
Consider Yourself Kissed by Jessica Stanley review – a delightfully grounded romance
There are not many romantic novels that include Brexit, Boris Johnson's ICU stay and the 'Edstone'. Then again, not many political novels begin with a classic meet-cute. Jessica Stanley's UK debut, Consider Yourself Kissed, is – to misquote Dorothy L Sayers – either a political story with romantic interludes, or a romance novel with political interludes. It is also the kind of book that, for a certain kind of reader, will immediately become a treasure.
That meet-cute, then: Coralie, a young Australian copywriter, and Adam, a single dad, swap homes for a single night. Adam looks like a shorter, younger Colin Firth; Coralie waits in vain for him to tell her that she looks 'like Lizzy Bennet, a known fact at school'. Coralie considers Adam's neat bookcase of political biographies, including – to her joy – those of Australian politicians. Adam considers Coralie's piles of 'those green-spine books by women'. They fall in love, books-first, fairly instantly. And the reader who knows immediately that battered green spines mean Virago Press, and that what is being implied by Coralie's careful collection is key to not just her character, but the character of this novel as a whole – that reader will also be irresistibly, hopelessly in love by chapter three. (If this meet-cute does nothing for you, you're in the wrong place.)
This is a book for people who, like Coralie, love Nancy Mitford, the Cazalet Chronicles and The Line of Beauty. (Maybe also a hint of Kate Atkinson in the liberal use of ironic parentheses?) That these are Stanley's literary inspirations is so evident that her novel almost feels like a kind of homage: not just in the funny, brisk, tender texture of her writing, but also in the upper middle-class world she details with such care. There is a clear Elizabeth Jane Howard-ness to Stanley's fine latticework of family relationships and objects, and the way those objects – for example, the precisely detailed contents of Adam's daughter's backpack ('Five pens, two notebooks, a little skateboard … a fawn soft toy dog with enormous eyes, some shriveled conkers, and a slim work of Usborne nonfiction called Animals at War') - build up to a precise evocation of time and place. What Alan Hollinghurst did with a wedding-cake pile in Notting Hill, Stanley now does for a terrace house in Hackney. (Such is London. Such is inflation.) Adam's house – which becomes, practically if not strictly speaking financially, Coralie's also – is a lovely and enviable place. There are artistic lesbian grandmothers to paint scenes (from Animals at War, obviously!) on bedroom doors; vintage baby-changing tables; pink workrooms and yellow nurseries.
And yet within this rarefied world, there are clear cracks: one might even say universal cracks, of the kind that not even adoring Adam and cautious Coralie can intellectualise. It is hard to write about the unfairness of Adam and Coralie's relationship without wanting to excuse it, somehow, on behalf of two fictional characters. Adam just wants to succeed! He's trying! When Coralie tells him to change, he tries! They make each other (and the reader) laugh; have great sex; are intellectual and emotional equals! I loved Adam; I loved Coralie; I loved their relationship and their family and their life. But when Coralie storms out to sleep in 'what used to be … the spare room, but which (somehow) … had become Adam's study', that '(somehow)' leaps off the page. (I have long noticed that in a house with one spare room and a heterosexual couple who both work from home, the spare room is where he works – with a door that shuts and perhaps even a designated desk – and she works somewhere else. Always for good reasons, but always.)
Coralie knows all of this. She has 'read novels' about this. And yet it's happening to her. 'How could the world … be made fair,' she wonders, 'when two people who loved each other couldn't even manage a life?' This is a book about making a better world, globally and domestically – and whether, perhaps, those two might amount to the same thing.
Stanley is clearly deeply interested in global affairs – her first novel, published only in Australia, detailed the death of a cabinet minister – and it does not always work seamlessly for the regular reader. Sentences that begin, 'Sadly, developments in 2020 …' can feel more lecture than pleasure: I hate to think about Brexit as much as Adam wants to mention Brexit. And yet by grounding the novel in such a specific time and place, Stanley makes us believe that at least for these two characters – and perhaps the rest of us, too – the political and personal are inextricably braided together. How can we make a better world? How can we be better to each other? Perhaps, then, Consider Yourself Kissed is neither truly a romance novel nor a political novel – merely a very human novel. And a very good one.
Consider Yourself Kissed by Jessica Stanley is published by Hutchinson Heinemann (£16.99). To support the Guardian and the Observer buy a copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.
Sign up to Bookmarks
Discover new books and learn more about your favourite authors with our expert reviews, interviews and news stories. Literary delights delivered direct to you
after newsletter promotion
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Starmer's attack on Reform's irresponsible policies could backfire
For a politician who has done more than most to shape modern Britain, nothing seems to stick to Nigel Farage. Not the chaos of the post-Brexit referendum years; or the contradiction of his closed-border English nationalism combined with a fondness for courting nomad capitalists from Malaysia to Mar-a-Lago. This is, of course, because the Reform UK leader is the agitator-in-chief. He has prodded successive prime ministers into action, but has not been in the driving seat himself. Things though are changing. When Keir Starmer turned his guns on Reform last week, blasting the party's 'fantasy economics', he made clear that Farage is now Labour's most serious rival. While Kemi Badenoch has led the Conservatives into increasing irrelevance, Reform has marched on to once traditional Labour ground on the economy, while keeping a rightwing stance on immigration and culture. It is clear that Farage sees an opening to peel support away from both traditional parties at once. It is no fantasy to suggest that Farage, riding high in opinion polls, could become prime minister. He should expect heightened scrutiny of his policies as a result, not least on economic policy, where there are serious questions marks over whether Reform's tax and spending plans add up. However, something is lost in the argument about Farageonomics. Not only are the party's numbers hardly better than scribblings on the back of one of its leader's umpteen fag packets, but there is a more fundamental problem: his plans would not help the communities that Reform claims to champion. Yes, scrapping the two-child limit on benefits, introduced by the Conservatives but maintained by Labour – something Farage promised he would do – would be welcome. At least 350,000 children would be lifted out of poverty overnight, at a cost of £2bn – barely a rounding error in the government's more than £1tn of annual spending. Why Labour has not taken this step is a mystery. There is the tight position of public finances, but perhaps also a political calculation that Reform-curious voters are among the majority of people who tell opinion pollsters that benefits eligibility is too lax. As is clear from recent weeks, Britain's attitudes are not that simple to triangulate. Labour has made a grave political error in reckoning otherwise. Farage's other policies remain straight from the right-wing, free-market libertarian playbook. They would help working-class families little, and the super-rich a lot. Central to Reform's election manifesto was a plan to cut £60bn from income tax. It would raise the personal allowance from £12,750 at present to £20,000 a year, while lifting the 40% higher-rate threshold from £50,271 to £70,000. Unspecified welfare cuts worth £15bn also feature – a sum three times larger than the savings Labour is pushing to find from the disability and incapacity support bill, which has provoked nationwide anger. Lifting more people out of tax altogether might sound beneficial for poorer households, and for many it would be. However, most of the gains from these vastly expensive policy changes would flow to the rich. According to analysis by the IPPR thinktank, raising the personal allowance would come with a cost to the exchequer of at least £40bn a year, and hand the poorest 20% of households an extra £380 on average in annual household disposable income. However, the richest fifth would get a vast £2,400 extra. Changes to the higher-rate threshold would cost the exchequer about £18bn a year, and would benefit the poorest fifth of families by just £17. The richest, again, would get a much bigger boost, of £2,700. Taken together, the top 10% of households would get 28p for every £1 of cash forgone by the exchequer, while the bottom 10% would receive only 2p. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Where in Britain would the winners and losers be from these vast distributive changes? For those with the biggest gains, look no further than London, home to 47 out of 50 local areas with the highest incomes before housing costs, according to the latest official figures, including Westminster, Kensington and Chelsea, Wandsworth and Camden. Of the 50 areas with the lowest incomes, more than half are in Yorkshire and the Humber, with a further quarter in the East Midlands, places where Reform has gained the most ground in the opinion polls. Those in Farage's constituency of Clacton, where average earnings are £25,670 a year, would gain far less than in the leafy London commuter belt seat of Orpington, where the Reform leader has a £1m property and typical pay is £41,385 a year. In defence of Farage, something resembling an opposition to Labour's vast parliamentary majority is not a bad thing. Starmer should not be surprised that the poorest communities in Britain are deserting Labour. Promising 'change', then continuing as the Tories did, with high-profile benefit cuts, will do that. Starmer's attack on Farage's fiscally irresponsible stancemay highlight Labour's discipline but could also backfire. Voters are of course keen for the numbers to add up – nobody would relish another Liz Truss moment- but Labour's attack is reminiscent of the ill-fated Project Fear – as opponents named the campaign to stay in the EU – and risks reinforcing a sense that the party has lost its purpose in the depths of a Treasury spreadsheet. Where the prime minister should focus is on using words and deeds to show the country's poorest communities that Labour can change things for the better, in contrast to the cod working-class values of his shape-shifting opponent.


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Home and Away star finds love after 'unhealthy' relationship with co-star ex
Home and Away star Sarah Roberts has revealed that she has finally found love again with a new man following her 'unhealthy' marriage to soap co-star James Stewart Home and Away star Sarah Roberts has revealed that she has finally found love again, following her tumultuous marriage with co-star James Stewart. The TV star, 40, who played Willow Harris in the Australian soap, split from James last year and described their relationship as something that "wasn't healthy." But now, Sarah admitted that she has fallen in love with a new man who allows her "to grow in beautiful and unexpected ways." Speaking on the Stellar's Something to Talk About podcast, she said: "I've fallen in love with a man, I'm so in love. I finally found myself, as clichéd as that may sound." Soon after the couple called time on their marriage, reports surfaced that he too had found love again with fellow Home and Away star Ada Nicodemou. And while Sarah appeared to beam with delight when talking about her new love, it seems dealing with her split in the public eye took its toll. She explained: "Dealing with it in the spotlight, and then everything that came out in the media after, absolutely ripped my heart into a million little pieces. But I can't change anyone else's actions or the way people behave. What I can take responsibility for is the way that I feel." She said: "And I know that hurt people hurt people, but healed people can heal people – and I'm so happy with where I'm at today. I've finally found a love for myself which I didn't have. I have beaten myself up for a long time over the fact I stayed in something that wasn't healthy." Sarah found fame after landing the role of Willow in the Aussie soap between 2017 and 2021. But despite leaving the soap, it seems Sarah still has ties to the cast. Back in February Sarah told Daily Mail Australia: "One of my best friends was one of my cast mates on Neighbours. That goes way back. Another one of my best friends, Emily Weir, she's from Home and Away." She added: "I've also made friends with a lot of the new cast from Home and Away because Emily is friends with them and we all hang out together. I just had my 40th birthday party at the end of last year and I had a party on a boat on the Sydney Harbour. It was full of a lot of the Home and Away cast. I get really close to people and really value my friendships.' Sarah continued: "You share so many deep dark secrets about yourself and you have to develop a lot of trust between each other. That lends itself to strong friendships." While Sarah craved out a career for herself in Australian soaps, it looks as though she has now set her ambitions on landing a role on a HBO series in Hollywood. She told the publication: "My next dream it would be to book a television show where I'm in a contract for five years. I would like that to be a character I can sink my teeth into. " Sarah added: "I'm not sure I'd want to do another soap. I would have loved to have done something like Breaking Bad or Game of Thrones. That would be a dream job for me."

The National
2 hours ago
- The National
No one more to blame for cost of living crisis than Nigel Farage
Flynn claimed that no one is more responsible for the cost-of-living crisis, which independent analysis has previously shown that Brexit was among the leading causes, than Farage. Flynn has called on Farage to apologies to Scots ahead of his visit to Scotland on Monday, claiming that the Reform leader is the cause of the cost-of-living crisis and not the solution. He said: 'People feel that the economy isn't working for them right now, and it's no wonder given the mess the UK is in – but nobody has contributed to that mess more than Nigel Farage. 'For decades, Farage was Brexit's biggest champion, and we all know it has made us poorer. All the data and research backs this up – and people across Scotland feel it every time they go to the shops or pay their bills.' Farage was an integral part of the campaign to leave the EU and claimed that the UK spent an alleged £350m on EU membership which would be freed up for the NHS. (Image: Newsquest) However, just hours after the Brexit vote in 2016, Farage backpedaled his claim, which had been repeatedly criticised as inaccurate by the UK Statistics Authority. Prominent economists have cited Brexit as one of the main reasons for soaring bills and rising food costs, with the Office of Budget Responsibility (OBR) stating in October last year that the UK's status outside the single market is costing the UK economy billions of pounds every year. Flynn added: 'Farage is the cause of the cost of living crisis, not the solution. He should have apologised to the people of Scotland long ago for the damage inflicted by Brexit – and he should take the opportunity to apologise when he makes his daytrip to Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse tomorrow. 'Compare Farage's record of decimating living standards to the SNP's record of delivery: cutting living costs through free prescriptions, restored Winter Fuel Payments, and scrapping Peak Rail Fares. 'Only the SNP are supporting people through the cost of living crisis and only the SNP are standing up to Farage and his brand of politics.' Analysis by the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR) published in January found that Brexit had 'permanently diminished trade efficiency in the UK by introducing customs checks, rules of origin requirements, and regulatory divergence from the EU.' It said: 'These barriers increase costs for both exporters and importers.' Ahead of Farage's visit to Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse, the SNP's candidate for the by-election in the constituency, Katy Loudon, said people in the area already know the damage the Reform leader has caused to the UK. (Image: PA) She said: 'Nigel Farage has done more than most to harm Scotland's economy and send costs soaring for Scottish households. 'People across this constituency know the damage he has caused because they feel it everyday in higher prices, but the once architect of Brexit is now portraying himself as the answer to the challenges facing people across Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse.