Menendez brothers resentenced, parole now possible
LOS ANGELES: Lyle and Erik Menendez, who have spent more than three decades behind bars for the grisly shotgun murders of their parents in the family's luxury Beverly Hills home, could soon walk free after a judge on Tuesday reduced their life sentences. The ruling came after an emotional court hearing in Los Angeles during which the men took full responsibility for the 1989 double killing.
"I do believe they've done enough over the last 35 years that one day they should get that chance" to be freed, Judge Michael Jesic said. Jesic reduced the men's original sentences of life without the possibility of parole to a term of 50 years to life. The time they have already spent behind bars means they are already eligible to apply for parole, with a hearing scheduled for next month. The pair have spent two years trying to get their sentences reduced, with a public campaign bolstered by celebrity support from the likes of Kim Kardashian and supercharged by the hit Netflix miniseries "Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story."
Blockbuster trials in the 1990s heard how the men killed Jose and Kitty Menendez in their Beverly Hills mansion, in what prosecutors said was a cynical attempt to get their hands on a large family fortune. After setting up alibis and trying to cover their tracks, the men shot Jose Menendez five times with shotguns, including in the kneecaps. Kitty Menendez died from a shotgun blast as she tried desperately to crawl away from her killers.
The brothers initially blamed the deaths on a mafia hit, but changed their story several times in the ensuing months. Erik, then 18, confessed to the murders in a session with his therapist. The pair ultimately claimed they had acted in self-defense after years of emotional and sexual abuse at the hands of a tyrannical father. During their decades in prison, changing social mores and greater awareness of sexual abuse helped elevate the men to something approaching cultural icons, a status that was nourished by a parade of docudramas and TV miniseries. Legal hearings have been so popular that court managers used a lottery system for the public gallery.
'Full responsibility'
On Tuesday, Lyle Menendez, now aged 57, addressed the court via videolink, admitting he had murdered his parents. "I take full responsibility for all my choices ... the choice to point a gun at my mom and dad... the choice to reload... the choice to run and to hide and to do anything I could to get away," he said, according to reporters who were in court. His brother, Erik, 54, told the court he had been wrong to take the law into his own hands and said his actions were cruel and cowardly. "I have no excuse, no justification. I take full responsibility," he said. "I reached out to my brother for help and convinced him that we couldn't escape. "I fired five rounds at my parents and went to get more ammunition. I lied to police, lied to my family. I am truly sorry."
The men's family had earlier pleaded with the judge to show mercy, showcasing the work they have done in prison, including working with terminally ill inmates. Their cousin Anamaria Baralt told the hearing they were reformed and had earned their freedom. "We believe that 35 years is enough," she said. "They are universally forgiven by our family. They deserve a second chance at life."
Diane Hernandez, niece of Kitty Menendez, said the brothers were "remarkable human beings." "There is absolutely no chance that they would break the law" if released, she said. "Their only desire is to do good." Los Angeles District Attorney Nathan Hochman had opposed the resentencing, insisting that without a full accounting of the lies they had told — he said they gave five explanations for the murders — they should not be allowed out of prison. Under California law, if a parole board recommends the grant of parole for someone convicted of murder, Governor Gavin Newsom has the right to affirm, reverse or modify their decision. — AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
14-05-2025
- Kuwait Times
Menendez brothers resentenced, parole now possible
LOS ANGELES: Lyle and Erik Menendez, who have spent more than three decades behind bars for the grisly shotgun murders of their parents in the family's luxury Beverly Hills home, could soon walk free after a judge on Tuesday reduced their life sentences. The ruling came after an emotional court hearing in Los Angeles during which the men took full responsibility for the 1989 double killing. "I do believe they've done enough over the last 35 years that one day they should get that chance" to be freed, Judge Michael Jesic said. Jesic reduced the men's original sentences of life without the possibility of parole to a term of 50 years to life. The time they have already spent behind bars means they are already eligible to apply for parole, with a hearing scheduled for next month. The pair have spent two years trying to get their sentences reduced, with a public campaign bolstered by celebrity support from the likes of Kim Kardashian and supercharged by the hit Netflix miniseries "Monsters: The Lyle and Erik Menendez Story." Blockbuster trials in the 1990s heard how the men killed Jose and Kitty Menendez in their Beverly Hills mansion, in what prosecutors said was a cynical attempt to get their hands on a large family fortune. After setting up alibis and trying to cover their tracks, the men shot Jose Menendez five times with shotguns, including in the kneecaps. Kitty Menendez died from a shotgun blast as she tried desperately to crawl away from her killers. The brothers initially blamed the deaths on a mafia hit, but changed their story several times in the ensuing months. Erik, then 18, confessed to the murders in a session with his therapist. The pair ultimately claimed they had acted in self-defense after years of emotional and sexual abuse at the hands of a tyrannical father. During their decades in prison, changing social mores and greater awareness of sexual abuse helped elevate the men to something approaching cultural icons, a status that was nourished by a parade of docudramas and TV miniseries. Legal hearings have been so popular that court managers used a lottery system for the public gallery. 'Full responsibility' On Tuesday, Lyle Menendez, now aged 57, addressed the court via videolink, admitting he had murdered his parents. "I take full responsibility for all my choices ... the choice to point a gun at my mom and dad... the choice to reload... the choice to run and to hide and to do anything I could to get away," he said, according to reporters who were in court. His brother, Erik, 54, told the court he had been wrong to take the law into his own hands and said his actions were cruel and cowardly. "I have no excuse, no justification. I take full responsibility," he said. "I reached out to my brother for help and convinced him that we couldn't escape. "I fired five rounds at my parents and went to get more ammunition. I lied to police, lied to my family. I am truly sorry." The men's family had earlier pleaded with the judge to show mercy, showcasing the work they have done in prison, including working with terminally ill inmates. Their cousin Anamaria Baralt told the hearing they were reformed and had earned their freedom. "We believe that 35 years is enough," she said. "They are universally forgiven by our family. They deserve a second chance at life." Diane Hernandez, niece of Kitty Menendez, said the brothers were "remarkable human beings." "There is absolutely no chance that they would break the law" if released, she said. "Their only desire is to do good." Los Angeles District Attorney Nathan Hochman had opposed the resentencing, insisting that without a full accounting of the lies they had told — he said they gave five explanations for the murders — they should not be allowed out of prison. Under California law, if a parole board recommends the grant of parole for someone convicted of murder, Governor Gavin Newsom has the right to affirm, reverse or modify their decision. — AFP
Arab Times
19-03-2025
- Arab Times
Hollywood director arrested for swindling Netflix out of $11M
NEW YORK, March 19, (AP): A Hollywood writer-director was arrested Tuesday on charges that he swindled $11 million from Netflix for a sci-fi show that never aired, instead steering the cash toward cryptocurrency investments and a series of lavish purchases that included a fleet of Rolls-Royces and a Ferrari. Carl Erik Rinsch - perhaps best known for directing the film "47 Ronin" - has been charged with wire fraud and money laundering over what federal prosecutors allege was a scheme to defraud the streaming giant. Prosecutors said Netflix had initially paid about $44 million to purchase an unfinished show called "White Horse" from Rinsch, but eventually doled out another $11 million after he said he needed the additional cash to complete the show. Rather than using the extra money to wrap up production, Rinsch quietly transferred the money to a personal brokerage account, where he made a series of failed investments that lost about half of the $11 million in two months, according to prosecutors. The filmmaker then dumped the rest of the money into the cryptocurrency market, which proved to be a profitable move, with Rinsch eventually transferring the earnings into a personal bank account, according to an indictment. From there, Rinsch spent about $10 million on personal expenses and luxury items in a spending spree that, according to prosecutors, included about $1.8 million on credit card bills; $1 million on lawyers to sue Netflix for more money; $3.8 million on furniture and antiques; $2.4 million for five Rolls-Royces and one Ferrari; and $652,000 on watches and clothes. Rinsch, 47, was arrested in West Hollywood, California, and had an initial court hearing on Tuesday. He appeared in a federal courtroom in Los Angeles in a turtleneck sweater and jeans with shackles on his arms and legs. He did not enter a plea and spoke only to answer a judge's questions. When asked if he'd read the indictment against him, he said "not cover to cover' but told the judge he understood the charges. U.S. Magistrate Judge Pedro V. Castillo ordered that he be released later Tuesday after he agreed to post a $100,000 bond to assure he'll appear in court in New York, where his indictment was filed. His newly appointed attorney, Annie Carney, declined to comment outside court. She said during the hearing that she had not yet seen the prosecution's evidence against Rinsch. When discussing the terms of his release, she said, "the allegations in this case are purely financial.' Rinsch's New York court date had not yet been set.
Arab Times
22-02-2025
- Arab Times
Netflix series on wellness blogger's cancer hoax sparks fresh outrage
WELLINGTON, New Zealand, Feb 22, (AP): A decade after wellness influencer Belle Gibson admitted she didn't have terminal brain cancer, which she claimed was cured by the healthy lifestyle that made her famous, her story has inspired a new Netflix series - and fresh outrage in Australia about the case's lack of resolution. Authorities said this week they're still pursuing the disgraced Instagram star for unpaid fines, fueling ongoing ire among Australians about one of the country's most brazen online scams - an episode that drew attention to the destructive harms of false health claims on social media. Apple Cider Vinegar, Netflix's dramatic retelling of Gibson's story released this month, doesn't recount what happened after it was revealed in 2015 that she wasn't sick. In real life, she never faced criminal charges. But in 2017, Australia's federal court fined her 410,000 Australian dollars ($261,000), which she had raised for charity and failed to donate. The consumer watchdog in the state of Victoria is still trying to recover the funds, a spokesperson told The Associated Press. Gibson's healthy recipe app, The Whole Pantry, had 200,000 downloads in one month from the Apple store in 2013. She claimed proceeds from the app and her cookbook - published by a Penguin imprint - would be donated to charities and to the family of a child with cancer. Only 2% of the total was donated and Gibson was found to have breached consumer law. A court ordered her to produce the remaining funds and barred her from making health claims. In a letter to the court, Gibson said she was in debt, didn't have a job and couldn't pay the costs. "Consumer Affairs Victoria has continued to undertake actions to enforce the debt owed by Annabelle Natalie Gibson (Belle Gibson) under court order,' said a statement from the agency that was supplied on Wednesday. The statement did not say if any of the money has been recovered. Authorities have raided Gibson's home twice in attempts to seize assets, but they didn't publicly divulge an outcome. The AP tried to reach Gibson for comment but didn't receive a response. She hasn't spoken publicly in years and wasn't involved with, or paid by, the creators of the Netflix show. Jacinta Allan, the premier of Victoria, said this month she was "disappointed' the case remains unresolved. But the authorities "won't let up,' Allan told reporters. Journalist Richard Guilliatt, who in 2015 was the first to report that Gibson was lying, said the lack of legal consequences still fuels "vitriol' toward the erstwhile influencer. "The thing remains sort of like an open wound,' he said. "What she has suffered is just incredible public humiliation. There's a part of me that thinks people are just going to have to let it go at some point.' Gibson's book publisher paid a $30,000 ($19,000 US) fine in the civil case for failing to fact-check her claims. While Gibson hasn't faced more charges, her case had other repercussions. Australia's code governing therapeutic health claims was dramatically overhauled in 2022 and breaches can now be punished by millions of dollars in fines - changes some analysts attribute in part to Gibson's conduct. Paid testimonials for such goods are now prohibited, and anyone claiming health expertise cannot endorse them. "This would have applied to the therapeutic claims that Belle made,' said Suzy Madar, a Sydney-based partner at the law firm King & Wood Mallesons. Apple Cider Vinegar has drawn praise for its skewering of online wellness culture - and criticism from Australians involved in the real-life events it recounts. The series is billed as a "true-ish story, based on a lie,' and Gibson is the only real person the show purports to depict. But Queensland man Col Ainscough, whose wife and daughter - also a wellness influencer - both died of cancer decried the production in a statement this month, because its characters included a family with a different name whose story appeared to parallel his own. The show was "insensitive and clearly profit-driven,' Ainscough said. "Behind the TV stories, behind the dramatization, are real people who have had their lives devastated by the actions of this individual,' Allan, the state premier, told reporters. But the case still holds fascination as one of Australia's most "bizarre and flagrant' online scams, reporter Guilliatt said. "I like to think that it really was a wake-up call for a lot of people,' he said. "I hope it's had an impact in terms of people's gullibility about accepting advice on very serious health conditions online.'
