Egypt calls for stronger central bank cooperation, local currency use at BRICS summit
Speaking on behalf of President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi, Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly said the world was suffering from complex crises and a decline in multilateralism, and that BRICS countries should bolster their financial and economic ties to face these challenges.
'We must enhance cooperation between the central banks of the BRICS countries and advance our efforts in enabling financial settlements in local currencies, in line with the BRICS cross-border payments initiative,' Madbouly told a session titled 'Enhancing Multilateralism, Economic and Financial Affairs, and Artificial Intelligence.'
Madbouly stated that the world is experiencing a decline in the effectiveness of the international system, while developing countries are suffering from rising debt service burdens, inflation, and difficulty in accessing concessional financing for infrastructure projects.
'This situation has been further complicated by geopolitical tensions and conflicts, especially in the Middle East, which has resulted in other challenges such as illegal immigration and the displacement of populations,' he said.
Madbouly said that Egypt believes in the need to strengthen the multilateral system, with the United Nations at its core, and highlighted several priorities for the BRICS group.
He noted that the development finance gap for developing countries has exceeded $4 trillion annually and stressed the role of the BRICS New Development Bank (NDB) in providing concessional financing, particularly in local currencies.
The prime minister also emphasised the important role of the private sector and the need to enhance links between businesses in BRICS countries and partner nations to implement joint projects in energy, manufacturing, and agriculture.
On technology, Madbouly said Egypt welcomed the Brazilian presidency's efforts in drafting the 'BRICS Leaders' Declaration on Global Governance of Artificial Intelligence,' calling it a solid foundation for cooperation. He said BRICS nations need to formulate an effective roadmap for knowledge and technology transfer, as well as capacity building in advanced and emerging technologies, especially AI.
In his closing remarks, the prime minister reiterated Egypt's full commitment to enhancing joint cooperation with BRICS member states to achieve their common goals.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
UN Security Council members disagree on when to lift Syria sanctions
A potential dispute is widening among UN Security Council members over sanctions on Syria, with some opposing a US-led drive to lift all restrictions on Damascus. President Donald Trump last month ordered an easing of sanctions on Syria but as some US measures require an act of Congress to be wiped, several Security Council designations remain in place. The US sees full and immediate sanctions relief as vital to stabilising and rebuilding Syria after a 14-year civil war ended in December with the removal of president Bashar Al Assad. His defeat was led by Hayat Tahrir Al Sham (HTS), which once had ties to Al Qaeda and has been on the US sanctions list since 2014 - though its designation as a foreign terrorist organisation was revoked this month. Several HTS members including Syria's interim President Ahmad Al Shara remain subject to a travel ban, frozen assets and other measures. The US this week urged the Security Council to review its sanctions on Mr Al Shara and HTS, saying changes were necessary to support Damascus in its fight against terrorism, including ISIS and Al Qaeda-linked groups. Dorothy Shea, acting US ambassador to the UN, said Washington was working with council members to address the Syria-related sanctions, stressing the government in Damascus had demonstrated a commitment to combat extremist threats. The 36th UN report of the Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team said that while no operational ties between HTS and Al Qaeda had been observed, some member nations raised concerns that other members, particularly those in tactical positions or absorbed into the newly formed Syrian army, remained ideologically loyal to Al Qaeda. Ms Shea called on the Security Council to adjust its sanctions so 'the Syrian government can prevail in the fight against terrorism, while keeping the most dangerous and unrepentant actors designated". The report estimated more than 5,000 foreign 'terrorist fighters' remain at large in Syria, posing a threat to regional stability. 'Member states noted the complexity of the issue and expressed concern that efforts to legitimise foreign terrorist fighters may regularise their status in the Syrian Arab Republic without reducing their threat,' the report notes. Some foreign terrorist fighters – in particular those from Central Asia- retained 'external ambitions' and were dissatisfied with the interim government's approach. Several council members, including Russia, China and France, advocate a more measured approach to lifting sanctions, with Beijing the most vocal. 'China's main issue with delisting HTS remains the question of foreign fighters, specifically the presence of Uighur nationalists in Syria, whom they consider an issue of national security concern,' Maya Ungar, a UN analyst at the International Crisis Group, told The National. 'Russia, France and other European countries remain concerned about foreign fighters as well, as there are European, Chechen and Central Asian fighters active in Syria." She noted any compromise on foreign fighters that satisfies the Chinese on the issue is also likely to end up satisfying Russia and France as well. Mr Trump has embraced Mr Al Shara's presidency and during a visit to Saudi Arabia in May he said he would end all sanctions on Syria. But only the US Congress can repeal the Caesar Act, legislation from 2019 that sought to punish the Assad regime. In Washington, recent violence in Syria is fuelling a debate in Congress about whether it should repeal the Caesar Act in full, or adjust it so restrictions can be lifted only if Damascus meets human rights and other benchmarks. Republican Representative Mike Lawler this month introduced a bill that would amend the act to allow it to be waived if the Syrian government is not targeting civilians, among other provisions. The Syrian Emergency Task Force, which works to help build democracy in Syria, urged US legislators to vote against Mr Lawler's bill and push for a clean repeal. Because the Caesar sanctions were placed against the Assad regime, they should by definition be lifted without conditions, Mouaz Moustafa, the task force's executive director, told The National. 'Lifting those sanctions does not mean the US can't sanction Syria, or individuals or groups or whoever in Syria that commits any crimes against any minority,' he said. The Caesar Act currently has a temporary and renewable waiver but Mr Moustafa said the US has a moral obligation to scrap the legislation once and for all. He said using Caesar as leverage over Syria's new government threatens to destabilise Syria and risk further civil war. 'Caesar is not the way to hold the Syrian government accountable for any mistakes it may make, or has made,' Mr Moustafa said. 'Caesar was about Assad. Assad is gone.'
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
US special envoy Steve Witkoff to travel to Israel as hunger grips Gaza
The US special envoy for the Middle East Steve Witkoff is expected to travel to Israel on Thursday, amid increasing international outcry over the humanitarian situation in Gaza. Mr Witkoff "will meet officials to discuss next steps in addressing the situation in Gaza', a US official confirmed. The death toll from Israel's military campaign has now surpassed 60,100 and images of starving children have fuelled anger and concern in many western countries, including the US. President Donald Trump this week conceded 'real starvation' was taking place across Gaza. 'I see it and you can't fake that,' he said. 'We have to get the kids fed.' Hopes for a ceasefire and hostage release deal were dashed last week when Israel and the US walked away from negotiations after receiving Hamas's response to their proposal. Mr Witkoff accused Hamas of acting in a 'selfish way' and not in 'good faith". 'We will now consider alternative options to bring the hostages home and try to create a more stable environment for the people of Gaza,' he said. Washington has yet to say what those alternatives are.
Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump, Starmer, Macron: A theatre of inhumanity
The images are finally breaking through the propaganda fog. Starving children - ribs sharp beneath thinning skin - have made the front pages, from The Daily Express to The New York Times. Aid agencies are now echoing what Palestinians have been shouting for months: this is not a humanitarian crisis. It is a man-made famine. It is genocide, and it is being broadcast in real time. According to Doctors Without Borders, cases of severe malnutrition among children under five in Gaza have tripled in just two weeks. A quarter of the children and pregnant women examined were malnourished. Since May, famine deaths have surged - over 50 in the past week alone. The World Food Programme confirms Gaza receives just 12 percent of the food it needs. A third of the population is going days without eating. Babies are starving, mothers faint and aid convoys are shot at or turned away. Now, the UN-backed Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC) has issued an urgent alert: the "worst-case scenario of famine is currently playing out in the Gaza Strip". New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Famine thresholds for food consumption and acute malnutrition have already been breached. Starvation and disease are accelerating. Without immediate intervention, the outcome is clear: mass death. So how did the self-proclaimed leaders of the free world respond? With cruelty in three dialects. Social engineering at gunpoint US President Donald Trump delivered the blunt-force version: snarling, smirking and fundamentally uninterested in anything that cannot be monetised or golfed on. As skeletal children flickered across screens, Trump lied without blinking and denied there was a famine in Gaza. His team sabotaged ceasefire talks in Doha, blamed Hamas for selfishness and walked away - back to the clubhouse. Trump's indifference is total, playing golf while Gaza withers, he reveals the full rot of his worldview: entitlement, cruelty and a billionaire's disdain for those beneath him Hamas had proposed exactly what the international community demanded: UN-led food distribution, withdrawal of Israeli troops from civilian areas and a permanent ceasefire in exchange for hostages. But that was far too humane for Washington and Tel Aviv. They preferred their aid weaponised, their food politicised and their victims punished for surviving their tons of bombs. The so-called Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a failed Israeli-American "humanitarian" scheme, was put in charge of feeding Gaza. Instead, it helped map out killing zones. Leaked documents detail $2bn "transit camps" to "re-educate" Palestinians - colonisation rebranded in PowerPoint - not relief, rather social engineering at gunpoint. Even Israel's military admits there was no evidence Hamas stole aid. Still, Gaza starves - not by accident, but by design. This is policy, and if anyone was still unsure, Netanyahu clarified: "In any path we choose, we will be forced to allow the entry of minimal humanitarian aid." Not enough. Not urgent. Minimal. Starvation, then, is not collateral; it is a strategy. Relief, drip-fed, outrage managed. This is rationed agony. Suffering, meted out with precision. Trump indifference Meanwhile, in Scotland, teeing off as Gaza collapsed, Trump was not only dodging genocide; he was running from Jeffrey Epstein's shadow. Palestinians - like the trailer park teens in Epstein's Rolodex - do not exist in Trump's gated universe. He sees only property values and dinner reservations. Everything else is expendable. Gaza famine: We hold British institutions accountable for enabling this horror Read More » Trump's indifference is total. Playing golf while Gaza withers, he reveals the full rot of his worldview: entitlement, cruelty and a billionaire's disdain for those beneath him. But he was not finished. Between rounds, Trump moaned: "We sent $60m… nobody acknowledged it… makes you feel a little bad." Apparently, Palestinians should send thank-you cards for the starvation, for the tents torched in the night and the children torn apart by US-made bombs. This is Trump's empathy: crumbs followed by tantrums - the logic of a mob boss. You clap or you get nothing. Trump does not just deny famine, he mocks it and downgrades it to "probably malnutrition". He lies again about Hamas stealing aid, even as Israeli officials admit otherwise. He wants praise for food that never arrived and impunity for the policies that blocked it. Then there is British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, the master of the soft veto. Where Trump bellows, Starmer tiptoes. While tens of thousands chanted for a ceasefire, he released a polished video offering to treat a few injured Palestinian children in Britain. A gesture? Or a stage prop? Behind the sober tone lies staggering complicity. Starmer has done nothing to stop arms exports to Israel, including F-35 jet components. He talks about airdrops as if tossing food from 3,000m is more than a photo op. These drops kill as often as they feed. Starmer plays the reasonable man - all poise, no pressure - as if a well-worded statement could hush the cries from Rafah When asked why Britain will not act, officials shrug: we must follow America. And yet, when Trump abandoned Ukraine, Britain led alone. The difference is not capability; it is will, or rather, its absence. What could Starmer do? Plenty: suspend arms exports, freeze Israeli assets, sanction GHF-linked firms, join South Africa's genocide case at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and even recall the ambassador. He could say the word: genocide. But instead, he plays the reasonable man - all poise, no pressure - as if a well-worded statement could hush the cries from Rafah. He performs concern while the bodies accumulate just behind the curtain. Macron's illusion Then comes French President Emmanuel Macron, cloaked in silk and the language of peace while selling his illusion. He announced France would recognise a Palestinian state. Dramatic? Until you read the fine print: no borders, no capital, no end to occupation, no teeth. It is the same vision floated by Canada's prime minister: a "Zionist Palestinian state" - defanged, demilitarised and designed to grease normalisation deals with Arab states. It is not a state, but a hologram, a soundbite, a mirage. Gaza genocide: The West finds new language - but does nothing to stop Israel Read More » While the Israeli army storms the occupied West Bank, while the Israeli parliament pushes annexation, Macron offers paper recognition. His "support" is sleight of hand, a magician's flourish to distract while the real work of ethnic cleansing proceeds unimpeded. If Macron were serious, he would sanction Israel, freeze reserves in French banks, support the ICJ case and stop arresting French citizens protesting genocide. But seriousness was never the point; performance was. And now, Starmer is following suit, offering to recognise a Palestinian state - not as an unconditional right to the whole of occupied Palestinian land, but as a bargaining chip, dangled only if there is no ceasefire, to politely urge Israel to reconsider its course. Where Macron offered a mirage, Starmer offered a shadow of one - not solidarity, not strategy, just PR in slow motion. Trump sneers, Starmer stage-manages and Macron suavely deceives. As Gaza starves and aid workers plead for a ceasefire, these men deliver rehearsed lines, not rescue. They offer theatre in place of leadership, gestures in place of justice, and euphemisms in place of courage. While Israeli ministers call openly for Gaza's erasure, these men retreat behind velvet curtains, pose for cameras and nod gravely. They are not statesmen. They are performers. Their suits are tailored. Their cowardice, too. Trump is only different in style, not in substance. Where Macron and Starmer lacquer their complicity in diplomacy and euphemism, Trump bellows his out like a wrecking ball - no disguise, just arrogance live-streamed. But the core is the same: a shared, deliberate disregard for Palestinian life, a common indifference to suffering and a unity of inhumanity. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
