CCP imposes Rs1bn in penalties on cartels and deceptive advertisers
Out of the 12 orders issued, eight were related to deceptive marketing. Three orders involved cartelization and price fixing. One order was issued on the direction of the Lahore High Court to address the issue of CCP's jurisdiction in a case involving the deceptive and fraudulent use of a trademark under Section 10(2) of the Competition Act. In a landmark case, CCP fined six urea manufacturers and their trade group — Fertilizer Manufacturers of Pakistan Advisory Council (FMPAC) — a total of Rs375 million for price-fixing. Each company was fined Rs50 million; the association was fined Rs75 million.
Another major penalty of Rs155 million was slapped on eight poultry hatcheries for fixing prices of day-old broiler chicks. In deceptive marketing cases, Kingdom Valley was fined Rs150 million for false claims about its housing project. Unilever and Friesland Campina Engro were fined Rs75 million each for marketing frozen desserts as ice cream. Unilever also faced an additional Rs60 million penalty for deceptive ads for Lifebuoy products.
Al-Ghazi Tractors was fined Rs40 million for false fuel efficiency claims. Hyundai Nishat Motors received Rs25 million fine for misleading ads about the Hyundai Tucson SUV. 3N Lifemed Pharmaceuticals was fined Rs20 million for using fake certification for dialysis machines. The fine was later reduced to Rs2 million by the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT). British Lyceum and Diamond Paints were fined Rs5 million each for publishing misleading advertisements.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
Anti-competitive practices in power sector: CCP raids on offices of four companies suspected of bid rigging in tenders
ISLAMABAD: In a major enforcement action to curb anti-competitive practices in the power sector, the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) conducted simultaneous raids on the offices of four companies suspected of bid rigging in tenders for the supply of transformer reclamation material to power distribution companies (DISCOs). The coordinated raids were carried out by CCP's authorised officers in Lahore and Gujranwala, targeting suppliers who are alleged to have colluded in manipulating the bidding process. These companies were found to be quoting identical prices and engaging in tender rotation — a classic hallmark of cartel behaviour. The action follows a formal complaint lodged by the Lahore Electric Supply Company (LESCO), which observed suspicious bidding patterns in recent procurement cycles. LESCO reported that multiple firms submitted bids with identical rates for various items, raising red flags regarding possible collusion. In response, the CCP initiated a formal enquiry under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2010, which prohibits agreements that restrict competition, including bid rigging under Section 4(2)(e). A preliminary analysis of the bidding data revealed that certain companies appeared to be coordinating their bids to ensure pre-determined outcomes in tender awards. In some cases, these suppliers were found rotating their wins while maintaining price parity, thereby undermining the competitive tendering process and harming public procurement efficiency. This is not the first time CCP has uncovered such practices in the transformer materials market. In 2020, the Commission concluded a similar enquiry involving bid rigging by multiple vendors supplying transformer bushings and reclamation items to DISCOs, including LESCO, MEPCO, and GEPCO. In that case, CCP found collusion among at least five firms, and imposed significant penalties. The recurrence of such practices underscores systemic vulnerabilities in the public procurement mechanisms of the power sector and the need for stronger oversight by procuring agencies. If the ongoing investigation confirms collusive conduct, the Commission is empowered to issue show-cause notices to the implicated firms and proceed with hearings. Upon establishing contravention, CCP may impose penalties of up to 10% of annual turnover or PKR 75 million, whichever is higher. In addition, the Commission can recommend structural or behavioural remedies to prevent recurrence and restore market integrity. The CCP has urged the public, including procurement officers, business insiders, and concerned citizens, to come forward with credible information about cartelization or bid rigging. The Commission's Whistleblower Reward Scheme offers cash rewards ranging from PKR 200,000 to PKR 2 million, based on the quality and value of the information provided. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
3 days ago
- Business Recorder
CCP raids transformer material suppliers over suspected bid rigging
The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) team has raided the offices of four suppliers involved in the provision of transformer reclamation materials to various power distribution companies (DISCOs). The raids were carried out simultaneously in Lahore and Gujranwala. These companies are suspected of being part of a cartel that manipulated bidding processes for transformer-related tenders. The CCP launched the raids as part of an ongoing enquiry into bid rigging practices in DISCO procurement. The enquiry was initiated after Lahore Electric Supply Company (LESCO) raised concerns with the CCP regarding identical bids submitted by various suppliers. A review of bidding data revealed that the companies often quoted identical prices and appeared to rotate tenders among themselves. CCP imposes Rs1 billion in penalties on cartels, deceptive advertisers during FY2024-25 Such practices fall under Section 4(2)(e) of the Competition Act, 2010, which prohibits collusion in tendering. Bid rigging not only distorts fair competition but also causes significant financial losses to the public exchequer. If the ongoing enquiry confirms any form of collusion, the CCP will issue show-cause notices to the companies involved. The CCP has also urged the public to report any such anti-competitive behaviour. Whistleblowers may be eligible for cash rewards ranging from Rs200,000 to Rs2,000,000, depending on the value and verifiability of the information provided.
Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
Temu faces CCP scrutiny for anti-competitive practices
Listen to article Temu, a Chinese e-commerce platform, has come under the radar of the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) over alleged misleading practices that are said to distort the local market. Temu entered the Pakistani market a few months ago with an aggressive digital advertising campaign, flooding platforms with promotional content. These ads, which promoted heavy discounts and seemingly risk-free purchases, quickly attracted consumers while putting local sellers at a disadvantage due to the scale and pricing Temu offered. A coalition of independent retailers and sellers, the Chainstore Association of Pakistan, submitted a grievance to the CCP, alleging that Temu's practices are anti-competitive and harmful to both consumers and domestic businesses. "We write to alert the Competition Commission of Pakistan regarding growing anti-competitive market behaviour stemming from the influx of unregulated foreign e-commerce platforms such as Temu and Shein," the statement said. These platforms, which have no physical or legal presence in Pakistan, are operating freely via online portals, offering artificially underpriced and/or substandard products shipped under the De Minimis exemption, without paying any taxes or import duties. Meanwhile, local retailers, online sellers, and manufacturers are fully compliant with tax, customs, and regulatory obligations. This creates a distorted and unfair playing field, with serious economic consequences. The association has pointed out the massive displacement of formal, tax-paying local businesses, along with the loss of consumer protection, quality control, and regulatory oversight. Temu is currently encouraging pre-payments in foreign currency with no cash-on-delivery option, which the association claims is likely to undermine the country's current account balance. "We request the CCP to take action and initiate a formal investigation into the market practices of such foreign platforms operating without compliance." The association has recommended regulatory collaboration with the Ministry of Commerce, FBR, and SECP to enforce registration and fair competition. It has also urged logistics and courier companies to only process shipments with valid commercial invoices and ensure each parcel has the correct declared retail value. It further called for the use of a verifiable tracking system and the submission of all shipment data digitally to relevant authorities for monitoring. Pakistan's formal retail sector, manufacturers, importers, and e-commerce players are being rendered uncompetitive by these practices, which pose long-term risks to the integrity of the country's tax and trade ecosystem. "These foreign operators are violating the spirit of fair competition and undermining Pakistan's regulated economy. CAP is ready to provide any assistance in this matter and supports all actions CCP deems appropriate," the association said. Additionally, a separate complaint has also been filed through the Office of Fair Trade in Islamabad by a group of independent sellers who claim that Temu is distorting the market and misleading consumers, making it difficult for local businesses to compete. One of the central allegations is Temu's pricing strategy, described by complainants as predatory. By selling products at extremely low prices, Temu is accused of undermining fair competition and threatening the survival of small local retailers who comply with all regulatory and taxation policies. Logistics and import industry insiders have reported that Temu frequently under-declares the value of goods, breaks high-value orders into smaller parcels to stay below tax thresholds, and mislabels products to avoid customs duties. These practices are not only unethical but also illegal and raise concerns about whether newly introduced policies will be effective if enforcement is not strengthened. Despite increasing evidence, customs authorities have taken limited action. While local businesses are often penalised for minor issues, platforms like Temu continue to operate without proper enforcement, creating an uneven playing field. Domestic sellers face growing regulatory and financial pressure despite contributing to local employment and the economy.
