logo
Concerns and hopes aired at public debate over Hobart's proposed Macquarie Point stadium

Concerns and hopes aired at public debate over Hobart's proposed Macquarie Point stadium

Cost, location, and the benefits to aspirational young Tasmanians have emerged as key themes during a public forum to debate Hobart's proposed Macquarie Point stadium.
A 70-person crowd filled ABC Hobart's foyer on Wednesday afternoon, made up of those for, against, and undecided over the planned multi-purpose facility.
Tasmania's AFL team being allowed to play in the national competition hinges on a new roofed stadium being built.
It's a key condition of the government's deal with the AFL.
The panel — made up of Tasmania's Business Minister Eric Abetz, the Tasmania Devils AFL team general manager Kath McCann, prominent architect Mat Hinds, and Independent MLC for Elwick Bec Thomas — fielded wide-ranging questions from the public.
Among them, the possibility of renegotiating the terms of the AFL's deal to either move the stadium's location, or scrap it all together.
"But the deal is there for all to see, that is what we are pursuing."
Mr Hinds, an architect with Taylor and Hinds who gave evidence to the parliament's Public Accounts Committee on the stadium's impacts, said the current site was "far too small" for the size of the development.
"The building itself is drawn to fit, but what we're not seeing is all of the energy of that building and its servicing requirements," Mr Hinds said.
"It's 10 metres higher than the Tasman Bridge.
One point of ongoing contention raised by the audience was the cost to build the stadium — a figure estimated by Tasmanian Planning Commission to be about $1 billion.
Earlier this month, the Tasmanian government confirmed it would no longer seek private investment to help fund the stadium, opting instead to fund the construction through existing funding and extra borrowings.
The government plans to sell off the broader Macquarie Point precinct to pay for the loan, which is expected to be in the hundreds of millions.
While acknowledging the stadium and team came at a "big cost", Ms McCann told the crowd the team and the stadium could not be separated, and the economic benefits would bear out.
"When this comes to town, the indirect benefit of new businesses popping up in this state will be enormous," she said.
"I know it feels like the AFL have starved us, but they are setting this club up for success.
Another sticking point raised by the audience was the approval pathway to make the stadium a reality.
The state government has promised to introduce special legislation to allow the stadium to be built, after saying it no longer had faith in the Project of State Significance (POSS) process, which is currently being undertaken by the Tasmanian Planning Commission.
The special enabling legislation hasn't been released, but it is expected to be voted on in June.
Ms Thomas, one of the independent Legislative Council members whose vote will decide if the legislation passes, said cost was "front of mind" in her pending decision.
"If I'm making a decision with my heart, Tasmania deserves a team," she said.
"However … we have to make decisions with our heads.
Lily Mills, a student at the Tasmania Academy of Leadership and Sport, said it would help keep younger people in the state.
"Without the stadium or without the team, how else could the state offer the same standard of opportunities that the Tasmania Football Club has created and will continue to create," Ms Mills said.
Earlier in the day, politicians and the tourism sector also made their views known.
Peak-bodies representing the tourism, events and hospitality sector — the Tasmanian Hospitality Association (THA), Tourism Industry Council Tasmania (TICT), Business Events Tasmania Board and Destination Southern Tasmania — said the "the once in a generation opportunity was too important to lose".
In a joint statement, they urged Tasmanian policymakers to "back the stadium for its critical economic and social value and to create a vibrant entertainment precinct at Macquarie Point".
All six Tasmanian Greens MPs gathered at York Park in Launceston to announce they had written to AFL boss Andrew Dillon on Wednesday asking for the stadium to be dropped as a condition of the licence.
Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff labelled the stadium "a heartless and unfair" condition and called on Premier Jeremy Rockliff to ask the AFL to renegotiate the terms of the deal.
"The train's left the station, the Tasmanian people and our team are onboard, and we're not going to have a stadium with us," Dr Woodruff said.
Meanwhile, independent MPs Miriam Beswick and Rebekah Pentland called on the state and federal governments, along with the AFL, to "find a better way forward".
"The three key players need to sit down and find a way forward that exposes taxpayers to less risk," Ms Beswick and Ms Pentland said in a joint statement.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Legal Practice Board of WA faces parliamentary inquiry amid 'detailed list' of complaints
Legal Practice Board of WA faces parliamentary inquiry amid 'detailed list' of complaints

ABC News

time7 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Legal Practice Board of WA faces parliamentary inquiry amid 'detailed list' of complaints

The tables will be turned on WA's legal watchdog as it faces a parliamentary inquiry into longstanding concerns about its operations. The Legal Practice Board of WA (LPBWA) is the independent regulator for the state's legal profession, deciding who is admitted to practice law, issuing annual practising certificates and resolving complaints about lawyers' conduct. But the LPBWA itself has been the subject of complaints for years, according to the profession's peak body. "Concerns about the board's governance and processes have been building for some time," Law Society CEO Kate Wellington told the ABC. "We appreciate the nature of the board's regulatory role. The board's purpose is public protection. "The legal profession, too, serves a public purpose and it is important that its ability to fulfil that purpose is not hindered by barriers to effective practice." Late last month, the Law Society said it presented a report to the board "based on feedback shared with us in a profession-wide survey, which pointed to delays, service challenges and problematic regulatory processes". The chair of state parliament's Public Administration Committee, which will probe the LPBWA, said the survey contributed to the committee's decision to open its inquiry. "People were talking about the timeliness of responses, the manner of interactions, a lot of technical issues around applications," Labor MP Kate Doust said. "It's quite a detailed list. "We were quite surprised at the nature of the responses in the survey and certainly the number of responses to the survey." Ms Doust said given the role the Legal Practice Board played in WA's legal system, the committee felt it necessary to investigate those complaints. "You want to make sure that people have got appropriate access and timely responses to the matters they have to deal with, their engagement with the board," she said. "There just seemed to be a fairly high rate of dissatisfaction with their engagement." The board's annual report for 2023-24 showed it failed to meet many of its time-based key performance indicators — for example, while it aimed to resolve 80 per cent of "consumer matters" within 90 days, it did so in just 42 per cent of cases. It also aimed to resolve 80 per cent of the "highest complexity significant investigations" within a year, but only met that timeframe 40 per cent of the time. The only time-based targets that were on track related to internal reviews of decisions. The committee is now calling for submissions to inform its wide-ranging investigation into "the operation and effectiveness" of the board. "This inquiry will give those impacted an opportunity to voice their concerns without fear," Ms Wellington said. In a statement, the board's executive director welcomed the opportunity to engage with the committee. "These are matters we take seriously. "Over the past 12 months the board has commenced a number of internal reforms aimed at improving service delivery, streamlining regulatory approvals and enhancing stakeholder engagement. "The board remains committed to maintaining the trust of the public, the legal profession and government." In May the LPBWA was hacked, resulting in "limited corporate correspondence" being taken, which it said included "minimal contact information" and "bank account details for the board and a very small number of third parties who have been directly notified". It forced the organisation to take some of its systems online and process lawyers' practising certificates manually.

'Urgent' bans on abusive childcare workers to take up to 12 months, says attorney-general
'Urgent' bans on abusive childcare workers to take up to 12 months, says attorney-general

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

'Urgent' bans on abusive childcare workers to take up to 12 months, says attorney-general

Loopholes allowing child abusers to "shop around" childcare centres may not be closed for another year, the attorney-general has conceded, ahead of a meeting of ministers on Friday. Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said child abusers were "clearly shopping around" to exploit gaps in Australia's patchwork police check system for the sector. She said creating a system to make sure workers "banned in one" state were "banned in all" would be the immediate and urgent concern of Friday's meeting of ministers. But she conceded it may not be in place for another 12 months. "It's a long time when you consider the fact of the fragmentation we have here, the complex IT systems that need to be done, but also different states have different laws and regulations here," Ms Rowland told the ABC. The nation's attorneys-general will meet on Friday, a month after revelations of another case of alleged widespread child abuse by a Melbourne childcare worker. Joshua Dale Brown faces more than 70 offences linked to a childcare centre in Point Cook, in Melbourne's south-west. Ms Rowland said Australians would be startled to learn that Australia's police check systems, which operate at a state level, do not have measures to ensure that if a childcare worker is banned in one state the ban automatically extends to every state. She said establishing information sharing to fix that would be today's "urgent" priority". "I would like to think this is something that is certainly capable of being done within certainly the next 12 months," Ms Rowland said. "If we can have a better sense of that following today's meeting, that would be a good thing. A National Working With Children Check system was one of the key recommendations from the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sex Abuse, made a decade ago. Ms Rowland acknowledged that change had not happened "quickly enough" due to a patchwork federal system where responsibilities sat with different ministers, IT systems were not compatible, funding sources differed and states each had different information standards. But she said Labor had begun work on changes last term in the wake of charges against Australia's worst paedophile, Ashley Paul Griffith, in 2022. Ms Rowland said a dedicated unit had been established within her department to ensure outcomes were met. Attorneys-general will also consider near-term changes to establish continuous monitoring and sharing capabilities at Friday's meeting, as well as longer term measures to lift the bar for workers to be excluded.

Plans for Canberra school expansion changed after data shows enrolments won't surge as predicted
Plans for Canberra school expansion changed after data shows enrolments won't surge as predicted

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

Plans for Canberra school expansion changed after data shows enrolments won't surge as predicted

A school community has voiced dismay after the ACT government walked back its pre-election promise to deliver a $50 million school expansion. The government told Majura Primary School in Canberra's Inner North it would instead get a $20 million modernisation project owing to fewer projected enrolments. There are now questions being raised over how the government determines the likely demand on a school. Majura Primary P&C convener Rachael Brown said the government had initially told the school, which has about 670 primary students, it would grow to about 1,000. That number was then "drastically" revised down to about 700. "When we asked questions about the modelling, we weren't able to get any details," Dr Brown said. "We're very frustrated." She said the children complained they had nowhere to play and the school felt overcrowded. "Earlier this year, our kindergarten children had to have their health checks in our preschool's office because there's no spare room at our school," Dr Brown said. "Multiple classrooms were above the safe standard for heating and cooling in summer. "And some of those students, including my own child, ended up doing their school work in the principal's office because there was nowhere else for them to do their work. "None of the classes are above the student-to-teacher ratio but the actual space in the room is significantly less than [the ACT Education Directorate's] own standards are for a new school. "It's just completely unacceptable." Education Minister Yvette Berry said the school's expansion plans were based on pre-COVID projections that suggested a boom in enrolments. In making "informed guess work", she said the government used demographers, immigration figures and Australian Bureau of Statistics birthing data, as well as other sources. She said enrolment projections were revised down before the last election. Despite that, the government promised the $50 million expansion for Majura Primary School in its re-election campaign. She said the directorate and Infrastructure Canberra were consulting with the school about what their modernisation project might look like. And while demand in the priority enrolment areas of some schools is projected to drop, that's not the case across the board. Ms Berry said Shirley Smith High School in East Gungahlin was expected to see growth. The $30 million reduction in promised funding for Majura Primary raised concerns among other school communities expecting investments. Ms Berry has sought to allay those fears, reiterating a previous promise to "upgrade and modernise" Lyneham High School's hall. She also said Charnwood Dunlop School would still get a new playground. "I understand people thinking that things will all happen in the [first year's budget] but that's not possible." She said her pre-election promise to invest $150 million in projects across government schools would happen, including $30 million for heating and cooling upgrades. Independent MLA Thomas Emerson, whose electorate includes Majura Primary School, said he had written to Ms Berry seeking more information about how enrolment projections come about. He said he wondered whether there was less demand on public schools because people were seeing more value in Canberra's independent institutions. "I'm a bit concerned that we've not seen sufficient investment in school infrastructure in a timely way and that might be contributing to reduced enrolment numbers," Mr Emerson said. "I've spoken with parents who have children at Majura Primary and other schools … who are really conflicted. "They really believe in public education, but they have the means to make a different choice and they don't know what to do.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store