&w=3840&q=100)
Reliance flags crude supply risks amid US tariff blow on Indian exports
New Delhi
Indian oil major Reliance Industries has raised concerns that ongoing global tensions, including tariffs and sanctions, may disrupt oil trade and hit refining margins.
In its latest annual report, the Mukesh Ambani-led company pointed to volatile crude prices driven by sanctions, shifting tariff rules, and output decisions by the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and non-OPEC countries, news agency Reuters reported
Market reaction: Oil stocks slide
Shares of oil marketing firms dropped between 0.6 per cent and 2 per cent on Thursday amid a weak broader market. The Nifty 50 index was down 0.6 per cent, and Reliance Industries' stock slipped 1 per cent following new tariff announcements from the United States, Reuters reported.
US imposes steep tariffs on India
The US has launched a new wave of tariffs targeting dozens of countries, with India facing some of the highest hikes. A 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods came into force on Thursday under a directive signed last week by President Donald Trump.
In a further escalation, Trump announced an additional 25 per cent duty specifically targeting India's energy ties with Russia — effectively doubling the tariff burden on Indian exports to 50 per cent. The second round of tariffs is scheduled to take effect on August 27.
What's in the executive order?
The latest order, titled 'Further Modifying the Reciprocal Tariff Rates', outlines revised duties on exports from nearly 70 countries:
• India: 50 per cent (after both rounds)
• Laos, Myanmar: 40 per cent
• Pakistan: 19 per cent
• Sri Lanka: 20 per cent
• UK: 10 per cent
• Japan: 15 per cent
The White House has accused India of violating sanctions through its 'direct or indirect' imports of Russian crude oil, arguing that such trade undermines efforts to isolate Moscow amid the Ukraine war. 'The Government of India is currently directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil,' the executive order stated.
Trump justified the move under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, claiming the action is 'necessary and appropriate' to address the threat from Russia and uphold emergency measures first announced in 2022.
What's covered and what's exempt
Goods that are already shipped or cleared before September 17 will not face the new duties. But for everything else, the 25 per cent surcharge will apply on top of existing tariffs.
Economic impact: Growth under stress
According to Goldman Sachs, the fresh tariff hike could slow India's economic growth. The firm estimates a 0.3 percentage point drop in annualised GDP growth, in addition to the 0.3 pp hit already expected from the earlier April 2025 tariffs.
Once various exemptions are factored in, Goldman projects that the effective average tariff rate on Indian exports to the US will rise to around 32 per cent.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump has 9 drug cartels on hit list; sends US army to neutralize them in urgent order
President Donald Trump is pushing the Department of Defense to use military action against drug cartels that have been designated as foreign terrorist organizations. The New York Times cited sources to report on Friday that Trump's secret order gives authorization for potential military operations against such cartels in international waters and on foreign soil. This comes only weeks after the State Department issued a list of terrorist-designated cartels, dubbed as Trump's 'hit list'. President Donald Trump signs a proclamation declaring National Purple Heart Day in the East Room of the White House(AP) The NYT report added that Trump's decision to bring the US army into the fight is the 'most aggressive step so far' in his campaign against the cartels. 'It signals Mr. Trump's continued willingness to use military forces to carry out what has primarily been considered a law enforcement responsibility to curb the flow of fentanyl and other illegal drugs,' the publication added. Read More: 'Will be 1929... GREAT DEPRESSION': Trump warns of consequences if tariffs overturned In a February press release, the State Department and Marco Rubio stated that over 9 cartels were designated terrorist organizations. They included Tren de Aragua, Mara Salvatrucha (MS-13), Cártel de Sinaloa, Cártel de Jalisco Nueva Generación, Cártel del Noreste (formerly Los Zetas), La Nueva Familia Michoacana, Cártel de Golfo (Gulf Cartel), and Cárteles Unidos. None of these cartels have issued a reaction to Trump's latest order. White House Deputy Press Secretary Anna Kelly explained to NYT that the secret directive justifies President Trump's 'top priority is protecting the homeland'. 'President Trump's top priority is protecting the homeland, which is why he took the bold step to designate several cartels and gangs as foreign terrorist organizations.' The Defense Department has not commented on the new directive. Read More: The Trump Organization has partnered with leading Indian developers, earning nearly 175 cr from seven projects: Report Earlier this year, the State Department said that 'terrorist designations play a critical role in our fight against terrorism and are an effective way to curtail support for terrorist activities'. 'The intent of designating these cartels and transnational organizations as terrorists is to protect our nation, the American people, and our hemisphere. That means stopping the campaigns of violence and terror by these vicious groups both in the United States and internationally. These designations provide law enforcement additional tools to stop these groups.'
Hans India
26 minutes ago
- Hans India
Khalistan embassy in Canada: A brazen provocation that Ottawa still won't confront
New Delhi: Having failed to make any sort of impact in India, the pro-Khalistan elements have made Canada their playground for several years now. In fact, ties between India and Canada have turned sour and fragile owing to this issue. New Delhi has accused Canada of shielding Khalistan elements who are counterproductive to India's security interests. Now, to make matters worse, a so-called Embassy of the Republic of Khalistan has opened up in Surrey, British Columbia. This development is a further irritant in the already fragile ties between India and Canada. While under Justin Trudeau, ties had nosedived, a change of Prime Minister in Canada did re-ignite some hope for relations between the two countries. Under Mark Carney, relations seemed to be moving forward in the right direction. However, the pro-Khalistan elements wield too much influence, which makes it hard for any party in the country to ignore them. The so-called embassy is located at the Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara, once led by Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a designated terrorist in India. It was his murder that ignited diplomatic tensions. The opening of this embassy is not just worrisome, but is a brazen act by these elements who are part of terror organisations, narcotic cartels, and gangs. Canada has not yet reacted to this development. The Indian High Commission in Ottawa had issued a statement condemning the move. It said that this is a direct threat to India's sovereignty. The High Commission also called upon Canada to act against such elements. What is more ironic is that there is no word on this development from David Eby, the Premier of British Columbia. The embassy is said to have received funding of USD 150,000 from the state. British Columbia has an NDP government, a party that, until recently headed by Jagmeet Singh, who was an ally of Trudeau and a known Khalistan sympathiser. India has provided proof in the form of several dossiers about the activities of these elements. There is ample proof to suggest that those sitting in Canada are running the terror-gangster nexus that operates largely in India. However, Canada has refused to blink and, at one time, accused India of having a hand behind the killing of Nijjar. The question is why can't Canada act against these dangerous elements? For one, politicians in Canada have recognised these elements not as terrorists, but as legitimate political non-violent people. Signages seeking a Khalistan state and referendums by these persons are seen as a non-violent expression. The biggest reason for the stoic silence is vote bank politics. Canada's legal framework places a high value on freedom of expression that is protected under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This is exactly what the Khalistani elements use to term themselves as legitimate activities. Canada has also, on several occasions, said that this is about freedom of speech and hence no action can be taken against them. The Canadian Security Intelligence Service had in 2024 said that non-violent advocacy for an independent state of Khalistan cannot be considered extremism. However, in 2024, the same agency had said that Khalistanis pose a threat. It went on to say that Khalistani extremists continue to use Canada as a base for promotion, fundraising, or planning of violence in India. This was a major shift in approach, but on the ground, nothing seems to have changed. As per the 2021 census, the population of Sikhs in Canada stood at 7.7 lakh. This is something that politicians cannot ignore, as these are sizeable vote banks and also have immense influence in the country. While a majority of this Sikh population does not subscribe to the Khalistan ideology, there are a few who think otherwise. Although smaller in number, Canadian politicians want to take no chances when it comes to elections. Can India and Canada remain quiet about this and let relations strain further? The answer is no. India and Canada will have to act upon these elements. Canada, in particular, has recognised the problem, but is yet to act on it. Indian officials will realise the gravity on when the Khalistan elements spill on the streets and hurt Canadian interests. It has been happening gradually, but the question is -- how long will Canada wait?
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Assam CM accuses Mamata of creating NRC fear for political gain
Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Thursday (August 7, 2025) criticised his West Bengal counterpart Mamata Banerjee for 'trying to scare the Bengali people by dangling the sword of the National Register of Citizens (NRC)' ahead of the 2026 Assembly elections. Assembly elections in Assam and West Bengal are due early next year. Mr. Sarma said Ms. Banerjee's concerns over the NRC were unfounded. 'She suddenly says she is not going to obey the NRC. Who has asked her to obey the NRC? Where is the NRC? Nobody has ordered the NRC,' he told journalists in Guwahati on Thursday (August 7, 2025) night. 'She is instilling fear in the minds of Bengali people to get their votes. In the last five years, she has not discussed the NRC. Now, she is talking about all these things as the elections are approaching,' he said. Ms. Banerjee has been flagging some 'NRC' notices issued to residents of West Bengal, mostly Bengali Hindus, by Foreigners' Tribunals (FTs) in Assam. One such case was that of Uttam Kumar Brajabasi, a resident of Dinhata in Cooch Behar for 50 years. Mr. Sarma claimed Mr. Brajabasi was a citizen of Assam who had temporarily gone to West Bengal, and that the notice issued to him was part of a judicial process. Refuting reports, the Chief Minister also said the Assam government had not taken any 'special decision' to drop the cases of non-Muslim illegal migrants, who entered India from Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Pakistan before 2015, from the FTs. 'The State Cabinet did decide to drop the cases of Koch-Rajbanshi and Gurkha people from the FTs, but there has been no such special decision for the others. The State government has nothing to do additionally for people provided security and protection under the Citizenship (Amendment) Act,' Mr. Sarma said. 'The case [related to the CAA] is in the Supreme Court. Unless the Supreme Court strikes it down, that is the law of the land,' he added. According to official records, as of July 15, eight people in Assam had applied for Indian citizenship under the CAA, and only two had appeared for an interview. The 1951 NRC in Assam was updated under the watch of the Supreme Court. More than 19.06 lakh of the 3.3 crore applicants were left out of the complete draft published in August 2019.
