George Mason University's diversity efforts are now facing a major federal challenge: Here's why
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The federal civil rights probe was launched over allegations that GMU's hiring and promotion practices unlawfully favour faculty from underrepresented groups, potentially violating Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
According to the OCR, the investigation stems from complaints filed by several professors who claim GMU engaged in "illegal racial preferencing" under its DEI initiatives. Title VI prohibits discrimination based on race, colour, or national origin in any programme receiving federal funding. OCR officials assert that the university's DEI policies amount to "pernicious and widespread discrimination," as reported by
WTOP New
s.
Allegations focus on hiring and promotion policies
The OCR cited various internal policies implemented at GMU since 2020. Among these are the appointment of Equity Advisors in each department who reportedly consider immutable characteristics such as race in hiring decisions. Additionally, GMU President Gregory Washington had expressed support for recognising "the invisible and uncredited emotional labour" of faculty of colour in tenure and promotion criteria, as quoted by WTOP News.
Another point of concern raised by OCR is the university's diversity cluster hire initiatives, designed to close demographic gaps between the student body and faculty. The OCR claims these practices demonstrate that GMU "not only allow[s] but champion[s] illegal racial preferencing," according to a statement from Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Craig Trainor, as reported by WTOP News.
University denies wrongdoing and rebrands DEI office
In response to the investigation, President Washington stated in a university-wide email that GMU has "always complied" with civil rights laws and announced the renaming of the DEI office to the Office of Access, Compliance, and Community.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
Washington described the change as "a more specific and intuitively accurate reflection of its charter," and clarified it was not an attempt to avoid scrutiny, according to WTOP News.
GMU issued an official statement saying it received the OCR's letter at the same time as news organisations. The university reaffirmed its compliance with all federal and state laws and stated it regularly reviews its policies to ensure alignment with legal standards.
Student and faculty demographics under review
More than 50% of GMU's students identify as people of colour, yet over 65% of its faculty are white, according to internal university reports. This disparity has been central to the DEI measures now under federal scrutiny.
Probe follows separate antisemitism investigation
This is not the first time GMU has faced a Title VI investigation. Earlier this year, the OCR launched a separate inquiry into allegations that the university failed to respond appropriately to antisemitic incidents on campus following the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas conflict in October 2023.
The university has denied those claims, and President Washington stated that "antisemitism has no place at George Mason University, and never has," as reported by WTOP News.
Investigation aligns with broader political context
The GMU investigation comes amid a nationwide rollback of DEI programmes in higher education, with the current US administration under President Donald Trump taking an active stance against such initiatives.
In Virginia, Governor Glenn Youngkin has prioritised restructuring university governance and cutting DEI spending.
The case at GMU parallels a similar situation at the University of Virginia, where President Jim Ryan resigned following a Title VI complaint and political pressure. Analysts suggest that Virginia's upcoming elections, particularly for the office of Attorney General, may influence how such investigations unfold.
Support and resistance from public figures and alumni
Virginia's former Governor Doug Wilder, the first Black governor in US history and a GMU supporter, criticised the scrutiny facing GMU's leadership. He referenced his own experience attending segregated schools and questioned how George Mason, the university's namesake, would view the situation today, according to
WTOP News
.
Three Democratic state senators who are GMU alumni—Jeremy McPike, Stella Pekarsky, and Saddam Azlan Salim—issued a joint statement of support for President Washington. They highlighted the university's academic progress between 2020 and 2025, referencing its jump from 45 to 30 in Wall Street Journal public university rankings, and from 72 to 51 in US News rankings, as noted by
WTOP News
.
They concluded: "To claim that anti-racism is racially discriminatory makes a mockery of the laws the Department claims to be enforcing," as reported by
WTOP News
.
TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us
.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
Trump Says China Trip "Not Too Distant" As Trade Tensions Ease
Washington: President Donald Trump on Tuesday said a trip to China might be "not too distant," raising prospects that the leaders of the world's two largest economies may meet soon to help reset relations after moving to climb down from a trade war. Trump made the remarks while hosting Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. at the White House, where he praised the "fantastic military relationship" with Manila as the U.S. looks to counter China's influence in the Indo-Pacific region. Yet, Trump still said the U.S. is "getting along with China very well. We have a very good relationship." He added that Beijing has resumed shipping to the U.S. "record numbers" of much-needed rare earth magnets, which are used in iPhones and other high-tech products like electric vehicles. Widely speculated about since Trump returned to the White House, a summit between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping would be expected to stabilize — even for a short while — a difficult relationship defined by mistrust and competition. Beijing believes a leader-level summit is necessary to steady U.S.-China relations and that Trump must be wooed because he has the final say on America's policy toward China, despite more hawkish voices in his Cabinet, observers say. The question, however, is when. Danny Russel, a distinguished fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute, said Trump has consistently shown his hunger for a visit to China and that Beijing has used that to bolster leverage. "As soon as the leadership in Beijing is satisfied that Trump will be on his best behavior and will accept terms for a deal that they think are favorable, they will give a green light to the visit," Russel said. Sun Yun, director of the China program at the Washington-based think tank Stimson Center, said a visit "is in the making" with two sides likely to strike a trade deal. What Trump said might mean the visit would not be in September but "potentially November, but still depends on whether they play ball on trade and other things we want," Sun said. Trump's campaign to impose tariffs on other countries kicked off a high-stake trade war with Beijing. China raised tariffs on U.S. goods to 125% in response to Trump's hiking the tax on Chinese goods to 145%. Both sides also imposed on each other harsh trade restrictions on critical products: China on rare earths, and the U.S. on computing chips and jet engine technology. Trade tensions, however, eased following two rounds of high-level talks in Geneva and London, when the two sides agreed to lower tariffs — pending a more permanent deal by mid-August — and pull back on trade restrictions. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Tuesday on Fox Business' "Mornings with Maria" that he will be meeting with his Chinese counterparts in Stockholm next week to work on "what is likely an extension" of the Aug. 12 deadline. "I think trade is in a very good place with China," Bessent told host Maria Bartiromo. "Hopefully, we can see the Chinese pull back on some of this glut of manufacturing that they're doing and concentrate on building a consumer economy." He said he also expects to bring up China's purchases of Russian and Iranian oil and Beijing's role in aiding Moscow in its war against Ukraine. Beijing has not announced any travel plans for Vice Premier He Lifeng, who led trade negotiations in both Geneva and London on behalf of the Chinese government, but it is not unusual for China to make such announcements closer to a travel date. In a possible friendly gesture, Beijing on Tuesday said it suspended an antitrust investigation into chemical maker DuPont's operations in China. China's State Administration for Market Regulation made the announcement in a one-line statement but gave no explanation for the decision. DuPont said in a statement that it is "pleased" with China's action. Chinese regulators launched the investigation in April against DuPont China Group, a subsidiary of the chemical giant, as part of Beijing's broad, retaliatory response to Trump's sky-high tariffs. Beijing also has agreed to approve export permits for rare earth elements and rare earth magnets that U.S. manufacturers need to build cars, robots, wind turbines and other high-tech products. The U.S. has eased restrictions on some advanced chips and other technologies.
News18
5 hours ago
- News18
Trump says China trip is not too distant as trade tensions ease
Last Updated: Washington, Jul 23 (AP) President Donald Trump on Tuesday said a trip to China might be 'not too distant," raising prospects that the leaders of the world's two largest economies may meet soon to help reset relations after moving to climb down from a trade war. Trump made the remarks while hosting Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. at the White House, where he praised the 'fantastic military relationship" with Manila as the U.S. looks to counter China's influence in the Indo-Pacific region. Yet, Trump still said the U.S. is 'getting along with China very well. We have a very good relationship." He added that Beijing has resumed shipping to the U.S. 'record numbers" of much-needed rare earth magnets, which are used in iPhones and other high-tech products like electric vehicles. Widely speculated about since Trump returned to the White House, a summit between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping would be expected to stabilize — even for a short while — a difficult relationship defined by mistrust and competition. Beijing believes a leader-level summit is necessary to steady U.S.-China relations and that Trump must be wooed because he has the final say on America's policy toward China, despite more hawkish voices in his Cabinet, observers say. The question, however, is when. Danny Russel, a distinguished fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute, said Trump has consistently shown his hunger for a visit to China and that Beijing has used that to bolster leverage. 'As soon as the leadership in Beijing is satisfied that Trump will be on his best behavior and will accept terms for a deal that they think are favorable, they will give a green light to the visit," Russel said. Sun Yun, director of the China program at the Washington-based think tank Stimson Center, said a visit 'is in the making" with two sides likely to strike a trade deal. What Trump said might mean the visit would not be in September but 'potentially November, but still depends on whether they play ball on trade and other things we want," Sun said. Trump's campaign to impose tariffs on other countries kicked off a high-stake trade war with Beijing. China raised tariffs on U.S. goods to 125% in response to Trump's hiking the tax on Chinese goods to 145%. Both sides also imposed on each other harsh trade restrictions on critical products: China on rare earths, and the U.S. on computing chips and jet engine technology. Trade tensions, however, eased following two rounds of high-level talks in Geneva and London, when the two sides agreed to lower tariffs — pending a more permanent deal by mid-August — and pull back on trade restrictions. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Tuesday on Fox Business' 'Mornings with Maria" that he will be meeting with his Chinese counterparts in Stockholm next week to work on 'what is likely an extension" of the Aug. 12 deadline. 'I think trade is in a very good place with China," Bessent told host Maria Bartiromo. 'Hopefully, we can see the Chinese pull back on some of this glut of manufacturing that they're doing and concentrate on building a consumer economy." He said he also expects to bring up China's purchases of Russian and Iranian oil and Beijing's role in aiding Moscow in its war against Ukraine. Beijing has not announced any travel plans for Vice Premier He Lifeng, who led trade negotiations in both Geneva and London on behalf of the Chinese government, but it is not unusual for China to make such announcements closer to a travel date. In a possible friendly gesture, Beijing on Tuesday said it suspended an antitrust investigation into chemical maker DuPont's operations in China. China's State Administration for Market Regulation made the announcement in a one-line statement but gave no explanation for the decision. DuPont said in a statement that it is 'pleased" with China's action. Chinese regulators launched the investigation in April against DuPont China Group, a subsidiary of the chemical giant, as part of Beijing's broad, retaliatory response to Trump's sky-high tariffs. Beijing also has agreed to approve export permits for rare earth elements and rare earth magnets that U.S. manufacturers need to build cars, robots, wind turbines and other high-tech products. The U.S. has eased restrictions on some advanced chips and other technologies. (AP) AS AS (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: July 23, 2025, 04:15 IST News agency-feeds Trump says China trip is not too distant as trade tensions ease Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
15 hours ago
- Time of India
Too 'woke' for America? Donald Trump pulls US out of Unesco; DEI policies, pro-Palestinian, pro-China tilt prime reasons
US President Donald Trump pulled out America from Unesco over its support for "woke, divisive cultural and social causes" including DEI policies, pro-Palestinian and pro-China tilt. "Continued involvement in Unesco is not in the national interest of the United States," AFP reported quoting state department spokeswoman. Back in February, Trump had directed a 90-day review of the US role in Unesco, focusing particularly on examining any 'anti-Semitism or anti-Israel sentiment within the organization.' "Upon conducting the review, administration officials took issue with Unesco's diversity, equity and inclusion policies as well as its pro-Palestinian and pro-China bias," the New York Post reported citing White House official. 'China has leveraged its influence over Unesco to advance global standards that are favorable to Beijing's interests,' the official said. 'President Trump has decided to withdraw the United States from Unesco – which supports woke, divisive cultural and social causes that are totally out-of-step with the commonsense policies that Americans voted for in November,' White House deputy spokesperson Anna Kelly said. 'This President will always put America First and ensure our country's membership in all international organizations aligns with our national interests,' Kelly added. Critics have pointed to Unesco's 2023 release of an 'anti-racism toolkit' and its 2024 'Transforming MEN'talities' campaign as examples behind Trump's concern. The toolkit urged member states to embrace 'anti-racist' policies and engage in a 'race to the top' to position themselves as leading voices for social justice, by confronting their histories of racism and committing to equity-driven reforms. The States initially pulled out of the UN agency in 1983 during the then President Ronald Reagan's administration, arguing that Unesco had overly politicized nearly every issue it addressed, shown clear antagonism toward free societies, particularly free markets and a free press, and engaged in unchecked budgetary growth.
