
Why e dey important to off your phone for plane
You siddon, dem do all di safety tok-tok, to wear belt and den di pilot tell you say time don reach to off your phone, but you dey play games or watch video, but not for di first time, you ask your sef why I dey run dis parole?
Some theories dey point say phones and oda gadgets fit affect di electronic systems.
According to regulations wey resemble demselves worldwide, electronic devices no suppose to stay on under 3,000m (10,000ft), even if e dey in flight mode.
But above dat height from di ground pipo fit use laptops or music players but di phones go still dey off.
Di US Federal Aviation Administration ban cell phones for airborne use howeva bicos say e fit interfere wit aircraft instruments. Dem say "devices fit dey used for airplane mode or wit cell connection off. You fit use WiFI connection on your device if di plane get WiFI system and airline allow di use."
Di US constitution tok say "di use of cellular telephones while di aircraft dey airborne dey prohibited by FCC rules".
BBC tori pesin, Katia Moskvitch tok say personal phones fit act to malfunction aeroplanes bicos of dia electronics based systems wey dem dey call avionics.
Dis avionics na wetin det used for navigation, to tok wit pipo for ground and monitor wetin dey keep di plane for air and some of dis components dey use sensors to take give informate to di cockpit.
So na how phones fit affect di information wey di plane dey get. No be just phone sha o, Kindles, laptops and handheld gaming consoles bicos all of dem dey comot radio waves.
If dis waves dey at frequencies wey dey close to di ones di avionics dey emit, e fit corrupt di signals and readings wey dem dey provide.
If dis sensors no work, e fit affect systems like radar, communications and collision avoidance technology.
Di problem fit rise well well if your devices don spoil and dey comot stronger radio waves or if di signals from multiple device combine.
No record do show say crashes don dey directly linked to phone use interference but sometimes pesin no dey know wetin dey cause di accidents.
Flight recorder fit no show say critical system bin fail bicos of electromagnetic interference from passengers devices.
However, even though straight line no dey between crash and use of electronic devices.
Katie reveal say US Aviation Safety Reporting System wey Nasa dey maintain show 50 cases of safety issues wey phone use cause.
One case report tok say, "First Officer report say compass systems bin get k-leg for initial climb. Wen dem ask passengers to make sure say all dia devices bin dey off, di compass system go back to normal."
One 2006 analysis of di data base show 77 times wey dey highly link interference from electronic gadgets.
Di International Air Transport Association (IATA) show 75 separate incidents wey pilots believe say na phones cause electronic interference between 2003 and 2009.
BBC tori pesin, Katia Moskvitch point out say even though some airlines don dey advertise how dem go allow pipo to use dia phones for flights, no be for wen di plane dey take off or land, na just for wen di plane dey cruising altitude.
Wetin you fit do or not do in plane
BBC News Pidgin reach out to di Director, Public Affairs & Consumer Protection for di Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA), Michael Achimugu on wetin be di aviation regulations wey dey guide airline passengers, and e list di offences wey include but no dey limited to di following;
Smoking for inside plane or for non-smoking area of di terminal building na offence.
Use of mobile phones and/or oda communication/electronics gadgets inside plane without di approval of di aircraft Commander na offence.
Fighting or oda disorderly conduct for inside plane or for di terminal building na offence.
Any conduct/act wey constitute nuisance to oda passengers na offence.
Disobedience of lawful instructions issued by di aircraft commander, flight crew, cabin attendants, check-in staff and/or security screening staff na offence.
Any conduct wey endanger or wey dey likely to endanger di safety of flight operations na crime.
Tampering wit smoke detectors and oda aircraft equipment na crime.
No pesin dey allowed to carry, or attempt to carry, weapons, prohibited items or oda dangerous devices for body, or for inside im load for plane unless e dey authorized for transport.
No pesin go dey allowed to enta security restricted area or sterile area unless di aviation security officer don screen and clear am for entry.
Na crime to take pictures or videos for restricted areas for di airport terminal
Carry Prohibited Items:
Items like sharp objects, flammable liquids, or certain electronics dey restricted and security go seize am.
Di Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority regulations allow di aircraft commander or airport authority to take di necessary measures wey include restraint wia necessary wen dem see any passenger wey dey misbehave on board or for di terminal building.
NCAA also list offences and di penalty for inside airplane or for terminal area.
Operating a portable electronic device in violation of crew directives go attract - Maximum civil penalty
Drinking alcoholic beverages wey no be di operator serve - Maximum civil penalty
Interference wit crew member go attract - Maximum civil penalty
Physical assault or threat to physically assault a flight or cabin crewmember go attract - Minimum to maximum civil penalty and/or criminal referral
Physical assault or threat to physically assault an individual wey no be crewmember - Minimum to maximum civil penalty and/or criminal referral.
Traveller wey act in a manner wey pose imminent threat to di safety of aircraft or oda individuals on di aircraft go face - Minimum to maximum civil penalty and/or criminal referral.
Smoking for area wia dem write or put "No Smoking' sign - Maximum civil penalty.
Smoking for aircraft lavatory - Maximum civil penalty.
Tampering wit smoke detector - Minimum to maximum civil penalty and/or criminal referral.
Refusal to fasten seat belt for wia seat belt sign dey - Minimum to moderate civil penalty.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
In the time of tariffs, Nvidia and AMD cut unusual deals with Trump
Hello, and welcome to TechScape. My Spotify playlists are undergoing a British invasion this week. Here's what I'm listening to: PinkPantheress, Lola Young and Evita in London. Donald Trump announced this week that two US chipmakers would tithe 15% of their revenue from sales in China to the US government. Paying for the license to sell to Chinese customers represents an unprecedented deal. My colleague Helen Davidson reports from Taipei: The chipmakers Nvidia and AMD have agreed to give the US government 15% of their revenue from advanced chips sold to China in return for export licences to the key market. The arrangement will lead to Nvidia giving 15% of its revenue from Chinese sales of its H20 chips, and AMD giving 15% of revenue from Chinese sales of its MI308 chips, according to reports citing US officials. The H20 and MI308 chips were banned from sale to China in April, despite the lower-powered H20 being designed specifically to abide by restrictions introduced by the Biden administration. Nvidia's CEO Jensen Huang, head of the most valuable company in the world at $4.44tn, has been lobbying the White House for months to open up sales in China, where the US still prohibits sales of Nvidia's most advanced chips over national security concerns. In July, Trump relaxed some restrictions imposed by Joe Biden's administration. The deal with Nvidia and AMD seems as much about personally appealing to Trump as it does about generating revenue for the US government. The agreement has all the trappings of Trump entering into business with the chipmakers. In a way, it's a version of a playbook other major tech companies have been trying out as Trump is dramatically changing the international business landscape. Apple announced a $100bn investment commitment in US manufacturing. CEO Tim Cook, who had made the journey to the White House himself, presented Trump with a glass trophy (including 24 karat gold base) designating the president a graduate of the Apple Manufacturing Academy, launched in Michigan the week prior. During his meeting with Cook, Trump said he would levy a 100% tariff on semiconductor chips, which could set both Apple and Nvidia back billions. However, the president said: 'If you're building in the United States of America, there's no charge.' Both Nvidia and Apple are likely to be exempted from the tariffs. Each appears to have paid for the privilege – Apple with its domestic investment, Nvidia with its revenue-sharing agreement. OpenAI launched the new version of the artificial intelligence that underpins ChatGPT last week. There are quite a few aspects of the release to consider to understand it fully – what the company is saying, where the AI race between tech giants stands, the model's new capabilities and pitfalls, the environmental impact – so I've rounded up the Guardian's coverage of GPT-5 below. OpenAI said GPT-5 has marked improved coding and writing capabilities over its predecessor. My colleague Dan Milmo reports: OpenAI has claimed to have taken a 'significant step' towards artificial general intelligence (AGI) with the launch of its latest upgrade to ChatGPT, but has admitted there are still 'many things' missing in its quest to create a system able to do humans' jobs. Sam Altman, OpenAI's chief executive, called the model a 'significant step forward' to achieving the theoretical state of AGI, which the startup defines as a highly autonomous system that outperforms humans at most economically valuable work – or, in other words, can do their jobs. Read the full story on the unveiling of GPT-5: OpenAI says latest ChatGPT upgrade is big step forward but still can't do humans' jobs The race towards artificial general intelligence is running hot, with tech giants pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into the technology, but like OpenAI, Google and Meta acknowledge they have not reached that goal yet. Dan Milmo and Dara Kerr report: '[It is] missing something quite important, many things quite important,' said Altman, such as the model's inability to 'continuously learn' even after its launch. In other words, these systems are impressive but they have yet to crack the autonomy that would allow them to do a full-time job. Last month, Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive of Facebook parent Meta, said development of superintelligence – another theoretical state of AI where a system far exceeds human cognitive abilities – is 'now in sight'. Google's AI unit on Tuesday outlined its next step to AGI by announcing an unreleased model that trains AIs to interact with a convincing simulation of the real world. Read the full story: 'It's missing something': AGI, superintelligence and a race for the future Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion How we know OpenAI's new model is not an omniscient presence that will lord over all humanity: GPT-5 is making some goofy mistakes. It struggles with maps in a way a 10-year-old might. Per my colleague Josh Taylor: when Guardian Australia asked the latest model of ChatGPT to identify the number of Rs in Australia's states and territories, it could identify those which did. But the AI also believed Northern Territory had just three Rs not five. When asked to produce it on a map, spelled the territory as 'Northan Territor'. Read the full story: OpenAI unveils ChatGPT-5 and its hyped 'PhD level' intelligence struggled with basic spelling and geography GPT-5 is a more powerful model than its predecessor, meaning it will consume more resources to answer each query. Here's what experts told Aisha Kehoe Down: 'A more complex model like GPT-5 consumes more power both during training and during inference. It's also targeted at long thinking … I can safely say that it's going to consume a lot more power than GPT-4,' said Rakesh Kumar, a professor at the University of Illinois, currently working on the energy consumption of computation and AI models. Given recent reports that ChatGPT handles 2.5bn requests a day, the total consumption of GPT-5 could reach the daily electricity demand of 1.5m US homes. Read the full story: OpenAI will not disclose GPT-5's energy use. It could be higher than past models Surprise: AOL, formerly known as America Online, was still offering dial-up internet service in 2025. My colleague Edward Helmore reports: The hisses, pings and screeches that introduced millions of Americans to the nascent online world are to be formally retired when AOL's dial-up internet shuts down in late September. At its peak in the late 1990s and early 2000s, AOL had over 23 million subscribers in the US, making it the dominant internet service provider at the time. Currently, only a small fraction of US households – about 175,000 – still rely on dial-up for internet access and web browser platforms. In 2013, Pew Research found that just 3% of American households used dial-up internet. The 2025 figure represents less than 0.5% of the current population. What once seemed ubiquitous in the US and UK is now a relic and only a partially important piece of the history of the internet. Many parts of the world that are now online never experienced – perhaps endured might be the more apt word – dial-up internet. They jumped straight to broadband, wifi, or the mobile internet, a phenomenon known as technological leapfrogging. If you're feeling nostalgic for the early days of the internet, though, you can listen to the classic, grating sound of dialing into the web via Wikipedia's page on the subject. TikTok to replace trust and safety team in Germany with AI and outsourced labor Companies aiding Trump's immigration crackdown see 'extraordinary' revenues Staff at UK's top AI institute complain to watchdog about its internal culture Social media accounts of Palestinians desperate for funds are being flagged as spam 'A million calls an hour': Israel relying on Microsoft cloud for expansive surveillance of Palestinians


The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
YouTube to begin testing a new AI-powered age verification system in the U.S.
YouTube on Wednesday will begin testing a new age-verification system in the U.S. that relies on artificial intelligence to differentiate between adults and minors, based on the kinds of videos that they have been watching. The tests initially will only affect a sliver of YouTube's audience in the U.S., but it will likely become more pervasive if the system works as well at guessing viewers' ages as it does in other parts of the world. The system will only work when viewers are logged into their accounts, and it will make its age assessments regardless of the birth date a user might have entered upon signing up. If the system flags a logged-in viewer as being under 18, YouTube will impose the normal controls and restrictions that the site already uses as a way to prevent minors from watching videos and engaging in other behavior deemed inappropriate for that age. The safeguards include reminders to take a break from the screen, privacy warnings and restrictions on video recommendations. YouTube, which has been owned by Google for nearly 20 years, also doesn't show ads tailored to individual tastes if a viewer is under 18. If the system has inaccurately called out a viewer as a minor, the mistake can be corrected by showing YouTube a government-issued identification card, a credit card or a selfie. 'YouTube was one of the first platforms to offer experiences designed specifically for young people, and we're proud to again be at the forefront of introducing technology that allows us to deliver safety protections while preserving teen privacy,' James Beser, the video service's director of product management, wrote in a blog post about the age-verification system. People still will be able to watch YouTube videos without logging into an account, but viewing that way triggers an automatic block on some content without proof of age. The political pressure has been building on websites to do a better job of verifying ages to shield children from inappropriate content since late June when the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a Texas law aimed at preventing minors from watching pornography online. While some services, such as YouTube, have been stepping up their efforts to verify users' ages, others have contended that the responsibility should primarily fall upon the two main smartphone app stores run by Apple and Google — a position that those two technology powerhouses have resisted. Some digital rights groups, such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Center for Democracy & Technology, have raised concerns that age verification could infringe on personal privacy and violate First Amendment protections on free speech.


The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Legendary carmaker is launching new range of cheapest ever EVs boasting enough energy to ‘power a house for 6 DAYS'
PLUGGED IN Legendary carmaker is launching new range of cheapest ever EVs boasting enough energy to 'power a house for 6 DAYS' A LEGENDARY carmaker is launching a new range of its cheapest ever EVs. The cars are being created using a "revolutionary" process following a three-year project. 1 Ford's new EVs will be built at the company's Louisville plant in the US but are expected to be offered globally This scheme allows the cars to boast enough energy to "power a house for six days", according to the boss of the company. Ford is releasing the Universal EV Platform for a mid-size, double-cab pick-up truck that will be on sale in 2027, priced at $30,000 (£22,000). While the new EVs will be built at Ford's Louisville plant in the US, the vehicles are expected to be offered globally. It comes after the recent signing of trade deals between the US and the UK. The UK Government has also revealed a £650 million grant could knock up to £3,750 off the price of low-priced EVs. Ford CEO Jim Farley said more models using the process will follow, as first reported by Autocar. These will reportedly include a hatchback, crossover, van and a three-bench SUV. These are likely to start at around the same price. The new range is also being used to boost sales in the US market, and is likely to be seen as an endorsement of Donald Trump's policy to focus on domestic manufacturing to boost the US economy. Iconic British car brand to begin 'new era' with 'urban SUV' to be launched next year Farley said the process uses battery cells made at Ford's new Blue Oval Battery Park in Michigan. He said there were "no guarantees" with the project, and added: 'It is a bet. There is risk. I cannot 100% say this will work. There is an automotive graveyard full of projects that have not worked.' In his statement, Farley highlighted the fact that Ford will create its new EVs in the US. He said competitors "build their vehicles in Asia and import them from abroad. This is not what we are doing. We took on the challenge that others have stopped doing. 'This project is bigger than Ford motor cars. It is about our country."