HC issues notices against illegal pubs, restaurants
The court issued notices to the Delhi government and the city police, asking them to file responses containing details of such bars, pubs, and restaurants.
'The affidavit by the respondents should also contain the details of action taken in case the bars, pubs and restaurants mentioned in the petition are found violating the provisions of law,' the court said while listing the matter for hearing next on August 27.
Petitioner Mahtab Khan has claimed that bars, restaurants, clubs and pubs in the city are operating illegally, without the L-16 licence and pointed out that these establishments are prohibited from operating and selling alcohol after 1 a.m. without possessing the licence.
The plea states that these establishments are located in areas where fire tenders cannot reach in case of an accident, as some of them do not have an appropriate approach to the road.
The petitioner's counsel submitted that despite highlighting the illegality through a representation, the authorities have failed to take any action and stop these establishments from operating after the permitted time limit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Online bullying can be as mentally traumatic as physical violence: Delhi HC
Cyberbullying can be as mentally traumatic and scarring as physical violence, the Delhi High Court has said, while upholding the conviction of a man who sent morphed nude images and threatening messages to a minor girl studying in Class 9. The judgment, delivered on July 28 by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, stressed the devastating psychological impact of online harassment, particularly on children. (HT Archive) The court rejected his appeal against a five-year sentence, describing the case as a 'textbook example of cyberbullying.' The judgment, delivered on July 28 by Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, stressed the devastating psychological impact of online harassment, particularly on children. 'What is deeply concerning is the use of technology to commit cyberbullying – an act that, while faceless and silent, can be as mentally traumatic and scarring as physical violence, especially when directed towards children. Such conduct, in the virtual world, has very real and devastating consequences in the real world,' justice Sharma said. The conviction stems from a complaint filed in September 2016 by the victim's mother. The minor girl, then in Class 9, was using a tablet for studying when she received morphed obscene images of herself along with threatening messages on WhatsApp. The sender, a man known to the family, warned her that the photos would be circulated if she didn't comply with his demands. The trial court in March last year had convicted him under various provisions of the Indian Penal Code including sexual harassment, stalking, criminial intimidation, sections 12 (sexual harassment) and 14 (using child for pornographic purposes) of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (Pocso) Act, 2012 and section 67 (publishing or transmitting obscene material in electronic form) under the Information Technology Act. Challenging the verdict, the man claimed he was falsely implicated and that the case was full of contradictions. The Delhi Police, however, maintained that the evidence clearly showed he had transmitted obscene material and had criminally intimidated a minor. Justice Sharma, in her 35-page ruling, upheld the trial court's decision. She said that even the threat of circulating morphed images, without actually doing so, can cause irreparable long-term damage to a child's mental well-being and dignity. The act of morphing her face, the court added, sought to not only shame her but to coerce her by creating fear. 'A morphed image once created and circulated can have long-term consequences for a child's mental health, dignity, and reputation,' the judge observed. 'The fear of such circulation alone, even if the image is never actually published, is enough to terrorise a young mind.' The court also highlighted the urgent need to protect children in digital spaces. With growing reliance on gadgets for education, it said, the notion of child safety must extend beyond physical environments. 'This court is of the view that creating a safe environment for children cannot be restricted to physical spaces alone. The modern world demands that equal protection be extended to digital spaces, where children are now spending considerable time,' the court said.
The Hindu
7 hours ago
- The Hindu
HC warns of severe action for cybercrimes targeting children
Underscoring the seriousness of cyber offences targeting children, the Delhi High Court has said that such crimes will attract severe consequences, reflecting the grave psychological impact on victims. While upholding the conviction of a man in a cyber-bullying case involving a minor, Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, in a judgement delivered on July 28, stated that digital abuse, though often faceless and silent, can be as mentally scarring as physical violence. The court was hearing an appeal in a 2016 case registered following a complaint lodged by the mother of a 14-year-old girl, a Class IX student, who became the target of a cyber assault. According to the prosecution, the victim received a morphed nude image with her face superimposed on another person's body, accompanied by a threatening message warning that the obscene content would be posted on Facebook unless she complied with the sender's demands. 'The present case reflects a textbook example of cyber-bullying, where an adolescent girl, who was pursuing her studies, became a victim of a targeted assault upon her privacy and dignity,' said Justice Sharma. 'Such conduct, in the virtual world, has very real and devastating consequences in the real world,' the judge said. The High Court said the psychological impact on a minor is difficult to quantify in words in a judgment. A trial court convicted the accused under relevant provisions of the Indian Penal Code, the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, and the Information Technology Act. He was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for five years. The High Court found no grounds to interfere with the conviction, noting that the plea for leniency on behalf of the man 'stands on a fragile footing'. 'It is important not only to detect and punish such crimes effectively but also to affirmatively uphold a child's right to safety, dignity, and mental well-being in such cases,' it added.
The Hindu
8 hours ago
- The Hindu
Centre to withdraw order granting release of film Udaipur files, Delhi HC told
The Centre on Friday (August 1, 2025) informed the Delhi High Court that it was withdrawing its decision granting nod to the release of the film Udaipur Files - Kanhaiya Lal Tailor Murder, and will take a decision on the revision petitions 'afresh'. The court, which was hearing two pleas challenging the Centre's decision allowing the release of the movie, directed the parties to appear before the government on August 4 and make their submissions. The court was informed by the counsel for the film's producer that the movie is scheduled to be released on August 8 and they would take some time for making arrangements for releasing it by engaging the theatres. The court took on record statement by Additional Solicitor General Chetan Sharma, representing the Central government as also the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), that the government will withdraw the earlier decision granting nod to the release of the film and 'take a decision on the revision petitions preferred by the petitioners afresh'. Noting the submissions, the court disposed of the two petitions filed by Mohammed Javed, one of the accused in the Kanhaiya Lal murder case, and Jamiat Ulema-i-Hind president Maulana Arshad Madani. The Centre's counsel had said the film has undergone a two-step filter, first by the censor board, which suggested 55 cuts, and second by the committee, which further asked for six cuts, totalling 61 cuts. Javed's counsel objected to the release of the film on the ground that it would prejudice his case during the trial. Kanhaiya Lal, an Udaipur-based tailor in Rajasthan, was murdered in 2022, allegedly by Mohammad Riyaz and Mohammad Ghous, for sharing a social media post in support of former BJP leader Nupur Sharma after her controversial comments on Prophet Mohammed. The trial is pending before the special NIA court in Jaipur.
