly stop.'
The PM's spokesman said the figures were 'clearly unacceptable'.
They added: 'But let's be clear, gangs have been allowed to embed industrial-scale smuggling enterprises across Europe, whilst our own asylum system collapsed through failed policies like Rwanda.
'But we are taking action.'
The spokesman pointed to arrests of gang leaders, thousands of boat seizures, and closer ties with France.
The Ministry of Justice confirmed legal aid fees for immigration and asylum cases will rise by 30 per cent, marking the first increase in almost three decades.
6
6
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
My customer's neighbours REFUSED to cut down their hedge... so here's what I did next
A man who was fed up with his neighbour refusing to cut down their large hedge took drastic action. In a video shared on TikTok, the irritated homeowner, posting under the username @gardenyardzmowing1982, showed how something as mundane as a garden border can cause conflict. In the clip the frustrated gardener showed off the huge shrub separating his and his neighbour's homes. Panning across the garden TikTok users could see the metres-long shrub standing almost twice as tall as the neighbour. The TikToker claimed that the house next door had 'refused' to cut it back and he had been forced to take matters in to his own hands. His video then showed a time lapse of the content creator, dressed in navy trousers and a T-shirt, using a hedge trimmer to cut down at least a foot of growth. By the end of the video, the guerrilla gardener had taken off a considerable chunk from the top of the shrub and seemed satisfied with the transformation. And while the TikTok user was pleased with his handiwork, others were less than impressed and took tot he comments under his video to express their concerns. One user suggested the neighbour might sue and wrote: 'By Law in the UK you are allowed to cut anything overhanging your garden but not the entire hedge. If I was your neighbour I'd sue'. Another TikTok user echoed this, commenting: 'If it the hedge belongs to a neighbour you can cut anything over hanging on your side of the boundary but you are not allowed to reduce the height without permission. Criminal damage'. One voiced concern over local wildlife and asked whether the TikToker had considered nesting birds before shopping off the overhanging branches. They commented: 'I hope you avoided the nesting season?' and another joined in the sentiment, adding, 'Hedges are for wildlife as much as anything else. you could have simply trimmed the top not hacked it off. But then I suppose most people don't consider others, least of all the natural world.' While the TikTok user was pleased with his handiwork, others were less than impressed and took tot he comments under his video to express their concerns. While another suggested that the neighbour might have been growing the hedge tall for privacy reasons, writing, 'Maybe the neighbour wanted it tall for a reason. Probably to block out annoying neighbours'. Others criticised the keen gardener and asked why he had cut the hedge down and limited his own privacy with users writing: 'The hedge is great for privacy and wind protection', 'You should have left it, was more private' and 'why did you do his side you can't do it some people like privacy!'. According to the website you can only trim a hedge up to the property boundary. If you do more than this your neighbour could take you to court for damaging their property.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Sweden invented ‘flight shaming'. Now it is begging airlines to return
The country that invented 'flight shaming', a concept championed by climate activist Greta Thunberg, has scrapped its air tax in a bid to boost its ailing economy. As of July 1, Sweden has dropped the levy of 76–517 krona (£5.50–£37.40) per passenger per flight, an eco measure introduced by the centre-left government in 2018. The U-turn will be seen as a disaster by environmentalists, and it exposes a tension at the core of the aviation versus climate debate. When jumbo jets disappear emissions drop, but other things begin to dwindle too: regional growth, connectivity and – it appears in Sweden – public support for eco concerns. The emptying of Swedish skies Sweden introduced its air tax in the same year that a 15-year-old Greta Thunberg organised her first solo climate protest outside Swedish Parliament. In a short period of time the 'flight shaming' ('flygskam') movement took hold. A survey in 2019 showed that nearly a quarter of Swedes were abstaining from flying in a bid to reduce their climate footprint, up from 17 per cent the year before. The impact on Sweden's aviation industry was stark. Swedavia AB, which runs 10 Swedish airports, saw passenger numbers drop for seven consecutive months in 2019. The country witnessed its slowest growth in airline passenger numbers for a decade. Meanwhile, state train operator SJ saw passengers leap to 32 million citing 'big interest in climate-smart travel.' In the seven years that followed, international flights dropped by a third. Smaller airports, particularly in the wild and remote northern regions, saw fewer arrivals as airlines scaled back operations. Ryanair ceased all domestic flights in Sweden, while the domestic-focused Bromma Airport near Stockholm came to the brink of closure. Today, only one regional airline, Västfly, still uses the airport. The pandemic was the catalyst for change. The country suffered a recession in 2023 and the economy shrank by 0.3 per cent between April and July 2024. It was within this economic climate that the new right-wing government, elected in 2022, said that there were 'few reasons to feel flight shame' as they announced plans to invest £76m into the aviation sector and drop the air tax entirely. Airlines were quick to praise the decision. Ryanair promptly re-introduced two new aircraft to its Swedish fleet and added ten new routes. EasyJet said 'we strongly welcome the abolition of taxes on passengers to help keep flying affordable' and Norwegian announced it would add new routes from Norway to Sweden. 'We congratulate the Swedish government for abolishing the aviation tax. It is excellent news, which recognises that taxation of air passengers is counterproductive economically and ineffective environmentally,' was the international aviation body IATA's response to the news. The climate lobby, however, is disheartened by the news. Justin Francis, co-founder and executive chair of Responsible Travel, tells The Telegraph: 'Some governments' short-term attitudes to regulating aviation have shifted, but the science hasn't, and aviation will account for an ever-increasing percentage of total global carbon emissions and the massive costs of climate change to business and society.' The European countries banning domestic flights No doubt politicians in neighbouring countries will be watching keenly from the sidelines to see how Sweden's U-turn plays out. That's because since Sweden introduced its eco-war against aviation, other countries have followed suit. In 2020, Germany increased its domestic and intra-European flight taxes by 75 per cent, while Belgium imposes a €10 'boarding tax' for flights of less than 500km (310 miles). In the Netherlands passengers must pay a departure tax of €29.40 per flight, regardless of the destination. Denmark is the latest to join the party. As of January 1 this year, passengers have had to pay 50DK (£5.73) for intra-European flights, 310DK (£35.83) for medium-haul and DK410 (£47.55) for long-haul flights. Ryanair was quick out of the blocks to criticise the tax. The Irish airline publicly described it as a 'discriminatory, fake eco-tax', criticising Denmark for penalising short-haul passengers while not taxing transfer passengers travelling far greater distances. The airline has scrapped its services from Billund and Aalborg, in response. Other countries are clamping down on short-haul aviation through other means. In 2023, France passed a law banning domestic flights on routes where the journey could be made by rail in less than 2hr 30m. While this was hailed as a 'domestic flight ban', effectively ruling out air travel between Paris Orly and Nantes, Lyon and Bordeaux, some argued they could have been more ambitious by extending the train travel time to four hours, or to measure from city to city rather than airport to airport. In its current form, where you can still fly from Paris Charles de Gaulle to Nantes, Lyon and Bordeaux. Because of this, the domestic flight ban has been criticised for being more gestural than anything else. Spain is considering mirroring the policy, banning flights where you can make the same journey in 2hr 30m. This would rule out 11 domestic air routes, reducing the country's domestic aviation emissions by an estimated 10 per cent. But, as in France, climate activists said it didn't go far enough, with the group Ecologistas en Acción describing the measures as 'purely symbolic'. The question is where these countries will go next. Clearly the Swedish U-turn highlights the complexities around marrying green policies with national interconnectivity and regional prosperity. 'Until electric planes and emissions-free aviation are viable options, we all need to fly less,' says Justin Francis. 'Aviation fuel needs to be taxed in line with other transport fuels. The industry has had a free pass here for too long, and the proceeds need to be ring fenced for investment in lower-carbon aviation and improving rail infrastructure.'
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Brian Reade: 'Hypocrisy over Glastonbury IDF death chant is ludicrous'
A few months ago America's Vice President warned that the greatest threat to British democracy was not Russia's nukes but our shutting down of free speech. JD Vance lambasted the UK for 'criminalising' dissenters who held alternative viewpoints, saying: 'I believe that dismissing people's concerns is the most surefire way to destroy democracy.' He even argued that Keir Starmer should be made to repeal our hate-speech laws if he wanted to secure a trade deal with Donald Trump. And the Right in this country heartily applauded their MAGA soulmate. Kemi Badenoch proclaimed: 'Free speech is precious, and under threat. We must fight for it because it challenges dangerous orthodoxies.' And a leading Daily Mail commentator wrote a gushing eulogy, under the headline: 'Sock it to 'em JD'. However, the thing about right-wing libertarians who clutch their pearls over so-called 'cancel culture' is that free speech only really appeals to them when they're in agreement with it. When Black rap duo Bob Vylan used a sick turn of phrase at Glastonbury to condemn Israel's military actions in Gaza, that sacred principle of defending free speech went out of the window. Tory politicians and media outlets bayed for Vylan's heads, demanding criminal investigations, cheering as their US visas were revoked and arguing that failure to arrest them would amount to 'two-tier justice'. The very same defenders of liberty who gave wide berths to controversialists like Elon Musk and Laurence Fox, defended Katie Hopkins' calls for gunships to be turned on refugees in small boats and wailed about Roald Dahl books having words removed, were enraged that a punk rapper should be allowed to chant 'death to the IDF'. Mainly enraged because it was being aired by their despised whipping boy, the pinko BBC. And, yes, the BBC did cock up by broadcasting the clearly controversial duo live, but Glastonbury is an anti-Establishment music festival where anything can be said. For example, On Bob Vylan's Glasto backdrop were the words 'Eat The Rich.' Maybe the police should also arrest them for incitement to cannibalise James Dyson? Maybe the Beeb should have put a trigger warning up saying: 'This act may contain opinions about killings in Gaza that the majority of genocide experts believe to be genocide'? Or maybe not, because then the Right would have called it 'nanny state interference' designed to turn our mollycoddled youth into snowflakes. The hypocrisy is ludicrous. Had Glastonbury been going during the height of the US bombing of Vietnam would the BBC have felt the need to censor any hippies chanting 'Hey, hey, LBJ, how many kids have you killed today?' Would that have been hate speech? Not to be outdone by the Tories, Keir Starmer jumped on the outraged bandwagon by calling Vylan's outburst 'appalling'. Meanwhile, since Vylan's outburst, an estimated 300 innocent Gazans have lost their ability to mouth any speech at all, due to being mercilessly killed by IDF bombs and bullets. And Israeli newspaper Haaretz quoted IDF soldiers as saying they had received orders to fire live ammunition into crowds of unarmed Palestinians at food points. 'It's a killing field,' said one combatant. Yet nothing the IDF does, or any calls the extremists in the Israeli cabinet make about wanting to wipe Gaza off the map, attracts anywhere near the scale of right-wing rage that four words spoken by a punk rapper does. Now that's appalling. Our readers can save money using the code .
