
After years of doubt, I finally found a foldable worth using daily (Spoiler: It's not a Samsung or a Pixel)
Something always felt off. Some had unsightly display creases that totally broke the immersion, others were lacking either in the battery life or the camera areas, which are always crucial, some had unusable interfaces, and others were just peculiar in the negative sense of the word.
My point being, no foldable really enticed me to use it as a daily driver, until I stumbled upon this "older" device released back in 2024. The phone I'm currently talking about and the one I'm obsessed with right now is the Vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and it's easily among the best foldables to this day. It definitely is a more complete phone than any Galaxy Z Fold you can get, that's for sure.
Here's my colleague Preslav giving the Vivo X Fold 3 Pro a heatlthy skeptical look. But believe me, my friend, this is the foldable that could finally make even you switch from your precious Samsungs. (Image by PhoneArena)
To explain why I rate this foldable much higher than, say, the Galaxy Z Fold lineup, which is what most people think of when they hear " foldable phone " , I will do what I do best and give you a quick review of the phone in question.
The first thing that blew me away with this Vivo was the design. We start off with a pretty thin body that measures 4.7 mm unfolded and 10.2 mm folded. It's not the thinnest foldable around, true, but it's still super-thin and sleek. When you use it folded with a case on, it feels just as large as an iPhone 16 Pro Max with a case on. Moreover, at 236gr, this phone is lighter than some iPhones I've used.
Both objectively and subjectively, it's a beaut' (Image by PhoneArena)
I particularly loved the aspect ratio of the phone itself. At 21:9, it's perfectly functional and notably more useful than the Z Fold's narrower outer screen. The X Fold 3 Pro is perfectly usable even in its folded state, so you're not forced to unfold it every time you want to use it. The crease on the inner screen is there, you can sometimes see it when a reflection hits, but you can barely feel it when you move your fingertips on top of it. That's just the solution I love with foldables, as the necessary drawback of a crease is almost negligible here. In addition, the hinge is super-strong and solid, unlike the flimsy ones on the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and the Pixel 9 Pro Fold.
There's also a simple but very useful hardware mute switch, which is super-convenient.
The there's the interface. Laugh all you want, but I'm convinced that Vivo's oddly named Funtouch OS is among the best custom Android skins. It's functional, feature-rich, and manages a sleek interface style devoid of any fleeting design trends. There are tons of useful features sprinkled throughout the interface, which is usually the case with phones hailing from China, but interestingly, Funtouch OS is probably the least "Chinese-looking" phone skin I've laid my eyes upon.
For example, Xiaomi's HyperOS or Oppo's ColorOS are instantly recognizable with their near-identical iOS-like styling that oozes with everything but originality. Funtouch OS is more understated as it's definitely closer to stock Android yet still has its own, rather unique UX design. Classy notifications (with colorful icons, mind you), a unified notification shade that simply revels in efficiency, and all the latest Android features you've come to expect are currently here.
There are many personalization and customization features, with Funtouch OS' Dynamic Effects offering some of the deepest and most intriguing ways to shape the interface to your liking. You can change the home screen entering animation, the fingerprint icon and recognition animations, the charging and USB insertion animations, the ambient light effect when receiving a notification, and so much more. A proper treasure trove for customization freaks like me!
There are some AI features, but they are mostly forgettable. As long as I have access to Gemini and ChatGPT, my AI needs are sorted, and I have hardly needed anything more.
I absolutely adore the foldable-specific features here, like swiping up an app to open it in split-screen or run in a floating window, as well as the neat dock at the bottom. If you quickly close and open the foldable, you can easily open most apps in split-screen, and that's genius. Position the phone half-open on any surface, and you get a customizable standby clock. Okay, technically, we don't get the latest hardware inside the Vivo X Fold 3 Pro: there's "only" a Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chip inside instead of the more powerful Snapdragon 8 Elite. Is that a problem? Absolutely not!
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 is still a flagship chip that marries superb raw power with decent enough efficiency, despite clocking it slightly lower scores in the synthetic benchmarks. The performance is top-notch in almost any task you might think of, and I could even emulate some of my favorite PC and PS3 games with respectable frame rates (thank the gods for Android emulation).
The phone is equipped with 16GB of RAM, which is great in itself, but Vivo also lets you use up to 16GB of the 512GB of storage as additional memory, totalling to around 32GB of available memory. This allows the phone to hold so many apps in its memory that I'm sometimes surprised that apps I haven't used in a day or so were still held in the memory. This is perfect for heavy multitaskers, which I apparently am. There's somehow a 5,700mAh battery fitted on the foldable phone . Vivo has used a second-gen carbon-silicon battery which boasts 780 Wh/L density. I will be honest with you, I don't know what that means exactly at the top of my mind, but I can attest to the decent battery life of the phone itself. With a mixed folded/unfolded use through the day and usually moderate usage, it's easily a day, day-and-a-half phone.
What I like even more is the fast 100W charging. Pop the phone on the charger, go make yourself a brunch and some coffee, and voilà, it's typically trickling at around 80%, which is more than enough to last you a day. There are also two ultrasonic fingerprint scanners here, one on the internal screen and another one on the external display. That's a rarity, with many manufacturers opting for either an ultrasonic/optical or a single capacitive fingerprint in the power button.
Speaking of the displays, both are superb. Colorful OLEDs with just the right amount of customization allowing you to fine-tune the color temperature and tone, very high peak brightness and low enough minimum one, with a smooth 120Hz refresh rate. Absolutely top-notch!
Not the very best, but good enough for me (Image by PhoneArena) Although it received a fairly middle-of-the-road score in our PhoneArena camera tests, the Vivo X Fold 3 Pro camera still amazes me to this day. It reminded me that the best camera is the one you have on you, but also the one you know the strengths and weaknesses of, allowing you to squeeze the best possible results with what you have available.
Hardware-wise, it's a pretty respectable triple camera setup with a 50MP main camera with a large sensor, a 50MP ultrawide, and a high-res 64MP telephoto with 3X optical zoom that uses sensor cropping to zoom even further without any noticeable image quality loss. I routinely take photos at between 6X and 10X, and the quality is more than acceptable (taking your kid to the park apparently involves a lot of zooming in to capture all the shenanigans).
I absolutely adore the number of features and hidden functionalities available in the camera app. Apart from the standard photo, video, Pro shooting, and portrait modes, this phone also lets you take tilt shift photography, dabble into astrophotography (with AR constellation support), have access to many portrait modes emulating the look of some classic Zeiss lenses like Distagon, Sonnar, Planar, Biotar, and so much more.
There's a proper macro mode here, which uses the correct camera (it's the telephoto one, not the ultrawide).
You can also customize the cinematic video mode look by applying custom or some preloaded LUTs, apply a slow-shutter effect, and generally feel like an aspiring cinematographer. All cool beans!
Although it's not the best camera around in terms of pure quality, it's just enough for me. More often than not, it's not the camera hardware, but the creativity that takes a better photo.
he hinge is perfect. Once more for the Galaxy Z Fold users in the back, THE HINGE IS PERFECT (Image by PhoneArena)
The things I don't like? The phone can capture up to 8K@30fps videos, but the quality is just okay. There's a big difference when you switch between the different cameras when taking a video, which doesn't always look great. Newer Vivo phones also have the very useful Live Photo feature, which works just like on the iPhone and captures a short video before and after you hit the shutter button, but the X Fold 3 Pro only allows this in its dedicated Snapshot mode. In it, none of the standard camera features are available, so it's mostly a wasted functionality here. Other foldables like the Oppo Find N5 support regular Live Photo capture in all standard still photography modes, so excuse me if I'm a bit envious.
The phone is only IPX8, not IP68. While that's normal to expect from a foldable, I would have loved some minor dust proofing, at least IP48 matching the Galaxy Z Fold series.
The glass on the outer screen, while having super-strong shatter resistance (at least according to the official specs), the outer glass isn't very scratch-resistant. While I pamper it, I can notice some micro scratches here and there, which isn't inspiring a lot of confidence, as I now have to consider getting a 3D glass protector from Chinese online retailers.
The audio quality isn't too good as well, but that's usually the case with foldable phones . The dual stereo speakers inside are tiny due to the cramped space inside, which could be some of the reasons why the audio is simply lacking in terms of strength and presence. You eventually get used to it, but if someone plays the same audio track on a Galaxy flagship or an iPhone, it would be a night-and-day difference.
And yes, the pricing isn't the most affordable. Currently, you can find the phone going for around $1,300 from reputable online retailers that specialize in reselling Chinese phones, but the price was higher last year. Now that I've used the phone, I'm fully convinced it's worth it, though: the value you get out of the Vivo X Fold 3 Pro definitely beats those equally expensive newer foldables out there.
Currently, I have no plans to stop using this device. It has everything I could possibly want from a phone, be it a foldable or a regular one.
Given the increasing pace of rumors regarding the upcoming Vivo X Fold 5 (the company conveniently skips the "4" iteration of the phone as is the Chinese tradition), I am fully expecting to be shock-and-awed by Vivo's next-gen foldable phone and would absolutely rattle up the chain of command so that I can review it as soon as it enters the PhoneArena premises.
As a conclusion, I've you've been hesitant to try out a foldable phone , make sure to look past the usual suspects coming from Samsung and Google. Chinese manufacturers are playing in another league altogether, and I'd never swap the X Fold 3 Pro for a Galaxy Z Fold. Secure your connection now at a bargain price!
We may earn a commission if you make a purchase This offer is not available in your area.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Phone Arena
3 hours ago
- Phone Arena
The Android 17 dessert name leaks. Can you guess what it is?
Started as an inside joke at Google, many of you younger Android users might not remember the dessert name given to new Android releases starting with Android 1.5, which was the third build of Android after Android 1.0 and Android 1.1. The dessert names were names of a desert, and since Android 1.5 was the third build of Android, the dessert name started with a "C" since that is the third letter of the alphabet. Every major new Android build was given a dessert name that started with the letter of the alphabet that was next after the previous major Android build. For example, the fourth build of Android, Android 1.6, had the dessert name Donut. The first Android phone owned by many of you older PhoneArena users was the fantastic Motorola DROID. It was the first phone running Android 2.0, which was the fifth major build of Android and had the dessert name of Eclair. The latter started with the letter "E," the next letter in the alphabet after the "D" used for Android 1.6, the previous major Android release. The statue representing the dessert name for Android 5.0, Lollipop. | Image credit-Unknown Surely this should bring back memories. Eclair was the first Android operating system to feature free Google Maps turn-by-turn directions. Google eventually partnered with Nestle, and in 2013, the dessert name for Android 4.4 was KitKat after the well-known chocolate bar. This took Android to promo heaven as 50 million KitKat bars nestled inside a wrapper containing Android branding were released in 19 countries. These wrappers offered prizes such as a free Nexus 7 tablet. Google repeated this with Android 8 and Android 8.1 in 2017. A deal with Nabisco allowed Google to use the world famous Oreo name as an Android dessert moniker. As it did with KitKat, Google took advantage of the popularity of the creme-filled sandwich cookie to promote Android devices among Oreo buyers. Google ended the practice of giving each major new Android release a dessert name after Android 9 was given the Pie desert name in 2018. Since Android 10, Google has kept the tradition alive, but only internally. The practice of using the next letter in the alphabet as the first letter for the selected dessert ended just this year. The internal dessert name for Android 15 in 2024 was Vanilla Ice Cream. By tradition, this year's internal dessert name should have started with a "W." Instead, because Google switched to a trunk-based model to develop new Android builds, Google moved ahead to "B" and selected Baklava as the dessert name for Android 16. Android expert Mishaal Rahman says that with Google returning to the practice of going down the alphabet each year for the first letter of the dessert name, Android 17 will use a dessert name starting with the letter "C." That will be "Cinnamon Bun," according to Rahman, who explains why he is so confident that this is indeed the correct dessert name for Android 17. "A trusted source within Google shared evidence with us that clearly shows the company using "CinnamonBun" as the internal codename for API level 37.0," he said. The Core API level is the name used by developers to distinguish different Android releases as opposed to the marketing names of the operating system, which uses numbers such as Android 15 and Android 16 . Rahman says that you might see Android 17 referred to as "Android CinnamonBun" in beta versions of Android 17. Once the OS hits platform stability and all changes to how the system interacts with apps have been locked in, you can expect Google to refer to the operating system as Android 17. Here's the complete list of Android dessert names from the beginning through this year: Android 1.0-No codename, 2008 Android 1.1-Peiti Four (internal), 2009 Android 1.5-Cupcake, 2009 Android 1.6-Donut, 2009 Android 2.0, 2.1-Eclair, 2009 Android 2.2-Froyo, 2010 Android 2.3-Gingerbread, 2010 Android 3 -Honeycomb (Tablets only), 2011 Android 4-Ice Cream Sandwich,2011 Android 4.1, 4.2, 4.3-Jelly Bean, 2012 Android 4.4-KitKat, 2013 Android 5.0, 5.1-Lollipop, 2014 Android 6-Marshmallow, 2015 Android 7.0, 7.1-Nougat, 2016 Android 8.0, 8.1-Oreo, 2017 Android 9-Pie, 2018 Android 10-Quince Tart (internal), 2019 Android 11-Red Velvet Cake (internal), 2020 Android 12, 12L-Snow Cone (internal), 2021 Android 13-Tiramisu (internal), 2022 Android 14-Upside Down Cake (internal), 2023 Android 15 -Vanilla Ice Cream (internal), 2024 -Vanilla Ice Cream (internal), 2024 Android 16 -Baklava (internal), 2025 Doesn't reading through this list, especially the early years, bring back plenty of memories?


GSM Arena
4 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Realme Buds T200 review
Prasad, 10 August 2025 The Realme Buds T200 are the latest in the company's range of entry-level true wireless earbuds. Priced at just INR 1,999 (~$23), the Buds T200 are aimed at those with a tight budget but still want to experience more premium features such as active noise cancellation, dual-device connectivity, and LDAC. Design The Realme Buds T200 have a fairly simple design for the case that looks like a boxier version of the AirPods Pro case. On the front of the case is a status LED and on the bottom is a USB-C charging port. Unfortunately, there is no pairing button on the case, which means you have to pull the earbuds out of the case and use the press and hold gesture on both of them to initiate pairing. Like the case, the earbuds also have a fairly simple design with color-matched ear tips. On the stalks are little indentations to show you where you need to tap to execute the touch gestures. The earbuds have no optical or capacitive sensor on the inside so you don't get auto pause when you remove them. One annoyance with the earbuds — and this is more to do with how they sit inside the case — is that they can be difficult to pull out of the case. They sink far too deep inside the case when seated, leaving very little surface area to grab on to while pulling them out. The surface that is exposed is very rounded and often covered in oils from the skin, making this entire process cartoonishly challenging. In terms of comfort, the Buds T200 are great. The earbuds are light and have plush ear tips despite the low price. There are no single tap gestures so you don't have to worry about activating something every time you pick up the earbuds. The overall build quality is okay. Both the earbuds and the case are made out of plastic, as you'd expect at this price. The case lid had a bit of side-to-side movement and the glossy finish got scratched up pretty easily. The earbuds are rated for IP55, however, so you don't have to worry about dust or water getting in there. The Buds T200 come in four colors. The Neon Green pictured here is seriously vibrant in person but has a simple black interior. The Dreamy Purple has matching purple interior. The Mystic Black has a fetching blue interior while the Snowy White settles for a plain gray interior. Software and features The Realme Buds T200 support the Realme Link app. Unlike with other brands that have dedicated apps for their audio devices, the Realme Link is a general-purpose app from Realme for all its accessories, including smart home devices and fitness bands. This is where things get annoying. It's bad enough that companies often force you to create an account whenever you want to use one of these apps to use your smart home devices or even fitness products but for some reason Realme also does it with its audio devices. This means, you cannot use the Buds T200 with this app until you first create and sign into a Realme account into the app. This is a very annoying condition to put on your users and while it is relatively easy to just use a temporary email ID to create an account, many people would just end up giving their personal email IDs or phone numbers to create the account. There is no benefit to doing so and is a waste of time and invasion of privacy by the company. Realme Link app Moreover, this process is also necessary if you use a Realme phone. If you have a OnePlus or Oppo phone, you don't need to use the HeyMelody app to access features of the OnePlus or Oppo branded audio products as all the features just appear within Bluetooth settings. The HeyMelody app is only for use with non-OnePlus/Oppo products. But you still have to use the Realme Link app on a Realme phone, which just comes across as a desperate attempt to siphon people's phone numbers and email IDs through the app. Once you get past this unnecessary hurdle, the experience of using the app is similar to what you find in HeyMelody used by OnePlus and Oppo products. You have a bunch of audio options at your disposal, including a six-band custom EQ and four presets, Spatial Audio (without head tracking), and a toggle to enable 'High-definition sound', which just enables LDAC. This is off by default, so if you thought you'd just not use the Realme Link app to avoid the hassle of logging in, know that you will be limited to SBC and AAC. Audio settings The app also has something called Dynamic audio, which just enables another three-band EQ. It's not clear what this adds over the six-band EQ already available and what precisely is dynamic about it. The fewer bands also make changes that are far too broad, so unless you are someone who is somehow intimidated by a six-band EQ then you can probably try this option. Other features in the app include ANC modes toggle, a game mode that reduces latency, gesture settings, dual-device connection menu, and something called MindFlow Mode, which are a bunch of sample tunes to help you relax. Other settings I don't have much to complain about the functionality within the app itself. It even does little things like showing the exact color of the earbuds that you have paired with the phone. It's just that there is simply no need to force the user into making an account and ideally Realme should just use the HeyMelody app like OnePlus and Oppo. Performance Audio quality The Realme Buds T200 use standard 12.4mm dynamic drivers. They connect using Bluetooth 5.4 and support SBC, AAC, and LDAC at up to 32-bit/96kHz. Using the Original Sound preset, the Buds T200 are astonishingly good-sounding pair of earbuds. Realme's tuning here is truly impressive and leaves little room to complain. Starting with the low frequencies, the Buds T200 employ a very reserved bass-boost that provides just the right amount of thump and rumble without overwhelming the listener and obfuscating the mid frequencies. The mids, in turn, are very clear with superb body and timbre that makes vocals and instruments come alive in the mix. The treble finishes strong with brilliant clarity and air, which also helps create a stunning imaging experience with great object placement and a relatively broad soundstage. If I had to nitpick, I would say just a tiny bit more presence in the upper mids would not have gone amiss. Also, the treble can get a bit too sharp at times and if you predominantly listen to bright music then you might find this a bit annoying. However, this is very easily fixed by the EQ with very minor adjustments so it's simply not a concern. Overall, I was truly stunned with how well Realme has tuned these earbuds. I found myself constantly trying to find more and more music to listen to just to see how well it would play on the earbuds and after a while I was just enjoying myself. This is a far cry from other products in this segment where I often find myself mentally checking out after a few minutes and have to essentially force myself to listen to for the sake of the review. It's not the most detailed sound I've heard, even from wireless earbuds, and I think we are reaching the limits of the drivers here. But the sound is so well-tuned that you keep wanting to explore more of your library in a way I've rarely felt wanting to, even with products that cost twenty times as much. Microphone The Realme Buds T200 have okay microphone performance. Voices sound fine when tested in a quiet room with only some amount of warbling. In noisier environments, voices get quieter and softer, but people on the other end would still be able to understand you and the background noise is relatively well-controlled for this segment. Noise cancellation The Realme Buds T200 have active noise cancellation. The earbuds use two microphones each, both of them being on the outside. There is no feedback microphone inside the earbuds to listen to the sound within the ear canal, which is also why you don't get the feature to check if the ear tips create a proper seal. The active noise cancelling performance isn't good. The first time I put the earbuds on I felt as if the feature simply wasn't active even though it was. You are always aware of your surroundings as the earbuds do very little about noise in the mid and high frequencies. The ANC performance on offer here falls in the 'better than nothing' category and you should definitely be looking at spending more if this feature truly matters to you. In a similar vein, the transparency mode performance is also not great. The sound is muffled and often it was better to just remove the earbuds to hear your surroundings. Latency The Realme Buds T200 have a claimed 45ms latency performance with Game mode enabled. Even with this mode disabled, the latency performance isn't too bad on these earbuds, as there's likely not a lot of audio processing happening. Enabling Game mode tightens things further and whatever minor delay was there also becomes negligible. Connectivity The Realme Buds T200 had good connectivity performance. There were no connection issues and dropouts during testing. Multi-device pairing also worked flawlessly. Battery life Realme promises 4.5 hours of battery life while using LDAC and ANC. In my testing, I got 4 hours and 40 minutes, which is just a bit higher than the claimed figure. This was, however, with LDAC set to the highest 990kbps bitrate. When set to 660kbps, I got 5 hours and 19 minutes, which is a good bit more with no audible difference in sound. If you just leave it at auto, as most people do, it would default to the lowest bitrate as it usually does and you'd get even longer battery life. Conclusion As mentioned at the beginning of the review, the Realme Buds T200 cost just INR 1,999. There are times where this is apparent, whether it's in the plasticky build quality, the subpar active noise cancellation, and a few basic features being missing. Then there are things like the forced login to use the app, which shouldn't be a thing at any price point. But then you listen to them and suddenly the price doesn't make sense. Realme's tuning here is so outrageously good that I have half a mind to revisit some older reviews and start docking points for sounding so much worse despite being so much more expensive than the T200. For an audiophile on a budget, it does not get any better than this. So I want you to get your priorities in order. If you want good ANC above anything else, then you should look elsewhere. But if you want good audio quality while spending as little as possible, then you just found your next purchase.


GSM Arena
4 hours ago
- GSM Arena
Realme Buds T200 review
The Realme Buds T200 are the latest in the company's range of entry-level true wireless earbuds. Priced at just INR 1,999 (~$23), the Buds T200 are aimed at those with a tight budget but still want to experience more premium features such as active noise cancellation, dual-device connectivity, and LDAC. Design The Realme Buds T200 have a fairly simple design for the case that looks like a boxier version of the AirPods Pro case. On the front of the case is a status LED and on the bottom is a USB-C charging port. Unfortunately, there is no pairing button on the case, which means you have to pull the earbuds out of the case and use the press and hold gesture on both of them to initiate pairing. Like the case, the earbuds also have a fairly simple design with color-matched ear tips. On the stalks are little indentations to show you where you need to tap to execute the touch gestures. The earbuds have no optical or capacitive sensor on the inside so you don't get auto pause when you remove them. One annoyance with the earbuds — and this is more to do with how they sit inside the case — is that they can be difficult to pull out of the case. They sink far too deep inside the case when seated, leaving very little surface area to grab on to while pulling them out. The surface that is exposed is very rounded and often covered in oils from the skin, making this entire process cartoonishly challenging. In terms of comfort, the Buds T200 are great. The earbuds are light and have plush ear tips despite the low price. There are no single tap gestures so you don't have to worry about activating something every time you pick up the earbuds. The overall build quality is okay. Both the earbuds and the case are made out of plastic, as you'd expect at this price. The case lid had a bit of side to side movement and the glossy finish got scratched up pretty easily. The earbuds are rated for IP55, however, so you don't have to worry about dust or water getting in there. The Buds T200 come in four colors. The Neon Green pictured here is seriously vibrant in person but has a simple black interior. The Dreamy Purple has matching purple interior. The Mystic Black has a fetching blue interior while the Snowy White settles for a plain gray interior. Software and features The Realme Buds T200 support the Realme Link app. Unlike with other brands that have dedicated apps for their audio devices, the Realme Link is a general-purpose app from Realme for all its accessories, including smart home devices and fitness bands. This is where things get annoying. It's bad enough that companies often force you to create an account whenever you want to use one of these apps to use your smart home devices or even fitness products but for some reason Realme also does it with its audio devices. This means, you cannot use the Buds T200 with this app until you first create and sign into a Realme account into the app. This is a very annoying condition to put on your users and while it is relatively easy to just use a temporary email ID to create an account, many people would just end up giving their personal email IDs or phone numbers to create the account. There is no benefit to doing so and is a waste of time and invasion of privacy by the company. Realme Link app Moreover, this process is also necessary if you use a Realme phone. If you have a OnePlus or Oppo phone, you don't need to use the HeyMelody app to access features of the OnePlus or Oppo branded audio products as all the features just appear within Bluetooth settings. The HeyMelody app is only for use with non-OnePlus/Oppo products. But you still have to use the Realme Link app on a Realme phone, which just comes across as a desperate attempt to farm people's phone numbers and email IDs through the app. Once you get past this unnecessary hurdle, the experience of using the app is similar to what you find in HeyMelody used by OnePlus and Oppo products. You have a bunch of audio options at your disposal, including a six-band custom EQ and four presets, Spatial Audio (without head tracking), and a toggle to enable 'High-definition sound', which just enables LDAC. This is off by default, so if you thought you'd just not use the Realme Link app to avoid the hassle of logging in, know that you will be limited to SBC and AAC. Audio settings The app also has something called Dynamic audio, which just enables another three-band EQ. It's not clear what this adds over the six-band EQ already available and what precisely is dynamic about it. The fewer bands also make changes that are far too broad, so unless you are someone who is somehow intimidated by a six-band EQ then you can probably try this option. Other features in the app include ANC modes toggle, a game mode that reduces latency, gesture settings, dual-device connection menu, and something called MindFlow Mode, which are a bunch of sample tunes to help you relax. Other settings I don't have much to complain about the functionality within the app itself. It even does little things like showing the exact color of the earbuds that you have paired with the phone. It's just that there is simply no need to force the user into making an account and ideally Realme should just use the HeyMelody app like OnePlus and Oppo. Performance Audio quality The Realme Buds T200 use standard 12.4mm dynamic drivers. They connect using Bluetooth 5.4 and support SBC, AAC, and LDAC at up to 32-bit/96kHz. Using the Original Sound preset, the Buds T200 are astonishingly good-sounding pair of earbuds. Realme's tuning here is truly impressive and leaves little room to complain. Starting with the low frequencies, the Buds T200 employ a very reserved bass-boost that provides just the right amount of thump and rumble without overwhelming the listener and obfuscating the mid frequencies. The mids, in turn, are very clear with superb body and timbre that makes vocals and instruments come alive in the mix. The treble finishes strong with brilliant clarity and air, which also helps create a stunning imaging experience with great object placement and a relatively broad soundstage. If I had to nitpick, I would say just a tiny bit more presence in the upper mids would not have gone amiss. Also, the treble can get a bit too sharp at times and if you predominantly listen to bright music then you might find this a bit annoying. However, this is very easily fixed by the EQ with very minor adjustments so it's simply not a concern. Overall, I was truly stunned with how well Realme has tuned these earbuds. I found myself constantly trying to find more and more music to listen to just to see how well it would play on the earbuds and after a while I was just enjoying myself. This is a far cry from other products in this segment where I often find myself mentally checking out after a few minutes and have to essentially force myself to listen to for the sake of the review. It's not the most detailed sound I've heard, even from wireless earbuds, and I think we are reaching the limits of the drivers here. But the sound is so well-tuned that you keep wanting to explore more of your library in a way I've rarely felt wanting to, even with products that cost twenty times as much. Microphone The Realme Buds T200 have okay microphone performance. Voices sound fine when tested in a quiet room with only some amount of warbling. In noisier environments, voices get quieter and softer but people on the other end would still be able to understand you and the background noise is relatively well-controlled for this segment. Noise cancellation The Realme Buds T200 have active noise cancellation. The earbuds use two microphones each, both of them being on the outside. There is no feedback microphone inside the earbuds to listen to the sound within the ear canal, which is also why you don't get the feature to check if the ear tips create a proper seal. The active noise cancelling performance isn't good. The first time I put the earbuds on I felt as if the feature simply wasn't active even though it was. You are always aware of your surroundings as the earbuds do very little about noise in the mid and high frequencies. The ANC performance on offer here falls in the 'better than nothing' category and you should definitely be looking at spending more if this feature truly matters to you. In a similar vein, the transparency mode performance is also not great. The sound is muffled and often it was better to just remove the earbuds to hear your surroundings. Latency The Realme Buds T200 have a claimed 45ms latency performance with Game mode enabled. Even with this mode disabled, the latency performance isn't too bad on these earbuds as there's likely not a lot of audio processing happening. Enabling Game mode tightens things further and whatever minor delay was there also becomes negligible. Connectivity The Realme Buds T200 had good connectivity performance. There were no connection issues and dropouts during testing. Multi-device pairing also worked flawlessly. Battery life Realme promises 4.5 hours of battery life while using LDAC and ANC. In my testing, I got 4 hours and 40 minutes, which is just a bit higher than the claimed figure. This was, however, with LDAC set to the highest 990kbps bitrate. When set to 660kbps, I got 5 hours and 19 minutes, which is a good bit more with no audible difference in sound. If you just leave it at auto as most people do, it would default to the lowest bitrate as it usually does and you'd get even longer battery life. Conclusion As mentioned at the beginning of the review, the Realme Buds T200 cost just INR 1,999. There are times where this is apparent, whether it's in the plasticky build quality, the subpar active noise cancellation, and a few basic features being missing. Then there are things like the forced login to use the app, which shouldn't be a thing at any price point. But then you listen to them and suddenly the price doesn't make sense. Realme's tuning here is so outrageously good that I have half a mind to revisit some older reviews and start docking points for sounding so much worse despite being so much more expensive than the T200. For an audiophile on a budget, it does not get any better than this. So I want you to get your priorities in order. If you want good ANC above anything else, then you should look elsewhere. But if you want good audio quality while spending as little as possible, then you just found your next purchase.